Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med., 26 August 2025

Sec. Ophthalmology

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1645015

This article is part of the Research TopicImaging in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Eye DiseasesView all 33 articles

Differences in macular structure and microvasculature between high myopia and non-high myopia

Qin Chen&#x;Qin Chen1Keyao Song&#x;Keyao Song2Qing CunQing Cun2Wenyan YangWenyan Yang2Yijin TaoYijin Tao2Hua ZhongHua Zhong2Shitou Lv
Shitou Lv3*Chaoxu Qian,
Chaoxu Qian4,5*
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
  • 2Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
  • 3Department of Ophthalmology, The People’s Hospital of Mengzi, Mengzi, China
  • 4Aier School of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, China
  • 5Aier Eye Hospital Group, Shanghai Aier Eye Hospital, Shanghai, China

Purpose: To investigate the retinal and choroidal morphological and microvascular changes in myopic eyes using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).

Methods: In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, 142 eyes from 84 myopic patients were categorized into two groups based on spherical equivalent (SE): high myopia (HM; SE ≤ −6.0 D, 72 eyes) and non-high myopia (NHM; −6.0 D < SE ≤ −0.5 D, 70 eyes) groups. OCTA-derived parameters, including foveal retinal thickness (RT), choroidal thickness (CT), superficial retinal vessel density (SRVD) and deep retinal vessel density (DRVD), choriocapillaris density (CCD), and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area and perimeter, were analyzed.

Results: The mean SE was −10.16 ± 3.55 D in the HM group and −3.86 ± 1.60 D in the NHM group. RT measurements revealed substantial increases in HM eyes, including total foveal (276.4 ± 36.1 μm vs. 250.1 ± 23.3 μm; p < 0.01), parafoveal (348.0 ± 23.0 μm vs. 329.7 ± 20.8 μm; p < 0.01), and perifoveal regions (304.9 ± 25.1 μm vs. 290.6 ± 15.5 μm; p < 0.01). Retinal vascular analysis showed reduced SRVD in the fovea with borderline significance (14.9 ± 7.1% vs. 17.9 ± 7.4%; p = 0.05), while DRVD showed a non-significant reduction (31.4 ± 10.1% vs. 37.8 ± 24.0%; p > 0.05). HM eyes exhibited significant choroidal thinning (169.2 ± 74.0 μm vs. 222.4 ± 70.7 μm; p < 0.01) and decreased CCD (55.7 ± 3.1% vs. 58.0 ± 2.6%; p < 0.01). The FAZ displayed a larger area (0.4 ± 0.4 mm2 vs. 0.3 ± 0.1 mm2; p = 0.07) and perimeter (2.5 ± 1.1 mm vs. 2.1 ± 0.4 mm; p < 0.05) in HM subjects.

Conclusion: High myopia is associated with distinct retinal and choroidal alterations, including increased RT, reduced CT and CCD, and enlarged FAZ, suggesting progressive microvascular and structural remodeling with myopia severity.

Introduction

Myopia is a global public health concern, with projections suggesting that it will affect nearly half of the world’s population by 2050, of whom 9.8% will have high myopia (HM) (1). HM is a significant risk factor for vision-threatening complications due to its association with retinal and choroidal pathologies, including myopic maculopathy, choroidal atrophy, and retinal detachment (2). Despite its clinical importance, the morphological and microvascular changes in the retina and choroid of myopic eyes remain poorly understood, with conflicting evidence in the literature.

Morphological changes within the retina and choroid are significantly linked to high myopia (3). Structural changes in the posterior segment of the eye caused by HM, such as posterior staphyloma, retinal atrophy, and myopic maculopathy, contribute to irreversible visual impairment (4). While retinal thickness has been reported to vary with myopia severity, the relationship between macular intraretinal layer thickness, microvascular alterations, and functional visual outcomes remains unclear (5). The choroid, a critical vascular layer supplying the outer retina, is increasingly recognized as a key player in the regulation of myopia development and progression (6). Historically, technical limitations hindered detailed choroidal assessment, but recent advances in imaging have revealed its role in myopia-associated changes, though findings remain inconsistent.

Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) has revolutionized non-invasive imaging by enabling the simultaneous evaluation of retinal and choroidal morphology and microvasculature. Prior studies using OCTA reported conflicting results: most observed reduced retinal vessel density and choriocapillaris density (CCD) among patient in the HM group compared to those in the non-high myopia (NHM) group (5, 714), while others found no significant differences in retinal vessel density (15, 16) or CCD (17). These discrepancies may arise from variations in study design, sample characteristics, or imaging protocols, underscoring the need for further investigation.

Elucidating the structural and microvascular changes in myopia could provide insights into strategies for mitigating its progression and complications. In this study, we quantitatively compared macular retinal/choroidal thickness, vessel density, and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) parameters between HM and NHM patients to clarify these relationships.

Methods

This retrospective, cross-sectional study included patients with high myopia, from the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Age- and gender-matched patients with mild to moderate myopia were enrolled as controls during the same period. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committees of both institutions and complied with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Study eyes were divided into two groups based on spherical equivalents (SE), calculated as the spherical dioptric power plus one-half of the cylindrical dioptric power. Eyes with SE ≤ −6.00 diopters (D) were categorized as HM, while eyes with SE > −6.00 D and ≤ − 0.50 D were designated as NHM, which was also considered the control group. The exclusion criteria included astigmatism greater than 2.00 D, intraocular pressure (IOP) exceeding 21 mmHg, history of ocular trauma, intraocular surgery, retinal disease, any ocular or systemic disorders that might affect ocular circulation, and participants unable to complete the OCTA examination.

All subjects underwent comprehensive ocular examinations including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), slit-lamp examination, fundoscopy, refractive status assessed by an automatic refractometer (KR-8900; Topcon, Tokyo, Japan), non-contact tonometry (CT-1P; Topcon, Tokyo, Japan) for IOP, fundus photography (Visucam 200; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Germany) after cycloplegia, and axial length (AL) measurement via optical biometry (IOL Master; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany).

After pupillary dilation, OCTA scans of the macular regions were obtained using a commercially available RTVue XR OCT (Optovue, Fremont, California, USA) with the HD Angio retina mode (6 × 6 mm). The technique of OCTA has been described in detail previously (5, 713, 1517). Automatic segmentation by the inbuilt software generated en face projection images of superficial retinal vessel density (SRVD), deep retinal vessel density (DRVD), and choriocapillaris density (CCD). Image quality control excluded scans with signal strength index less than six, segmentation errors, motion, and decentration artifacts. Magnification effects due to axial length were corrected using Littman’s formula and Bennett’s algorithm (18). Briefly, according to Littman’s formula, the true size t of a retinal feature on an OCTA image can be expressed as t = p × q × s, where p is a constant value of 3.382, q is the magnification factor related to the eye, and s is the measurement. The factor q can be determined by Bennett’s formula: q = 0.01306 × (x − 1.82), where x is the axial length.

The FAZ metrics, including area (mm2) and perimeter (mm), were automatically generated by the built-in software. Similarly, the superficial and deep retinal vessel densities and retinal thickness measurements for the foveal, parafoveal, and perifoveal regions were automatically calculated by the system’s proprietary algorithms. Choroidal thickness was manually measured on enhanced HD line chorioretinal B-scans, with measurements taken from Bruch’s membrane to the choroid-sclera interface at the foveal center. All manual measurements were performed by an experienced ophthalmologist (K. S.) and verified by a senior ophthalmologist (H. Z.) to ensure accuracy.

For CCD analysis, OCTA images were processed using ImageJ software (version 1.53, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The 6 × 6 mm images were output from the instrument and were analyzed using the Phansalkar method with a default window radius of 15 pixels. The images were first converted to 8-bit format and subsequently binarized using the Phansalkar method (19). CCD, calculated as 1.0 minus the flow deficit density, was performed using the “Analyze Particles” command (Figure 1) (13, 19).

Figure 1
Electron microscopy images labeled A and B. Image A shows a dense, textured pattern with fine granularity, while Image B displays a similar pattern but appears more pixelated and contrasted. Both images have a scale bar in the lower left corner.

Figure 1. Quantitative analysis of choriocapillaris vessel density using OCT angiography. (A) Original 6 × 6 mm en face OCTA projection image of the choriocapillaris layer. (B) Corresponding binarized image generated using the Phansalkar method in ImageJ software (version 1.53; National Institutes of Health), demonstrating the flow signal used for choriocapillaris density (CCD) calculation. CCD was quantified as 1.0 minus flow deficit density using the analyze particles function.

Statistical analysis

Given the limitations of previous evidence, we applied the preliminary data to estimate the sample size. In our preliminary data analysis, the CT exhibited the highest variability among the measured parameters. The mean CT values were 210 μm in the NHM group and 180 μm in the HM group, with a comparable SD of 60 μm in both groups. With the power set at 80% and α at 0.05, the estimated sample size was 64 for each group, and the total sample size was 128. In our study, the eyes enrolled for analysis were 172, exceeding the calculated minimum. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 25.0 (SPSS, Inc., IBM Corporation, Chicago, IL, USA). The normality of data distribution was evaluated using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Continuous variables with a normal distribution were compared between the HM and NHM groups using linear mixed-effect models, after adjusting for the clustering effect between eyes within the same person by controlling for the covariates. The Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to examine the relationships between SE and each parameter. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics

A total of 142 eyes from 84 myopic patients were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 33.6 ± 13.1 years. The demographic and clinical information of the study population is presented in Table 1. The eyes were stratified into two groups based on SE: the high myopia group (HM, SE ≤ −6.0 D, 72 eyes) and the non-high myopia group (NHM, −6.0 D < SE ≤ −0.5 D, 70 eyes). The HM group demonstrated significantly greater AL and worse BCVA compared to the NHM group (p < 0.01).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics stratified by spherical equivalent.

Retinal thickness and vessel density between HM and NHM eyes

The macular RT measurements were consistently greater in the HM group compared to NHM controls, with significant differences observed in the total foveal (276.4 ± 36.1 μm vs. 250.1 ± 23.3 μm; p < 0.01), parafoveal (348.0 ± 23.0 μm vs. 329.7 ± 20.8 μm; p < 0.01), and perifoveal (304.9 ± 25.1 μm vs. 290.6 ± 15.5 μm; p < 0.01) regions. Layer-specific analysis revealed that the outer retinal layers were significantly thicker in the HM group compared to the NHM eyes (230.3 ± 25.8 μm vs. 208.7 ± 15.4 μm; p < 0.01). While the inner retinal layers showed a similar trend toward increased thickness in HM eyes (58.7 ± 15.0 μm vs. 53.9 ± 9.2 μm), this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.09) (Figure 2).

Figure 2
Bar chart comparing retinal thickness in micrometers between non-highly myopic (NHM) and highly myopic (HM) groups across five regions: total foveal, parafoveal, perifoveal, inner foveal, and outer foveal. Significant differences are indicated by asterisks, with NHM generally having lower retinal thickness compared to HM.

Figure 2. The histogram plot of retinal thickness. Comparative analysis of retinal thickness profiles between the high myopia (HM) and non-high myopia (NHM) groups. Histogram illustrates thickness measurements (μm) across different macular regions, demonstrating significant differences between the two groups. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.

Quantitative analysis revealed significantly reduced SRVD in the HM group compared to the NHM control group across all macular regions. The foveal SRVD demonstrated a borderline significant reduction in HM eyes (14.9 ± 7.1% vs. 17.9 ± 7.4%; p = 0.05), while more pronounced decreases were observed in both the parafovea (43.2 ± 6.4% vs. 48.1 ± 5.6%; p < 0.01) and perifovea (45.0 ± 5.0% vs. 48.1 ± 4.2%; p < 0.01) regions (Figure 3).

Figure 3
Bar graph comparing superficial retinal vessel density (SRVD) in foveal, parafoveal, and perifoveal regions for NHM and HM groups. NHM shows higher SRVD in parafoveal and perifoveal regions with significant differences (indicated by double asterisks) compared to HM.

Figure 3. The histogram plot of superficial retinal vessel density (SRVD). Comparative analysis of SRVD between the high myopia (HM) and non-high myopia (NHM) groups. Histogram displays SRVD (%) measurements across different macular regions, demonstrating reductions in HM eyes versus NHM controls. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.

Similarly, DRVD in the HM group was reduced in the fovea (31.4 ± 10.1%), parafoveal (49.1 ± 6.4%), and perifovea (41.5 ± 5.6%) regions compared to the NHM control group (fovea: 37.8 ± 24.0%; parafoveal: 55.8 ± 31.2%, and perifovea: 49.1 ± 29.1%). These differences did not reach statistical significance, p > 0.05 (Figure 4).

Figure 4
Bar graph comparing deep retinal vascular density (DRVD) percentages across three regions: foveal, parafoveal, and perifoveal. NHM is shown in black, and HM in gray. NHM values are generally higher in all regions.

Figure 4. The histogram plot of deep retinal vessel density (DRVD). Comparative analysis of DRVD profiles between the high myopia (HM) and non-high myopia (NHM) groups. Histogram illustrates regional DRVD (%) measurements, showing reductions in HM eyes versus NHM controls, although observed difference did not reach statistical significance.

Choroidal thickness and choriocapillaris density between HM and NHM eyes

A total of 142 B-scans were taken and used for analysis. The total average CT was 195.5 ± 76.9 μm. The CT in the HM group (169.2 ± 74.0 μm) demonstrated significant thinning compared to the NHM control group (222.4 ± 70.7 μm; p < 0.01, Figure 5A). The CCD in the HM group (55.7 ± 3.1%) was significantly lower than that in the NHM control group (58.0 ± 2.6%, p < 0.01, Figure 5B).

Figure 5
Bar graphs A and B compare NHM and HM. A shows choroidal thickness, with NHM significantly thicker than HM. B displays choriocapillaris density, also higher in NHM. Both differences are statistically significant, marked by a double asterisk.

Figure 5. The histogram plot of choroid thickness (CT) and choriocapillaris density (CCD). Quantitative comparison of choroidal parameters between the high myopia (HM) and non-high myopia (NHM) groups. (A) CT measurements show significant thinning in HM eyes. (B) CCD demonstrating reduced vascular perfusion in the HM group. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.

Foveal avascular zone characteristics between HM and NHM eyes

The FAZ metrics exhibited enlargement of eyes in the HM group compared to eyes in the NHM group, with both area (0.4 ± 0.4 mm2 vs. 0.3 ± 0.1 mm2; p = 0.07) and perimeter (2.5 ± 1.1 mm vs. 2.1 ± 0.4 mm; p < 0.05) demonstrating measurable increases (Table 2).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. The area and perimeter of FAZ in high myopia and non-high myopia eyes.

The correlation between SE and each parameter

For the total of 142 myopic eyes, SE showed significant negative correlations with BCVA (r = −0.73, p < 0.01), RT (r = −0.60, p < 0.01), FAZ area (r = −0.30, p < 0.01), and FAZ perimeter (r = −0.26, p < 0.01). Conversely, SE demonstrated significant positive correlations with CT (r = 0.46, p < 0.01), CCD (r = 0.48, p < 0.01), SRVD (r = 0.53, p < 0.01), and DRVD (r = 0.46, p < 0.01) (Figure 6).

Figure 6
Eight scatter plots showing correlations between SE (D) and various eye-related parameters. A: BCVA with a correlation of -0.73. B: Retinal thickness, r = -0.60. C: FAZ Area, r = -0.30. D: FAZ Perimeter, r = -0.26. E: Choroidal thickness, r = 0.46. F: Choriocapillaris density, r = 0.48. G: SRVD, r = 0.53. H: DRVD, r = 0.46. Each plot demonstrates a line of best fit indicating the direction and strength of the correlation.

Figure 6. The correlation between spherical equivalent (SE) and ocular parameters. SE exhibits negative correlations with best correct visual acuity (BCVA), retinal thickness, and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area and perimeter, while showing positive correlations with choroidal thickness, choriocapillaris density, superficial retinal vessel density (SRVD) and deep retinal vessel density (DRVD). All correlations are statistically significant (p < 0.01).

Discussion

Our study reveals significant microvascular and structural alterations distinguishing HM eyes from NHM eyes. Specifically, HM eyes exhibited reduced retinal vessel density in both superficial and deep vascular plexuses, decreased CCD, and thinner subfoveal CT, while demonstrating increased subfoveal RT and enlarged FAZ dimensions compared to NHM controls. The observed patterns of retinal and choroidal vascular attenuation, coupled with FAZ enlargement, suggest that microvascular insufficiency may represent both a biomarker and a potential mechanistic factor in high myopia development.

Previous investigations have consistently demonstrated the critical role of choroidal changes in myopia development. As the primary vascular supply for the outer retina, the choroid exhibits remarkable plasticity in response to refractive demands (6). Animal studies first established this relationship in the 1990s, showing choroidal thickness modulation in response to optical defocus in avian models (20). Subsequent human studies by Read et al. (21) confirmed similar choroidal adaptations, supporting the choroid’s active role in emmetropization and myopia development.

The choriocapillaris, the innermost layer of the choroidal vasculature, consists of a small diameter and fenestrated capillaries located beneath Bruch’s membrane. Historically, technical limitations in imaging modalities constrained our understanding of choriocapillaris function. While indocyanine green angiography (ICG) has served as a primary choroidal imaging technique, its invasive nature and its inability to specifically isolate the choriocapillaris layer have restricted its utility. The advent of OCTA has revolutionized this field by enabling non-invasive, high-resolution visualization of choroidal vasculatures. Recent advances in image processing, particularly binarization techniques, have facilitated quantitative assessment of choroidal vascular luminal area, thereby extending our analytical capabilities beyond simple thickness measurements to explore potential correlations between microvascular alterations and myopic progression (19, 22).

Our findings demonstrate significant reductions in both choroidal thickness and CCD in HM eyes compared to NHM controls, aligning with established literature documenting an inverse relationship between choroidal thickness and myopia progression (23). This choroidal attenuation appears to be progressive, with studies showing decreasing thickness correlating with both myopia onset and severity (24). Current evidence consistently identifies choroidal thinning as a hallmark structural alteration in myopia (23), with particular significance in HM, where marked thinning has been established as an early and characteristic change (6). Wu et al. developed an artificial intelligence-based architecture for choroid segmentation, offering a simple approach to revealing morphological changes in myopia (25). Recent investigations utilizing OCTA quantification of choriocapillaris flow deficit percentage (CC FD%)—representing regions of subthreshold or impaired blood flow—have reported elevated CC FD% in HM eyes (10, 14). OCTA also revealed significant reductions in both choroidal thickness and circulation in eyes with greater myopic refraction among anisomyopic subjects (26). Supporting evidence from chick myopia models revealed that choriocapillaris alterations are followed by a decrease in choroidal blood flow (27), suggesting that choroidal thinning might be associated with decreased blood flow (23, 24). While Yang et al. attributed these vascular changes primarily to vessel diameter constriction (28), other studies suggested that these changes were associated with reductions in vascular density, stromal components, and choriocapillaris thinning itself (10, 29).

Our study revealed significantly greater retinal thickness in the foveal, parafoveal, and perifoveal regions of HM patients compared to NHM controls after ocular magnification adjustment (all p < 0.05). These findings corroborate evidence from existing literature demonstrating retinal thickening associated with higher myopic degrees (3032). Kim et al. specifically documented increased thickness across all individual retinal layers throughout the macular region in HM versus NHM subjects (30). Population-level evidence from Duan et al.’s study of 6,830 Chinese adults further supports this relationship, showing positive correlations between axial length and macular thickness (31). Longitudinal data from pediatric cohorts additionally confirm progressive macular thickening accompanying myopia progression (32). While generally consistent with these reports, our results partially contrast with the findings by Liu et al. (33), who found that some retinal layers increased but not the total mean retinal thickness, with a higher myopia. Another study found that the RT decreased with myopia progression (34). However, this study utilized 12 × 12 mm imaging without accounting for magnification effects, potentially confounding the results. The relationship between RT and myopia remains controversial. Our study demonstrates that high myopia tends to increase macular RT. The underlying mechanisms for this association remain unclear. High myopia may be associated with more segmentation errors because long AL induced morphological changes. To minimize these segmentation artefacts, all automated segmentation lines by the instrument were manually verified by two experienced ophthalmologists, with special attention given to high myopic eyes with staphyloma. Magnification correction plays an important role in calculating the actual measurements. Kang et al. (35) demonstrated that scan circle magnification exceeds 5% in eyes with myopia exceeding −4.00 D and recommended that ocular magnification adjustment should be considered when myopia exceeds −4.00 D. The observed retinal thickening in HM may be explained by the differential axial elongation effects across retinal regions—while equatorial and per-equatorial areas demonstrate marked changes, foveal thickness remains relatively stable (36), supporting the concept of macular thickness independence from axial length variations (4).

Our study additionally demonstrated significantly larger FAZ dimensions (both area and perimeter) in HM patients compared to NHM controls, aligning with previous reports of FAZ enlargement in high myopia (37). These findings are substantiated by a dedicated FAZ analysis study involving 106 healthy myopic participants stratified by axial length quartiles, where the upper quartile (HM group) exhibited significantly greater FAZ parameters than the lower quartile (NHM group) when measured by OCTA (37). Further supporting evidence has been gathered from studies documenting concurrent FAZ area enlargement and macular VD reduction (38), suggesting that FAZ characteristics may serve as an indirect indicator of retinal perfusion status. The observed FAZ changes may result from mechanical vascular trunk displacement during axial elongation, potentially leading to compromised blood flow. However, our results contrast with those of Zivkovic et al. (39), who reported no significant FAZ differences between myopic and control eyes. However, they obtained the measurements without adjusting the magnification.

Several limitations should be acknowledged in the current investigation. First, the retrospective cross-sectional design and relatively small sample size constrain our ability to establish causal relationships between observed microvascular and structural changes in myopic eyes. Future prospective studies with larger cohorts are warranted to validate these findings and elucidate potential causal mechanisms. Second, methodological variations in imaging protocols may affect the comparability of the results. While our analysis utilized 6 × 6 mm en face OCTA scans, other studies have employed different field sizes (e.g., 3 × 3 mm, 12 × 12 mm central 1-mm macular zone) (12, 34, 40). These technical differences in scan dimensions could influence vessel density measurements and limit direct comparisons across studies. Third, our study did not specifically assess intra-or inter-grader repeatability for CT. However, we implemented rigorous quality control protocols. All manual measurements were performed by an experienced ophthalmologist (K. S.) and subsequently verified by a senior ophthalmologist (H. Z.) to ensure measurement accuracy.

In summary, our OCTA-based investigation, incorporating appropriate magnification adjustment, revealed distinct microvascular and structural alterations in HM eyes compared to NHM controls. High myopia is associated with distinct retinal and choroidal alterations, including increased RT, reduced CT and CCD, and enlarged FAZ, suggesting progressive microvascular and structural remodeling with myopia severity. The identified patterns of vascular attenuation and structural remodeling provide valuable insights for developing targeted strategies to monitor and potentially mitigate myopia-related complications. However, future prospective studies with larger cohorts are required to validate these findings and elucidate the precise mechanisms underlying these observed changes.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University and The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (ID: 2020-SR-339). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Author contributions

QCh: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. KS: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. QCu: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Data curation. WY: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Data curation. YT: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Data curation. HZ: Investigation, Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition. SL: Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation. CQ: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Project administration, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. The work was supported by Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2023JJ70013), Shanghai Xuhui District Medical Research Project (SHXH202317), the Clinic Research Foundation of Aier Eye Hospital Group (AGK2306D03), Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department-Kunming Medical University Applied Basic Research Joint Special Project (202001AY070001-210), and First-Class Discipline Team of Kunming Medical University (2024XKTDTS01).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; RT, retinal thickness; CT, choroidal thickness; CC FD%, choriocapillaris flow deficit percentage; CCD, choriocapillaris density; SRVD, superficial retinal vessel density; DRVD, deep retinal vessel density; FAZ, foveal avascular zone; HM, high myopia; NHM, non-high myopia; IOP, intraocular pressure; OCTA, optical coherence angiography; SE, spherical equivalent.

References

1. Holden, BA, Fricke, TR, Wilson, DA, Jong, M, Naidoo, KS, Sankaridurg, P, et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. (2016) 123:1036–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Jones, D, and Luensmann, D. The prevalence and impact of high myopia. Eye Contact Lens. (2012) 38:188–96. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31824ccbc3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Ohno-Matsui, K, Wu, PC, Yamashiro, K, Vutipongsatorn, K, Fang, Y, Cheung, CMG, et al. Imi pathologic myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2021) 62:5. doi: 10.1167/iovs.62.5.5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Jonas, JB, Wang, YX, Dong, L, Guo, Y, and Panda-Jonas, S. Advances in myopia research anatomical findings in highly myopic eyes. Eye Vis (Lond). (2020) 7:45. doi: 10.1186/s40662-020-00210-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Venkatesh, R, Sinha, S, Gangadharaiah, D, Gadde, SGK, Mohan, A, Shetty, R, et al. Retinal structural-vascular-functional relationship using optical coherence tomography and optical coherence tomography - angiography in myopia. Eye Vis (Lond). (2019) 6:8. doi: 10.1186/s40662-019-0133-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Read, SA, Fuss, JA, Vincent, SJ, Collins, MJ, and Alonso-caneiro, D. Choroidal changes in human myopia: insights from optical coherence tomography imaging. Clin Exp Optom. (2019) 102:270–85. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12862

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Yang, Y, Wang, J, Jiang, H, Yang, X, Feng, L, Hu, L, et al. Retinal microvasculature alteration in high myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2016) 57:6020–30. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19542

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Li, M, Yang, Y, Jiang, H, Gregori, G, Roisman, L, Zheng, F, et al. Retinal microvascular network and microcirculation assessments in high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. (2017) 174:56–67. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.10.018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Milani, P, Montesano, G, Rossetti, L, Bergamini, F, and Pece, A. Vessel density, retinal thickness, and choriocapillaris vascular flow in myopic eyes on oct angiography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. (2018) 256:1419–27. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4012-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Al-Sheikh, M, Phasukkijwatana, N, Dolz-Marco, R, Rahimi, M, Iafe, NA, Freund, KB, et al. Quantitative oct angiography of the retinal microvasculature and the choriocapillaris in myopic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2017) 58:2063–9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-21289

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Fan, H, Chen, HY, Ma, HJ, Chang, Z, Yin, HQ, Ng, DSC, et al. Reduced macular vascular density in myopic eyes. Chin Med J. (2017) 130:445–51. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.199844

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Wong, CW, Matsumura, S, Htoon, HM, Tan, S, Tan, CS, Ang, M, et al. Assessment of the macular microvasculature in high myopes with swept source optical coherence tomographic angiography. Front Med (Lausanne). (2021) 8:619767. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.619767

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Cheng, W, Song, Y, Gao, X, Lin, F, Li, F, Wang, P, et al. Axial length and choriocapillaris flow deficits in non-pathological high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. (2022) 244:68–78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.08.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Su, L, Ji, YS, Tong, N, Sarraf, D, He, X, Sun, X, et al. Quantitative assessment of the retinal microvasculature and choriocapillaris in myopic patients using swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. (2020) 258:1173–80. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04639-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Mo, J, Duan, A, Chan, S, Wang, X, and Wei, W. Vascular flow density in pathological myopia: an optical coherence tomography angiography study. BMJ Open. (2017) 7:e013571. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013571

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Yang, S, Zhou, M, Lu, B, Zhang, P, Zhao, J, Kang, M, et al. Quantification of macular vascular density using optical coherence tomography angiography and its relationship with retinal thickness in myopic eyes of young adults. J Ophthalmol. (2017) 2017:1397179. doi: 10.1155/2017/1397179

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Jiang, Y, Lou, S, Li, Y, Chen, Y, and Lu, TC. High myopia and macular vascular density: an optical coherence tomography angiography study. BMC Ophthalmol. (2021) 21:407. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-02156-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Dai, Y, Xin, C, Zhang, Q, Chu, Z, Zhou, H, Zhou, X, et al. Impact of ocular magnification on retinal and choriocapillaris blood flow quantification in myopia with swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography. Quant Imaging Med Surg. (2021) 11:948–56. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-1011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Chu, Z, Zhang, Q, Gregori, G, Rosenfeld, PJ, and Wang, RK. Guidelines for imaging the choriocapillaris using oct angiography. Am J Ophthalmol. (2021) 222:92–101. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.08.045

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Wildsoet, C, and Wallman, J. Choroidal and scleral mechanisms of compensation for spectacle lenses in chicks. Vis Res. (1995) 35:1175–94. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00233-c

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Read, SA, Collins, MJ, and Sander, BP. Human optical axial length and defocus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2010) 51:6262–9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5457

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Chen, Q, Meng, Q, Tao, Y, Liu, J, Zeng, Z, Sheng, Y, et al. The role of peripapillary vessel density and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in diagnosing and monitoring myopic glaucoma. Front Med (Lausanne). (2025) 12:12. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1620968

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Liu, Y, Wang, L, Xu, Y, Pang, Z, and Mu, G. The influence of the choroid on the onset and development of myopia: from perspectives of choroidal thickness and blood flow. Acta Ophthalmol. (2021) 99:730–8. doi: 10.1111/aos.14773

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Xiong, S, He, X, Zhang, B, Deng, J, Wang, J, Lv, M, et al. Changes in choroidal thickness varied by age and refraction in children and adolescents: a 1-year longitudinal study. Am J Ophthalmol. (2020) 213:46–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.01.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Bao, J, Huang, Y, Li, X, Yang, A, Zhou, F, Wu, J, et al. Spectacle lenses with aspherical lenslets for myopia control vs single-vision spectacle lenses: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. (2022) 140:472–8. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.0401

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Tang, C, Huang, F, Hu, R, Ji, Y, Gao, Y, Shi, K, et al. Interocular differences in choroidal thickness and circulation in anisomyopic adults and their association with myopia severity. Front Med (Lausanne). (2025) 12:12. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1641704

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Hirata, A, and Negi, A. Morphological changes of choriocapillaris in experimentally induced chick myopia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. (1998) 236:132–7. doi: 10.1007/s004170050053

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Yang, YS, and Koh, JW. Choroidal blood flow change in eyes with high myopia. Korean J Ophthalmol. (2015) 29:309–14. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2015.29.5.309

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Dan, YS, Cheong, KX, Lim, SY, Wong, QY, Chong, RS, Wong, CW, et al. Quantitative assessment of the choroidal vasculature in myopic macular degeneration with optical coherence tomographic angiography. Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). (2023) 3:3. doi: 10.3389/fopht.2023.1202445

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Kim, JH, Lee, SH, Han, JY, Kang, HG, Byeon, SH, Kim, SS, et al. Comparison of individual retinal layer thicknesses between highly myopic eyes and normal control eyes using retinal layer segmentation analysis. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:14000. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50306-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Duan, XR, Liang, YB, Friedman, DS, Sun, LP, Wong, TY, Tao, Q, et al. Normal macular thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography in healthy eyes of adult chinese persons: the Handan eye study. Ophthalmology. (2010) 117:1585–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.12.036

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Xu, M, Yu, X, Wan, M, Feng, K, Zhang, J, Shen, M, et al. Two-year longitudinal change in choroidal and retinal thickness in school-aged myopic children: exploratory analysis of clinical trials for myopia progression. Eye Vis (Lond). (2022) 9:5. doi: 10.1186/s40662-022-00276-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Liu, X, Shen, M, Yuan, Y, Huang, S, Zhu, D, Ma, Q, et al. Macular thickness profiles of intraretinal layers in myopia evaluated by ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. (2015) 160:53–61.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.03.012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Si, Y, Pang, K, Song, Y, Zhang, X, Yang, H, and Cui, Y. Observation of structural and vascular features of retina and choroid in myopia using ultra-widefield ss-octa. BMC Ophthalmol. (2024) 24:208. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03473-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Kang, SH, Hong, SW, Im, SK, Lee, SH, and Ahn, MD. Effect of myopia on the thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer measured by cirrus hd optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2010) 51:4075–83. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4737

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Jonas, JB, Xu, L, Wei, WB, Pan, Z, Yang, H, Holbach, L, et al. Retinal thickness and axial length. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2016) 57:1791–7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-18529

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Piao, H, Guo, Y, Zhang, H, Sung, MS, and Park, SW. Acircularity and circularity indexes of the foveal avascular zone in high myopia. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:16808. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96304-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Cheng, D, Chen, Q, Wu, Y, Yu, X, Shen, M, Zhuang, X, et al. Deep perifoveal vessel density as an indicator of capillary loss in high myopia. Eye (Lond). (2019) 33:1961–8. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0573-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Živković, MLJ, Lazić, L, Zlatanovic, M, Zlatanović, N, Brzaković, M, Jovanović, M, et al. The influence of myopia on the foveal avascular zone and density of blood vessels of the macula-an octa study. Medicina (Kaunas). (2023) 59:452. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030452

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Lal, B, Alonso-Caneiro, D, Read, SA, and Carkeet, A. Induced refractive error changes the optical coherence tomography angiography transverse magnification and vascular indices. Am J Ophthalmol. (2021) 229:230–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.04.012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: myopia, coherence tomography angiography, macular microvasculature, macular thickness, foveal avascular zone

Citation: Chen Q, Song K, Cun Q, Yang W, Tao Y, Zhong H, Lv S and Qian C (2025) Differences in macular structure and microvasculature between high myopia and non-high myopia. Front. Med. 12:1645015. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1645015

Received: 11 June 2025; Accepted: 11 August 2025;
Published: 26 August 2025.

Edited by:

Weihua Yang, Southern Medical University, China

Reviewed by:

Caterina Gagliano, Kore University of Enna, Italy
Xiao Zhang, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CAMS), China

Copyright © 2025 Chen, Song, Cun, Yang, Tao, Zhong, Lv and Qian. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Chaoxu Qian, Y3hxaWFuMjAxMkAxNjMuY29t; Shitou Lv, bHN0eXhtMDc4MDRAc2luYS5jb20=

These authors share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.