Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CLINICAL TRIAL article

Front. Med.

Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1604790

Efficacy and safety of peripherally-restricted κ-opioid receptor agonist-HSK21542 for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial

Provisionally accepted
Yinbo  ZhongYinbo Zhong1Haiying  WangHaiying Wang1Min  YanMin Yan1*Mengchang  YangMengchang Yang2Jiaqiang  ZhangJiaqiang Zhang3Ling  NanLing Nan4Zhiping  WangZhiping Wang5Jianjun  YangJianjun Yang6Jinglei  WuJinglei Wu7Qulian  GuoQulian Guo8Xiaoling  HuXiaoling Hu9Hongmeng  XuHongmeng Xu10Qiang  XuQiang Xu11Dongxin  WangDongxin Wang12
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
  • 2Department of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
  • 3Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
  • 4Department of Anesthesiology, The First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
  • 5Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
  • 6Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
  • 7Department of Anesthesiology, Liuzhou People's Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi Medical University, Liuzhou, China
  • 8Department of Anesthesiology, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China
  • 9Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan Province, China
  • 10Department of Anesthesiology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
  • 11Department of Anesthesiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
  • 12Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: This phase 2 trial comprised dose exploration (stage 1) and dose confirmation stages (stage 2) to determine the safety and efficacy of HSK21542 in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Methods: In stage 1, patients were randomly allocated at a ratio of 4:1 (12 to receive HSK21542, 3 to receive placebo) to 4 ascending dose groups in a sequential manner (group 1: preoperative HSK21542-0.4 μg/kg (or placebo)+HSK21542-0.2 μg/kg (or placebo) at postoperative 0h, 8h and 16h; group 2: preoperative HSK21542-1.0 μg/kg (or placebo)+HSK21542-0.5 μg/kg (or placebo) at postoperative 0h, 8h and 16h; groups 3 and 4: HSK21542-0.5 μg/kg or HSK21542-1.0 μg/kg (or placebo) at postoperative 0h, 8h and 16h). In stage 2, patients received HSK21542-0.5 μg/kg, HSK21542-1.0 μg/kg or placebo postoperatively at 0 h, 8 h and 16 h in a 1:1:1 ratio. The primary endpoints in stage 1 were the safety outcomes including the incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) while the primary endpoint of stage 2 was the time-weighted summed pain intensity differences over 24 h (SPID0-24h). Results: Stage 1 enrolled 63 patients and 57 completed the trial, while 61 patients were enrolled in stage 2, and 60 completed the trial. The most common TEAEs were fever (22.9% vs. 41.7%), nausea (25.0% vs. 33.3%) and vomiting (22.9% vs. 25.0%) in the HSK21542 and placebo groups in stage 1. HSK21542 doses of 0.5 μg/kg and 1.0 μg/kg administered postoperatively were recommended for the subsequent stage 2. The pooled results revealed a slightly lower SPID0-24h in HSK21542-1.0 μg/kg group (-1,679.8±2,284.3 scores×min) than those in HSK21542-0.5 μg/kg (-1,499.4±2,487.2 scores×min) and placebo groups (-435.2±2,852.9 scores×min; P=0.114). A significantly higher least squares mean difference of pain intensity differences (PID) was found in HSK21542-1.0 μg/kg group compared to the placebo (P=0.020). Conclusion: HSK21542 at all dose regimens demonstrated well tolerability and safety comparable to that of the placebo among patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery in the phase 2 trial. The dosing regimen of HSK21542-1.0 μg/kg administered postoperatively at 0 h, 8 h and 16 h exhibited an acceptable efficacy, warranting its recommendation for further phase 3 trial.

Keywords: κ-Opioid receptor agonists, Postoperative analgesia, Laparoscopic abdominal surgery, HSK21542, time-weighted summed pain intensity difference

Received: 07 Apr 2025; Accepted: 07 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhong, Wang, Yan, Yang, Zhang, Nan, Wang, Yang, Wu, Guo, Hu, Xu, Xu and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Min Yan, Department of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.