In the published article, there was an error in [Figure 1. Flowchart of patient recruitment] as published. [A total of 322 patients enrolled in the study(including 122 benign tomors and 210 malignany tumors), Train set (n = 257) Benign = 96, malignant = 161].
The corrected [Figure 1. Flowchart of patient recruitment] and its caption [Figure 1. Flowchart of patient recruitment. A total of 322 patients enrolled in the study (including 112 benign tumors and 210 malignancy tumors), with the training set (n = 257) consisting of 89 benign tumors and 168 malignant tumors.]
Figure 1
Flowchart of patient recruitment. A total of 322 patients enrolled in the study (including 112 benign tumors and 210 malignancy tumors), with the training set (n = 257) consisting of 89 benign tumors and 168 malignant tumors.
In the published article, there was an error in [Table 1, Characteristics of breast tumors in this study: in the training columns, Benign: 96(37.4%), Malignant: 161(62.6%)] as published.
The corrected [Table 1. Characteristics of breast tumors in this study. Benign: 89 (34.6%), malignant: 168 (65.4%)], and its caption [in the training columns] appears below.
Table 1
| Characteristics | Training (n = 257) | Testing (n = 65) | Values | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Menstrual status | 89 (34.6%) | 23 (35.4%) | χ2 = 3.078 | 0.079 |
| Age (years) | 50.31 ± 11.57 | 51.08 ± 10.72 | t = 0.486 | 0.627 |
| Diameter (mm) | 19.94 ± 11.27 | 22.78 ± 10.01 | t = 1.476 | 0.141 |
| CA-153 | 19.76 ± 8.97 | 20.52 ± 10.27 | t = 0.593 | 0.554 |
| BI-RADS category | χ2 = 6.080 | 0.108 | ||
| 1–3 | 57 (22.2%) | 24 (36.9%) | - | - |
| 4 (4a,4b,4c) | 138 (53.7%) | 28 (43.1%) | - | - |
| 5 | 44 (17.1%) | 8 (12.3%) | - | - |
| 6 | 18 (7.0%) | 5 (7.7%) | ||
| Pathology | χ2 = 0.087 | 0.768 | ||
| Benign | 89 (34.6%) | 23 (35.4%) | - | - |
| Malignant | 168 (65.4%) | 42 (64.6%) | - | - |
Characteristics of breast tumours in this study.
In the published article, there was an error. In Section 2.1 Patient population was published with 257 patients (96 with benign breast tumours and 161 with malignant breast tumours) enrolled in the training cohort. The corrected sentence appears below: [The training cohort included 257 patients (89 with benign and 168 with malignant breast tumors)]”.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
deep learning, radiomics, multimodality imaging, breast tumours, deep learning radiomics, MRI, Mammography, Ultrosonography
Citation
Lu G, Tian R, Yang W, Liu R, Liu D, Xiang Z and Zhang G (2025) Correction: Deep learning radiomics based on multimodal imaging for distinguishing benign and malignant breast tumours. Front. Med. 12:1635819. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1635819
Received
27 May 2025
Accepted
02 June 2025
Published
23 June 2025
Volume
12 - 2025
Edited and reviewed by
Minjeong Kim, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Lu, Tian, Yang, Liu, Liu, Xiang and Zhang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Guoxu Zhang zhangguoxu_502@163.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.