CLINICAL TRIAL article
Front. Med.
Sec. Translational Medicine
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1614054
This article is part of the Research TopicEnhancing Sports Injury Management through Medical-Engineering InnovationsView all 11 articles
Effects of chronic low-frequency pulsed magnetic fields exposure on the contractility and morphology of biceps brachii in healthy adults--a randomized controlled, double-blind trial
Provisionally accepted- 1Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- 2Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
- 3Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: ;Low-frequency pulse magnetic fields (PEMF) has been proven by classic transient receptor potential channel 1 (TRPC 1) transcription activation peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator-1α(PGC-1α)increase upstream of the mitochondria calcium -axis to increase muscle and mitochondria function , and recreates the consistent with exercise induced metabolic adaptations and power to ascend; Methods: Eighty healthy subjects with a mean age of 20 years were recruited and randomly divided into a PEMF group receiving magnetic field stimulation and a control group receiving sham treatment, with 40 patients in each group. The trial lasted for 4 weeks. Both groups were subjected to either a 15-minute magnetic stimulation intervention or a sham treatment every 48 h. B-mode ultrasound images were used to evaluate changes in muscle thickness, cross-sectional area, pennation angle, and stillness;The PEMF group showed a significant increase in the MVC(maximum voluntary contracton) value and a significantly higher amplitude of the increase than the control group. There was no significant difference in BMI(Body Mass Index) between the two groups before and after the trial, nor in the rate of change in BMI between the two groups.However, from the analysis of the change trends, the PEMF group showed a downward trend, while the control group showed an increasing trend. In the PEMF group, all four parameters of muscle morphology were significantly higher than pre-test, while in the control group, all but one of the muscle stillness metrics were significantly lower. The PEMF group had significantly higher muscle morphological parameters than did the control group Conclusions: The current clinical trial showed that in healthy individuals aged 20 years,After four weeks of chronic exposure to a low-frequency pulsed magnetic field (1.5mT, 3300Hz), the maximum voluntary contraction force of the biceps brachii muscle was significantly increased, and a contralateral effect was observed. At the same time, the muscle thickness, cross-sectional area, pennation, and stillness of the intervention arm increased significantly. It provides a supportive basis for the improvement of muscle histopathology using this technique as an exercise replacement and a medical strategy for muscle improvement.
Keywords: Low frequency pulse magnetic field, TRPC 1, Skeletal muscle morphological structure, Muscle Strength, cross-transfer
Received: 18 Apr 2025; Accepted: 27 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Li, Li, Bai and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Tieli Yang, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.