Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.

Sec. Geriatric Medicine

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1659438

This article is part of the Research TopicInnovations and Strategies for Comprehensive Frailty Management in Older PeopleView all 17 articles

Construction of Risk Prediction Model for Dysphagia in Hospitalized Elderly Patients with Frailty

Provisionally accepted
Yuzhu  LinYuzhu LinChen  XUChen XU*Xue  SONGXue SONGQin  TANQin TANXiaolei  LianXiaolei Lian
  • Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective:To investigate the current status of dysphagia in hospitalized elderly patients with frailty,and construct a risk prediction model for dysphagia in hospitalized elderly patients with frailty.Methods:A total of 300 hospitalized elderly patients with frailty were selected as research subjects using a convenience sampling method from May to December 2024 in a tertiary general hospital in Mianyang. The survey tools included the General Information Questionnaire, Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF), Geriatric Self -Efficacy Scale for Oral Health ( GSEOH), Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI), and 5-Item Geriatric Depression Scale(GDS-15).Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0 software, and variable selection was conducted using the backward LR method to construct the risk prediction model.Results:A total of 300 questionnaires were distributed, and 287 valid questionnaires were retrieved, with an effective recovery rate of 95.7%.Among the 287 patients, 103 cases (35.9%) were identified with dysphagia.Among the 202 patients with a history of choking, 80 cases (39.6%) were identified as having swallowing disorders. In contrast, among the 85 patients without a history of choking, 23 cases (27.1%) had swallowing disorders. The difference was statistically significant (χ²=4.092, P=0.043).Logistic regression analysis showed that age, history of coughing, polypharmacy, malnutrition, oral health-related self-efficacy, and oral health assessment index were risk factors for dysphagia in elderly patients with frailty (P<0.05).The constructed risk prediction model was:Logit P = 0.770 × Age + 0.919 × Polypharmacy + 1.009 × History of Coughing + 1.208 × Malnutrition -0.113 × Oral Health-Related Self-Efficacy -0.262 × Oral Health Assessment Index + 10.200.The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test indicated no statistically significant difference between the model's predictions and actual outcomes (χ2 = 6.939, P = 0.543, P>0.05). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.875, with a sensitivity of 0.631 and a specificity of 0.891.Conclusion:The incidence of dysphagia in hospitalized elderly patients with frailty is relatively high. The main influencing factors include age, history of coughing, polypharmacy, malnutrition, oral health assessment index, and oral health-related self-efficacy. The constructed risk prediction model demonstrates high calibration and discrimination abilities, providing a valuable reference for the early detection, prevention, and intervention of dysphagia in hospitalized elderly patients with frailty.

Keywords: dysphagia, Frailty, Elderly, Influencing factors, Risk prediction model

Received: 04 Jul 2025; Accepted: 04 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Lin, XU, SONG, TAN and Lian. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Chen XU, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.