ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1665915
This article is part of the Research TopicOutcome of Sepsis and Prediction of Mortality Risk - Volume IIView all 9 articles
IL-10 to Lymphocyte Ratio (ILR) and Lactate in the Prognosis Prediction and Risk Stratification of Sepsis: A Pilot Study
Provisionally accepted- 1School of Medicine, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
- 2Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Sepsis is a highly heterogeneous clinical syndrome, and the real-time prognosis prediction and risk stratification for it remain a big challenge in current clinical research. This study aimed to assess the performance of IL-10/lymphocyte ratio (ILR) and lactate (Lac) in the prognostic prediction and risk stratification of sepsis. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study that included 148 patients with sepsis admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2022 to February 2023. Data collection commenced on the first day of ICU admission, with clinical and laboratory parameters recorded within 24 hours of diagnosis, including IL-10 levels, lymphocyte counts, Lac, SOFA score, and APACHE II score. The relationship between ILR and Lac and 28-day mortality were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression, and their predictive efficacy were assessed by receiver operator characteristic curves (ROCs), and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to validate the effect of risk stratification. Results: Patients in the death group exhibited significantly higher ILR (302.33 vs. 16.37) and Lac levels (3.25 mmol/L vs. 1.90 mmol/L) compared to the survival group (both p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that ILR (OR = 1.005, 95% CI 1.001-1.009) was independent risk factor for death at 28 days. Analysis of ROCs showed that the predictive efficacy of ILR (AUC = 0.860) was superior to the APACHE II score (AUC=0.797) and the SOFA score (AUC=0.704). Based on stratification by ILR (cutoff value 97.4) and Lac (cutoff value 4.1 mmol/L), the four risk stratification levels (Levels I–IV) exhibited progressively decreasing 28-day mortality rates: Level I (78.95%), Level II (50.00%), Level III (15.38%), and Level IV (7.69%). Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed significant survival differences (p < 0.001), with Level I demonstrating the worst prognosis. Conclusion: The combined ILR and Lac measurement provides a practical bedside tool for real-time sepsis risk stratification, demonstrating better prognostic utility than conventional scoring systems while maintaining clinical feasibility.
Keywords: Sepsis, Interleukin-10(IL-10), Lymphocyte Count, lactate (LAC), Prognosisprediction, risk stratification
Received: 14 Jul 2025; Accepted: 29 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yan, Liu, Fu, Qin, He, Liu and Niu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Bin Liu, School of Medicine, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
Bailin Niu, School of Medicine, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.