SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Med.
Sec. Pulmonary Medicine
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1649353
Impact of Glucocorticoid Administration on Therapeutic Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Provisionally accepted- Ningbo Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Ningbo, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved outcomes in advanced NSCLC, yet concurrent glucocorticoid use raises concerns due to immunosuppressive effects. Evidence regarding the prognostic impact of glucocorticoids in this setting remains inconsistent. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the association between glucocorticoid use and survival outcomes in NSCLC patients receiving ICIs, with particular attention to timing of administration. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted up to December 18, 2024, with no language restrictions. Eligible studies enrolled adult NSCLC patients treated with ICIs, stratified by glucocorticoid exposure, and reported overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), or objective response rate (ORR). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using fixed- or random-effects models depending on heterogeneity. Study quality was appraised with the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, and evidence certainty was evaluated using GRADE. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the impact of glucocorticoid timing (pre-ICI, at initiation, and post-ICI) on survival outcomes. Results: Fifteen studies involving 5,950 patients were included. Glucocorticoid use was significantly associated with inferior outcomes. The pooled HR for PFS was 1.44 (95% CI, 1.15–1.73; P < 0.001; I² = 77.7%), and for OS was 1.58 (95% CI, 1.24–1.93; P < 0.001; I² = 84.2%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that post-ICI glucocorticoid administration was strongly associated with poorer survival (PFS: HR = 1.98, 95% CI, 1.51–2.62; OS: HR = 2.28, 95% CI, 1.61–3.41; both P < 0.001), while pre-ICI use showed no significant effect (PFS: HR = 1.21, 95% CI, 0.85–2.01; OS: HR = 1.31, 95% CI, 0.69–2.28). Funnel plots and Egger’s regression test indicated no significant publication bias (PFS: P = 0.42; OS: P = 0.37). Evidence certainty for both OS and PFS was rated as moderate. Conclusions: In NSCLC patients receiving ICI therapy, glucocorticoid use might be associated with significantly poorer progression-free and overall survival, particularly when administered after the initiation of ICIs. Further research is warranted to clarify the timing and dosing parameters that could minimize potential negative effects on ICI efficacy.
Keywords: Non-small cell lung cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitors, Glucocorticoids, Progression-free survival, overall survival, Meta-analysis
Received: 18 Jun 2025; Accepted: 06 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Chen, Chen and Hong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Bo Hong, hongbodr1002@163.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.