Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CASE REPORT article

Front. Med., 17 October 2025

Sec. Pathology

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1662856

Primary mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the spleen: a case report and literature review


Bo ZhouBo Zhou1Canyang ZhanCanyang Zhan2Sheng Yan
Sheng Yan1*
  • 1Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
  • 2Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

Background: Tumors of the spleen are uncommon, and most represent metastases from primary organs. Primary mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the spleen is an extremely rare tumor. Only 11 cases have been reported in the literature.

Case presentation: Herein, we present a case of primary mucinous cystadenocarcinoma in the spleen in a 50-year-old woman. Abdominal CT and MRI revealed a 9.5 × 6.5 cm mixed solid-cystic lesion with heterogeneous enhancement of the mural nodules and septations, with secondary extension abutting the gastric fundus and pancreatic tail. Notably, tumor biomarker profiling demonstrated remarkable increases in CA19-9 (>12,000 U/ml) and CEA (41.5 ng/ml) levels. Following splenectomy, histopathology revealed the mass to be a mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. Given that metastatic cystadenocarcinoma is relatively common, investigations were performed to evaluate the primary site of malignancy. A whole-body PET-CT scan did not reveal any metabolically active lesions in any part of the body. Neither upper gastrointestinal endoscopy nor colonoscopy revealed any primary malignant lesions. Hence, it was reported as a primary mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the spleen.

Conclusion: The need for presenting this case is due to its rarity and because mucinous cystadenocarcinoma can be a rare differential diagnosis in cases of malignant splenic cysts.

Introduction

Splenic neoplasms, whether primary or metastatic, constitute uncommon clinical entities. Histopathologically, primary splenic tumors are classified into haematolymphoid and non-haematolymphoid categories, with lymphoproliferative malignancies and angiosarcoma demonstrating predominance in the respective subgroups (1). Metastatic involvement of the spleen has been documented in 2.3%−7.1% of autopsy series from cancer patients, typically manifesting as terminal events in disseminated oncological disease (2, 3).

Within the spectrum of mucinous cystic malignancies, ovarian, appendix, and pancreatic origins account for more than 90% of reported cases (4). In contrast, primary splenic cystadenocarcinomas represent exceptionally rare clinicopathological phenomena. To date, 11 cases of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the spleen have been reported worldwide (515). Here, we report a case of primary mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the spleen.

Case presentation

A 50-year-old woman was incidentally found to have splenic cystic lesions measuring 7.2 cm in diameter in October 2016. The tumor marker expression levels were all normal. The patient subsequently underwent annual cross-sectional surveillance (ultrasound/CT), which revealed imaging characteristics consistent with a benign splenic cyst and dimensional stability over 8 years.

In November 2024, interval surveillance imaging revealed progressive enlargement of the splenic mass in the absence of abdominal pain, diarrhea, or fever. The woman had no history of lymphadenopathy, organomegaly, or signs of chronic liver disease. Contrast-enhanced abdominal CT revealed a 9.5 × 6.5 cm heterogeneous splenic mass with cystic degeneration, with secondary extension abutting the gastric fundus and pancreatic tail (Figure 1). Subsequent MRI corroborated these findings, revealing a mixed solid-cystic lesion with heterogeneous enhancement of the mural nodules and septations (Figure 2). Notably, tumor biomarker profiling demonstrated remarkable increases in CA19-9 (>12,000 U/ml), CEA (41.5 ng/ml), and CA242 (>1,000 U/ml) levels, whereas routine hematological, coagulation, and metabolic panels remained unremarkable.

Figure 1
CT scans showing axial views of the abdomen in four panels labeled A through D. Panel A shows a large mass on the right side near the liver. Panel B shows a similar view with smaller lesions visible. Panel C displays a cross-section with another large mass adjacent to the liver. Panel D shows additional smaller lesions within the abdominal cavity. Each scan highlights differences in size and distribution of the lesions.

Figure 1. An abdominal computed tomography scan confirmed a 9.5 × 6.5 cm heterogeneous splenic mass with cystic degeneration (A, B), demonstrating extrasplenic extension abutting the gastric fundus and pancreatic tail (C, D).

Figure 2
MRI images in four panels labeled A, B, C, and D. Panel A shows a high-contrast area in the right section. Panel B displays a darker contrast with some visible structures. Panel C depicts a medium contrast with distinguishable sections. Panel D shows varied shades with a bright spot in the center-right region.

Figure 2. MRI revealed a mixed solid–cystic lesion with heterogeneous enhancement of the mural nodules and septations [(A) diffusion-weighted imaging, (B) T1-weighted imaging, (C) T2-weighted imaging, (D) Venous phase].

The patient subsequently underwent laparoscopic splenectomy, where a mass was observed to apparently arise from the spleen abutting the tail of the pancreas and the greater curvature of the stomach but without obvious peritoneal disease. During surgical exploration, the tail of the pancreas was carefully dissected and separated intact without resection. Furthermore, wedge gastrectomy was also performed because the mass tightly adhered to the fundus of the stomach. The patient recovered well after surgery without any postoperative complications.

Interestingly, dedicated sectioning and thorough microscopic examination of the entire specimen confirmed that the spleen cyst was lined by atypical irregular glandular epithelium, invading the serosa of the gastric wall and the surrounding greater omentum, which contained plenty of mucinous fluid (Figures 3A, B). Furthermore, the cyst lining was extensively sampled and shown to be composed of mucin-containing epithelial cells with architectural atypia. No ovarian stroma, pancreatic tissue, or lymph node metastasis were detected in the specimen microscopically. The Ki-67 proliferation index was 60%. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for CK7, CK20, and p53 (Figures 3C, D). The tumor was negative for WT1, TTF-1, ER, PR, PAX-8, and CDX-2 antigens. A middle-grade mucinous cystadenocarcinoma was diagnosed. The excision was complete (R0).

Figure 3
Histological panel showing four sections labeled A, B, C, and D. A and B display tissue stained with hematoxylin and eosin, highlighting cellular structures and variations. C and D show sections stained for immunohistochemistry, with varying distribution and intensity of brown staining. Scale bars are included for measurement reference.

Figure 3. Postoperative histopathological examination revealed a spleen cyst covered by atypical irregular glandular epithelium invading the serosa of the gastric wall and the surrounding greater omentum, which contained mucinous fluid (A, B). CK7 and CK20 antigen expression was detected via immunoenzymatic tests (C, D).

After the operation, the serum CEA (3.4 ng/mL) and CA199 (193.8 U/mL) levels exponentially decreased. Owing to the nature of the tumor, the patient was also recommended to remain under the care of the ambulatory gynecology clinic and undergo PET examination in the postoperative period. Whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT examination revealed no other primary foci of MCNs, especially in the ovaries. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and colonoscopy did not reveal any specific lesions. Hence, it was reported as a primary mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the spleen (Figure 4). We offered the patient a treatment regimen similar to that used for mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract, with radical surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. She has remained well without evidence of recurrence or metastasis 4 months after the operation.

Figure 4
Timeline illustrating the medical history of a splenic cystic lesion. It begins with a 7.2 cm lesion detected in October 2016, followed by stable monitoring over eight years. In November 2024, CT and MRI reveal an enlarged solid-cystic lesion. Elevated CA19-9, CEA, and CA242 levels are noted. A laparoscopic splenectomy and wedge gastrectomy result in a diagnosis of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. Post-operation, serum CEA and CA199 levels decrease, and evaluations show no evidence of another primary source. Four months later, no recurrence or metastasis is detected.

Figure 4. A timeline summarizing the main events of this case report.

Discussion

Malignant tumors of the spleen can be classified as lymphoid, non-lymphoid or metastatic and most frequently originate from melanomas or breast or lung cancers (1). Primary involvement of the spleen in lymphomas is much rarer than splenic infiltration over the course of the disease, and the most frequently encountered infiltrates are non-Hodgkin's lymphomas originating from B cells (2, 3). Non-lymphoid malignant tumors are rare and include sarcomas, angiosarcomas and malignant teratomas.

While the ovaries, appendix, and pancreas account for the vast majority of primary mucinous cystadenocarcinomas, rare cases have been documented in other sites including the gastrointestinal tract and urachus. For the present case, these potential primary origins were systematically ruled out through comprehensive imaging and clinical assessment. In view of the clinical and pathological findings, the tumor in our patient was considered a primary splenic mucinous cystadenocarcinoma.

The pathogenesis of splenic cystadenocarcinoma remains unclear. Five hypotheses were considered: heterotopic pancreatic tissue; heterotopic intestinal tissue; invaginated mesothelium of the splenic capsule; local invasion from a pancreatic malignancy; and metastasis. Ectopic pancreatic tissue has 0.55–13.7% prevalence in autopsy series (16), although splenic localization represents merely 1% of these aberrant foci. While these embryological remnants typically remain clinically silent, their neoplastic potential mirrors that of orthotopic pancreatic tissue, with documented progression to adenocarcinoma (3). To conclude, that a tumor developed from the pancreas, the following conditions must be fulfilled: first, normal pancreatic tissue should be present in the organ together with a neoplastic component, and if possible, a transition should be histologically proven between them; second, a neoplastic lesion should not be found in the pancreas. Notably, our specimen exhibited no acinar/ductal differentiation or endocrine components despite detailed examination of multiple sections, excluding this etiology of heterotopic pancreatic tissue despite its predominance in historical reports (Table 1).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Cases of primary mucinous splenic cystadenocarcinoma reported in the literature.

Cysts of the spleen are divided into true (primary or epithelial-lined) and false (secondary or pseudocysts) cysts. Splenic mucinous cysts are cystic spaces that are lined by mucin-producing epithelium and that range from benign cystadenoma to malignant cystadenocarcinoma (1720). Epidermoid variants demonstrate malignant potential through metaplastic-dysplastic progression to squamous cell carcinoma and mucinous cystadenocarcinoma (12). Immunohistochemical analysis revealed a CK7+/CK20+/p53+ phenotype with negativity for WT1, TTF-1, ER, and CDX-2. This profile is consistent with a mucinous cystadenocarcinoma and is discordant with origins in the lung, thyroid, endometrium, or ovaries. Although the phenotype shares features with gastrointestinal neoplasms, the possibility of a metastatic lesion was ruled out through a meticulous diagnostic workup. The absence of another primary source (pancreatic, gastrointestinal, and gynecological primaries) on contrast-enhanced CT/MRI, FDG-PET/CT, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and colonoscopy conclusively confirmed the diagnosis of a primary splenic mucinous cystadenocarcinoma.

Radical en bloc splenectomy remains the therapeutic gold standard for multiple cystadenomas, large cysts and those infiltrating into splenic tissue, as cyst aspiration or partial resection risks peritoneal dissemination (17, 18). Intraoperative frozen section analysis is critical, given the histological overlap between benign and malignant cystic lesions. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is required when there is an intraperitoneal spill of cystadenocarcinoma.

Advances in research continue to refine systemic treatment strategies for adenocarcinomas. Gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas, comprising esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, gastric, and colorectal subtypes, represent a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. It is primarily treated through a combination of surgical, chemotherapy, and radiation therapies (21). Progress in molecular profiling has enabled biomarker-directed therapies for specific patient subgroups, improving outcomes in populations such as those with HER2 amplification or Claudin18.2 overexpression (22, 23). The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has transformed the therapeutic landscape for gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas (24). However, predictive biomarkers beyond PD-L1 expression remain limited. Tumors exhibiting mismatch repair deficiency or high microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI-H) are generally associated with a more favorable prognosis and derive substantial benefit from ICIs, despite some clinical heterogeneity. In advanced dMMR/MSI-H disease, ICIs demonstrate efficacy across treatment lines and are recommended as first-line therapy. In patients with non-metastatic dMMR/MSI-H cancer, increasing evidence suggests that perioperative and adjuvant chemotherapy may not provide benefit to the dMMR/MSI-H subgroup (24).

Conclusion

In this report, we describe a rare case of primary mucinous splenic cystadenocarcinoma. Therapeutic success hinges on R0 resection combined with biomarker-guided adjuvant therapy, while long-term surveillance must address the undefined metastatic potential of this entity.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

BZ: Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization. CZ: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Methodology. SY: Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Investigation.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by grants from the Zhejiang Province Medical and Health Science and Technology Program (No. 2023KY109) and the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. LTGD24H160002).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Yang Q (Department of Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine) for providing the pathological data.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Silver DS, Pointer DT Jr, Slakey DP. Solid tumors of the spleen: evaluation and management. J Am Coll Surg. (2017) 224:1104–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.043

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Berge T. Splenic metastases. Frequencies and patterns. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand A. (1974) 82:499–506. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1974.tb00379.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Shi Z, Zhao Q, Lv B, Qu X, Han X, Wang H, et al. Identification of biomarkers complementary to homologous recombination deficiency for improving the clinical outcome of ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma. Clin Transl Med. (2021) 11:e399. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.399

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Shiono S, Suda K, Nobukawa B, Arakawa A, Yamasaki S, Sasahara N, et al. Pancreatic, hepatic, splenic, and mesenteric mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) are lumped together as extra ovarian MCN. Pathol Int. (2006) 56:71–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2006.01926.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Shuman RL, Bouterie RL. Cystadenocarcinoma of the pancreas presenting as a splenic cyst. Surgery. (1976) 80:652–4.

Google Scholar

6. Matsumoto M, Kawamura Y, Ishiguro M, Nagai T. Cystadenocarcinoma of the pancreas manifested as a splenic cyst. Acta Pathol Jpn. (1981) 31:1089–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.1981.tb02020.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Hoshikawa T, Hirata K, Shiramatsu K, Aizawa M, Kimura H, Hayasaka H, et al. A case of mucigenic epitherial cyst in the spleen. J Jpn Clin Surg Soc. (1987) 48:421–4. doi: 10.3919/ringe1963.48.421

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Morinaga S, Ohyama R, Koizumi J. Low-grade mucinous cystadenocarcinoma in the spleen. Am J Surg Pathol. (1992) 16:903–8. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199209000-00009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Zanetti G, Riccioni L, Gallo C, Salfi N, Martinelli GN. Splenic mucinous cystadenocarcinoma arising in heterotopic pancreatic tissue. Tumori. (1998) 84:606–10. doi: 10.1177/030089169808400519

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Hirota M, Hayashi N, Tomioka T, Murakami S, Ohshima H, Yamasaki K, et al. Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the spleen presenting a point mutation of the Kirsten-ras oncogene at codon 12. Dig Dis Sci. (1999) 44:768–74. doi: 10.1023/A:1026622111220

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Nisar PJ, Zaitoun AM, Lobo DN, Rowlands BJ. Heterotopic pancreas in the spleen: malignant degeneration to mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2002) 14:793–6. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200207000-00015

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Ohe C, Sakaida N, Yanagimoto Y, Toyokawa H, Satoi S, Kwon AH, et al. A case of splenic low-grade mucinous cystadenocarcinoma resulting in pseudomyxoma peritonei. Med Mol Morphol. (2010) 43:235–40. doi: 10.1007/s00795-010-0507-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Fujino Y, Kanaji S, Kawasaki K, Tominaga M, Kajimoto K. Mucinous cystadenoma of the ectopic pancreas with mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the spleen in a male patient: a report of a case. JOP. (2015) 8:390–3.

Google Scholar

14. Raul SK, Yadav B, Sharma R, Joseph M. Primary mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of spleen with pseudomyxoma peritonei: a very rare entity. Indian J Surg. (2020) 82:433–5. doi: 10.1007/s12262-019-01978-1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Wlazlak M, Grzasiak O, Wierzchniewska-Ławska A, Hogendorf P, Durczyński A, Strzelczyk J. Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the spleen - a very rare case of a primary splenic MCN. Pol Przegl Chir. (2020) 93:1–5. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0014.5754

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Dolan RV, ReMine WH, Dockerty MB. The fate of heterotopic pancreatic tissue. A study of 212 cases. Arch Surg. (1974) 109:762–5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1974.01360060032010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Gupta J, Gupta A. Ruptured primary mucinous cystadenoma of spleen leading to mucinous ascites. BMJ Case Rep. (2019) 12:e231212. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2019-231212

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Reta BK, Beker AM, Hagos HH, Weldegebriel MH, Kidanu GT, Zeray MA, et al. Rare case of primary mucinous cystadenoma of spleen: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. (2025) 126:110782. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.110782

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Singh O, Gupta S, Shukla S, Mathur RK. A rare case of primary mucinous cystadenoma of spleen. J Clin Med Res. (2009) 1:237–9. doi: 10.4021/jocmr2009.09.1257

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Lawgaly SA, Eldruki S. A rare case of mucinous cystadenoma of the spleen in Libya. Qatar Med J. (2021) 2020:41. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2020.41

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Brandi G, Ricci AD, Rizzo A, Zanfi C, Tavolari S, Palloni A, et al. Is post-transplant chemotherapy feasible in liver transplantation for colorectal cancer liver metastases? Cancer Commun. (2020) 40:461–4. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12072

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Ricci AD, Rizzo A, Brandi G. DNA damage response alterations in gastric cancer: knocking down a new wall. Future Oncol. (2021) 17:865–8. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-0989

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Klempner SJ, Janjigian YY, Wainberg ZA. Claudin18.who? Examining biomarker overlap and outcomes in claudin18.2-positive gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. ESMO Open. (2023) 8:100778. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100778

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Strickland MR, Lander EM, Gibson MK, Ilson DH, Ajani JA, Klempner SJ. Gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas with defective mismatch repair: current knowledge and clinical management. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. (2024) 22:e237103. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7103

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: primary mucinous cystadenocarcinoma, spleen, complete surgical removal, ectopic pancreas, case report

Citation: Zhou B, Zhan C and Yan S (2025) Primary mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the spleen: a case report and literature review. Front. Med. 12:1662856. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1662856

Received: 23 July 2025; Accepted: 01 October 2025;
Published: 17 October 2025.

Edited by:

Peng Huang, Sichuan University, China

Reviewed by:

Alessandro Rizzo, National Cancer Institute Foundation (IRCCS), Italy
Leizhou Xia, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, China
Birhanu Reta, Aksum University, Ethiopia

Copyright © 2025 Zhou, Zhan and Yan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Sheng Yan, c2hlbmd5YW5Aemp1LmVkdS5jbg==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.