Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.

Sec. Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1643142

Duration of Labor Stages and Pregnancy Outcomes in Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis

Provisionally accepted
  • Gynecology and Obstetrics department, Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Center Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: This study aimed to characterize the labor duration distribution and evaluate maternal-neonatal outcomes of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) under epidural anesthesia. Method: In this retrospective comparative study, we analyzed 156 term singleton VBAC cases with epidural anesthesia at Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital (January 2021-December 2024), matched 1:1 by age to nulliparous controls. Comparative analyses of baseline characteristics, pregnancy complications, delivery modes, pregnancy outcomes, and labor durations were performed using independent t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and χ²/Fisher's exact tests. VBAC cases were stratified by prior labor attempt (n=25 with vs. n=131 without) to assess its impact on labor progression, with Spearman tests evaluating inter-stage correlations. Results: Demonstrated that VBAC cases had significantly higher median 24h postpartum blood loss (330 vs. 250 mL), postpartum hemorrhage rates (43% vs. 20%), and neonatal NICU admission rates (10% vs. 2%) compared to nulliparous controls (all P<0.05). The 95th percentile durations for VBAC were 730 minutes (first stage) and 81 minutes (second stage), both significantly shorter than controls (P<0.05), while third-stage durations were comparable (95th percentile: 11 vs. 10 minutes, P>0.05). Prior labor attempt did not influence VBAC labor progression (P>0.05). Positive correlations existed between first and second stages in both groups (r=0.297, P=0.002). Conclusion: These results suggest that VBAC under epidural anesthesia may progress faster through first and second stages of labor than nulliparous deliveries but carries higher risks of adverse outcomes. Clinical management should integrate multifactorial assessment, warranting further investigation into labor patterns and outcome relationships.

Keywords: Labor duration, Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC), pregnancy outcomes, Postpartumhemorrhage, Epidural anesthesia

Received: 11 Jun 2025; Accepted: 21 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhu, Luo, Li and Xiong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Liling Xiong, 1029750177@qq.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.