Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Med.

Sec. Gastroenterology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1650124

This article is part of the Research Topic25 Years of 21st Century MedicineView all 13 articles

Prognostic biomarkers for predicting decompensation in alcoholic and non-alcoholic patients with compensated cirrhosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
Kristina  BaktikulovaKristina Baktikulova1Saulesh  KurmangaliyevaSaulesh Kurmangaliyeva1Kairat  KurmangaliyevKairat Kurmangaliyev1Konstantin  TissinKonstantin Tissin2Nadiar  Maratovich MussinNadiar Maratovich Mussin2Amin  TamadonAmin Tamadon2*
  • 1West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov Medical University, Aktobe, Kazakhstan
  • 2West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov State Medical University, Aktobe, Fars province, Kazakhstan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Hepatic decompensation is a critical turning point in the progression of compensated cirrhosis, with distinct pathophysiological trajectories in alcoholic and non-alcoholic etiologies.This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates prognostic biomarkers for predicting decompensation in patients with compensated cirrhosis, emphasizing differences between alcoholic and non-alcoholic liver disease.Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for peer-reviewed studies (up to April 2025) reporting hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals for biomarkers predicting decompensation in adults with compensated cirrhosis. Eligible studies included observational cohorts and control arms of RCTs, stratified by etiology (alcoholic vs. non-alcoholic). Data were pooled using random-effects models, with heterogeneity assessed via I² and Cochrane Q tests. Subgroup analyses explored biomarker performance by etiology and type (inflammatory, functional, and structural).Results: From 691 records, 66 studies (37,063 patients; Among these, 955 patients (2.6%) were alcoholic and 36,108 (97.4%) non-alcoholic, totaling 37,063 participants2.6% alcoholic, and 97.4% non-alcoholic) were included. In non-alcoholic cirrhosis, structural biomarkers like portal vein diameter (HR=7. 39 [4.90, 11.15]) and spleen size (HR=5. 79 [2.00, 16.80]) were strong predictors, alongside functional markers such as bilirubin (HR=4. 27 [2.93, 6.22]) and MELD score (HR=1. 13 [1.07, 1.20]). In alcoholic cirrhosis, inflammatory biomarkers, particularly extracellular vesicles (HR=5. 09 [2.01, 12.86]) and 2.75]), showed superior predictive value. Interleukin-6 was predictive across both etiologies (HR=1. 31 [1.00, 1.71]).Heterogeneity was substantial (I²>50%) for most biomarkers, reflecting population and methodological variability. Publication bias was low based on funnel plots and Egger's test.Etiology-specific biomarkers enhance prognostic accuracy in compensated cirrhosis.Structural and functional markers dominate in non-alcoholic cirrhosis, while inflammatory biomarkers are more predictive in alcoholic cirrhosis. Integrating these into personalized risk models could improve clinical management, though prospective validation is needed.

Keywords: biomarkers, Disease, Progression Liver, Cirrhosis Prognosis, Humans

Received: 19 Jun 2025; Accepted: 28 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Baktikulova, Kurmangaliyeva, Kurmangaliyev, Tissin, Mussin and Tamadon. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Amin Tamadon, West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov State Medical University, Aktobe, Fars province, Kazakhstan

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.