ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1659074
Exploration of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Female Pelvic Floor Reconstruction: A retrospective Study
Provisionally accepted
- 1Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
- 2Wuhan Jiangxia District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a prevalent condition treated with pelvic floor reconstruction surgery, which can be associated with significant postoperative morbidity. This study evaluated the safety and feasibility of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol specifically for this procedure. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 80 patients undergoing POP surgery between March 2022 and March 2023; 39 were managed with the ERAS protocol and 41 received conventional care. The ERAS pathway comprised multimodal interventions across preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases. Primary outcomes were postoperative length of stay (LOS) and hospitalization costs. Results: The ERAS group had a significantly shorter postoperative LOS (112.14 vs. 154.87 hours, P < 0.001) and lower hospitalization costs (¥40,483.02 vs. ¥42,942.12, P = 0.037) than the control group. There were no 30-day readmissions or reoperations in either group. The incidence of PONV was lower in the ERAS group (2.6% vs. 19.5%, P = 0.029). Time to first flatus, first ambulation, full unassisted ambulation, and return to basic activities of daily living (ADLs) were all significantly shorter in the ERAS group (all P < 0.05), and the overall complication rate was lower. Both groups showed comparable and significant improvements in POP-Q stage and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scores at 30-day follow-up, with no significant differences in VAS or Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores between groups. Conclusions: The implementation of the ERAS protocol for pelvic floor reconstruction is safe, feasible, and effective, leading to accelerated recovery, shortened hospital stay, and reduced cost, without compromising patient safety or satisfaction. These findings support the broader adoption of ERAS in POP surgery.
Keywords: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP), Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), Pelvic floor reconstruction surgery, length of hospital stay(LOS), Postoperative Complications
Received: 03 Jul 2025; Accepted: 20 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Xiao, Hong, Wan, Tang, Min, Hu, Li, Chen and Hong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Li Hong, dr_hongli@whu.edu.cn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.