Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Med.

Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1656737

This article is part of the Research TopicEnhancing Public Health Workforce Competencies: AI Integration and Post-Pandemic Educational ReformsView all 12 articles

Efficacy of simulation-based training of airway management in preparing hospitals for the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review

Provisionally accepted
Myrtha  Magdalena KohlerMyrtha Magdalena Kohler1Michaela  KolbeMichaela Kolbe2,3Benedict  KörtgenBenedict Körtgen1Stephanie  AngstStephanie Angst4Anna  Maria BarbulAnna Maria Barbul5Lisa  SeufertLisa Seufert6Radek  HasalRadek Hasal4Lea  BuehrerLea Buehrer7Ulrike  HeldUlrike Held7Bastian  GrandeBastian Grande3,8*
  • 1University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 2UniversitatsSpital Zurich Simulationszentrum, Zürich, Switzerland
  • 3Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
  • 4Stadtspital Zurich Triemli, Zürich, Switzerland
  • 5Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
  • 6Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia
  • 7Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, Universitat Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
  • 8UniversitatsSpital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: In response to the coronavirus pandemic, hospitals worldwide implemented simulation-based training to prepare healthcare providers for the revised protocols regarding airway management in infectious COVID-19 patients. We conducted a systematic review of simulation studies regarding airway management of COVID-19 patients with the aim of analyzing the findings of these studies and consolidating evidence-based recommendations in order to optimize the response to possible future pandemics. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, MedLine and Cochrane Library on August 25th 2022. As the different studies measured different outcomes (e.g. only confidence, only knowledge or both) in different ways, a random effects model was used for meta-analysis and change scores were calculated. Results: The systematic review included 20 studies after screening 141 articles. Meta-analyses revealed significant improvements in confidence and knowledge of the participants after the simulation training, supported by negative standardized mean differences (Cohen's d). Sensitivity analysis confirmed robust results across correlation estimates. However, there was a high risk of publication bias, as funnel plots showed asymmetry and studies the 95% confidence interval. Conclusions: This systematic review highlights the effectiveness of simulation training in improving healthcare providers' confidence and knowledge during pandemic-related airway management. The findings underscore the positive impact of simulation-based education, as demonstrated by significant pre-to post-training improvements. However, the observed publication bias suggests that further high-quality, unbiased studies are necessary to strengthen the evidence base and inform future training programs for pandemic preparedness.

Keywords: Simulation training, Airway Management, Difficult intubation, COVID, pandemic

Received: 30 Jun 2025; Accepted: 29 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Kohler, Kolbe, Körtgen, Angst, Barbul, Seufert, Hasal, Buehrer, Held and Grande. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Bastian Grande, bastian.grande@usz.ch

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.