Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.

Sec. Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1619188

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvancing Benign Surgery: Techniques, Outcomes, and Educational InnovationsView all 9 articles

Impact of Obesity on Clinical Outcomes of v-NOTES Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Study

Provisionally accepted
Qilin  WangQilin Wang1Yang  LiuYang Liu2Haiying  LIANHaiying LIAN1Feng  PANFeng PAN3Tao  LiTao Li2JunQiang  LIJunQiang LI2*
  • 1West China Longquan Hospital Sichuan University, The First People 's Hospital of Longquanyi District, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
  • 2Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China
  • 3The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Obesity is a global health challenge that complicates gynecological surgery. Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (v-NOTES) offers a minimally invasive approach for total hysterectomy (TH), but its safety and efficacy in obese patients remain underexplored.Objective: To assess the impact of obesity on perioperative and clinical outcomes of v-NOTES hysterectomy, accounting for potential confounders. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 211 patients who underwent v-NOTES TH between January 2021 and September 2024. Patients were categorized into two groups based on BMI: control group (BMI < 28 kg/m 2 , n = 112) and obesity group (BMI ≥ 28 kg/m 2 , n = 99). Intraoperative indicators and postoperative outcomes during hospitalization, including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, gastrointestinal recovery, hospital stay, and postoperative complications, were compared.Multivariable regression analysis was used to adjust for confounders. All patients were followed up during hospitalization and at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively.Obese patients had significantly longer operative times (β = 39.2, P < 0.001), delayed gastrointestinal recovery (time to first flatus: β = 5.8, P = 0.018), and prolonged hospital stays (β = 1.3, P = 0.002).Obese patients had significantly longer operative times (β = 39.2, P < 0.001), delayed gastrointestinal recovery (time to first flatus: β = 5.8, P = 0.018), and prolonged hospital stays (β = 1.3, P = 0.002). No significant differences were found in intraoperative blood loss, conversion rates, blood transfusion, postoperative complication rates, or total hospitalization costs (limited to the inpatient period) (all P > 0.05).v-NOTES hysterectomy is a safe and effective option for obese patients, with comparable complication rates to non-obese patients. However, obesity independently contributes to longer operative times and delayed recovery. Targeted perioperative strategies, particularly for improving gastrointestinal recovery, could enhance outcomes in this population.

Keywords: Obesity, vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, Total hysterectomy, postoperative recovery, Retrospective study

Received: 27 Apr 2025; Accepted: 11 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Liu, LIAN, PAN, Li and LI. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: JunQiang LI, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.