STUDY PROTOCOL article
Front. Med.
Sec. Precision Medicine
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1657906
Effectiveness of Magnetic Seizure Therapy versus Electroconvulsive Therapy for Major Depressive Episode in China: Protocol for a Double-blind, Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial
Provisionally accepted- 1Shanghai Mental Health Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
- 2First Hospital/First Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
- 3Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
- 4Ningbo Kangning Hospital, Ningbo, China
- 5Zhenjiang Mental Health Center, Zhenjiang, China
- 6The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
- 7Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- 8Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been a cornerstone in treating Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), demonstrating high efficacy but often limited by cognitive side effects. As an alternative, magnetic seizure therapy (MST) has emerged, offering comparable antidepressant effects with potentially fewer cognitive adverse outcomes. This study aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and cognitive impact of MST and ECT. This multicenter, double-blind, parallel, non-inferiority randomized clinical trial will be conducted at seven clinical centers. Participants diagnosed with MDD will be randomly allocated to either the ECT or MST group. Each center aims to recruit 30 participants, resulting in a total sample size of 210. The intervention includes 12 sessions over 4 weeks, followed by 12-week follow-up. Assessments (the 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-24), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), 8 cognitive tests, Electroencephalography, electrocardiography) occur at baseline, post-sessions 3/6/9/12 (3 hours after each session), and 4-/8-/12-week follow-ups. The primary outcome is the change in HDRS-24 total score from baseline to the 12-week follow-up, which is assessed after the completion of the 12-session acute treatment phase (conducted over 4 weeks) and a subsequent 12-week post-treatment observation period. Randomization and blinding protocols will be strictly followed to ensure unbiased treatment administration and assessment. This trial aims to provide robust evidence that MST is as effective as ECT in reducing depressive symptoms (assessed via HDRS-24) and to confirm its superior cognitive safety, with the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised as an additional primary outcome to evaluate verbal memory changes. Remaining cognitive measures will serve as secondary outcomes. Exploratory analyses will examine electroencephalography and electrocardiography data to identify potential neurophysiological biomarkers. If successful, this trial could significantly influence clinical practices and improve seizure treatment for patients with MDD.
Keywords: Seizure treatment, Electroconvulsive Therapy, magnetic seizure therapy, randomized controlled trial, Major Depressive Disorder
Received: 02 Jul 2025; Accepted: 17 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, He, Liu, Ju, Yang, Zhou, Hong, Wei, Tang, Zheng, Jia, Liu, Zhou, Hu, Wang, Zheng, Zeng, An, Li and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Tianhong Zhang, Shanghai Mental Health Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.