Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.

Sec. Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1663501

Global, regional and national burden of pelvic inflammatory disease: trend projections and health inequality analysis, 1990-2021 RUNNING HEAD (maximum 40 characters):The global burden of pelvic inflammatory disease

Provisionally accepted
Qingyu  SongQingyu Song1Zheng  ShenZheng Shen2Zhaoyi  JingZhaoyi Jing2Runze  MaRunze Ma3Jing  ZhouJing Zhou4*Hu  LiHu Li5*Tianyu  BaiTianyu Bai5*
  • 1Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
  • 2Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
  • 3Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
  • 4Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
  • 5Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, Jinan, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), a global health challenge, poses a major challenge to women's health and economic development, but has received relatively little research investment and attention.We aimed to assess the global, regional, and national burdens and trends of PID in women from 1990 to 2021. Methods:The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 standardized methodology was used to analyze the burden of PID at global, regional, and national levels, with attention to the age factor; The indicators covered in this study include prevalence, years lived with disability (YLDs), age-standardized rates (ASR), and estimated annual percentage change (EAPC), accompanied by 95% uncertainty intervals (UI) for the period from 1990 to 2021. Join-point regression was applied to identify turning points in the change in the burden of disease, and in addition, Spearman correlation analyses were used to assess the association between ASR and SDI; the study also involved a cross-countryinequality analysis with decomposition.Finally, Bayesian age-period-cohort modeling was used to predict the disease burden of pelvic inflammatory disease in 2035. Results:PID prevalence and YLDs increased over 32 years, whereas ASPR and ASYR remained relatively stable; the PID burden of disease is concentrated in the 30-39 year age group; countries with lower SDI bear a greater burden of PID, and health inequalities have declined but persist; population growth and aging are driving the burden of PID, with epidemiological changes driving the increase in PID but slowing the rise in YLDs; projections based on the BAPC model suggest that the burden of PID will continue to rise through 2035. Conclusion: From 1990 to 2021, the global burden of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) exhibited an overall upward trend, a trend that is expected to persist. The population with the highest concentration of PID disease burden is women aged 30–39, and the region with the highest concentration of PID disease burden is low-SDI countries. Consequently, health policies ought to prioritize these populations and regions, integrating sexual health education into fundamental public health services, promoting free screening and early diagnosis and treatment, and fortifying training for frontline healthcare workers and access to contraceptive methods to mitigate the

Keywords: Global burden of disease, Pelvic Inflammatory Disease, socio-demographic index, Inequality analysis, Decomposition analysis

Received: 10 Jul 2025; Accepted: 11 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Song, Shen, Jing, Ma, Zhou, Li and Bai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Jing Zhou, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
Hu Li, Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, Jinan, China
Tianyu Bai, Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, Jinan, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.