Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Med., 28 August 2025

Sec. Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1609519

The efficacy of acupuncture on endometrial receptivity in infertile women: an overview of systematic review and meta-analysis

  • 1Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
  • 2The First Affiliated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
  • 3Xindu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
  • 4TCM Preventative Treatment Research Center of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
  • 5Nanbu County People’s Hospital, Nanchong, China

Background and objective: Endometrial receptivity (ER) enhancement is crucial in managing infertility. Although systematic reviews (SRs) have investigated acupuncture’s potential to improve ER in infertile women, the evidence remains fragmented due to insufficient quality assessment. This overview aimed to rigorously evaluate the reporting quality, methodological rigor, risk of bias, and evidence confidence of existing SRs, while synthesizing clinical evidence on acupuncture’s efficacy and safety for ER enhancement in infertility.

Search strategy: Seven databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang) were systematically searched from inception to March 1, 2025, using combined subject headings and free-text terms (“acupuncture therapy,” “endometrial receptivity,” “infertility,” “systematic review”).

Inclusion criteria: SRs investigating acupuncture’s therapeutic effects on ER in infertile women were eligible.

Data extraction and analysis: Two independent reviewers performed study selection and data extraction. Methodological quality, reporting completeness, bias risk, and evidence certainty were evaluated using validated tools: AMSTAR 2, ROBIS, PRISMA-A, and GRADE.

Results: From 524 screened records, 10 SRs (published 2019–2023, encompassing 7–25 RCTs each) were included. Methodological quality assessed by AMSTAR 2 showed that all 10 SRs exhibited critically low quality. Reporting quality assessed by PRISMA-A showed that overall completeness >70%, but deficiencies in protocol registration (50%) and funding disclosure (10%). Risk of bias assessed by ROBIS showed that only one SR had low risk of bias. As to the evidence confidence, among the 55 evaluated outcomes, 92.72% (51/55) were low/very low quality (2 high, 2 moderate, 24 low, 27 very low). Descriptive analyses suggested that combining acupuncture with other treatments (medications, Chinese herbal medicine, and IVF-ET) may improve pregnancy and ovulation rates, with a high to moderate quality of evidence.

Conclusion: Current evidence supporting acupuncture for ER enhancement is predominantly low quality, limited by critical methodological weaknesses and heterogeneity. While combination therapies show preliminary promise, definitive conclusions require high-quality RCTs with standardized outcome measures.

Systematic review registration: This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024497881).

1 Introduction

Infertility, defined as the inability to achieve clinical pregnancy after 12 months of unprotected intercourse, is a major global public health challenge (1). Affecting approximately 15% of couples worldwide with a rising incidence (24), infertility significantly impacts women’s physical and psychological health and creates societal burdens, including social stigma, marital instability, and financial strain (58). While assisted reproductive technology (ART) offers treatment, clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) remain suboptimal, largely due to embryonic developmental abnormalities and poor endometrial receptivity (PER). Notably, PER contributes to roughly two-thirds of implantation failures (9, 10), highlighting its clinical importance.

Endometrial receptivity (ER) refers to the transient state of the uterus that allows blastocyst implantation. It is typically assessed using three main parameters: endometrial thickness (EMT), morphology, and vascular perfusion. Establishing ER involves complex interactions involving hormones, cytokines, growth factors, and uterine blood flow (11). Since PER is a key cause of female infertility, recurrent miscarriage, and poor ART outcomes, improving ER is crucial for addressing infertility and enhancing ART success rates (12, 13).

Current strategies to enhance ER include: (1) hormonal interventions (oral/vaginal estrogen) to stimulate endometrial growth; (2) medications like low-dose aspirin, low-molecular-weight heparin, or sildenafil citrate to improve blood flow; and (3) mechanical interventions (intrauterine perfusion/physical stimulation) to increase ER sensitivity. Despite these approaches, outcomes are often inadequate. Existing treatments frequently show limited effectiveness, poor patient compliance (especially with long-term heparin), and significant side effects, from gastrointestinal issues to thromboembolic risks (12, 13). This clear therapeutic gap underscores the urgent need for novel, more effective, and safer treatments.

Acupuncture is increasingly used in infertility care. Survey indicate 75% of UK complementary medicine clinics offer acupuncture for fertility support (14), with proposed mechanisms including regulating ovarian function, restoring hormonal balance, and reducing stress (1517). Studies suggest acupuncture may improve ER through multiple pathways: enhancing endometrial structure, increasing uterine blood flow, regulating progesterone signaling, and modulating key molecular markers (e.g., integrin αvβ3, LIF, VEGF, HOXA10) essential for implantation (15, 1822). However, systematic reviews (SRs) on acupuncture’s efficacy for ER improvement report conflicting results, likely due to methodological differences and inconsistent reporting in primary studies.

The value of SR evidence depends on rigorous methods and transparent reporting (23). Although numerous SRs examine acupuncture for ER optimization, comprehensive quality assessments are still scarce. Therefore, we conducted an overview of SRs to systematically evaluate their reporting quality, risk of bias, methodological quality, and confidence levels. We further investigated the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for improving ER in women with infertility. Unlike prior reviews, this study is the first overview of the systematic reviews to rigorously evaluate ER-specific outcomes across infertility subtypes.

2 Methods

2.1 Protocol and registration

This study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024497881). As it involved the analysis of existing SRs, ethical approval was not required. This overview adhered strictly to the registered protocol. No deviations occurred; all planned analyses (quality appraisal, narrative synthesis) were executed.

2.2 Literature search

A systematic search was conducted across seven electronic databases from their inception to March 1, 2025: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chongqing VIP Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP), and Wanfang. The search strategy utilized standardized subject headings and free-text terms encompassing four core concepts: “acupuncture therapy,” “endometrial receptivity,” “infertility,” and “systematic review.” Detailed search strings for the four international databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) are provided in Supplementary material 1. Search strategies for Chinese databases were tailored to their specific query structures.

2.3 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

2.3.1 Study design

SRs adhering to PRISMA guidelines were eligible if they synthesized evidence from two or more randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating acupuncture interventions for improving ER in women with infertility. SRs were excluded if they were a network meta-analyses, a protocol of meta-analysis, or full text was not available to be reviewed. Network meta-analyses were excluded to avoid confounding from indirect comparisons; protocols were excluded as they lack synthesized data.

2.3.2 Participants

Infertile women with PER were included, provided uterine factors were confirmed by transvaginal sonography (TVS) without structural abnormalities. Exclusion criteria comprised congenital uterine anomalies, intrauterine adhesions, or active pelvic inflammatory disease.

2.3.3 Intervention

Interventions in the experimental group mainly included acupuncture or acupuncture plus other treatments such as medications, Chinese herbal medicine (CHM), in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET), embryo transfer (ET), and frozen embryo transfer (FET). The acupuncture types included manual acupuncture, electrical acupuncture (EA), warm acupuncture, moxibustion, acupoint catgut implantation, abdominal acupuncture, transcutaneous electrical acupuncture stimulation (TEAS), plum-blossom needle, auricular point sticking, auricular acupuncture, and acupoint injection.

2.3.4 Comparators

The comparators included medicine, placebo, sham acupuncture (SA), lifestyle, physiotherapy, routine care, IVF-ET, ET, FET, CHM, and no treatment.

2.3.5 Outcomes

Fertility outcomes, ER outcomes and safety outcomes were included. Specifically, fertility outcomes included pregnancy rate (PR), CPR, live birth rate (LBR), biochemical pregnancy rate (BPR), ovulation rate, embryo transfer number/rate, and embryo implantation number/rate; ER outcomes included endometrial pattern (EMP), EMT, endometrial pulse index (PI), resistive index (RI), and peak systolic velocity/end-diastolic blood velocity (S/D).

2.4 Study selection

A comprehensive literature search was performed following the predetermined search strategy. All retrieved records were imported into EndNote X9 (Clarivate Analytics, United States) for systematic data management. After automated deduplication, two reviewers (LH, ZJ) independently screened records in two stages: (1) titles/abstracts to exclude clear irrelevancies; (2) full texts of potentially eligible articles. Strict exclusion criteria were applied at each stage, with reasons documented per PRISMA guidelines. To ensure methodological rigor, the reviewers performed cross-verification of their screening decisions upon completion. Any discrepancies in study selection were resolved through panel discussion, with unresolved disagreements arbitrated by a senior researcher (FHY).

2.5 Data extraction

A dual extraction protocol was implemented using a standardized extraction template. Two investigators (LH and TCJ) independently extracted the following data elements from included systematic reviews: (1) basic characteristics: authorship, publication year, country of origin, funding sources; (2) methodological components: search databases utilized, number of RCTs/participants, diagnostic criteria, intervention protocols, outcome measures, risk of bias assessment tools; (3) synthesis findings: primary conclusions and safety profiles. All extractions underwent cross-validation, with discordant entries resolved through structured reconciliation meetings. Persistent discrepancies were adjudicated by a senior investigator (FHY) to ensure consensus.

2.6 Methods

2.6.1 Assessment of methodological quality

A Measurement Tool to Evaluate Systematic Review 2 (AMSTAR 2) was applied to assess the methodological quality of the included SRs. AMSTAR 2 is a critical appraisal tool for evaluating the quality of SRs, allowing for a comprehensive evaluation of SRs in terms of study selection, protocol design, data extraction, data analysis, and discussion. AMSTAR2 consists of 16 entries with seven key entries (2, 4, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15) and nine non-key entries. Among the 16 entries, five of the entries (2.4.7.8.9) are evaluated with “yes,” “partially yes” and “no,” and the remaining entries were evaluated with “yes” and “no.” SRs was categorized as high, medium, low and very low based on the conformity of the entries. The evaluation criteria are as follows: (1) rated as “high”: no or one non-critical weakness; (2) rated as “medium”: more than one non-critical weakness; (3) rated as “low”: one critical weakness with or without non-critical weaknesses; (4) rated as “very low”: more than one critical weakness with or without non-critical weaknesses (24). Two assessors (ZJ and TCJ) independently conducted evaluations. All discordant ratings underwent blinded re-evaluation followed by consensus discussion, with final arbitration by a senior investigator (FHY) when required.

2.6.2 Risk of bias assessment

The risk of bias of included SRs were assessed using Risk of Bias in Systematic Review tool (ROBIS) which is completed in three phases, with the phase−1 focusing on assessing relevance which is optional, the phase-2 focusing on identifying concerns during the review process, and the phase-3 focusing on judging the risk of bias (25). The phase-2 comprises four domains, including study eligibility criteria, identification and selection of studies, data collection and study appraisal, and synthesis and findings. Phase-3 evaluates the overall risk of bias in the interpretation of review results. The risk of bias was rated as “low,” “high,” or “unclear.” Two independent investigators (LH and ZJ) assessed the ROBIS and reviewed each other’s findings once completed. Any differences in scores that were not resolved through discussion were assessed by a senior investigator (FHY).

2.6.3 Assessment of reporting quality

Reporting quality was assessed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses for Acupuncture (PRISMA-A) checklist. PRISMA-A is a tool for improving the reporting quality of SRs related to acupuncture, which contains 27 items with each item is answered with “yes,” “no,” or “partly yes” (26). Two independent investigators (LH and TCJ) assessed the PRISMA-A separately with a cross-check progress in the end, and a senior investigator (FHY) was involved if disagreements about assessment results could not be solved by discussion.

2.6.4 Assessment of evidence

Evidence confidence of included SRs was assessed by the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). To ensure consistency, the GRADE rating was reapplied to all outcomes included in the systematic review. GRADE encompasses five aspects: risk of bias, inconsistency, indirection, imprecision, and other considerations (publication bias, large effect, plausible confounding, and dose–response gradient).

Evidence quality is categorized into four levels: High (very confident that the true effect is close to the estimated value; well-designed RCTs typically start as high), Moderate (moderately confident that the true value is likely close to the estimate but there is a possibility of difference), Low (limited confidence that the true value may differ substantially from the estimate), and Very low (little to no confidence that the true value is likely substantially different from the estimate).

The key to determining the evidence quality level is the “downgrading” or “upgrading” of a predefined starting point (high for RCTs, low for observational studies). Downgrading factors include: (1) Study limitations/Risk of bias (flaws in study design or execution); (2) Inconsistency (large heterogeneity in results between studies that cannot be reasonably explained); (3) Indirectness (differences in the PICO elements—Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome—between the studies and the target question); (4) Imprecision (small sample size or low event number leading to overly wide confidence intervals); (5) Publication bias (indications that studies with negative results were not published). Upgrading factors (primarily applicable to observational studies starting from low) include: (1) Large magnitude of effect (e.g., RR ≥ 2 or <0.5 that cannot be readily explained by confounding); (2) Dose–response relationship; (3) All plausible confounding factors would diminish the observed effect. The assessment process was performed for each critical outcome, starting from the initial level, and comprehensively considering the downgrading and upgrading factors to arrive at the final grade.

This assessment was conducted independently by two researchers (ZJ and TCJ) using the GRADEpro GDT platform,1 followed by cross-verification. Any discrepancies in ratings were resolved through group discussion or arbitration by a senior researcher (FHY).

2.7 Heterogeneity analysis

Clinical and methodological heterogeneity across SRs (e.g., population differences, acupuncture protocols) precluded meta-analysis. We followed SWiM guidelines for narrative synthesis, categorizing results by outcome and intervention type.

3 Results

3.1 Literature search

Following searches across seven databases, 524 records were identified: PubMed (n = 18), Embase (n = 23), Web of Science (n = 21), Cochrane Library (n = 2), CNKI (n = 451), WanFang (n = 6), and VIP (n = 3). After removing 23 duplicates, 501 records underwent screening. Title/abstract assessment yielded 13 potentially eligible articles. Full-text review excluded three articles: one lacking ER-related outcomes (27), one being a network meta-analysis (28), and one containing only a single acupuncture RCT for infertility within its SR. Ten articles met all inclusion criteria (2938). The literature selection process is detailed in Figure 1.

Figure 1
Flowchart depicting a study selection process. Initially, 524 records were identified from various databases including PubMed, Embase, and others. After removing 23 duplicates, 501 records remained. 488 records were excluded based on titles and abstracts. Thirteen full-text articles were reviewed for eligibility. Three were excluded for specific reasons: one for being a network meta-analysis, one for only having one RCT on acupuncture for infertile women, and one without outcomes on endometrial receptivity. Ultimately, ten studies were included.

Figure 1. The inclusion and exclusion of systematic reviews studying acupuncture on endometrial receptivity in infeltile women. CNKI, China National Knowledge Infrastmcture; VIP, Chongqing VIP Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database.

3.2 Characteristic of the included SRs

Characteristics of the 10 included systematic reviews (2019–2023) are summarized in Table 1. Two SRs were published in Chinese and eight in English. The included SRs searched six to 12 databases and included seven to 25 RCTs with the participants varied from 516 to 3,041. All 10 SRs performed meta-analysis, eight of 10 SRs performed subgroup analysis, and seven SRs performed sensitivity analysis. The treatment groups included acupuncture alone, acupuncture plus medicine/CHM, acupuncture plus medicine and CHM, acupuncture plus IVF-ET, ET, or FET, acupuncture plus IVF-ET and CHM, acupuncture combined with IVF-ET, and intrauterine shortwave therapy (IST). The acupuncture methods included manual acupuncture, warm acupuncture, TEAS, plum-blossom needle treatment, EA, cupping, auricular point sticking, auricular acupuncture, acupoint injection, acupoint catgut embedding, and moxibustion. The control groups included the following interventions, either singly or in combination: medicine, SA, blank control, routine care, physiotherapy, press bean combined with electromagnetic wave lamp, CHM, IVF-ET, ET, FET, and shallow acupuncture. SA included sham acupuncture, mock transcutaneous electrical acupuncture stimulation (MTEAS), sham electroacupuncture, placebo acupuncture, placebo auricular acupuncture, and placebo moxibustion. The medicine included Diane-35, metformin, placebo, human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), bromocriptine, progesterone, ethinylestradioland cyproterone acetate tablets, hormone replacement therapy, levofloxacin, dydrogesterone, letrozole, clomiphene, estradiol valerate tablets, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, aspirin and gentamicin, dexamethasone, chymotrypsin, sodium chlorideL. The outcome measures mainly referred to fertility outcomes (PR, CPR, LBR, embryo implantation rate, fertilization rate, ovulation rate, number of oocytes retrieved, maximum follicle diameter, high-quality embryo rate, antral follicle count, and number of embryo transfers), ER outcomes (endometrial vascular index, S/D, RI, PI, endometrial flow index, EMP, and EMT), endocrine outcomes (FSH, LH, P, E2, and AMH), and other outcomes (efficacy rate, Gn duration, Gn dose, and cycle cancelation rate). All 10 SRs were assessed using the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The characteristics of the included systematic reviews.

3.3 Quality of the included SRs

3.3.1 Quality of the methodology

All SRs failed critical AMSTAR-2 domains: 100% lacked a priori protocols (Item 2) and funding disclosures (Item 10); 90% omitted excluded study lists (Item 7). Table 2 and Figure 2 present the results.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Methodological assessments of included systematic reviews by AMSTAR 2.

Figure 2
Bar chart showing AMSTAR-2 domains across sixteen items, with blue, orange, and yellow bars representing responses Y, PY, and N, respectively. Item 1 has a blue bar, indicating a lower percentage than the others, while Items 10 and 11 show yellow, signifying higher percentages of N responses.

Figure 2. Graphical presentation ofAMSTAR-2. Y, yes; PY, partial yes; N, no; AMSTAR2, A Measurement Tool to Evaluate Systematic Review 2.

3.3.2 Risk of bias

The results of ROBIS assessment are shown in Table 3. In phase-2, all SRs had a low risk of bias in Domain−1 and Domain-4 and six SRs were considered to have a low risk of bias in Domain-3; notably, ROBIS showed high bias in study selection (Domain 2). In phase-3, only one SR had an overall low risk of bias.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Results of the ROBIS assessment.

3.3.3 Reporting quality

Reporting quality assessed by PRISMA-A showed that overall completeness >70%, suggesting that the reports were mostly complete (39), but deficiencies centered on protocol registration (Item5, 50% compliance) and funding disclosure (Item27, 10% compliance). A detailed assessment of PRISMA-A is shown in Table 4 and Figure 3.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Compliance of included SRs with PRISMA-A checklist.

Figure 3
Bar chart showing compliance of systematic reviews with PRISMA-A items as percentages. Y (blue), PY (orange), and N (yellow) represent compliance levels. Most items have high compliance (Y), with lower compliance in Funding, Conclusions, Study selection, and Risk of bias across studies.

Figure 3. Graphical presentation of PRISMA-A. Y, yes; PY, partial yes; N, no; PRISMA-A, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for Acupuncture.

3.3.4 Confidence in study outcomes

Confidence in study outcomes were assessed by GRADE and the quality of outcomes varied from high quality to very low quality. Specifically, of these, two were of high quality, two were of moderate quality, 24 were of low quality, and 27 were of very low quality. Risk of bias, followed by publication bias, imprecision and inconsistency, was the most common reason for downgrading. The detailed results are presented in Table 5.

Table 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Evidence quality of included studies.

3.4 Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for infertile women

The efficacy of acupuncture on ER in infertile women is summarized in Table 5. Efficacy and safety were mainly reported based on the following outcomes: fertility, ER, and safety.

3.4.1 Efficacy of acupuncture on fertility outcomes

3.4.1.1 PR

There were seven SRs reported acupuncture on pregnancy rate, of which one SR (32) reported that there was no significant difference in improving pregnancy rate between acupuncture and medicine with very low-quality evidence, while acupuncture plus medicine alone or with CHM could improve the pregnancy rate with moderate-quality evidence. The other six SRs all indicated that acupuncture alone or with other treatments could improve the PR; of those, two had high-quality evidence (33, 37), three had low-quality evidence (29, 31, 36), and one had very low-quality evidence (34).

3.4.1.2 CPR

One SR with very low-quality evidence reported that acupuncture plus COH could improve CPR, but there was no significant difference compared to COH therapy alone (38), while two SRs with low-quality evidence suggested that acupuncture as an adjuvant treatment resulted in a higher CPR than treatment without acupuncture treatment (30, 35).

3.4.1.3 BPR

Two SRs suggested that acupuncture with medicine/FET had a significant effect on BPR compared to medicine/FET alone, sham acupuncture/blank control, or sham acupuncture plus medicine with low-quality evidence (30, 35).

3.4.1.4 LBR

Two SRs with low-quality evidence and one SR with very low-quality evidence showed that compared with the control group, acupuncture alone or with other treatments (FET, IVF-ET) had no significant difference in LBR (29, 34, 35).

3.4.1.5 Ovulation rate

One SR (37) with moderate-quality evidence and two SRs (31, 32) with low-quality evidence showed a statistically significant increase in the ovulation rate between the experimental and control groups, indicating that acupuncture can significantly increase the ovulation rate. One SR (36) reported that acupuncture plus CHM, with or without medicine, could not improve the ovulation rate compared to medicine alone with very low-quality evidence.

3.4.1.6 Embryo transfer

Low-quality evidence (30) suggested that there was no statistically significant difference in the number of embryo transfers among the acupuncture treatment group, sham/placebo, or non-acupuncture group, while very low-quality evidence (29) suggested that compared with medication, acupuncture was effective in improving embryo transfer rates.

3.4.1.7 Embryo implantation

Two SRs (30, 38) with low-quality evidence reported statistical significance in the embryo implantation rate, which indicated that acupuncture treatment was prior to the sham/placebo or non-acupuncture groups.

3.4.2 Efficacy of acupuncture on ER outcomes

3.4.2.1 EMP

Three SRs used type A endometrium as an evaluation indicator, whereas one SR used type A and type B endometrium as evaluation indicators. Four SRs (29, 30, 34, 35) reported that acupuncture could significantly improve the number of trilinear endometria when comparing acupuncture plus IVF-ET/FET/medicine with IVF-ET/FET/medicine with or without SA; of these, two had low-quality evidence and two had very low-quality evidence.

3.4.2.2 EMT

Nine SRs reported acupuncture in EMT, of which one SR (29) showed that acupuncture alone was not statistically significant compared to medicine/SA/routine care with very low-quality evidence. However, when acupuncture was used as an add-on treatment combined with medicine, IVF-ET, FET, or CHM, there was a statistically significant difference between the experimental and control groups, indicating that with acupuncture, the EMT could be significantly improved, and the quality of evidence of SRs varied from low to very low (2931, 3338).

3.4.2.3 RI

Three SRs (29, 32, 34) with very low-quality evidence found that acupuncture alone or in combination with medicine, IVF-ET, FET, or Chinese herbal medicine could decrease PI compared to the control group.

3.4.2.4 PI

One SR (32) with very low-quality evidence, reported no significant difference when acupuncture was combined with other treatments (medicine and CHM). Two SRs (29, 32) with low-quality evidence suggested that, compared with press bean plus electromagnetic warm lamp and medicine, acupuncture showed a better improving effect on PI. Furthermore, very low-quality evidence (34) showed that acupuncture combined with IVF/TEF/medicine improved the PI better than a control without acupuncture.

3.4.2.5 S/D

One SR (29) with low-quality evidence showed that, compared with medicine, acupuncture showed a better improving effect on S/D. Very low-quality evidence (34) showed that acupuncture combined with IVF-ET/FET/medicine was better than control without acupuncture.

3.4.3 Safety outcomes

Of the 10 SRs, six SRs (2931, 35, 37, 38) mentioned the adverse events of acupuncture in the treatment of infertile women, and one SR (32) showed no adverse effects during acupuncture therapy. The main adverse reactions included fainting, dizziness, and subcutaneous congestion at acupuncture points.

4 Discussion

Although all the included SRs revealed the potential benefits of acupuncture as an adjuvant treatment on fertility outcomes and ER outcomes in infertile women, the confidence in this finding is still reduced by the restrictions of the RCTs included in each SR. The AMSTAR2, ROBIS, and PRISMA-A assessments revealed significant qualitative deficiencies for each SR.

Evidence strength was categorized as moderate confidence when supported by high- or moderate-quality studies (40). This relatively reliable evidence suggests that combining acupuncture with other treatments (medicine, CHM, or IVF-ET) improves PR and ovulation rates compared to control groups not receiving acupuncture. However, conclusions are constrained by very low certainty evidence, and efficacy of acupuncture alone remains unproven. Therefore, the current evidence regarding acupuncture’s efficacy on ER outcomes is of insufficient confidence to draw meaningful conclusions.

AMSTAR 2 assessment revealed common methodological flaws, including: inadequate description of PICO elements; lack of a prior study protocol; insufficient justification for the SR type; non-comprehensive literature search strategy; absence of duplicate study selection/data extraction; incomplete listing of study exclusion rationales; insufficient description of included study characteristics; failure to report funding sources for included RCTs; inadequate discussion of risk of bias impact on overall findings; failure to identify or discuss sources of heterogeneity and their impact; and omission of conflict of interest reporting. The ROBIS assessment identified significant concerns, particularly in Phase 2 (Domains 2 and 4), indicating shortcomings in study identification, selection, data collection, and appraisal. PRISMA-A results highlighted three major reporting deficiencies: lack of protocol/registration reporting, inadequate description of information sources, and failure to account for funding sources’ roles. Finally, according to GRADE, the most prevalent reasons for downgrading evidence certainty were risk of bias, followed by publication bias, imprecision, and inconsistency.

Female infertility is closely associated with abnormal cervical mucus production, diminished oocyte quality, ovulatory dysfunction, tubal obstruction, and poor ER. ER plays a critical role in achieving successful pregnancy, with conception and pregnancy rates strongly correlated with endometrial thickness and blood flow patterns across different age groups (41). Acupuncture is widely used as an adjuvant therapy for infertility, particularly with treatments like IVF-ET. Our results indicate that adjuvant acupuncture may improve pregnancy rates and ovulation rates in infertile women. Clinical studies further demonstrate that acupuncture significantly improves clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, cycle ovulation rate, fertilization rate, oocyte yield, and high-quality embryo count, while reducing the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (4252). Mechanistically, acupuncture appears to regulate female reproductive hormones, cellular functions, and immune signaling molecules, thereby supporting reproductive endocrine system regulation, follicular development, and embryo implantation (53). Specific studies on PER reveal that acupuncture enhances ER by improving endometrial morphology, promoting microcirculation, and bidirectionally modulating estrogen, progesterone, and their receptors (15, 1822). However, owing to the limitations and inconsistencies of the current evidence, our overview shows that the efficacy of acupuncture on ER outcomes remains uncertain. Zheng conducted a SR and meta-analysis to evaluate dose-related acupuncture in infertile women with PER and showed that the effect of acupuncture was dose-dependent, and a trend of relatively higher acupuncture dosage showed better effects for PER (34). Historically, the efficacy of traditional Chinese acupuncture is closely related to the selection of acupoints, treatment duration, and treatment frequency (54), that is to say, dose-related acupuncture plays a critical role in the therapeutic effect of acupuncture. Therefore, future studies on the efficacy of acupuncture at different doses should be conducted. In addition, the SRs included in our overview revealed that acupuncture had better therapeutic effects when combined with other treatments, including medications, CHM, and IVF-ET. A network meta-analysis of the best acupuncture regimen for ER in infertile women may be beneficial for the selection of acupuncture regimens in future high-quality clinical research and clinical practice.

In view of these shortcomings, the following conditions should be adopted for future SRs: First, the PICO component should be made explicit in the research questions and inclusion criteria in an SR. Second, the study protocol of a SR is strongly recommended to be drafted and registered before the start of the SR, which can help to minimize the potential bias in the review process and reporting. Third, the search for primary studies should take a comprehensive approach whenever possible, with the search for gray literature being particularly important. Fourth, a list of excluded literature should be provided in the study selection process to reduce data omissions. Fifth, SRs need to fully document the essential characteristics of the included RCTs to help determine the extent to which the results of different studies can be combined and to inform the analysis of heterogeneity and the application of the results. Last but not least, SRs should report on their funding and the funding of the included RCTs to help identify potential conflicts of interest.

This comprehensive and systematic overview presented the most up-to-date evidence for the application of acupuncture for ER in infertile women, and registration on the PROSPERO platform was performed to limit the possibility of biased decision-making during this overview. However, some limitations exist in this study: (1) Language bias (Chinese/English-only inclusion); (2) Potential publication bias due to exclusion of gray literature; (3) Clinical heterogeneity precluded quantitative synthesis; (4) Inclusion of different acupuncture modalities-grouping together diverse interventions might bias synthesis.

5 Conclusion

Current evidence suggests that acupuncture, as an adjuvant therapy combined with other treatments (medication, IVF-ET, FET, or CHM), may benefit infertile patients and improve fertility outcomes. However, due to methodological limitations and inconsistent findings, definitive conclusions regarding acupuncture’s efficacy and safety for ER in infertile women cannot be drawn. Further high-quality research is required to substantiate acupuncture’s application for improving ER in this population. Future studies should: adopt core outcome sets (e.g., EMT, RI, live birth rate) to standardize ER assessment; implement harmonized acupuncture protocols or dosage standards; and prioritize RCTs designed to isolate acupuncture’s specific contribution from adjuvant effects (e.g., acupuncture vs. sham acupuncture + standardized IVF).

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

HF: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. JZ: Data curation, Formal analysis, Software, Writing – review & editing. CT: Data curation, Methodology, Software, Writing – review & editing. HL: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the Sichuan Natural Science Foundation Youth Fund project (No. 2025ZNSFSC1843). The funder had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, manuscript drafts, or decision-making for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1609519/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

References

1. Warner, L, Jamieson, DJ, and Barfield, WD. CDC releases a national public health action plan for the detection, prevention, and management of infertility. J Women's Health. (2015) 24:548–9. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5355

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Gerrits, T, Van Rooij, F, Esho, T, Ndegwa, W, Goossens, J, Bilajbegovic, A, et al. Infertility in the global south: raising awareness and generating insights for policy and practice. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. (2017) 9:39–44.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

3. Kurabayashi, T, Mizunuma, H, Kubota, T, and Hayashi, K. Ovarian infertility is associated with cardiovascular disease risk factors in later life: a Japanese cross-sectional study. Maturitas. (2016) 83:33–9. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.08.015

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Sun, H, Gong, TT, Jiang, YT, Zhang, S, Zhao, YH, and Wu, QJ. Global, regional, and national prevalence and disability-adjusted life-years for infertility in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: results from a global burden of disease study, 2017. Aging. (2019) 11:10952–91. doi: 10.18632/aging.102497

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Teklemicheal, AG, Kassa, EM, and Weldetensaye, EK. Prevalence and correlates of infertility related psychological stress in women with infertility: a cross-sectional hospital based survey. BMC Psychol. (2022) 10:91. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00804-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Hazlina, NHN, Norhayati, MN, Bahari, IS, and Arif, NANM. Worldwide prevalence, risk factors and psychological impact of infertility among women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. (2022) 12:e057132. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057132

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. (2020) 113:533–5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.025

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Zegers-Hochschild, F, Adamson, GD, de Mouzon, J, Ishihara, O, Mansour, R, Nygren, K, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril. (2009) 92:1520–4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Lédée-Bataille, N, Laprée-Delage, G, Taupin, JL, Dubanchet, S, Frydman, R, and Chaouat, G. Concentration of leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) in uterine flushing fluid is highly predictive of embryo implantation. Hum Reprod. (2002) 17:213–8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.1.213

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Franasiak, JM, Forman, EJ, Hong, KH, Werner, MD, Upham, KM, Treff, NR, et al. The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening. Fertil Steril. (2014) 101:656–63.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.11.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Liujing, H, Rong, L, Haitao, Y, Xi, L, and Ying, Q. Research progress of improving endometrial receptivity. Med Recapitul. (2017) 23:4204–9.

Google Scholar

12. Cui, N, Li, AM, Luo, ZY, Zhao, ZM, Xu, YM, Zhang, J, et al. Effects of growth hormone on pregnancy rates of patients with thin endometrium. J Endocrinol Investig. (2019) 42:27–35. doi: 10.1007/s40618-018-0877-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Liang, YX, Liu, L, Jin, ZY, Liang, XH, Fu, YS, Gu, XW, et al. The high concentration of progesterone is harmful for endometrial receptivity and decidualization. Sci Rep. (2018) 8:712. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18643-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Magee, B, and Smith, KR. Infertility clinics and acupuncture: a qualitative web-based study. J Assist Reprod Genet. (2023) 40:2367–73. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02898-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Stener-Victorin, E, Waldenström, U, Andersson, SA, and Wikland, M. Reduction of blood flow impedance in the uterine arteries of infertile women with electro-acupuncture. Hum Reprod. (1996) 11:1314–7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019378

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Pei, J, Strehler, E, Noss, U, Abt, M, Piomboni, P, Baccetti, B, et al. Quantitative evaluation of spermatozoa ultrastructure after acupuncture treatment for idiopathic male infertility. Fertil Steril. (2005) 84:141–7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.12.056

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Smith, CA, de Lacey, S, Chapman, M, Ratcliffe, J, Norman, RJ, Johnson, NP, et al. The effects of acupuncture on the secondary outcomes of anxiety and quality of life for women undergoing IVF: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. (2019) 98:460–9. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13528

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Stener-Victorin, E, Waldenström, U, Tägnfors, U, Lundeberg, T, Lindstedt, G, and Janson, PO. Effects of electro-acupuncture on anovulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. (2000) 79:180–8.

Google Scholar

19. Stener-Victorin, E, Kobayashi, R, and Kurosawa, M. Ovarian blood flow responses to electro-acupuncture stimulation at different frequencies and intensities in anaesthetized rats. Auton Neurosci. (2003) 108:50–6. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2003.08.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Stener-Victorin, E, Kobayashi, R, Watanabe, O, Lundeberg, T, and Kurosawa, M. Effect of electro-acupuncture stimulation of different frequencies and intensities on ovarian blood flow in anaesthetized rats with steroid-induced polycystic ovaries. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. (2004) 2:16. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-2-16

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Stener-Victorin, E, Jedel, E, Janson, PO, and Sverrisdottir, YB. Low-frequency electroacupuncture and physical exercise decrease high muscle sympathetic nerve activity in polycystic ovary syndrome. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. (2009) 297:R387–95. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00197.2009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Arranz, L, Guayerbas, N, Siboni, L, and De la Fuente, M. Effect of acupuncture treatment on the immune function impairment found in anxious women. Am J Chin Med. (2007) 35:35–51. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X07004606

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Zhong, D, Xiao, Q, Xiao, X, Li, Y, Ye, J, Xia, L, et al. Tai chi for improving balance and reducing falls: an overview of 14 systematic reviews. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. (2020) 63:505–17. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2019.12.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Shea, BJ, Reeves, BC, Wells, G, Thuku, M, Hamel, C, Moran, J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. (2017) 358:j4008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Whiting, P, Savović, J, Higgins, JP, Caldwell, DM, Reeves, BC, Shea, B, et al. ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol. (2016) 69:225–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Wang, X, Chen, Y, Liu, Y, Yao, L, Estill, J, Bian, Z, et al. Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist. BMC Complement Altern Med. (2019) 19:208. doi: 10.1186/s12906-019-2624-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Gu, Y-E, Zhang, X, Zhang, Q, Dai, M-C, Wu, Y, Zhou, Y, et al. The effects of acupuncture on pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization with embryo transfer: an interdisciplinary systematic review. J Gynecol Obstetr Hum Reprod. (2019) 48:677–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.07.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Yang, L, Yang, W, Sun, M, Luo, L, Li, HR, Miao, R, et al. Meta analysis of ovulation induction effect and pregnancy outcome of acupuncture & moxibustion combined with clomiphene in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Front Endocrinol. (2023) 14:1261016. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1261016

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Zhong, Y, Zeng, F, Liu, W, Ma, J, Guan, Y, and Song, Y. Acupuncture in improving endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Complement Altern Med. (2019) 19:19. doi: 10.1186/s12906-019-2472-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Li, M, Liu, Y, Wang, H, Zheng, S, Deng, Y, and Li, Y. The effects of acupuncture on pregnancy outcomes of recurrent implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. (2021) 2021:6661235. doi: 10.1155/2021/6661235

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Liu, Y, Wu, L, Yao, S, Wu, C, Lu, L, and Yi, W. Acupuncture for infertile women without undergoing assisted reproductive techniques (ART) a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. (2019) 98:e16463. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016463

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Liu, X, Shi, W, Liu, Z, Shi, S, Ke, C, Zhang, P, et al. Effects of acupuncture on luteinized Unruptured follicle syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Complement Ther Med. (2020) 49:102319. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102319

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Yahui, Z, Min, L, and Lixia, P. A meta-analysis of the effects of acupuncture and moxibustion on endometrial receptivity and clinical pregnancy outcome of vitro fertilization-embryo transfer patients. Clin J Chin Med. (2022) 14:100–5.

Google Scholar

34. Zheng, X, Yu, S, Liu, L, Yang, H, Wang, F, Yang, H, et al. The dose-related efficacy of acupuncture on endometrial receptivity in infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:858587. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.858587

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Zhu, C, Xia, W, Huang, J, Zhang, X, Li, F, Yu, X, et al. Effects of acupuncture on the pregnancy outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:987276. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.987276

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Liyuan, J, Jian, L, Haiyan, H, and Haixia, S. Meta-analysis of therapeutic effect of acupuncture combined with traditional Chinese medicine in treatment of infertile patients. Med J Chin People Armed Police Force. (2023) 34:501–6.

Google Scholar

37. Mo, J, Zhang, Y, Jin, N, and Zhou, Y. Effectiveness of traditional Chinese medicine formulas combined with acupuncture in the treatment of ovulation dysfunction infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. (2023) 102:e34310. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034310

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Wang, RR, Su, MH, Liu, LY, Lai, YY, Guo, XL, Gan, D, et al. Systematic review of acupuncture to improve ovarian function in women with poor ovarian response. Front Endocrinol. (2023) 14:1028853. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1028853

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Yang, H, Xiao, ZY, Yin, ZH, Yu, Z, Liu, JJ, Xiao, YQ, et al. Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for polycystic ovary syndrome: an overview of systematic reviews. J Integr Med. (2023) 21:136–48. doi: 10.1016/j.joim.2022.12.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Atkins, D, Best, D, Briss, PA, Eccles, M, Falck-Ytter, Y, Flottorp, S, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. (2004) 328:1490. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Shao, Y, Feng, H, Li, L, Zong, Y, and Liang, J. Predictive value of endometrial receptivity for pregnancy outcomes of in-vitro fertilization embryo transfer for patients of different ages. Altern Ther Health Med. (2023) 29:210–7.

Google Scholar

42. Rashidi, BH, Tehrani, ES, Hamedani, NA, and Pirzadeh, L. Effects of acupuncture on the outcome of in vitro fertilisation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Acupunc Med. (2013) 31:151–6. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2012-010198

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Chen, Q, and Hau, C. Impacts on pregnancy outcome treated with acupuncture and moxibustion in IVF-ET patients. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. (2015) 35:313–7.

Google Scholar

44. Wang, X, Jing, F, Wang, C, Tian, L, Liu, H, Fang, L, et al. The influence for success rate of warm acupuncture for tube baby of infertility patients with kidney yang deficiency:a randomized controlled trial. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. (2016) 36:906–10. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2016.09.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Zhou, L, Xia, Y, Ma, X, Tang, L, Lu, J, Tang, Q, et al. Effects of "menstrual cycle-based acupuncture therapy" on IVF-ET in patients with decline in ovarian reserve. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. (2016) 36:25–8.

Google Scholar

46. Qu, F, Wang, FF, Wu, Y, Zhou, J, Robinson, N, Hardiman, PJ, et al. Transcutaneous electrical Acupoint stimulation improves the outcomes of in vitro fertilization: a prospective, randomized and controlled study. Explore. (2017) 13:306–12. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2017.06.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Altutunji, AZ, Liu, L, Cai, J, Wang, Z, and Gao, Y. The effect of acupuncture on anti-mullerian hormone and assisted reproduction outcome in polycystic ovary syndrome patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. J Pak Med Assoc. (2019) 69:S4–8.

Google Scholar

48. Kusuma, AC, Oktari, N, Mihardja, H, Srilestari, A, Simadibrata, CL, Hestiantoro, A, et al. Electroacupuncture enhances number of mature oocytes and fertility rates for in vitro fertilization. Med Acupun. (2019) 31:289–97. doi: 10.1089/acu.2019.1368

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Shuai, Z, Li, X, Tang, X, Lian, F, and Sun, Z. Transcutaneous electrical acupuncture point stimulation improves pregnancy outcomes in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing in vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer: a prospective, randomised trial. Acupun Med. (2019) 37:33–9. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2017-011483

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Wu, HC, Zhang, JW, Sun, ZG, Xiang, S, Qiao, Y, and Lian, F. Effects of Electroacupuncture on expression of PI3K/Akt/Foxo3a in granulosa cells from women with Shen (kidney) deficiency syndrome undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Chin J Integr Med. (2019) 25:252–8. doi: 10.1007/s11655-019-2948-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Guven, PG, Cayir, Y, and Borekci, B. Effectiveness of acupuncture on pregnancy success rates for women undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. (2020) 59:282–6. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.01.018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Xiang, S, Xia, MF, Song, JY, Liu, DQ, and Lian, F. Effect of electro-acupuncture on expression of IRS-1/PI3K/GLUT4 pathway in ovarian granulosa cells of infertile patients with polycystic ovary syndrome-insulin resistance of phlegm-dampness syndrome. Chin J Integr Med. (2021) 27:330–5. doi: 10.1007/s11655-020-3219-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Xu, JY, Zhao, AL, Xin, P, Geng, JZ, Wang, BJ, and Xia, T. Acupuncture for female infertility: discussion on action mechanism and application. Evid Based Compl Altern Med. (2022) 2022:3854117. doi: 10.1155/2022/3854117

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Sun, N, Tu, JF, Lin, LL, Li, YT, Yang, JW, Shi, GX, et al. Correlation between acupuncture dose and effectiveness in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Acupun Med. (2019) 37:261–7. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2017-011608

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: acupuncture, endometrial receptivity, infertility, overview, systematic review

Citation: Fan H, Zhou J, Tang C and Liu H (2025) The efficacy of acupuncture on endometrial receptivity in infertile women: an overview of systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Med. 12:1609519. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1609519

Received: 10 April 2025; Accepted: 08 August 2025;
Published: 28 August 2025.

Edited by:

Mohd Helmy Mokhtar, National University of Malaysia, Malaysia

Reviewed by:

Yumei Zhou, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, China
Xiangping Peng, Waseda University, Japan

Copyright © 2025 Fan, Zhou, Tang and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Huan Liu, TEgxMjNZV0hAMTYzLmNvbQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.