Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CASE REPORT article

Front. Med., 09 July 2025

Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1605965

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvanced Monitoring in ARDS: Enhancing Mechanical Ventilation through Innovative TechniquesView all articles

Abdominal wall hematoma after prone ventilation during postpartum VV-ECMO: a case report and systematic review

Guosen HeGuosen He1Xuemei FanXuemei Fan2Shuai Wang
Shuai Wang1*Yu Dong
Yu Dong1*
  • 1Department of Critical Care, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China
  • 2Department of Neurology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China

Background: Pregnant women with ARDS are rare in themselves, and the rare complication of an abdominal wall hematoma during VV-ECMO is extremely aggressive. We report this rare case with the aim of informing clinicians to be alert to this serious complication and to share our treatment experience.

Case presentation: A 42-year-old Chinese woman was infected with viral pneumonia at 26 weeks of gestation, which progressed to severe ARDS. After emergency termination of pregnancy, she was placed on VV-ECMO support and ventilated in the prone position. During this period, an unexplained drop in hemoglobin occurred, so she was withdrawn from the VV-ECMO support, and was diagnosed with an abdominal wall hematoma on CT examination, which was later cured with conservative treatment.

Conclusion: Maternal prone abdominal wall hematoma found during VV-ECMO is rare and prone to adverse outcomes. We remind clinicians to be aware of this rare complication and prevent it.

Introduction

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), initially described as a severe complication in critically ill patients, is characterized by bilateral pulmonary infiltrates and acute hypoxemia unrelated to heart failure (1). Prone positioning ventilation is one of the few interventions proven to reduce mortality in mechanically ventilated ARDS patients (2). Although complications during prone positioning are recognized, abdominal wall hematoma is clinically rare and often presents non-specifically as an abdominal mass, acute pain, distension, or hypotension (3). Post-cesarean abdominal wall hematoma is an uncommon surgical complication; delayed diagnosis may lead to severe outcomes, including prolonged recovery, life-threatening events, and increased healthcare burden (4). We report a case of abdominal wall hematoma occurring during prone positioning ventilation under venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) support in a postpartum ARDS patient. Although the outcome was favorable, this rare complication warrants clinical vigilance.

Patient information

A 42-year-old woman (gravida 3, para 1, with one prior cesarean delivery) was transferred to our hospital at 26 weeks’ gestation with a 1-month history of cough and sputum. Initial tests for SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, and influenza B were negative, and community-acquired pneumonia was diagnosed. Despite 5 days of oral azithromycin (500 mg/day), symptoms worsened. On February 29, 2024, she was admitted to the high-risk maternity center and subsequently transferred to the ICU following multidisciplinary assessment (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Flowchart depicting patient stages. Stage 1 involves a progression from home with coughing, to a local hospital with cough aggravation, and ICU admission with respiratory deprivation and a temperature of thirty-eight point five degrees Celsius. Treatment not available between February twenty-four and twenty-eight, two thousand and twenty-four. Stage 2 includes preserving the pregnancy, VV-ECMO, and occurrence of abdominal wall hematoma from February first to twenty-ninth, two thousand and twenty-four.

Figure 1. Stage 1 is the patient’s pre-admission treatment timeline; Stage 2 is the patient’s post-admission treatment timeline.

Clinical findings

On admission, she was alert with a temperature of 38.5°C. Under high-flow oxygen therapy (FiO 40%, 40 L/min), oxygen saturation was 91%, respiratory rate 27 breaths/min, and crackles were auscultated in the left lower lung. Laboratory results: WBC 6.7 × 109/L (reference: 4–10 × 109/L), neutrophils 93.1% (40–75%), lymphocytes 5.2% (20–50%), CRP 139.5 mg/L (0–8 mg/L). Lung ultrasound showed A-lines in upper fields and B-lines in diaphragmatic areas. Obstetric and cardiac ultrasounds were unremarkable. Chest CT revealed bilateral infiltrates (Figure 2).

Figure 2
CT scan images in four panels labeled A, B, C, and D, showing transverse sections of the lungs. Panel A shows clear lung fields with minimal opacity. Panels B, C, and D increasingly display more lung opacities and potential areas of consolidation, indicating progressive changes or pathology.

Figure 2. Lung CT (A–D) at the time of admission, showing ground-glass opacities in both lungs.

Diagnostic assessment

Based on clinical manifestations and etiological evidence, she was diagnosed with viral pneumonia, ARDS, and acute respiratory failure.

Therapeutic intervention

High-flow oxygen, lateral positioning ventilation, oseltamivir (75 mg BID), and intravenous azithromycin (0.5 g QD) were initiated. Dexamethasone (6 mg Q12H × 4 doses) was administered for fetal lung maturation. By March 2, worsening hypoxemia prompted emergency cesarean delivery under general anesthesia. A 920-g female infant (Apgar 6/7) was transferred to neonatology.

Following surgery, the patient returned to the ICU with poor oxygenation, exhibiting an oxygen index (PaO/FiO ratio) of less than 100 mmHg. Initial ventilator settings included a FiO of 100%, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 15 cmHO, respiratory rate of 20 breaths per minute, driving pressure of 15 cmHO, and a resulting tidal volume of 300 mL. Following discussion, prone positioning ventilation was initiated. Ventilation remained in pressure control mode during prone positioning, with settings maintained at FiO 100%, PEEP 15 cmHO, respiratory rate 20 breaths per minute, and driving pressure 15 cmHO; the resulting tidal volume increased to 380 mL. A sustained inflation (SI) recruitment maneuver was performed, leading to improvement in respiratory mechanics and oxygenation. However, the oxygen index remained below 100 mmHg. After further discussion, VV-ECMO support was initiated on March 3. Cannulation was performed via the right femoral vein (21F drainage cannula) and right internal jugular vein (17F return cannula). Initial ECMO settings were: rotational speed 3,540 rpm, blood flow 3.67 L/min, and sweep gas flow 4 L/min.

In consultation with the obstetrics team, systemic heparin anticoagulation was initiated 12 h post-cesarean delivery. The starting dose was 5 units/kg/h, titrated based on activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) monitoring (Figure 3). Prone positioning ventilation was continued during VV-ECMO support for 12–16 h daily. During this period, a gradual decline in hemoglobin levels was observed. Repeated bedside ultrasound examinations revealed no obvious source of bleeding. On day 5 of ECMO support, a significant drop in hemoglobin occurred, accompanied by unstable ECMO flow. Anticoagulation was held, and packed red blood cells were transfused. Following assessment, ECMO support was successfully weaned and decannulated on day 6. A subsequent computed CT scan of the chest and abdomen revealed an intermuscular hematoma within the abdominal wall (Figure 3). Consultations were obtained from obstetrics and abdominal wall surgery services. Anticoagulation was withheld, and hemostasis was promoted using a double postpartum abdominal binder for compression. Hemoglobin levels subsequently stabilized. The patient was then transferred from the ICU to the abdominal wall surgery department for continued management.

Figure 3
Four-panel image with CT scans labeled A, B, C, and D showing different abdominal views, alongside a line graph. The graph, titled

Figure 3. Panels (A,B) show a large hematoma of the abdominal wall on CT plain scan of the abdomen; panels (C,D) show no enhancement of the hematoma on enhanced CT; panel (E) shows the trend chart of the aPTT (activated partial thromboplastin time) monitoring of heparin anticoagulation during the VV-ECMO period.

Follow-up and outcomes

Following transfer to the abdominal wall surgery department, the patient continued compression therapy with the abdominal binder and adhered well to the regimen. Repeat abdominal CT scan after 1 week demonstrated significant reduction in the size of the postpartum abdominal wall hematoma (Figure 4). Both the mother and the infant recovered fully and were discharged without long-term sequelae.

Figure 4
CT scan images labeled A to D show cross-sectional views of the abdomen. Each scan displays different levels, depicting various organs and anatomical structures in grayscale. The images are arranged in a two-by-two grid, with a ruler on the right side indicating scale.

Figure 4. After treatment, the abdominal wall hematoma (A–D) was significantly reduced compared to the previous one.

Discussion

Abdominal wall hematoma during prone positioning under VV-ECMO is exceptionally rare. Although our patient recovered, this complication could have precipitated ECMO circuit thrombosis if it occurred earlier, increasing morbidity and costs. In the context of respiratory pandemics, this warrants heightened awareness.

Approximately 0.1–0.2% of pregnancies are complicated by respiratory failure. Physiological changes increase susceptibility to hypoxemia, which may adversely affect the fetus (5). ARDS is a leading cause of non-obstetric mortality in pregnancy (5, 6), though its incidence remains low (7). Our patient’s rapid progression to ARDS underscores the need for vigilance in similar cases.

Prone positioning, used since 1976 for ARDS (8, 9), improves oxygenation when lung-protective ventilation fails (10). Data in late pregnancy are limited to case reports (11). Our patient benefited significantly from prone positioning only after delivery, suggesting its early application in gestational ARDS may be advantageous.

Management of ARDS often requires mechanical ventilation. However, in pregnant patients receiving mechanical ventilation, excessive ventilation and alkalosis should be avoided to prevent uterine vasoconstriction, while hyperventilation and hypercapnia should be minimized to avert fetal respiratory acidosis. Additionally, maternal PaO₂ should be maintained above 70 mmHg to ensure adequate fetal oxygenation (5). Importantly, due to the rarity of ARDS in pregnancy prior to the pandemic, management strategies for respiratory compromise in this population were largely extrapolated from non-pregnant patients.

For ARDS patients managed with mechanical ventilation employing high PEEP, low tidal volume, low plateau pressure, and permissive hypercapnia, the therapeutic cornerstone remains ventilator synchronization using sedation combined with prone positioning ventilation. Prone positioning has been utilized during pregnancy and reported in case series (1215). It improves ventilation-perfusion matching, reduces compression of the posterior and medial lungs, thereby diminishing hypoxic vasoconstriction, enhancing cardiac output, and recruiting additional alveolar units. Although randomized controlled trials are lacking, documented complications in standard ARDS patients include barotrauma, bleeding, transient hypotension, and transient hypoxemia (16), all potentially detrimental to the fetus. The need for delivery should be coordinated with neonatologists and obstetricians. Based on our prior experience and this case, timely termination of pregnancy becomes paramount when maternal condition deteriorates. Most intensivists possess limited experience managing pregnant patients with ARDS. Nevertheless, the fundamental management goals for all ARDS patients are consistent: optimizing oxygenation and maintaining perfusion and cardiac output. Crucially, potential adverse effects of therapy on the fetus must be considered to ensure the survival of both mother and fetus under the threat of hypoxemia.

VV-ECMO is reserved for refractory hypoxemia/hypercapnia (17, 18). Pre-ECMO prone positioning correlates with better outcomes (18), but delayed ECMO initiation risks irreversible lung injury. Delivery timing remains challenging. For patients >30–32 weeks with progressive respiratory failure, early delivery should be considered (19, 20). In our case, multidisciplinary debate prioritized maternal safety over fetal gestation extension. Given the gestational age of only 27 weeks, the obstetrics and neonatology teams advocated prolonging the pregnancy to enhance fetal viability. However, from the intensive care perspective, continuing the pregnancy posed extreme risks to both mother and fetus. Thus, in such scenarios, intensivists should prioritize maternal safety and advocate for timely pregnancy termination.

Cases of thoracic hemorrhage have been reported in COVID-19 (21). Management of postpartum abdominal wall hematoma lacks established guidelines. These hematomas are classified as subcutaneous, subfascial, or extraperitoneal. Subcutaneous hematomas involve superficial bleeding, presenting as wound oozing or ecchymosis, and are readily detectable. Subfascial and extraperitoneal hematomas are deeper and often identified later. Extraperitoneal hematomas, developing within loose connective tissue, can expand significantly, forming large collections. Patients typically present with low-grade fever; examination may reveal swelling, widening, and tenderness around the incision. Diagnosis is confirmed by aspiration of blood or ultrasound. Large extraperitoneal hematomas can cause marked abdominal distension, anemia disproportionate to visible blood loss, and potentially life-threatening hemorrhagic shock (22). Hematomas < 5 cm in diameter, if localized with no active bleeding, can be managed conservatively with infection prophylaxis and observation. Active bleeding, signs of infection, or anticipated low success with conservative management warrant aggressive intervention, such as endovascular embolization (23) or surgical evacuation with meticulous hemostasis and drainage if needed (24). In our patient, hematoma development during prone positioning necessitated anticoagulation hold—a precarious situation during ECMO. Fortunately, the outcome was favorable.

Prone positioning ventilation in patients with recent abdominal surgery or during pregnancy remains challenging. Some consider it a relative contraindication (25, 26). Clinicians face the core dilemma of balancing the potential benefits of prone positioning against complication risks in such ARDS patients. Strategies like reducing prone duration, alternating prone/lateral positioning, or using neuromuscular blockade to reduce intra-abdominal pressure during proning require validation through prospective studies.

The timing of heparin anticoagulation initiation in our patient (12 h post-cesarean) prompted extensive discussion. During ECMO, the balance between thrombosis and hemorrhage is a daily concern. Contact between blood and the non-biological circuit surface activates coagulation pathways, consuming both procoagulant and anticoagulant factors, thereby increasing the patient’s risk for both thrombosis and bleeding (27). Consequently, routine anticoagulation is essential for ECMO patients, with the explicit goal of preventing bleeding in vivo and clotting ex vivo. Due to the inherent complexity of ECMO patients, guidelines lack uniform recommendations for anticoagulation targets. The 2021 ELSO Anticoagulation Guideline (28) advocates for rational interpretation of Activated Clotting Time (ACT) values over rigid targets. Suggested targets include maintaining Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) at 1.5–2.5 times baseline or 60–90 s, and anti-Factor Xa levels between 0.3–0.7 IU/mL (with unchanged heparin dose if within range). Chinese expert consensus (29) recommends aPTT 40–55 s, ACT 180–220 s, and anti-Factor Xa 0.3–0.7 IU/mL for most patients. Therefore, anticoagulation requires individualized management, with clinicians adjusting targets daily based on the patient’s evolving clinical status, bleeding manifestations, and coagulation parameters.

Take-away

We remind clinicians that prone ventilation after cesarean delivery requires attention to the serious complication of abdominal wall hematoma and suggest preventive measures for patients undergoing prone ventilation with an abdominal incision. According to our practice, the use of abdominal restraints reduces the occurrence of this complication.

Conclusion

Maternal prone abdominal wall hematoma found during VV-ECMO is rare and prone to adverse outcomes. We remind clinicians to be aware of this rare complication and prevent it.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

GH: Writing – original draft. XF: Writing – original draft. SW: Writing – review & editing. YD: Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by Science and Technology Program of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Zhejiang Province (grant: 2024ZL718) and the Construction Fund of Key Medical Disciplines of Hangzhou (grant: 2025HZZD04).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Al-Husinat, L, Azzam, S, Al Sharie, S, Azzam, S, Battaglini, D, Alrababah, A, et al. A narrative review on the future of ARDS: evolving definitions, pathophysiology, and tailored management. Crit Care. (2025) 29:88. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05291-0

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Luo, J, Pavlov, I, Tavernier, E, Perez, Y, Kharat, A, McNicholas, B, et al. Awake prone positioning in adults with COVID-19: an individual participant data meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. (2025) 185:572–81. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.0011

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Colakoglu, MK, Ozdemir, A, Kalcan, S, Demir, A, Demiral, G, and Pergel, A. Spontaneous abdomen and abdominal wall hematomas due to anticoagulant/antiplatelet use: surgeons' perspective in a single center. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. (2020) 26:50–4. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2019.32485

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Howell, C, and Simman, R. Accidental intra-arterial injection of enoxaparin sodium leading to abdominal wall expanding subcutaneous hematoma and abdominal wound: case report-vascular. Front Surg. (2025) 12:1477926. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1477926

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Lapinksy, SE. Acute respiratory failure in pregnancy. Obstet Med. (2015) 8:126–32. doi: 10.1177/1753495X15589223

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Federici, L, Picone, O, Dreyfuss, D, and Sibiude, J. Successful continuation of pregnancy in a patient with COVID-19-related ARDS. BMJ Case Rep. (2020) 13:e237511. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-237511

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Hou, L, Li, M, Guo, K, Wang, W, Li, B, Li, J, et al. First successful treatment of a COVID-19 pregnant womanwith severe ARDS by combining early mechanical ventilation and ECMO. Heart Lung. (2021) 50:33–6. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.08.015

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Piehl, MA, and Brown, RS. Use of extreme position changes in acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med. (1976) 4:13–4. doi: 10.1097/00003246-197601000-00003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Wang, Y, Muhetaer, Y, Zheng, X, Wu, W, Tao, J, Zhu, L, et al. Time-dependent effects of prone position on ventilation-perfusion matching assessed by electrical impedance tomography in patients with COVID-19 ARDS: sub-analysis of a prospective physiological study. Ann Intensive Care. (2025) 15:46. doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01452-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Guerin, C, Reignier, J, Richard, JC, Beuret, P, Gacouin, A, Boulain, T, et al. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. (2013) 368:2159–68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Kenn, S, Weber-Carstens, S, Weizsaecker, K, and Bercker, S. Prone positioning for ARDS following blunt chest trauma in late pregnancy. Int J Obstet Anesth. (2009) 18:268–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.02.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Cavalcante, FM, Fernandes, CD, Rocha, LD, Galindo-Neto, NM, Caetano, JÁ, Barros, LM, et al. Use of the proneposition in pregnant women with COVID-19 or other health conditions. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. (2021) 29:3494. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.5181.3494

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Akatsuka, M, Tatsumi, H, Yama, N, and Masuda, Y. Therapeutic evaluation of computed tomography findings for efficacy of prone ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients with abdominal surgery. J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). (2020) 6:32–40. doi: 10.2478/jccm-2020-0003

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Huang, CY, Tsai, YL, and Lin, CK. The prone position ventilation (PPV) as an approach in pregnancy with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. (2021) 60:574–6. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2021.03.036

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Xu, J, Fu, F, Ding, Q, Wang, B, and Ji, P. Prone positioning in a pregnant woman with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: a case report. Crit Care Nurse. (2025) 45:29–35. doi: 10.4037/ccn2025831

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Sharma, NS, Wille, KM, Bellot, SC, and Diaz-Guzman, E. Modern use of extracorporeal life support in pregnancy and postpartum. ASAIO J. (2015) 61:110–4. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000154

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Pacheco, LD, Saade, GR, and Hankins, GDV. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during pregnancy and postpartum. Semin Perinatol. (2018) 42:21–5. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2017.11.005

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Vaquer, S, De Haro, C, Peruga, P, Oliva, JC, and Artigas, A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of complications and mortality of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Intensive Care. (2017) 7:1–13. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0275-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Kucirka, LM, Norton, A, and Sheffield, JS. Severity of COVID-19 in pregnancy: a review of current evidence. Am JReprod Immunol. (2020) 84:e13332. doi: 10.1111/aji.13332

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Chong, J, Ahmed, S, and Hill, K. Acute respiratory distress syndrome in a pregnant patient with COVID-19 improved after delivery: a case report and brief review. Respir Med Case Rep. (2020) 31:101171. doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2020.101171

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Presciuttini, B, Benazzi, D, Amato, M, and Pagani, M. Hemorrhagic complications in COVID-19: three women with pectoral hematoma and a review. Ital J Med. (2023) 17:1590. doi: 10.4081/itjm.2023.1590

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Wang, T, Liu, R, Li, Y, Qian, W, and Niu, M. Clinical characteristics of postpartum women with hypoxia: a retrospective analysis of 92 cases. Int J Gen Med. (2025) 18:1581–90. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S508028

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Maruhashi, T, Kurihara, Y, Kitamura, R, Oi, M, Suzuki, K, and Asari, Y. Carbon dioxide angiography during angioembolization for trauma patients increases the detection of active bleeding and leads to reliable hemostasis: a retrospective, observational study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. (2024) 50:2147–54. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02628-2

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Debras, E, Capmas, P, Maudot, C, and Chavatte-Palmer, P. Uterine wound healing after caesarean section: A systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. (2024) 296:83–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.02.045

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Scholten, EL, Beitler, JR, Prisk, GK, and Malhotra, A. Treatmentof ARDS with prone positioning. Chest. (2017) 151:215–24. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.06.032

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Mitchell, DA, and Seckel, MA. Acute respiratory distress syndrome and prone positioning. AACN Adv Crit Care. (2018) 29:415–25. doi: 10.4037/aacnacc2018161

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Nunez, JI, Gosling, AF, O'Gara, B, Kennedy, KF, Rycus, P, Abrams, D, et al. Bleeding and thrombotic events in adults supported with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an ELSO registry analysis. Intensive Care Med. (2022) 48:213–24. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06593-x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Michael, ABV, Ryerson, LM, Ratano, D, Fan, E, Faraoni, D, and Annich, GM. ELSO adult and pediatric anticoagulation guidelines. ASAIO J. (2021) 68:303–10. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001652

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Chinese Medical Doctors Association Extracorporeal Life Support Professional Committee. Expert consensus on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circulatory assistance for adults. Chin Med J. (2018) 98:886–94. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-1537.2018.02.003

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: ARDS, prone ventilation, VV-ECMO, abdominal wall hematoma, case report

Citation: He G, Fan X, Wang S and Dong Y (2025) Abdominal wall hematoma after prone ventilation during postpartum VV-ECMO: a case report and systematic review. Front. Med. 12:1605965. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1605965

Received: 04 April 2025; Accepted: 17 June 2025;
Published: 09 July 2025.

Edited by:

Savino Spadaro, University of Ferrara, Italy

Reviewed by:

Filippo Binda, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Italy
Barbara Presciuttini, Azienda Ospedaliera Carlo Poma, Italy

Copyright © 2025 He, Fan, Wang and Dong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Shuai Wang, amx1d2FuZ3NAMTYzLmNvbQ==Yu Dong, MTgzNjgxMTUyNzNAMTYzLmNvbQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.