ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Hepatobiliary Diseases
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1633837
Comparison of Sarcopenia Screening Indices Using Serum Creatinine and Cystatin C in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Hanyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- 2Department of Pharmacology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- 3College of Pharmacy, Daegu Catholic University, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and sarcopenia share underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and can bidirectionally influence the development and progression of each other. Diagnosing sarcopenia in individuals with MASLD is challenging due to overlapping symptoms and the frequent requirement for expensive, specialized equipment for muscle mass assessment. Therefore, accessible screening methods are crucial. Serum indices based on creatinine (Cr) and cystatin C (CysC), including Calculated Body Muscle Mass (CBMM), Sarcopenia Index (SI), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ratio, have emerged as potential biomarkers for sarcopenia. This study aimed to compare the performance of these serum indices in screening for low skeletal muscle index (SMI) among patients with MASLD. Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled 146 participants with MASLD. Anthropometric and laboratory data were collected. The CBMM, SI, and eGFR ratios were calculated using serum Cr and CysC levels. Low SMI was determined using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) according to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) 2019 criteria. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the correlations between serum indices and SMI. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the discriminative ability of these serum indices for detecting low SMI. Furthermore, machine learning models (Linear Regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost), coupled with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis, were employed to evaluate the importance of these indices in predicting low SMI. Results: Patients with higher fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) scores (≥2.67) had a significantly higher prevalence of low SMI. CBMM demonstrated the strongest correlation with SMI (R²=0.4306, p<0.0001) and the best discriminative ability for low SMI (Area under ROC: 0.9149 for males and 0.9444 for females) compared with SI and eGFR ratio. Machine learning models consistently identified CBMM as the most important feature for predicting SMI based on the SHAP analysis. These findings suggest that CBMM, derived from readily available serum markers, could serve as a valuable initial screening tool for identifying MASLD patients at risk of sarcopenia who may benefit from further assessment and early interventions.
Keywords: MASLD, Sarcopenia, Creatinine, Cystatin C, Muscle mass estimation
Received: 23 May 2025; Accepted: 28 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Hwang, Lee, Kim and Lee. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Yun Kim, College of Pharmacy, Daegu Catholic University, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea
Sang Won Lee, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Hanyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.