Comprehensive genetic screening of 70 severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis probands reveals novel pathogenic variants and syndromic associations

Introduction: Idiopathic scoliosis (IS) is a complex spinal deformity affecting ~3% of the population, with a multifactorial and genetically heterogeneous origin. This study aimed to investigate the genetic origins of severe IS by examining both constitutional and post-zygotic alterations.

Methods: We analyzed 70 unrelated IS-affected individuals using whole exome sequencing (WES) and SNP array approaches on intraoperatively collected articular processes and blood samples.

Results: Two pathogenic constitutional copy number variants (CNVs) were identified – a 43.6 Mb duplication on chromosome 8p and trisomy X – along with eight regions of homozygosity (ROH) located on chromosomes 1, 2, 8, 12, 14, and 16, absent in ethnically matched controls. Additionally, a heterozygous DMD deletion (exons 17–36) was found in one female, and rare recurrent pathogenic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) were detected in ENAM and FLNB genes. Notably, 13% (95% CI, 6.1–23%) of individuals harbored pathogenic variants, spanning CNVs, ROH, and SNVs, suggesting a genetic contribution to IS.

Discussion: Our findings demonstrate that one in seven cases classified as idiopathic may have an underlying monogenic cause. This study underscores the polygenic and heterogeneous nature of IS and highlights the need for genetic testing by integrating WES and SNP array analyses into its diagnostic workflow. Our findings suggest that incorporating genetic testing into the diagnostic evaluation of severe IS patients may enable personalized genetic counseling and, consequently, improve clinical management.

1 Introduction

Scoliosis is a three-dimensional spine deformity, diagnosed through X-ray imaging by measuring the major curvature using the Cobb angle method (≥10°). Approximately 80% of cases are classified as idiopathic, meaning that no clear cause is identified (1, 2). Idiopathic scoliosis (IS) is primarily observed in adolescents (AIS), with girls being up to 10 times more likely to develop severe disease and experience rapid progression (3). The female predominance may reflect developmental factors, as girls enter puberty earlier during the critical period of postural system maturation. However, the absence of a clear sex-linked inheritance pattern suggests the Carter effect, a genetic phenomenon in which males, as the less frequently affected sex, must carry a higher genetic burden to develop the condition. This increases their likelihood of transmitting it to the next generation, thereby maintaining the sex imbalance (1, 4–6).

The prevalence of IS varies geographically and affects roughly 2–3% of the population. Research suggests that IS may have a hereditary component, with an estimated 6–11% penetrance among first-degree relatives, further supported by higher concordance in monozygotic compared to dizygotic twins (1). A Swedish Twin Registry-based study found that genetic factors account for 38% of the risk of developing scoliosis, while the remaining 62% attributed to environmental factors. Although a polygenic inheritance pattern has been predominantly proposed for IS, identifying its precise genetic basis remains challenging due to its heterogeneity. Several limitations, including small cohort sizes, inconsistent findings, difficulties in replicating results across different populations, and insufficient clinical examination of study groups, contribute to the existing gaps in knowledge.

In this study, we selected a well-defined cohort with a uniform ethnic background, focusing on severe, surgically treated IS cases, with a median curvature of 59 degrees. Since only a fraction of IS patients (0.1–0.3%) exhibit curvatures exceeding 40 degrees, we hypothesized that this severely affected group is enriched for constitutional and/or post-zygotic pathogenic variants compared to the general AIS population (2, 3, 7, 8).

Our study focused on a comprehensive molecular analysis of both constitutional and post-zygotic variants. To investigate this, we collected paired blood and intraoperative material from articular processes, enabling the assessment of single nucleotide variation using whole-exome sequencing (WES) and SNP array-based genotyping for structural variation. Post-zygotic mosaic variants arise after fertilization and may be present only in a subset of tissues, making them undetectable in blood alone. This strategy enabled exploring genetic mechanisms that have not previously been investigated in IS. The primary aim of the study was to identify constitutional and post-zygotic variants in severe AIS, providing a basis for future studies and potential applications in personalized genetic counseling and clinical management.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Ethics statement

This study was approved by the Independent Bioethics Committee for Research at the Medical University of Gdańsk (no. NKBBN/418/2017). Written informed consent for genetic testing was obtained from all individuals participating in this study and/or their parents/legal guardians. Control samples used in the study were collected under a research protocol approved by the Bioethical Committee at the Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń (no. KB509/2010) and by the Independent Bioethics Committee for Research at the Medical University of Gdańsk (no. NKBBN/564/2018), and all donors were recruited and enrolled under informed and written consent. All research involving human participants and human-derived tissues was conducted in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations, including Declaration of Helsinki. No personally identifiable information was included in the manuscript.

2.2 Clinical description of studied subjects

This study included 70 unrelated individuals of a uniform ethnic background, with an average age of 15. All probands were diagnosed with severe IS, characterized by a median Cobb angle deformation of 59°. They underwent direct vertebral rotation as part of scoliosis correction treatment (9). We specifically included young individuals whose severe scoliosis was not attributable to mechanical damage or environmental factors that could have contributed to the progression or manifestation of spinal curvature. Individuals with known genetic syndromes causing secondary scoliosis were excluded. However, genetic testing was not part of the standard diagnostic procedure offered before enrollment in the study.

Blood samples (BL) and/or articular processes (AP) closest to the area of deformation were collected from the individuals, depending on availability. Of the 70 individuals, both types of samples were collected from 58 individuals, while the remaining 12 provided only one type, either from BL or AP (Figure 1; Supplementary Table 1). To verify whether the candidate variant is de novo or inherited, BL samples were collected from the probands’ parents, when available.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Visual representation of the study workflow. AP, articular processes; BL, whole blood; SK, skin; Ctrl, control; CNVs, copy number variations; CNAs, copy number alterations; ROH, runs of homozygosity, *or smaller if clinically justified surgery qualification.

Detailed clinical information of the studied cohort is provided in the Supplementary Table 1. Briefly, the cohort comprised 13 boys and 57 girls. Notably, 60.3% (41/68) of the cases did not report a family history of scoliosis. Family history was collected via self-report from patients or their parents (unavailable for two individuals), and no clinical examinations of relatives were performed. The cohort’s average height and weight percentiles were 61 and 58, respectively, based on reference growth and BMI charts for Polish adolescents (10). Besides severe scoliosis, several patients exhibited additional skeletal abnormalities, including pectus excavatum in two probands, knee problems, pigeon-toe, flat feet, Osgood-Schlatter disease, and incorrect pelvis rotation, each reported in one case. Furthermore, back pain was reported by 27.5% (19/69) of participants. Among these 19 individuals, some disclosed accompanying symptoms, including respiratory difficulties (2/19), paresthesia (1/19), myoclonus (1/19), and paraparesis (1/19). Clinical information was unavailable for one individual.

As a control for the study, BL and skin (SK) samples from two groups of female individuals diagnosed with breast cancer, with the same ethnic background, were analyzed using SNP array and WES following the same protocols as the studied group. The first control group, consisting of 440 unrelated individuals, provided SK samples for the structural genomic rearrangement analysis. The second control group, used for WES analysis, included 79 SK and 63 BL samples from 142 individuals. Neither group was preselected based on scoliosis status, with the population risk of mild scoliosis estimated at approximately 3% (2, 3, 8).

2.3 DNA isolation

DNA extraction from peripheral blood leukocytes was performed using the QIAamp DNA Blood Midi Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD), while the standard phenol-chloroform method was used for solid tissue samples. The quality and quantity of DNA were assessed spectrophotometrically (Varioscan-Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA) and fluorometrically (Qubit-Thermo Fisher & TapeStation–Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA).

2.4 SNP array

We conducted a chromosomal rearrangement analysis using the Illumina Infinium Global Screening Array Multiple Disease (GSA-MD-24v3-0-EA_20034606_A1) (Illumina, San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (11, 12) to identify DNA copy number variation (CNVs), copy number alterations (CNAs), and runs of homozygosity (ROH) within the genome (hg19). Genotyping was performed on 65 individuals, including 58 with both AP and BL and seven with only BL samples. Data were analyzed using Nexus Copy Number v10.0 (BioDiscovery), the MoChA pipeline v.2023–09-19 (13, 14), and Bcftools v.1.17 (15).

In the Nexus Copy Number analysis, only alterations supported by at least five probes in samples with Log Ratio (LRR) standard deviation <0.2 were included. Constitutional alterations over 150 kbp were included, while duplications and deletions <150 kbp were manually curated (Supplementary Table 2). CNVs entirely overlapping those present in the Database of Genomic Variants (as of November 2023) and lacking protein-coding genes were excluded (16). The pathogenicity of constitutional CNVs was further assessed using publicly available online tools, i.e., Franklin by Genoox and CNV-ClinViewer by Broad Institute, followed by the manual inspection. Both tools are semi-automated systems for the clinical significance classification of CNVs, aligning with the current diagnostic recommendations (17).

To analyze post-zygotic findings, data from each individual were examined in pairs of AP and BL, first using Nexus Copy Number and then the MoChA pipeline to identify CNAs occurring in low cell fractions, with default parameters (14).

For ROH confirmation, we applied the BCFtools/RoH command to the VCF generated by the MoChA pipeline (15). This command identifies autozygosity regions using a hidden Markov model and 1,000 Genomes allele frequencies as reference. Results with quality scores <90 (fwd-bwd phred) and <5 Mbp were excluded (18).

Results were visualized using R v4.1.2 and package karyoploteR (19).

2.5 Whole exome sequencing (WES)

WES libraries were prepared for all 70 enrolled probands using SureSelect XT HS All Exon V7 (Agilent Technologies) and Twist Library Preparation EF Kit 2.0 (Twist Bioscience, South San Francisco, CA), following manufacturers’ protocols. This included 32 pairs of AP and BL, and the remaining 38 samples being either BL or AP, depending on material availability. The libraries sequencing was performed using NextSeq550, HiSeq XTen, and NovaSeq 6,000 Illumina instruments, with a mean sequencing depth of 157x (median 137x) across targeted regions.

For data analysis, an in-house pipeline based on GATK4 best practices was applied (20). The reads were aligned to the reference genome (hg38) using the Burrows-Wheeler transform aligner (21). Complementary variant calling strategies were employed: Platypus v0.8.1.1 for constitutional variants, which demonstrates superior performance for constitutional variant detection in WES data, and Octopus v0.7.4 for post-zygotic variants, which uses a haplotype-aware algorithm analyzed in pairs—specifically optimized for low-frequency variant detection, including mosaicism (22, 23). Variants with mapping quality <30 or supported by high-quality bases (≥30), but in fewer than five reads, and variants located outside the targeted regions were excluded from further analysis. Functional annotation of all files was performed with ANNOVAR (24). Filtering was conducted using R v4.1.2.

2.6 Variant selection criteria

All events in exonic and splicing canonical regions that passed the variant calling filters, with a sequencing depth ≥30 and an allele frequency ≥0.07, were included. Constitutional variants classified as “Benign” and “Likely Benign” in the ClinVar database were excluded. All truncating variants were included for further pathogenicity assessment. Non-truncating events were filtered based on their population frequency using the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD v2.1.1, v3.1.2). Variants with a minor allele frequency (MAF) ≤ 0.01 (“popmax”) or absent in the database were retained.

To assess the theoretical deleterious impact of synonymous and missense variants, the Splice AI tool (Δ score ≥0.5) was used for splicing prediction, and REVEL (≥0.7) for analysis of missense variants (25, 26).

All post-zygotic variants called by Octopus were defined through comparison of paired AP and BL samples and underwent manual curation, including Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) inspection, exclusion of variants with gnomAD popmax MAF > 0.01, in silico pathogenicity prediction, and assessment of biological plausibility for scoliosis. These criteria were chosen to reduce false positives from artifacts or common polymorphisms while retaining rare, potentially disease-relevant events.

Firstly, we applied the above-mentioned filtering criteria to evaluate the pathogenicity of variants in genes previously linked to scoliosis (Supplementary Table 3) (27). Subsequently, using the same filtering criteria, we analyzed all remaining protein-coding genes to acquire a comprehensive understanding of the genetic makeup underlying IS. Variant pathogenicity classification was performed following the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) diagnostic recommendations (28).

In this study, “recurrent variants” are defined as genetic variations that either arise independently in ≥2 unrelated individuals or represent ≥2 distinct variants within the same gene.

2.7 Genomic confirmation mutational analysis

Selected candidate variants classified as pathogenic, likely pathogenic, or variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were confirmed by bidirectional Sanger sequencing and analyzed using SnapGene v6.2.1.

2.8 Statistical analysis

Statistical tests were performed using R v4.1.2 with packages stats and binom. The statistical significance of the differences between the two groups was assessed using Fisher’s exact test with p-value <0.05. Confidence intervals for proportions were calculated using the exact binomial method (Clopper-Pearson) to ensure appropriate coverage for small sample sizes. Multiple testing correction was not applied, given the hypothesis-driven focus on recurrent variants.

3 Results

3.1 Structural chromosomal rearrangements

We identified a total of 6,795 constitutional CNVs and 6,258 ROH using Nexus Copy Number software and BCFtools/RoH. After applying the filtering criteria (Materials and methods) we narrowed down the dataset to 41 CNVs and eight ROHs. Among the 41 reported here CNVs, three were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic and were not found in the control group. Namely, two large duplications were observed on chromosomes 8 and X in two unrelated probands, P15 and P69, respectively (Figure 2). A trisomy of the short arm of chromosome 8, spanning 43.6 Mbp, was identified in a 17-year-old girl with a severe IS characterized by left convex thoracic curvature, a Cobb angle of 60 degrees, mild facial dysmorphia, a wide neck, dextrocardia, and pectus excavatum. This individual also carried a 28 Mbp ROH on chromosome 12, including the centromeric region. A trisomy of chromosome X was identified in P69, a 14-year-old female with IS and a Cobb angle of 50 degrees, tall stature (73rd percentile), low body mass (below 3rd BMI percentile), aphasia, and back pain. Her medical history indicated that her father also had scoliosis, though no further clinical data were available. The third identified clearly pathogenic variant was a heterozygous deletion of exons 17–36 in the DMD gene in P46, a 12-year-old female with a Cobb angle of 60 degrees (Supplementary Table 2). All individuals with these findings were referred for genetic counseling.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Key findings from the SNP array analysis.

Additionally, 19 CNVs were classified as likely benign or benign (data not presented), while another 19 CNVs were VUS. Eight ROHs >5 Mbp were detected on chromosomes 1, 2, 8, 12, 14, and 16 (Supplementary Table 2), encompassing a total of 712 protein-coding genes. Among them, 133 genes are potentially dosage sensitive.

No post-zygotic Copy Number Alterations (CNAs) in MoChA and Nexus analysis met the filtering criteria.

3.2 Single nucleotide variation analysis

No statistically significant post-zygotic variants, that met the filtering criteria (Methods), and were potentially damaging or related to scoliosis, were identified in the cohort of 32 AP.

After applying cut-off filtering criteria, constitutional variants identified in the studied cohort were grouped into two categories, as follows.

3.2.1 Genes previously associated with IS

We identified here a total of 45 variants in 38 individuals, including 17 truncating variants found in 30% (21/70) of individuals and 28 non-truncating variants in 34.3% (24/70) of cases (Supplementary Table 4). Of these variants, 12 distinct and two recurrent heterozygous variants in 14 genes, present in 16 individuals, were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic according to current diagnostic recommendations (Table 1) (28). These included seven nonsense variants in the DHCR7, FANCM, FLNB, NEB, OBSL1, RPGRIP1L, and WDR81 genes; three frameshifts variants in FANCL, NALCN, and TMEM67; two missense variants in LMNA and SLC26A2; and two splicing variants in TMEM231 and UPB1. All 14 variants were either rare (“popmax” < 0.005) or had not been reported in the gnomAD database. Constitutional variants in the FLNB, LMNA, and NALCN genes have previously been associated with autosomal dominant (AD) disorders, such as Larsen syndrome, Laminopathies, Familial partial lipodystrophy, and Congenital contractures of the limbs, face, hypotonia, and developmental delay, which present clinically with scoliosis or other skeletal abnormalities (29–32). Among the genes specifically associated with IS, recurrent pathogenic, likely pathogenic, or VUS heterozygous variants were identified in A2ML1, ERCC2, MYH7, FLNB, RYR1, and TMEM231 (Supplementary Table 4), with FLNB reaching statistical significance in Fisher’s exact test compared to the control group (p-value = 0.035). Statistical tests were performed based on the number of identified pathogenic variants in the studied group compared to the control group, counting occurrences per gene.

Table 1

Table 1. Summary of constitutional likely pathogenic and pathogenic variants identified by whole exome sequencing (WES) in genes associated with idiopathic scoliosis.

3.2.2 Genes not previously linked to IS

In this group of genes, we identified 1,353 truncating variants, including 97 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, 554 VUS, and 702 benign or likely benign variants. Additionally, 516 non-truncating variants were identified, including 62 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, 355 VUS, and 99 benign or likely benign variants. These 159 pathogenic or likely pathogenic truncating and non-truncating variants (Supplementary Table 5) were identified in 151 genes in total. Of these, 20 genes contained 26 heterozygous variants, either recurrent or multiple distinct variants within the same gene, observed in 31 unrelated individuals.

4 Discussion

Here, we found that individuals with severe IS exhibit various structural and point variations, which lead to other known genetic disorders presenting with a scoliosis phenotype, albeit without a common genetic component. This observation aligns with the polygenic inheritance mode that has predominantly been proposed for IS (4).

4.1 Structural variants and gene dosage effects

Two large constitutional CNVs identified in our cohort highlight the role of chromosomal imbalance in severe IS (Figure 2; Supplementary Table 2). First, 47,XXX syndrome is a common chromosomal aneuploidy, affecting 1 in 1,000 females, often remaining undiagnosed due to subtle clinical symptoms. Affected individuals tend to be taller and may exhibit an increased prevalence of thoracic kyphosis (33). Trisomy X has been previously observed in AIS patients, with a reported frequency of 0.7% (2/286), compared to 0.19% (1/529) in controls (34). Our detection rate of 1.75% (1/57) (95% CI, 0–9.4%) and absence in controls substantially exceeds previous reports, suggesting enrichment in severe cases. The mechanism remains unclear whether scoliosis may result from direct genetic effects on spinal development or be secondary to the increased stature and altered growth patterns typical in 47,XXX syndrome.

The second large CNV, associated with a trisomy 8p syndrome, is characterized by a variable phenotype that includes mild to severe developmental delay, short stature, dysmorphic features, autism, epilepsy, scoliosis, and spastic paraplegia (35, 36). The trisomy 8p case exemplifies how gene dosage imbalances in critical developmental pathways contribute to severe IS. The duplication encompasses dosage-sensitive FGFR1 and BMP1 genes, both essential for spine and cartilage development, providing a plausible mechanism for the observed skeletal phenotype (Supplementary Table 1) (37, 38). The co-occurrence of a large ROH containing haploinsufficient connective tissue genes further illustrates the complex genetic architecture underlying severe IS, highlighting the complexity of genetic influences on spinal health.

In addition to the two large CNVs, we identified a small pathogenic deletion of exons 17–36 in the DMD gene in one female individual (Supplementary Table 1). Constitutional pathogenic variants in DMD lead to Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophies, both inherited in an X-linked recessive manner. Female heterozygotes are usually asymptomatic; however, up to 17% exhibit muscle weakness (39). Papa et al. reported the presence of scoliosis and lordosis in 79% of female DMD heterozygous carriers, although the studied cohort was limited to 15 individuals (39). The co-occurrence of the NALCN pathogenic variant in this patient (Table 1), inherited from an affected mother, exemplifies potential oligogenic inheritance patterns in severe IS. Constitutional pathogenic variants in this gene cause autosomal dominant congenital limb and facial contractures, hypotonia, and developmental delay, with scoliosis being one of the main symptoms (32).

According to current diagnostic recommendations (18) ROH regions greater than 5 Mb are considered significant and may increase the risk of autosomal recessive (AR) disorders. The identification of eight large ROH regions absent in controls represents an unexplored mechanism in IS pathogenesis. These regions harbor numerous dosage-sensitive skeletal development genes (Supplementary Table 2), suggesting that regional haploinsufficiency or unmasking of recessive alleles may contribute to disease severity, particularly in populations with higher consanguinity rates.

4.2 Simple nucleotide variants and heterozygous carriers

The WES findings from our cohort align with prior studies, providing a list of potential candidate genes associated with IS (Table 1) (1, 2, 5). Among the identified variants, FLNB and LMNA, both associated with autosomal dominant disorders that include scoliosis in their phenotypic spectrum, emerge as particularly significant contributors to severe IS, with FLNB showing statistical enrichment compared to controls (p < 0.05).

FLNB encodes filamin B, a cytoplasmic protein that organizes the actin cytoskeleton, whose alterations cause skeletal disorders, including AD Larsen syndrome and AR spondylocarpotarsal synostosis. Jiang et al. demonstrated that FLNB pathogenic variants alter protein conformation in IS, suggesting a disease-modifier role (31). The identification of rare variants absent in controls supports a causal role in the pathogenesis of severe IS. However, due to limited evidence, two of three identified variants are classified as VUS until further data becomes available (Supplementary Table 4).

Similarly, LMNA encodes Lamin A and C, which are crucial for nuclear integrity and cellular processes. Variations in LMNA gene are linked to laminopathies, which affect muscles, fat, and bones, causing skeletal deformities, including scoliosis (29, 30), providing a mechanistic link between nuclear envelope dysfunction and spinal deformity.

Beyond AD genes, we identified several clearly pathogenic variants associated with AR disorders (Table 1). While heterozygotes for AR conditions are typically asymptomatic due to the presence of one functional allele, rare cases exhibit mild symptoms or increased susceptibility to conditions associated with the underlying disease. For instance, symptomatic heterozygotes have been reported in metabolic and neuromuscular disorders, such as cystinuria type 1 and 2 or hereditary aceruloplasminemia (40).

When comparing the prevalence of heterozygous pathogenic variants in the genes linked to AR diseases (Table 1), we observed a rate of 22.86% (16/70) (95% CI, 13.7–34.4%) in the IS cohort versus 14.08% (20/142) (95% CI, 8.8–20.9%) in controls. This difference was not statistically significant (Fisher exact test, p-value = 0.12), and therefore should be interpreted cautiously.

The underlying causes of symptomatic heterozygosity remain unclear. Hypothetical mechanisms could include oligogenic inheritance, synergistic heterozygosity, DNA methylation, or environmental factors. Other theoretical explanations might involve dosage effects leading to haploinsufficiency, dominant-negative effects, gain-of-function variations, or undetected secondary variants such as deep splice or regulatory changes (40–42). However, these possibilities are speculative, and further studies will be required to investigate their potential role in IS.

4.3 Preliminary novel findings

As a second tier of this study, we analyzed genes not previously linked to IS. While several variants classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic (Supplementary Table 5) are primarily associated with metabolic, developmental, or immunological disorders, scoliosis is generally not considered a direct or secondary feature. One exception is the ENAM gene, which showed recurrent rare pathogenic frameshift variants in four unrelated individuals. The cumulative results for ENAM were statistically significant (p = 0.04, Fisher’s exact test) compared to the control group (Supplementary Figure 1).

Both frameshifts occur in the terminal exon of ENAM and are associated with amelogenesis imperfecta (AI), a condition affecting enamel formation, resulting in truncated enamelin protein production. ENAM c.1259_1260insAG has been extensively reported in the literature, whereas c.2763del has been described only once in compound heterozygosity with another ENAM variant, both linked to AR AI (43). The identified variants are rare in the gnomAD population database (“popmax” ~ 0.00036) and are listed as pathogenic in ClinVar and Leiden Open Variation Database (LOVD; as of November 2024).

However, as our questionnaire did not specifically query dental conditions, and no dental abnormalities were spontaneously reported by participants, we cannot determine whether AI features were present. Additionally, these individuals reported no family history of scoliosis, further limiting the interpretability of the ENAM association. While no direct link between ENAM and scoliosis exists, some studies suggest that dental issues and spinal deformities may co-occur (44). Fuchs et al. found that enamelin variations affected bone and energy metabolism in mutant mouse lines, suggesting a pleiotropic role of the ENAM (45). However, this remains speculative and highlights the need for replication in properly matched cohorts with comprehensive dental phenotyping.

4.4 Post-zygotic variation in severe IS

An important consideration for future research is the potential role of post-zygotic variation in severe IS. To our knowledge, this study is the first to systematically investigate post-zygotic variants in IS using paired blood and intraoperative spinal tissue samples. Analyses including SNP array and WES revealed no evidence of tissue-specific mosaic variants in this cohort, suggesting that post-zygotic mosaicism does not play a major role in severe IS. Our mean sequencing coverage of 157 × may not detect low-level mosaicism (<10% variant allele frequency), leaving open the possibility of rare or tissue-restricted events. These negative findings are valuable, narrowing the search for causative mechanisms and suggesting that constitutional variants, rather than post-zygotic events, drive disease pathogenesis. Future studies employing ultra-deep sequencing or single-cell approaches may still uncover rare mosaic events below our detection threshold.

4.5 Study limitations

While the study was rigorous, including a large, well-phenotyped cohort of young individuals from the same ethnic background with severe scoliosis, there are some limitations. The control group was not fully standardized: it consisted exclusively of females and was not screened for scoliosis, with an estimated population risk of mild scoliosis of approximately 3%, which may limit the comparability and generalizability of our findings (2). Additionally, family history was self-reported, and family members were not clinically examined, which may affect the precision of clinical interpretations. These factors should be taken into account when extrapolating our results to broader populations.

4.6 Clinical implications and future directions

Despite the lack of direct recommendations for routine genetic testing in IS (2), our results suggest that molecular analysis could be valuable for individuals with severe IS (Cobb >40°) (2), as severe curvature suggests a strong genetic basis. Our findings suggest that genetic testing may have clinical utility for patients with severe IS. Diagnostic yield of 13% (9/70 individuals) (95% CI: 6.1–23%) comprising pathogenic CNVs including large chromosomal abnormalities and gene deletions (4.3%; 3/70) (95% CI: 0.9–12%), pathogenic variants in AD IS genes (2.9%; 2/70) (95% CI: 0.3–9.9%), and ROHs potentially contributing to disease susceptibility (5.7%; 4/70) (95% CI: 1.6–14%) partially supports our hypothesis that severely affected individuals are enriched for constitutional pathogenic variants compared to the general AIS population. This 13% yield is specific to severe IS cases and should not be generalized to the broader IS population with milder phenotypes. However, contrary to our expectations, no post-zygotic variants were identified, and the marked genetic heterogeneity observed challenges the concept of a unified pathogenic mechanism. Therefore, rather than targeted gene panels, a comprehensive diagnostic strategy is warranted. A stepwise approach could be considered, beginning with SNP array analysis as a cost-effective screening tool, given that large structural variants account for a notable proportion of identifiable genetic causes. If results from microarray analysis are negative, WES could provide more comprehensive information, as it is not limited to a predefined set of genes, which – as shown in the literature (46) – tend not to be recurrent. This approach may be particularly relevant in diverse populations, where population-specific gene panels may not reliably capture all pathogenic variants. Early identification of genetic factors may help guide treatment strategies and provide valuable information for genetic counseling.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena, EGAS00001008152.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Independent Bioethics Committee for Research at the Medical University of Gdańsk (no. NKBBN/418/2017 and NKBBN/564/2018 [control group]), and Bioethical Committee at the Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń (no. KB509/2010 [control group]). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin.

Author contributions

MH: Project administration, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Visualization. MK: Methodology, Supervision, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. MR: Writing – review & editing, Resources. MC: Resources, Writing – review & editing. PM: Software, Writing – review & editing. DS: Writing – review & editing, Software. JM: Writing – review & editing, Software. KŚ: Writing – review & editing, Resources. JD: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. RP: Resources, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. AP: Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by Project POWR.03.05.00-00-z082/18 co-financed by the European Union through the European Social Fund under the Operational Programme Knowledge Education Development 2014–2020. Additional funding was provided through Foundation for Polish Science, International Research Agendas Program co-financed by the European Union under the European Regional Development Fund (MAB/2018/6), Vetenskapsrådet, Cancerfonden.

Acknowledgments

We are deeply grateful to all the patients who willingly volunteered to participate in this study. We sincerely thank all the healthcare professionals from the Department of Orthopedic Surgery at the Medical University of Gdansk for their involvement in the patient recruitment and sample collection process. We acknowledge Dr. Natalia Filipowicz, Dr. Anna Kostecka, and MSc Magdalena Gucwa for consulting regarding laboratory procedures, as well as MSc Eng Agata Wojdak for administrative support during the project.

Conflict of interest

JD is a co-founder and shareholder of Cray Innovation AB, and JM is a co-founder and shareholder of Genegoggle sp. z o.o.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1646415/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Cheng, JC, Castelein, RM, Chu, WC, Danielsson, AJ, Dobbs, MB, Grivas, TB, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2015) 1:15030. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.30

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Negrini, S, Donzelli, S, Aulisa, AG, Czaprowski, D, Schreiber, S, De Mauroy, JC, et al. 2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis. (2018) 13:3. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0145-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Miyanji, F. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: current perspectives. ORR. (2014) 6:17–26. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S37321

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Kruse, LM, Buchan, JG, Gurnett, CA, and Dobbs, MB. Polygenic threshold model with sex dimorphism in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the Carter effect. J Bone Joint Surg. (2012) 94:1485–91. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01450

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Cheng, T, Einarsdottir, E, Kere, J, and Gerdhem, P. Idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of heritability. EFORT Open Rev. (2022) 7:414–21. doi: 10.1530/EOR-22-0026

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Wise, CA, Sepich, D, Ushiki, A, Khanshour, AM, Kidane, YH, Makki, N, et al. The cartilage matrisome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Bone Res. (2020) 8:13. doi: 10.1038/s41413-020-0089-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Pérez-Machado, G, Berenguer-Pascual, E, Bovea-Marco, M, Rubio-Belmar, PA, García-López, E, Garzón, MJ, et al. From genetics to epigenetics to unravel the etiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Bone. (2020) 140:115563. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115563

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Dunn, J, Henrikson, NB, Morrison, CC, Blasi, PR, Nguyen, M, and Lin, JS. Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. JAMA. (2018) 319:173. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11669

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Pankowski, R, Roclawski, M, Ceynowa, M, Mikulicz, M, Mazurek, T, and Kloc, W. Direct vertebral rotation versus single concave rod rotation: low-dose intraoperative computed tomography evaluation of spine Derotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). (2016) 41:864–71. doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000001363

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Kulaga, Z, Litwin, M, Tkaczyk, M, Różdżyńska, A, Barwicka, K, Grajda, A, et al. The height-, weight-, and BMI-for-age of polish school-aged children and adolescents relative to international and local growth references. BMC Public Health. (2010) 10:109. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-109

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Gunderson, KL, Steemers, FJ, Lee, G, Mendoza, LG, and Chee, MS. A genome-wide scalable SNP genotyping assay using microarray technology. Nat Genet. (2005) 37:549–54. doi: 10.1038/ng1547

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Steemers, FJ, Chang, W, Lee, G, Barker, DL, Shen, R, and Gunderson, KL. Whole-genome genotyping with the single-base extension assay. Nat Methods. (2006) 3:31–3. doi: 10.1038/nmeth842

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Loh, PR, Genovese, G, Handsaker, RE, Finucane, HK, Reshef, YA, Palamara, PF, et al. Insights into clonal haematopoiesis from 8,342 mosaic chromosomal alterations. Nature. (2018) 559:350–5. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0321-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Loh, PR, Genovese, G, and McCarroll, SA. Monogenic and polygenic inheritance become instruments for clonal selection. Nature. (2020) 584:136–41. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2430-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Narasimhan, V, Danecek, P, Scally, A, Xue, Y, Tyler-Smith, C, and Durbin, R. BCFtools/RoH: a hidden Markov model approach for detecting autozygosity from next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. (2016) 32:1749–51. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw044

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. MacDonald, JR, Ziman, R, Yuen, RKC, Feuk, L, and Scherer, SW. The database of genomic variants: a curated collection of structural variation in the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. (2014) 42:D986–92. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt958

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Riggs, ER, Andersen, EF, Cherry, AM, Kantarci, S, Kearney, H, Patel, A, et al. Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the clinical genome resource (ClinGen). Genet Med. (2020) 22:245–57. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0686-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Gonzales, PR, Andersen, EF, Brown, TR, Horner, VL, Horwitz, J, Rehder, CW, et al. Interpretation and reporting of large regions of homozygosity and suspected consanguinity/uniparental disomy, 2021 revision: a technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. (2022) 24:255–61. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.10.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Gel, B, and Serra, E. karyoploteR: an R/Bioconductor package to plot customizable genomes displaying arbitrary data. Hancock J, editor. Bioinformatics. (2017) 33:3088–90. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx346

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Van Der, AG, and O’Connor, BD. Genomics in the cloud: using docker, GATK, and WDL in Terra. 1st ed. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media (2020). 467 p.

Google Scholar

21. Li, H, and Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with burrows-wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. (2009) 25:1754–60. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Rimmer, A, Phan, H, Mathieson, I, Iqbal, Z, and Twigg, SRF. WGS500 consortium, et al. integrating mapping-, assembly- and haplotype-based approaches for calling variants in clinical sequencing applications. Nat Genet. (2014) 46:912–8. doi: 10.1038/ng.3036

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Cooke, DP, Wedge, DC, and Lunter, G. A unified haplotype-based method for accurate and comprehensive variant calling. Nat Biotechnol. (2021) 39:885–92. doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-00861-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Wang, K, Li, M, and Hakonarson, H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. (2010) 38:e164. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq603

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Ioannidis, NM, Rothstein, JH, Pejaver, V, Middha, S, McDonnell, SK, Baheti, S, et al. REVEL: an ensemble method for predicting the pathogenicity of rare missense variants. Am J Hum Genet. (2016) 99:877–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.08.016

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. De Sainte Agathe, JM, Filser, M, Isidor, B, Besnard, T, Gueguen, P, Perrin, A, et al. SpliceAI-visual: a free online tool to improve SpliceAI splicing variant interpretation. Hum Genomics. (2023) 17:7. doi: 10.1186/s40246-023-00451-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Rouillard, AD, Gundersen, GW, Fernandez, NF, Wang, Z, Monteiro, CD, McDermott, MG, et al. The harmonizome: a collection of processed datasets gathered to serve and mine knowledge about genes and proteins. Database (Oxford). (2016) 2016:baw100. doi: 10.1093/database/baw100

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Richards, S, Aziz, N, Bale, S, Bick, D, Das, S, Gastier-Foster, J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. (2015) 17:405–24. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Lanktree, M, Cao, H, Rabkin, S, Hanna, A, and Hegele, R. Novel LMNA mutations seen in patients with familial partial lipodystrophy subtype 2 (FPLD2; MIM 151660). Clin Genet. (2007) 71:183–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00740.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Ben Yaou, R, Yun, P, Dabaj, I, Norato, G, Donkervoort, S, Xiong, H, et al. International retrospective natural history study of LMNA -related congenital muscular dystrophy. Brain. Communications. (2021) 3:fcab075. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab075

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Jiang, H, Liang, S, He, K, Hu, J, Xu, E, Lin, T, et al. Exome sequencing analysis identifies frequent oligogenic involvement and FLNB variants in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Med Genet. (2020) 57:405–13. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106411

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Cochet-Bissuel, M, Lory, P, and Monteil, A. The sodium leak channel, NALCN, in health and disease. Front Cell Neurosci. (2014) 8:132. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00132

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Tartaglia, NR, Howell, S, Sutherland, A, Wilson, R, and Wilson, L. A review of trisomy X (47,XXX). Orphanet J Rare Dis. (2010) 5:8. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-5-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Buchan, JG, Alvarado, DM, Haller, G, Aferol, H, Miller, NH, Dobbs, MB, et al. Are copy number variants associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Clin Orthop Relat Res. (2014) 472:3216–25. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3766-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Okur, V, Hamm, L, Kavus, H, Mebane, C, Robinson, S, Levy, B, et al. Clinical and genomic characterization of 8p cytogenomic disorders. Genet Med. (2021) 23:2342–51. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01270-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Makia, J, Marafie, M, Abu-Henedi, S, Abulhasan, A, and Al-Wadaani, MM. Partial duplication of chromosome 8p: report of 5 patients and review of literature corresponding author. Egypt. J Hum Genet. (2007):8. Available online at: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:83075216

Google Scholar

37. Xi, L, Lv, S, Zhang, H, and Zhang, Z. Novel mutations in BMP1 result in a patient with autosomal recessive osteogenesis imperfecta. Molec Gen Gen Med. (2021) 9:e1676. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1676

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Wang, S, Chai, X, Yan, Z, Zhao, S, Yang, Y, Li, X, et al. Novel FGFR1 variants are associated with congenital scoliosis. Genes (Basel). (2021) 12:1126. doi: 10.3390/genes12081126

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Papa, R, Madia, F, Bartolomeo, D, Trucco, F, Pedemonte, M, Traverso, M, et al. Genetic and early clinical manifestations of females heterozygous for Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy. Pediatr Neurol. (2016) 55:58–63. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2015.11.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Kalyta, K, Stelmaszczyk, W, Szczęśniak, D, Kotuła, L, Dobosz, P, and Mroczek, M. The Spectrum of the heterozygous effect in Biallelic Mendelian diseases—the symptomatic heterozygote issue. Genes. (2023) 14:1562. doi: 10.3390/genes14081562

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Veitia, RA, Bottani, S, and Birchler, JA. Gene dosage effects: nonlinearities, genetic interactions, and dosage compensation. Trends Genet. (2013) 29:385–93. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2013.04.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Basilicata, MF, and Keller Valsecchi, CI. The good, the bad, and the ugly: evolutionary and pathological aspects of gene dosage alterations. PLoS Genet. (2021) 17:e1009906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009906

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Zhang, H, Hu, Y, Seymen, F, Koruyucu, M, Kasimoglu, Y, Wang, S, et al. ENAM mutations and digenic inheritance. Molec Gen Gen Med. (2019) 7:e00928. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.928

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Laskowska, M, Olczak-Kowalczyk, D, Zadurska, M, Czubak, J, Czubak-Wrzosek, M, Walerzak, M, et al. Evaluation of a relationship between malocclusion and idiopathic scoliosis in children and adolescents. J Child Orthop. (2019) 13:600–6. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.13.190100

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Fuchs, H, Sabrautzki, S, Seedorf, H, Rathkolb, B, Rozman, J, Hans, W, et al. Does enamelin have pleiotropic effects on organs other than the teeth? Lessons from a phenotyping screen of two enamelin-mutant mouse lines. Eur J Oral Sci. (2012) 120:269–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2012.00966.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Grauers, A, Einarsdottir, E, and Gerdhem, P. Genetics and pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis. (2016) 11:45. doi: 10.1186/s13013-016-0105-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar