ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Healthcare Professions Education
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1617885
For-Profit Growth and Academic Decline: A Retrospective Nationwide Assessment of Brazilian Medical Schools
Provisionally accepted- 1Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- 2Multinational Organization Network Sponsoring Translational and Epidemiological Research (MONSTER), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The rapid and predominantly for-profit expansion of medical schools in Brazil over the past decade has raised widespread concerns about the erosion of academic standards in medical education.This nationwide, retrospective study analyzed academic performance indicators from all Brazilian medical schools participating in the 2013, 2016, 2019, and 2023 cycles of the National Student Performance Exam (Exame Nacional de Desempenho dos Estudantes -ENADE), a standardized national exam used to assess students' knowledge at the end of undergraduate programs. We also included the Indicator of Difference Between Observed and Expected Performance (Indicador de Diferença entre os Desempenhos Observado e Esperado; IDD), which estimates the value added by institutions by comparing student performance at graduation with their academic background at entry. Data were sourced from publicly available datasets provided by the Brazilian Ministry of Education. We compared trends across public, non-profit private, and for-profit private institutions, using descriptive statistics, non-parametric tests, correlation analysis, and Bayesian mixed-effects regression models to assess the impact of institutional category and class size on academic performance.The number of for-profit medical schools in Brazil nearly doubled between 2013 and 2023. These institutions consistently demonstrated lower ENADE scores compared to public and non-profit peers. Although IDD scores showed some early gains, they declined significantly in 2023, particularly among new medical schools taking the ENADE for the first time, most of which were for-profit. Larger class sizes were negatively correlated with both ENADE and IDD scores. Regression models showed that public institutions outperformed for-profit schools by an average margin of more than 21 ENADE points, while class size emerged as a modest but statistically significant negative predictor of IDD.Our findings reveal that the unregulated expansion of for-profit medical schools in Brazil has been accompanied by a decline in academic performance, as measured by national benchmarks. These patterns suggest a structural misalignment between the commercial logic of expansion and the core educational mission of medical training. Regulatory reforms are urgently needed to realign the growth of medical education with principles of academic quality and social accountability.
Keywords: Medical Education, Brazil, academic performance, Education business, Undergraduate training
Received: 25 Apr 2025; Accepted: 24 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Andrade, Villalva, de Menezes, Quintanilha and Avena. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Bruno B Andrade, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.