ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1662239
This article is part of the Research TopicExtracorporeal Organ Support: Innovations and Challenges in Critical CareView all 11 articles
Effects of the primary lung infection on outcomes in patients with severe ARDS treated with ECMO: A retrospective analysis
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology,, Dresden, Germany
- 2Technische Universitat Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- 3Universitatsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Zentrum fur Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung, Dresden, Germany
- 4Institute for Medical Microbiology and Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO) remains associated with high mortality. Whether etiology-based differentiation within infectious ARDS improves prognostic and therapeutic precision remains unclear. This study compared vvECMO-treated ARDS patients with different pulmonary infections to identify clinically relevant etiology-specific differences. Methods: The retrospective single-center cohort study included adult patients who received vvECMO for severe infectious pulmonary ARDS between 2014 and 2021. Patients were categorized into Covid-19 (n=48) and Non-Covid (n=44). Clinical parameters, disease progression, treatment, and outcomes were compared. Cox and modified Poisson regression analyses identified predictors of ICU mortality. Results: Non-Covid ARDS patients had greater disease severity at ECMO initiation, although mortality was lower: SOFA score (15.7 vs. 13.7; p=0.003); PRESERVE score (3.73 vs. 2.73; p=0.004). In Covid-19 ARDS, age ≥60 years (RR 1.62), early SOFA score worsening (RR 1.17), new renal replacement therapy (RR 1.60), and septic shock (RR 3.33) were associated with increased mortality, whereas these factors were not predictive in Non-Covid ARDS. Red blood cell transfusion was associated with reduced mortality in both groups (HR 0.96 and 0.95), while fresh frozen plasma transfusion increased mortality exclusively in Covid-19 ARDS (HR 1.09). A rising SOFA score within five days after ECMO initiation predicted mortality only in the Covid-19 cohort (RR 1.17). Conclusions: Even within primary infectious pulmonary ARDS, substantial heterogeneity exists. The underlying infection critically affects the prognostic value of clinical parameters, organ dysfunctions, and scoring systems in vvECMO-treated patients. Considering ARDS etiology may improve risk stratification and guide individualized therapy
Keywords: ECMO, Critical Care, Sepsis, Infections, ARDS, phenotyping
Received: 08 Jul 2025; Accepted: 17 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Mirus, Heubner, Brückner, Birkner, Güldner, Rand, Menk, Petrick, Harb and Spieth. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Martin Mirus, martin.mirus@tu-dresden.de
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.