CLINICAL TRIAL article
Front. Med.
Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology
Effect of Dural Puncture Epidural Combined with Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus on Labor Analgesia in Patients with Gestational Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Provisionally accepted
- Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy affect 5%–10% of pregnancies and require the maintenance of hemodynamic stability while providing effective labor analgesia. This study compared the efficacy and safety of dural puncture epidural (DPE) block combined with programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) versus conventional epidural (EP) block in labor analgesia for patients with gestational hypertension (GH). Methods: Between January and March 2025, 98 primiparous women with GH and singleton pregnancies who requested neuraxial analgesia were randomized to receive either DPE–PIEB (Group D, n = 49) or EP–PIEB (Group E, n = 49). The primary outcome was time to effective analgesic onset (defined as Visual Analog Scale score≤ 30 mm). Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic stability, patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) use, incidence of breakthrough pain, maternal and infant outcomes, and adverse events. Results: Compared with EP–PIEB, patients receiving DPE–PIEB had a shorter onset of analgesia (6.05 ± 1.08 vs. 9.75 ± 1.3 min, P < 0.001), a longer time to first PCEA request (144.33 ± 17.18 vs. 116.58 ± 14.03 min, P < 0.001), fewer PCEA demands (2.78 ± 0.83 vs. 4.53 ± 1.26, P < 0.001), and had a lower incidence of breakthrough pain (9.1% vs. 25%, P < 0.05). The repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated that patients in Group D maintained lower and more consistent Mean arterial pressure (MAP) values throughout labor. MAP values were significantly lower at time points T1, T3, T4, and T5 in the DPE–PIEB group (P < 0.05), and maternal satisfaction scores were higher (9.39 ± 0.75 vs. 9.02 ± 0.76, P < 0.05). No significant between-group differences were found in neonatal outcomes (Apgar score, umbilical artery pH) or the incidence of adverse events between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions: DPE–PIEB can significantly shorten the onset of labor analgesia in patients with GH, reduce hemodynamic fluctuations and breakthrough pain, and improve maternal satisfaction, without increasing maternal or neonatal risks. This combined technique provides a more optimized analgesic strategy and can be safely and effectively implemented in labor analgesia for patients with GH.
Keywords: Analgesia, Epidural, Anesthesia, Spinal, Analgesia, Obstetrical, Infusions, Epidural, Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced
Received: 24 Jun 2025; Accepted: 30 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Zhang, Wu, Li, Liu and Zhao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Kai Zhao, 13180491860@163.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.