Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.

Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1630871

This article is part of the Research TopicClinical Advances in Acid-base Physiology and Hydroelectrolyte BalanceView all 4 articles

Mathematical Correction of the Effects of Storage Time and Gas Contamination on Blood Sample Measurements

Provisionally accepted
Bahareh  NevirianBahareh Nevirian1*Lars  Pilegaard ThomsenLars Pilegaard Thomsen1Steen  Kåre FagerbergSteen Kåre Fagerberg2,3Jette  NyboJette Nybo2,4Mette  Krogh PedersenMette Krogh Pedersen3Kjeld  Asbjørn Jensen DamgaardKjeld Asbjørn Jensen Damgaard3Lisha  ShastriLisha Shastri1Søren  Risom KristensenSøren Risom Kristensen2,4Stephen  Edward ReesStephen Edward Rees1*
  • 1Aalborg University, Respiratory and Critical Care (Rcare) Group, Aalborg, Denmark
  • 2Aalborg University, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg, Denmark
  • 3Aalborg University Hospital, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Aalborg, Denmark
  • 4Aalborg University Hospital, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aalborg, Denmark

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: Analysis delay and gas contamination can affect the accuracy of blood measurements. This study uses a mathematical model of blood acid-base chemistry and gas in the sample tubes to calculate values of pH, pCO2, pO2, SO2, glucose, and lactate at sample time from measurements with delayed analysis and gas contamination. Methods: Data were analyzed from two published studies. Study 1: samples were obtained from thirty critically ill patients in standard blood gas syringes and analyzed after 0, 36, 54, 72, 90, 108, 126, 144, 162, and 180 minutes. Study 2: samples were taken from 20 healthy participants in standard blood gas syringes and vacuum tubes (2 mL and 4 mL) and analyzed after 0, 20, and 90 minutes. Calculated values from the mathematical model were compared to measured values at sample time. Result: For delay of up to 90 minutes, the accuracy (mean) and precision (SD) of values calculated at the sample time using syringes and 4 mL vacuum tubes remained within clinically acceptable limits when compared to measured values, with the exception of SO₂ in vacuum tubes. Values represent the mean difference ± standard deviation of the difference between calculated and measured values. For syringes pH=-0.004±0.011, pCO₂ =0.08±0.18 kPa, pO₂ =0.05±0.34 kPa, SO₂ =0.39±2.21 %, Glucose =0.07±0.35 mmol/L, Lactate =0.13±0.22 mmol/L, and for 4 mL vacuum tubes pH=0.006±0.007, pCO₂=-0.07±0.11 kPa, pO₂=-0.37±0.34 kPa, SO₂=-7.79±4.95 %, Glucose=0.01±0.11 mmol/L, Lactate=-0.00±0.20 mmol/L. 2 mL vacuum tubes had poorer accuracy and precision when compared to syringes and 4 mL vacuum tubes in a subset of cases. Conclusion: This study has shown that a mathematical model can calculate accurate and precise values at sample time following delayed analysis for both standard blood gas syringes and some vacuum tubes. This method may have clinical application in improving the logistics of blood sampling and analysis.

Keywords: acid-base, mathematical modelling, Analysis delay, Gas contamination, Venous blood sampling

Received: 18 May 2025; Accepted: 05 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Nevirian, Pilegaard Thomsen, Kåre Fagerberg, Nybo, Krogh Pedersen, Asbjørn Jensen Damgaard, Shastri, Risom Kristensen and Edward Rees. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Bahareh Nevirian, Aalborg University, Respiratory and Critical Care (Rcare) Group, Aalborg, Denmark
Stephen Edward Rees, Aalborg University, Respiratory and Critical Care (Rcare) Group, Aalborg, Denmark

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.