Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CASE REPORT article

Front. Med., 21 October 2025

Sec. Infectious Diseases: Pathogenesis and Therapy

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1661140

Atypical presentation of cryptococcal meningitis in oncology patients: Case Report

Jing WeiJing Wei1Haiyan HuangHaiyan Huang2Yingyu ZhangYingyu Zhang3Yanlan HuangYanlan Huang1Yingfang LiangYingfang Liang1Shan Jiang
Shan Jiang1*
  • 1Department of Neuro and Cardiovascular Medicine, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
  • 2Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism Nephropathy, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
  • 3Division of Molecular Signaling, Department of the Advanced Biomedical Research, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan

Cryptococcal meningitis (CM) is a serious central nervous system (CNS) infection primarily affecting immuno-compromised individuals, including cancer patients. Although rare in oncology populations, it may present atypically and pose diagnostic challenges. We report two cases of malignancy-associated CM with non-classical features. The first involved a male with lung squamous cell carcinoma and multiple comorbidities, presenting with mild cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis and normal opening pressure. The second case involved a female with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and concurrent cryptococcal and purulent meningitis, showing marked leukocytosis and elevated CSF pressure. Neither had recent antitumor therapy. Despite similar initial symptoms of fever and headache, their clinical courses diverged: the male recovered with antifungal treatment, while the female had a poor response and discontinued therapy. These cases highlight the variable and atypical nature of CM in cancer patients and underscore the importance of early recognition and inclusion of fungal infections in the differential diagnosis for CNS complications, even in the absence of classical features.

Introduction

CM is a subacute or chronic meningoencephalitis caused by Cryptococcus species, and represents the most severe and frequent clinical manifestation of disseminated cryptococcal infection. Global surveillance estimates an annual incidence of approximately 250,000 cases, with over 181,000 associated deaths, highlighting its substantial global health burden (1).

As an opportunistic pathogen, Cryptococcus poses a significant risk to immunocompromised individuals. Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-associated immunosuppression is the predominant risk factor, accounting for up to 80% of cryptococcosis cases in Western countries. However, cases among non-HIV immunocompromised populations are increasingly recognized. These now represent approximately 5–10% of the total disease burden (2). Established risk factors in this group include prolonged corticosteroid or immunosuppressive therapy, solid organ transplantation, hematologic malignancies, and poorly controlled diabetes mellitus (35).

Among non-HIV patients, individuals with malignancies represent a particularly vulnerable subgroup. In these patients, CM often presents with atypical or non-specific clinical features, leading to frequent diagnostic delays and poorer outcomes (6, 7). The variability in presentation is likely influenced by the nature of the underlying malignancy (solid vs. hematologic), the degree of immune compromise, and concurrent comorbid conditions.

Here, we report two cases of CM in HIV-negative patients with distinct oncologic backgrounds. The first case involves a male patient with lung squamous cell carcinoma, diabetes mellitus, and membranous nephropathy, receiving long-term immunosuppressive therapy (tacrolimus and corticosteroids). The second case concerns a female patient with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Notably, neither patient had received recent antineoplastic treatment, yet both exhibited significant predisposing factors for invasive cryptococcal infection.

These cases highlight the diagnostic challenges posed by the variable manifestations of CM in oncology patients and emphasize the necessity for increased clinical vigilance. The divergent outcomes were likely influenced by factors including the type of underlying malignancy, host immune status, and therapeutic interventions.

Case description

Case 1

A 69-year-old male was admitted on August 30, 2023, with a two-month history of intermittent fever and headache. Before admission, the patient developed intermittent fever with peak temperatures up to 38.4 °C. The febrile episodes occurred irregularly in both frequency and duration, and were accompanied by chills and persistent distending headaches, most pronounced in the bilateral temporal regions. The patient denied vomiting, diplopia, vision loss, visual field deficits, limb numbness, or weakness. Headache intensity tended to diminish following defervescence, though it was associated with dizziness and blurred vision. Additionally, the patient reported an occasional paroxysmal cough productive of white mucoid sputum. Although antipyretic therapy provided temporary symptomatic relief, fever recurred repeatedly. The patient reported no contact with birds, avian droppings, or related materials prior to symptom onset, and no travel history to cryptococcus-endemic regions. His past medical history included stage II membranous nephropathy, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. Renal function had stabilized following a course of corticosteroid and tacrolimus treatment. Diabetes and hypertension were controlled with metformin and nifedipine, respectively. Physical examination revealed stable vital signs and no lymphadenopathy. Cardiopulmonary and abdominal examinations were unremarkable. The patient was alert, oriented, and exhibited no behavioral or psychiatric abnormalities. Cognitive functions, including memory and calculation, remained intact. Cranial nerve examination was normal. Gait was steady without involuntary movements. Muscle tone and strength were normal (5/5) in all limbs, with intact sensation and physiological reflexes. Pathological reflexes were absent. Nuchal rigidity was present. Autonomic functions were normal.

Upon admission, the patient underwent a comprehensive diagnostic evaluation. Chest computed tomography (CT) identified a nodular lesion within the posterior segment of the right upper lobe. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated multiple contrast-enhancing lesions involving the left frontal lobe, parafalcine region, right frontal lobe, and the sulcus of the left parietal lobe (Figure 1). Laboratory investigations revealed elevations in the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), while the white blood cell count, neutrophil percentage, and procalcitonin (PCT) level remained within normal limits. Cryptococcus neoformans capsular antigen test (CrAg) returned a positive result (Table 1). Additional testing, including autoantibody screening, (1,3)-β-D-glucan assay, Aspergillus galactomannan antigen testing, and HIV antigen/antibody assays, yielded negative results. No microbial growth was observed in cultures of bone marrow, blood, or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. In light of the suspected malignant pulmonary nodules, the patient subsequently underwent bronchoscopy with biopsy. Histopathological examination of the endobronchial biopsy confirmed squamous cell carcinoma. In response to persistent headache and fever, a lumbar puncture was performed, which revealed an opening CSF pressure of 112 cm H₂O. CSF analysis demonstrated pleocytosis, elevated protein concentration, and hypoglycorrhachia. No malignant cells were identified on cytological examination (Table 2).

Figure 1
Three MRI brain scans showing different sections, each with an arrow indicating areas of interest. The left and right scans are coronal views, while the middle scan is an axial view. All arrows point to areas with abnormalities or lesions.

Figure 1. Cranial MRI demonstrates contrast-enhancing lesions in the following locations: the left frontal lobe, parafalcine region, right frontal lobe, and adjacent to the sulcus of the left parietal lobe (arrows).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Pre-treatment laboratory test results of blood.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Pre-treatment cerebrospinal fluid analysis.

Integrating these diagnostic results with the patient’s medical history confirmed the following conditions: CM, squamous cell carcinoma of the right upper lobe, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. Treatment for CM was initiated with daily administration of amphotericin B cholesterol complex (280 mg) and flucytosine (1.5 g every 6 h) from September 2 to September 12, 2023. A repeat lumbar puncture on September 4 was intended to evaluate for autoimmune encephalitis and to perform CSF metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) for exclusion of other infections; however, due to financial constraints, only mNGS was conducted. The opening pressure was 152 cmH₂O. Both CSF culture and mNGS (the relative abundance of Cryptococcus neoformans was 20.45%) confirmed Cryptococcus neoformans infection, with no other pathogens detected. CSF analysis at this time showed persistent pleocytosis (387 × 106/L), a mildly elevated protein level (2.37 g/L), and decreased glucose (1.88 mmol/L) and chloride (106 mmol/L) concentrations. On September 8, PCT was mildly elevated (0.069 ng/mL), while hs-CRP remained stable (11.81 mg/L). After treatment, the patient’s fever and headache gradually resolved with no deterioration in neurological function. Given the active fungal infection, systemic antitumor therapy was deferred. The patient was discharged in stable condition following clinical improvement and resolution of the infectious symptoms.

Following discharge, the patient was referred to a local hospital and completed an additional month of antifungal therapy consisting of daily amphotericin B cholesterol complex (280 mg) and flucytosine (1.5 g every 6 h). The patient returned for an outpatient follow-up visit upon completion of this treatment and reported complete resolution of both headache and fever. Although hospitalization was recommended for further management of his lung tumor, the patient declined admission. There has been no further contact with him since that visit, and all subsequent attempts to reach the patient by telephone have been unsuccessful.

Case 2

On November 25, 2024, a 67-year-old female was admitted to the Department of Hematological Oncology and Pediatric Oncology with a chief complaint of recurrent fever and headache persisting for more than 10 days. Her symptoms began on November 16, 2024, with intermittent fever reaching a maximum temperature of 38.5 °C, accompanied by a persistent headache. Additional symptoms included altered mental status, generalized fatigue, reduced appetite, and sleep disturbances. Although antipyretic medications provided temporary relief, the fever recurred despite oral antibiotic therapy, leading to hospitalization. The patient reported no known exposure to birds, bird droppings, or related materials, and no travel history to cryptococcus-endemic regions prior to symptom onset. The patient had a known history of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). As her condition did not meet the criteria for treatment initiation, no therapeutic intervention had been administered. Over the preceding 3 months, she experienced multiple recurrent episodes of herpes zoster infection. There was no history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or other significant comorbidities, and no underlying immune disorders were documented. Her physical exam revealed that she was in stable condition but exhibited a depressed mental state, appearing quiet and withdrawn. Multiple enlarged lymph nodes were palpated bilaterally in the cervical regions. The largest node measured approximately 3 × 3 cm, with a firm consistency, fixed position, no tenderness, and an intact overlying skin without ulceration. Cardiopulmonary and abdominal exams were unremarkable. Cognitive functions, including orientation, memory, and calculation, remained intact. No abnormalities were detected on cranial nerve examination. The patient’s gait is normal, with no involuntary movements observed. Muscle tone and strength in all limbs are normal (grade 5/5). Both deep and superficial sensations are intact. Deep tendon reflexes and superficial reflexes are physiological, and no pathological reflexes are present. Nuchal rigidity was noted; however, coordination remains unimpaired. Autonomic function appears normal.

Following admission, laboratory investigations revealed leukocytosis with a normal neutrophil percentage. Inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP) and PCT, were within normal limits (Table 1). Serological testing for HIV antigen/antibody was negative. Given the presentation of recurrent fever and headache, along with a history of recurrent herpes zoster infections over the past 3 months, viral encephalitis or meningitis was suspected. Empirical anti-infective therapy was initiated with cefoperazone-sulbactam (3 g every 12 h), moxifloxacin (0.4 g daily), and acyclovir (0.5 g every 8 h). Despite this treatment, the patient remained febrile. Due to increasing concern for intracranial infection, she was transferred to our unit on November 26, 2024.

Upon transfer to our department, the existing anti-infective regimen was maintained, and a comprehensive diagnostic workup was initiated. Cranial MRI demonstrated multiple areas of leptomeningeal enhancement (Figure 2). Lumbar puncture revealed an elevated opening pressure of 240 mmH₂O. CSF analysis showed marked pleocytosis, elevated protein, and decreased glucose and chloride levels. Cytological examination identified abundant small lymphocytes, suggestive of CNS involvement by lymphoma (Table 2). mNGS of the CSF detected microbial genomes corresponding to Cryptococcus neoformans (77.78% relative abundance) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (28.57% relative abundance). No pathogenic autoantibodies associated with autoimmune encephalitis were detected. Additionally, CSF smear confirmed the presence of Cryptococcus neoformans, and the CrAg was positive.

Figure 2
Three MRI brain scans with different views: transverse, coronal, and sagittal. Each image has orange arrows pointing to specific areas within the brain, indicating points of interest or abnormalities.

Figure 2. Contrast-enhanced cranial MRI demonstrates leptomeningeal enhancement along the sulci and cisterns. (arrows).

Based on these collective findings, the patient was diagnosed with concurrent cryptococcal and bacterial meningitis. The recommended initial antimicrobial therapy included amphotericin B, flucytosine, and piperacillin-tazobactam. However, due to concerns regarding the cost and potential toxicity of amphotericin B, the patient declined this treatment. On November 28, 2024, the antifungal regimen was adjusted to intravenous fluconazole (0.4 g every 12 h) in combination with piperacillin-sulbactam sodium (3 g every 6 h). Following initiation of the modified antimicrobial therapy, the patient continued to experience intermittent fever. On December 2, 2024, after consultation with the clinical pharmacy team, the antimicrobial regimen was escalated to meropenem (2 g every 12 h) combined with fluconazole (0.4 g every 12 h). Follow-up laboratory testing on December 5, 2024, revealed a decrease in white blood cell count but an increase in CRP levels compared to previous results. Despite these adjustments, the patient remained febrile (Figure 3) and developed drowsiness. Neurological examination revealed no significant changes, indicating a poor therapeutic response and an unfavorable prognosis.

Figure 3
Line graph depicting body temperature in degrees Celsius over fourteen days for two cases. Case 1, represented by green diamonds, varies around 38°C. Case 2, shown by red triangles, fluctuates between 38°C and 39°C.

Figure 3. The figure traces the body temperature profiles of two patients throughout their hospitalization. Case 1 exhibited fever resolution following treatment, whereas the fever in Case 2 proved refractory and persisted.

After a thorough discussion of the clinical prognosis, the patient and her family elected to discontinue treatment and were discharged against medical advice. The patient subsequently sought care at another hospital but was soon discharged again due to the poor prognosis. All subsequent attempts to reestablish contact were unsuccessful, and no further follow-up could be conducted.

Discussion

Cryptococcosis is a classic opportunistic infection, primarily affecting immuno-compromised individuals. In oncology patients, several factors contribute to immune dysfunction, including tumor-induced disruption of immune surveillance mechanisms and immunosuppression mediated by the tumor microenvironment. These pathophysiological changes create a profoundly immunodeficient state, significantly increasing susceptibility to opportunistic infections such as cryptococcal disease (8). Among HIV-negative individuals, the most significant risk factors for cryptococcosis include malignancies, sarcoidosis, chronic corticosteroid therapy, tacrolimus use, and diabetes mellitus (35).

Tumor-associated CM often presents with attenuated CSF inflammatory response and atypical clinical features. Notably, only 5% of cancer patients with concurrent meningitis exhibit the classic triad of fever, neck stiffness, and altered mental status (6). In one of the two cases we reported, a male patient with lung squamous cell carcinoma presented with an atypical clinical course. Prior to his cancer diagnosis, he had comorbid diabetes mellitus and membranous nephropathy, for which he had received long-term corticosteroid and tacrolimus therapy. His presentation deviated from typical CM cases, as the lumbar puncture revealed normal CSF opening pressure—a rare finding that can complicate diagnosis. Similar cases have been documented in the literature, including instances where CM in non-cancer patients was initially misdiagnosed as normal pressure hydrocephalus (911). The patient’s underlying conditions, including membranous nephropathy and diabetes mellitus, not only predisposed him to cryptococcal infection but also contributed to the diagnostic complexity.

CM frequently manifests with nonspecific symptoms, which can obscure timely diagnosis and lead to delays in treatment (5). In this case, the patient presented with fever and headache as primary complaints. Neuroimaging revealed multiple contrast-enhancing cerebral nodules, which, in the context of his history of lung squamous cell carcinoma, raised strong suspicion for metastatic intracranial disease. This posed a significant diagnostic challenge. Ultimately, the diagnosis of CM was confirmed through comprehensive CSF analysis, including Cryptococcus neoformans smear and culture. This case highlights the critical importance of thorough CSF evaluation in immunocompromised patients, as reliance on radiographic findings alone may lead to diagnostic delays. Such delays, coupled with suboptimal antimicrobial therapy, are well-established contributors to adverse clinical outcomes in cryptococcal CNS infections (12). In immunocompromised cancer patients presenting with fever and headache, routine CSF CrAg should be performed regardless of CSF pressure measurements, given their heightened susceptibility to opportunistic infections. The second case involves a female patient with CLL who was hospitalized for recurrent fever and headache. Unlike the first case, this patient exhibited marked leukocytosis in both peripheral blood and CSF, accompanied by significantly elevated CSF opening pressure (240 mmH₂O). Such findings deviate from the typical presentation of CM, which is usually characterized by normal or mildly elevated leukocyte counts (13). These atypical features could have been easily misinterpreted as manifestations of her underlying CLL, potentially delaying diagnosis. Initial clinical suspicion of bacterial co-infection was later confirmed by CSF mNGS, which identified dual infections with Cryptococcus neoformans and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Despite multiple adjustments to her antimicrobial regimen targeting both pathogens, the patient continued to experience recurrent fever and headache. Ultimately, the patient and her family chose to discontinue treatment and requested discharge against medical advice.

Therefore, in patients with malignant tumors who develop neurological symptoms, such as fever and headache, multiple etiologies should be considered. The primary diagnostic goals are to determine whether the patient has intracranial metastasis, autoimmune encephalitis, or an intracranial infection. Single or multiple pathogens may cause intracranial infections. Thus, we recommend the following tests for differential diagnosis: contrast-enhanced MRI of the head, CSF cytology, CSF antibody testing for autoimmune encephalitis, CSF mNGS, and CrAg.

The two cases illustrate distinct clinical outcomes: the female patient with CLL demonstrated poor treatment response, while the male patient with lung squamous cell carcinoma achieved favorable therapeutic results. Several factors may explain this disparity. Currently, no universally established treatment standard exists for HIV-negative patients with CM. Multiple studies and clinical guidelines recommend amphotericin B in combination with flucytosine as the first-line induction therapy. Although some reports have documented the use of amphotericin B alone or fluconazole monotherapy, the combination of amphotericin B and flucytosine has been associated with superior survival outcomes in non-HIV-infected individuals (7, 8, 1416). For CM, our team employs consistent anti-infection regimens for both tumor and non-tumor patients. The principal distinction lies in the duration of induction therapy, which is tailored individually for cancer patients based on specific clinical factors. These include tumor type, rate of progression, and the patient’s overall tolerance to treatment. In cases with a high risk of rapid tumor progression, the combined regimen of amphotericin B and flucytosine is abbreviated to approximately 2 weeks, followed by maintenance therapy with oral fluconazole. Additionally, the patient’s financial capacity is carefully considered when designing the antifungal treatment plan. Throughout subsequent combined antitumor and antifungal therapy, our team conducts close monitoring of blood counts, liver function, and renal function. However, the CLL patient received fluconazole monotherapy due to financial constraints and concerns about amphotericin B toxicity, especially in the context of hematologic malignancy. In contrast, the lung cancer patient adhered to the recommended treatment regimen. Although fluconazole is effective against CM (17), the choice of regimen may influence prognosis, warranting further investigation. Notably, susceptibility testing in the male patient revealed intermediate sensitivity to fluconazole, while no CSF cultures were obtained for the CLL patient, leaving the possibility of fluconazole resistance unexamined—a potential contributor to treatment failure. Meanwhile, the CLL patient faced additional complications, including concurrent Pseudomonas aeruginosa meningitis and suspected CNS lymphoma infiltration. These factors likely compounded the therapeutic challenges and increased the risk of poor outcomes. Furthermore, studies suggest that involvement of arachnoid granulations, where abundant cryptococcal cells often accumulate, correlates with elevated CSF pressure in CM (18). The significantly higher CSF pressure observed in the CLL patient compared to the male patient may reflect a greater fungal burden, potentially contributing to her worse prognosis. Based on our team’s clinical experience, we have observed that the prognosis of CM in this patient population appears to be influenced by both polymicrobial co-infection and intracranial metastasis, despite considerable variability in clinical presentation. These findings, though derived from a limited two-case series, highlight the need for larger multicenter studies to further elucidate the complexity of this condition.

Conclusion

CM in patients with malignancies often exhibits non-specific clinical manifestations. Therefore, routine CrAg in CSF is strongly recommended for those with persistent fever or headache, even when typical risk factors are absent. Due to the high prevalence of polymicrobial co-infections in this population, comprehensive diagnostic approaches, including mNGS and antifungal susceptibility testing, are essential to guide targeted and effective treatment.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital Ethical Review Committee. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The human samples used in this study were acquired from the samples were derived from the test samples taken during the patient’s hospitalization. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

JW: Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Validation, Visualization, Data curation, Project administration, Formal analysis. HH: Data curation, Validation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – original draft. YZ: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Validation. YH: Formal analysis, Data curation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. YL: Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Formal analysis. SJ: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Supervision, Investigation, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Project administration, Data curation, Validation.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. The research was supported by Self-funded Medical Research Project by Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Health Commission 2024 (Z-A20240692).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Iyer, KR, Revie, NM, Fu, C, and Robbins, N. Treatment strategies for cryptococcal infection: challenges, advances and future outlook. Nat Rev Microbiol. (2021) 19:11. doi: 10.1038/s41579-021-00511-0

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Lu, CH, Chang, WN, Chang, HW, and Chuang, YC. The prognostic factors of cryptococcal meningitis in HIV-negative patients. J Hosp Infect. (1999) 42:313–20. doi: 10.1053/jhin.1998.0610

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Li, X, Paccoud, O, Chan, KH, Yuen, KY, Manchon, R, Lanternier, F, et al. Cryptococcosis associated with biologic therapy: a narrative review. Open Forum Infect Dis. (2024) 11:ofae316. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae316

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Sardar, Z, Kim, CA-O, and Thakur, KT. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for Cryptococcal meningitis in diverse patient populations in New York City. Open Forum Infect Dis. (2024) 11:ofae576. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae576

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Su, B, Zhang, Q, and Lv, J. Cryptococcal meningitis in adult patients with primary nephrotic syndrome. Clin Nephrol. (2018) 90:390–5. doi: 10.5414/CN109384

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Safdieh, JE, Mead, PA, Sepkowitz, KA, Kiehn, TE, and Abrey, LE. Bacterial and fungal meningitis in patients with cancer. Neurology. (2008) 70:943–7. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000305960.85546.5f

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Gangadharan, SS, and Raveendranath, S. Cryptococcosis in oncology patients: a case series in a tertiary care cancer Centre. Iran J Microbiol. (2023) 15:821–5. doi: 10.18502/ijm.v15i6.14163

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Schmalzle, SA, Buchwald, UK, Gilliam, BL, and Riedel, DJ. Cryptococcus neoformans infection in malignancy. Mycoses. (2016) 59:542–52. doi: 10.1111/myc.12496

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Seo, T, Kim, HK, and Shin, JW. Chronic cryptococcal meningitis with a cryptococcoma presenting as normal pressure hydrocephalus: a case report. Encephalitis. (2023) 3:114–8. doi: 10.47936/encephalitis.2023.00038

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Dhitinanmuang, W, Chongtrakool, P, and Jitmuang, A. Undiagnosed Cryptococcus gattii meningitis leading to subsequent ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection in a patient with symptoms of normal pressure hydrocephalus: case report and literature review. BMC Infect Dis. (2018) 18:257. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3165-y

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Raheja, H, Sinha, A, Irukulla, PK, and Kupfer, Y. Cryptococcal meningitis masquerading as Normal pressure hydrocephalus in an immune-competent adult. J Glob Infect Dis. (2017) 9:157–9. doi: 10.4103/jgid.jgid_2_17

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Denning, DW. Global incidence and mortality of severe fungal disease. Lancet Infect Dis. (2024) 24:e269. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00103-8

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Wang, Y, Gu, Y, Shen, K, Cui, X, Min, R, Sun, S, et al. Clinical features of cryptococcosis in patients with different immune statuses: a multicenter study in Jiangsu Province-China. BMC Infect Dis. (2021) 21:1043. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06752-x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Chang, CC, Harrison, TS, Bicanic, TA, Chayakulkeeree, M, Sorrell, TC, Warris, A, et al. Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of cryptococcosis: an initiative of the ECMM and ISHAM in cooperation with the ASM. Lancet Infect Dis. (2024) 8:e495–512. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00731-4

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Takazono, T, Hidaka, Y, Morimoto, S, Tashiro, M, Ashizawa, N, Hirayama, T, et al. Comparison of liposomal amphotericin B alone and in combination with flucytosine in the treatment of non-HIV Cryptococcal meningitis: a nationwide observational study. Mycoses. (2022) 65:897–902. doi: 10.1111/myc.13493

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Liu, J, Dong, R, Zhang, H, Yao, S, Liu, J, Yang, L, et al. Clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcome of low-risk non-HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: a retrospective cohort study. Med Mycol. (2023) 61:myad122. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myad122

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Loua, OO, Alle Akakpo, AE, Ouedraogo, D, Cissoko, Y, Soumaré, M, and Konaté, I. Neuromeningeal cryptococcosis in an HIV-negative patient with pulmonary tuberculosis in the infectious and tropical diseases department of the University teaching hospital point G of Bamako, Mali. Med Trop Sante Int. (2022) 2:282. doi: 10.48327/mtsi.v2i4.2022.282

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Loyse, A, Wainwright, H, Jarvis, JN, Bicanic, T, Rebe, K, Meintjes, G, et al. Histopathology of the arachnoid granulations and brain in HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: correlation with cerebrospinal fluid pressure. AIDS. (2010) 24:405–10. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328333c005

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: cryptococcal meningitis, atypical clinical manifestations, Cancer, case report, clinical management

Citation: Wei J, Huang H, Zhang Y, Huang Y, Liang Y and Jiang S (2025) Atypical presentation of cryptococcal meningitis in oncology patients: Case Report. Front. Med. 12:1661140. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1661140

Received: 07 July 2025; Accepted: 22 September 2025;
Published: 21 October 2025.

Edited by:

Shisan Bao, The University of Sydney, Australia

Reviewed by:

Sisi Peng, Wuhan University, China
Simon Williams, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (NHNN), United Kingdom

Copyright © 2025 Wei, Huang, Zhang, Huang, Liang and Jiang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Shan Jiang, amlhbmdzaGFuOTI5QDE2My5jb20=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.