Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.

Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1605584

Factors Associated with Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury in an Intensive Care Unit in the Amazon Region during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Cohort

Provisionally accepted
Vitória Alice  Alencar SousaVitória Alice Alencar Sousa1Daniele Nunes  da Silva FerreiraDaniele Nunes da Silva Ferreira2,3Giovana Vitória  Guimarães MendonçaGiovana Vitória Guimarães Mendonça2Rebecca  Lobato MarinhoRebecca Lobato Marinho2,3Natasha Cristina  Oliveira AndradeNatasha Cristina Oliveira Andrade2Tamires de Nazaré  SoaresTamires de Nazaré Soares2Marcos Jessé  Abrahão SilvaMarcos Jessé Abrahão Silva2,3*Suziane  do Socorro dos SantosSuziane do Socorro dos Santos2,3Yan  Corrêa RodriguesYan Corrêa Rodrigues3Diana  da Costa LobatoDiana da Costa Lobato2Daniele  Melo SardinhaDaniele Melo Sardinha2,3*Luana Nepomuceno  Gondim Costa LimaLuana Nepomuceno Gondim Costa Lima3
  • 1Universidade da Amazônia (UNAMA), Ananindeua, Brazil
  • 2Universidade do Estado do Pará, Belem, Para, Brazil
  • 3Evandro Chagas Institute, Ananindeua, Brazil

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Medical device–related pressure injuries (MDRPI) pose a serious public health challenge, particularly in intensive care settings during the COVID-19 pandemic. This retrospective cohort study aimed to characterize the profile and identify risk and protective factors for MDRPI among adult ICU patients in a metropolitan region of the Amazon between January 2021 and December 2022. We reviewed 603 medical records—31 patients (5.1%) developed MDRPI and 572 did not—and applied chi-square tests, normality assessments, Mann–Whitney U tests, binary logistic regression, and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Ethical approval was obtained from the Fundação Hospital de Clínicas Gaspar Viana Ethics Committee (approval no. 5,991,542). Independent risk factors for MDRPI included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 19.33; 95% CI 2.92–127.73; p = 0.002), orotracheal tube use (OR 19.00; p = 0.002), nasal catheter use (OR 3.33; 95% CI 1.32–8.40; p = 0.011), and longer hospital stay (OR 1.09 per day; 95% CI 1.05–1.12; p < 0.001). Protective factors were systemic arterial hypertension (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.08–0.58; p = 0.009), higher Braden scale scores (OR 0.22 per point; 95% CI 0.08–0.58; p = 0.002), and invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring (OR 0.14; 95% CI 0.03–0.79; p = 0.025). Survival analysis demonstrated that patients with MDRPI had significantly longer hospital stays and higher mortality rates (Breslow p = 0.007; log-rank p = 0.041; Tarone–Ware p = 0.011). This first study of MDRPI in the Amazon region highlights key modifiable factors and underscores the need for enhanced nursing protocols and working conditions to prevent device-related pressure injuries in critical care. These findings can guide continuing education initiatives and policy development in critical care nursing.

Keywords: Epidemiology, Pressure Ulcer Medical, medical devices, Adult intensive care units, Associated factor

Received: 03 Apr 2025; Accepted: 08 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Sousa, Ferreira, Mendonça, Marinho, Andrade, Soares, Silva, dos Santos, Rodrigues, Lobato, Sardinha and Lima. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Marcos Jessé Abrahão Silva, Evandro Chagas Institute, Ananindeua, Brazil
Daniele Melo Sardinha, Universidade do Estado do Pará, Belem, 66050-540, Para, Brazil

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.