ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Gene and Cell Therapy
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1666486
Intrathecal injection of bone marrow concentrate in children with autism spectrum disorder: A retrospective chart analysis
Provisionally accepted- 1Kobinia-Med, Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Vienna, Austria
- 2Sigmund Freud PrivatUniversitat Wien, Vienna, Austria
- 3Austrian Society for Regenerative Medicine (ASRM), Vienna, Austria
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: The growing prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) underscores the urgent need for therapies that target underlying biological mechanisms, with cell-based interventions offering a potentially transformative approach by targeting core physiological disruptions rather than providing temporary symptom management. The purpose of this study was to report on our experience with an autologous cell-based intervention in children with ASD. Methods: This retrospective data analysis included pre-and postinterventional data from 128 children with ASD who received intrathecal injections of autologous bone marrow concentrate. Patient and procedure related characteristics, complications, and the Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC) scores were extracted from patient's medical records. Results: Data were analyzed from 128 children (27 females and 101 males), aged between two and 16 years at their first intervention. A total of 32.8% underwent more than two single-step procedures. Significant improvements from the first to the second intervention were detected in the total and all subgroup ATEC scores, as well as in the severity groups (p<0.001). Following the intervention, 4.6% of children transitioned from the "mild" or "moderate" to the "no symptoms" category, and 25.4% of the initially categorized "severe" group shifted to a milder symptom category. The average total ATEC score improved from the first to the second intervention by 19.0±17.1 points, and one 60-point improvement was detected. The recorded ATEC score improvements in 85.9% of patients were similar between genders, as well as between age groups. A subgroup analysis of 39 patients who received three interventions also showed statistically significant differences in all ATEC scores between the three time points (p<0.001). The highest improvements occurred after the first intervention, continued to improve over time, and remained reduced even three to four years after the intervention. There was not a single serious adverse event in the 307 treatments. All complications (e.g., nausea/vomiting) were resolved within a week or less after the procedure. Conclusion: Both a significant improvement in ATEC scores, and significant severity shifts to milder forms–even into the 'no symptoms' category–suggest a measurable improvement in autism-related symptoms after autologous, bone marrow derived, intrathecally applied single procedures in children with ASD.
Keywords: Autism spectrum disorders (ASD), autologous, Bone marrow concentrate, Intrathecal, stemcell therapy, Children, Autism treatment evaluation checklist (ATEC)
Received: 15 Jul 2025; Accepted: 29 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Kobinia, Bukaty, Holly, Kobinia, Heuberer and Laky. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Georg S. Kobinia, Kobinia-Med, Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Vienna, Austria
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.