ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Geriatric Medicine
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1654670
Comparative Effectiveness of Manual Therapy and Band Exercises Combined with High-Intensity Walking for Pain, Posture, and Cardiorespiratory Health in Older Adults: A Randomised Clinical Trial
Provisionally accepted- 1Universitat de Valencia Facultat de Fisioterapia, Valencia, Spain
- 2Western University Ivey Business School, London, Canada
- 3Universidad Europea de Valencia SLU, Valencia, Spain
- 4Prague City University a s, Prague, Czechia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Musculoskeletal pain and cardiovascular and pulmonary disorders affect the growing population of older adults. Manual therapy has proven to be effective, however, research using elastic bands is still scarce. The aim of this manuscript is to compare the effects of elastic band program training versus a manual therapy protocol, both combined with high-intensity walking, on age-related health parameters, such as pain, posture, and cardiorespiratory variables. Methods: A multicentre randomised clinical trial was conducted on community dwelling older adults with non-specific musculoskeletal pain. Participants were divided into 2 groups: 1) Manual therapy and high-intensity walking group (MTWG), who received self-assisted manual therapy followed by supervised high-intensity walking and 2) Elastic band and high-intensity walking group (EBWG) who performed resistance exercises with elastic bands and high-intensity walking. Musculoskeletal pressure pain threshold in trapezius muscles, back pain intensity, postural pattern (change in thorax position and chest wall expansion) and cardiorespiratory variables (heart rate and oxygen saturation, SpO2) were measured before the intervention (T0), after the 4-week programme (T1) and after the 4-week follow-up (T2). Results: A total of 102 older adults (49 in the MTWG and 53 in EBWG) completed the study and were analysed. Five RM-MANCOVA models were specified. The EBWG showed significantly higher PPT scores than the MTWG across all data points (p. <.01); a between-within-subjects effect was found for VAS scores (p < .05) (Model A). Statistically significant within-subject differences were found for the left acromion-to-bed distance scores (p < .05) but not for the right-side scores (Model B). Similarly, significant between-subject differences for the upper chest wall were found (p. <.05), but not for the lower chest wall. However, univariate tests revealed significant within-subject for both the upper and lower chest wall scores. Finally, no significant differences were found in pulmonary function scores (Model D), heart rate (HR) or oxygen saturation scores (Model E). Conclusions: Both protocols reduce pain. Manual therapy helps with non-specific back pain and improves acromion-to-table posture, while elastic band treatment enhances trapezius pressure threshold and upper thoracic expansion. Neither improved lower thoracic mobility or respiratory variables.
Keywords: older adults, manual therapy, Elastic band, Pain, Posture, cardiorespiratory
Received: 26 Jun 2025; Accepted: 14 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Arnal-Gómez, Fuentes-Aparicio, Marques-Sule, Monzani, Cogollos-de-la-Peña, Pavlu and Espí-lópez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Laura Fuentes-Aparicio, laura.fuentes@uv.es
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.