Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Med.

Sec. Nephrology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1643415

This article is part of the Research TopicManagement of Patients with Dialysis Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease (DD-CKD)View all 5 articles

Vitamin D and Chronic Kidney Disease: Mechanisms, Clinical Implications, and Future Perspectives

Provisionally accepted
  • The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Vitamin D deficiency is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Vitamin D/vitamin D receptor (VDR) signaling intersects inflammation, oxidative stress/mitochondrial injury, fibrogenic pathways, the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS), and the gut–kidney axis, providing a biologic rationale for renoprotection. Methods: Narrative review; literature identified from PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library (January 2000–August 2025). Adult CKD populations (non-dialysis, dialysis, transplant) were included. Outcomes covered biologic/surrogate (e.g., proteinuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] slope) and hard endpoints (kidney failure, major cardiovascular events, fractures, mortality). Results/Interpretation: Nutritional vitamin D reliably corrects deficiency and improves laboratory profiles; VDR activators (VDRAs) suppress secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). However, consistent benefits on hard outcomes have not been demonstrated across CKD settings, likely reflecting heterogeneity (baseline vitamin D status, stage, co-therapies, endpoints) and formulation/dosing differences (D₃ vs D₂; cholecalciferol vs calcifediol; steady vs bolus). Safety considerations (hypercalcemia/mineral imbalance) apply to active agents and high-dose bolus regimens. Conclusions: A pragmatic approach is warranted: replete deficiency with nutritional vitamin D (prefer D₃; consider calcifediol when faster repletion or persistent SHPT is relevant), avoid mega-bolus dosing, and reserve active VDRAs for clear SHPT indications with careful calcium– phosphate–parathyroid hormone (PTH) monitoring—rather than positioning vitamin D as disease-modifying therapy for unselected CKD. Future trials should enrich truly deficient, higher-risk phenotypes, standardize regimens, and prioritize event-driven hard endpoints with embedded mechanistic markers to confirm on-target biology.

Keywords: Vitamin D, Chronic Kidney Disease, vitamin D receptor protein, renal fibrosis, Inflammation

Received: 08 Jun 2025; Accepted: 25 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Yuan, Wu and Ou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Santao Ou, ousantao@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.