Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CLINICAL TRIAL article

Front. Med.

Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1612779

The Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam for the Management of Emergence Agitation: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Provisionally accepted
Xiaoxing  LuXiaoxing Lu1,2Meiyan  ZhouMeiyan Zhou2Yao  LuYao Lu2,3Jia  SunJia Sun2Kexin  MaoKexin Mao2,3Yangzi  ZhuYangzi Zhu2,3Rongguo  WangRongguo Wang2Yong  CaoYong Cao4*Liwei  WangLiwei Wang1,2,3*
  • 1Soochow University Medical College, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
  • 2Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China
  • 3Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
  • 4Xuzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Emergence agitation (EA) is a common postoperative complication characterized by confusion, disorientation, and restless behavior that can lead to self-harm, the removal of medical devices, and other adverse events. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of a novel benzodiazepine, remimazolam, in the management of EA.A total of 219 adults experienced EA ( Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale SAS score ≥ 5) after otolaryngological surgery were randomly assigned (1:1:1 ratio) to receive one of the following three treatments: 2.5 mg remimazolam, 5.0 mg remimazolam, or placebo. The primary endpoint was the treatment success rate of EA, which was defined as an SAS score of <5 within 15 minutes after administration without the need for rescue sedation and no recurrence after 15 minutes. Secondary outcomes included rescue propofol dosage, EA duration, and the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge time. Adverse events were also monitored. The results demonstrated that both remimazolam groups (77.5% for 2.5 mg and 85.9% for 5.0 mg) had significantly higher treatment success rates compared to the placebo group (44.3%) (both P < 0.001). Additionally, they required less rescue propofol, had shorter EA durations, and faster PACU discharge times (all P < 0.001).Furthermore, the 2.5 mg group showed a lower incidence of hypoxia (7.0%) and hypotension (14.1%) compared to the placebo group (22.9% for hypoxia, 31.4% for hypotension) (P = 0.024 and 0.042, respectively). Exploratory analysis indicated that, for patients with dangerous agitation (SAS=7), only the 5.0 mg group (83.3%) had a significantly higher treatment success rate than the placebo group (0%) (P < 0.001). Our findings suggest that remimazolam is a promising option for managing EA in the PACU. For the entire study population, the 2.5 mg dose strikes an optimal balance between efficacy and safety. In patients with dangerous agitation, a 5.0 mg dose of remimazolam may offer potential benefits. These findings hold significant implications for guiding future therapeutic strategies for AE.

Keywords: Remimazolam, Emergency agitation, Anesthesia recovery, sedation, Otolaryngological surgery, randomized controlled trial

Received: 16 Apr 2025; Accepted: 30 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Lu, Zhou, Lu, Sun, Mao, Zhu, Wang, Cao and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Yong Cao, Xuzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
Liwei Wang, Soochow University Medical College, Suzhou, 215123, Jiangsu Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.