ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1667862
This article is part of the Research TopicInnovations in Pain Management: Mental Imagery and Sensory InterventionsView all articles
Comparison of Injectate Spread Following Transverse versus Sagittal In-Plane Ultrasound-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block: A Cadaveric Study
Provisionally accepted- 1Peking Union Medical College Hospital Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing, China
- 2institution of basic medical sciences chinese academy of medical sciences, beijing, China
- 3Institution of clinical medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is a clinically valuable regional anesthesia and analgesia technique for managing postoperative acute pain and certain chronic pain conditions. There are several approaches for ultrasound-guided TPVB. However, currently it is hard to provide an evidence-based recommendation on the choice between approaches. Comparisons of injectate distribution patterns among different approaches are limited. This observational cadaveric study compared dye distribution following TPVB using transverse in-plane (TI) and sagittal in-plane (SI) ultrasound-guidance. Methods: Ten paravertebral injections at the T6-7 were performed on five cadavers. Left side received injections with TI approach, and right side with SI approach. All injections consisted of 20 mL of 0.02% methylene blue. The cadavers were dissected to evaluate dye distribution. The ChAracteristics of Cadaver Training and sUrgical Studies (CACTUS) guideline was adhered to conduct and report this study. Results: All paravertebral injections resulted in dye staining in paravertebral space (PVS). On average, 3 ((IQR (3, 3)) PVS segments were stained with TI approach, and 2 (IQR (1, 2)) with SI approach (p = 0.26). Median intercostal staining area was 55.1 (IQR (30.1, 76.0)) cm2 with TI and 38.3 (IQR (7.8, 82.6)) cm2 with SI approach (p = 0.50). Sympathetic chain staining was observed in 80% (TI) and 40% (SI) of cadavers (p = 0.50). Regardless of injection approach, 1) the cephalad and caudal dye distribution was 1 ((IQR (0, 2)) and 0 (IQR (0, 1)) segment separately (p = 0.04); 2) a significantly higher odds of PVS staining, and a significantly longer distance of intercostal space stained were observed at T6-7 (p < 0.001, p < 0.01) and T5-6 level (p = 0.001, p < 0.01); 3) a positive association was observed between the number of PVS segments stained and sympathetic chain staining (p = 0.003). Conclusions: Both TI and SI ultrasound-guided TPVB approaches reliably target PVS. A predominantly cephalad distribution was noted with two approaches. No significant differences were observed between two approaches regarding the number of PVS segments stained, intercostal spread area, and the percentage of sympathetic chain stained. This study adds knowledge to the spread pattern of TPVB.
Keywords: nerve block1, ultrasonography2, regional anesthesia3, pain management4, dyespread5, thoracic paravertebral block6
Received: 17 Jul 2025; Accepted: 20 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Tang, Tang, Wang, Bai, Zhang, Zhang, Ma, Bi, Shen, Zhang, Ma and Huang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Shuai Tang, tangshuai@pumch.cn
Yuguang Huang, garypumch@163.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.