SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Med.
Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1669499
Efficacy and Safety of Esketamine in Patients Undergoing Painless Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China
- 2Zhongshan Clinical College, Dalian University, Dalian, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
ABSTRACT Background: Esketamine, an intravenous anesthetic with analgesic properties, is increasingly used as an adjunct in painless gastrointestinal endoscopy. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of esketamine combined with sedatives for anesthesia in adults undergoing painless gastrointestinal endoscopy Methods: Eight databases (PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed) were systematically searched from inception until April 20, 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing esketamine adjunctive therapy against placebo/sedative-alone in adults (ASA I-II) were included. Primary efficacy outcomes were anesthesia onset time, recovery time, and sedative requirements. Primary safety outcomes included procedure-related adverse events, and postoperative complications. Data synthesis was performed by using Review Manager 5.4 software. Subgroup analyses examined sedative type and esketamine dose. Results: Fifteen RCTs (n=2,260 patients) were included. Esketamine adjunctive therapy significantly reduced anesthesia onset time (MD: -6.41 seconds, 95% CI: -10.42 to -2.40; p=0.002) and total sedative requirements (SMD: -1.56, 95% CI: -1.92 to -1.20; p<0.00001), corresponding to approximately 25-30% dose reduction. Sensitivity analysis excluding supratherapeutic doses (≥0.4 mg/kg) revealed significantly shorter recovery time (MD: -0.74 minutes, 95% CI: -1.17 to -0.31; p=0.0008). Subgroup analysis identified the optimal dose window as 0.2-0.3 mg/kg, demonstrating maximal efficacy for onset time (MD: -9.75 min), recovery time (MD: -1.02 min), and sedative sparing. Safety outcomes indicated significantly reduced intraoperative hypotension, bradycardia, apnea, cough, body movement and injection pain,alongside transient increases in HR and MAP during instrumentation without clinically significant SpO₂ changes. Significantly increased postoperative dizziness occurred, particularly at doses ≥0.3 mg/kg, with no significant association to postoperative nausea/vomiting or drowsiness. Conclusion: Esketamine adjunctive therapy (optimal dose: 0.2-0.3 mg/kg) enhances sedation efficacy for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy by accelerating anesthesia onset, reducing sedative requirements, shortening recovery time, and decreasing intraoperative cardiorespiratory adverse events. Its primary safety concern is dose-dependent postoperative dizziness. Further large-scale, multinational trials are warranted to validate generalizability.
Keywords: Esketamine, gastrointestinal endoscopy, Meta-analysis, Perioperative Medicine, Systematic review
Received: 19 Jul 2025; Accepted: 20 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhang and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Qinghui Wang, wangqinghui@dlu.edu.cn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.