Allegra Battistoni1*
Linda Piras1
Nicola Tartaglia1
Francesco Maria Carrano2
Claudia De Vitis1Emanuele Barbato1- 1Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- 2Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
Endothelial dysfunction represents the critical pathophysiological mediator linking the modern epidemics of obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease. Persistent hyperglycemia and metabolic dysregulation promote oxidative stress, reduce nitric oxide bioavailability, and activate inflammatory pathways, thereby accelerating atherosclerosis and cardiovascular complications. Therefore, strategies aimed at restoring endothelial function are crucial to mitigate cardiovascular complications in individuals with cardiometabolic disorders. Among antidiabetic therapies, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists have demonstrated cardiovascular benefits in large-scale outcome trials, but the underlying mechanisms remain only partially elucidated. In this mini-review, we critically examine both clinical and experimental evidence, with emphasis on the direct effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on endothelial function. Moreover, we address the heterogeneity within this drug class, noting how differences may contribute to variability in vascular outcomes. By integrating clinical findings with molecular data, this review aims to refine our understanding of the potential endothelial mechanisms underlying cardiovascular protection. Our critical synthesis provides a clearer framework for interpreting the vascular effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists beyond glycemic control, thereby offering a more comprehensive view of their role in managing cardiometabolic disease.
1 Introduction
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and obesity constitute a convergent triad representing a major global health burden. Diabetes affects an estimated 463 million individuals worldwide, a number that has quadrupled since 1980 (1). More than half of these diabetes-related deaths are attributable to macrovascular complications, underscoring CVD as the principal driver of mortality in T2DM (2). This alarming overlap is not coincidental but rather reflects shared pathophysiological mechanisms, chief among them, endothelial dysfunction (ED). The vascular endothelium plays a pivotal role in maintaining vascular tone, regulating fibrinolytic and thrombotic activity, and preventing leukocyte and platelet adhesion (3). When compromised, the endothelium fosters a pro-inflammatory and pro-atherogenic environment, leading to impaired vasodilation and accelerated atherosclerosis (4, 5). ED is widely considered an early hallmark of CVD and is particularly prevalent in individuals with insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, and T2DM (6). In parallel, obesity has reached pandemic proportions, affecting close to one billion people worldwide (7). It is not only a primary driver of T2DM, but also an independent contributor to CVD risk (2–8). For each unit increase in BMI, the risk of developing diabetes and cardiovascular complications rises significantly (9). Because ED biologically links type 2 diabetes, obesity, and CVD, therapies capable of acting across all three pathways are urgently needed. In this context, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have emerged not only as effective glucose-lowering and weight-reducing agents but also as promising modulators of cardiovascular and endothelial health (10–12). The present mini-review therefore aims to summarize the contribution of ED to CVD in obesity and T2DM, to synthesize the pre-clinical and clinical evidence supporting endothelial and cardiovascular benefits of GLP-1RAs, and to delineate current controversies and research priorities that will inform future incretin-modulating interventions.
2 Incretins, GLP-1 receptors, and therapeutic agonists
Incretins are a class of gut-derived peptide hormones that enhance insulin secretion in response to nutrient ingestion, playing a key role in postprandial glucose regulation. The two primary incretins identified in humans are glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). Both act through specific G protein–coupled receptors predominantly expressed on pancreatic β-cells, where they stimulate insulin release in a glucose-dependent manner, thus minimizing hypoglycemia risk (13). Beyond their islet effects, incretins exert pleiotropic actions on the brain (appetite and satiety regulation), gastrointestinal tract (delayed gastric emptying), adipose tissue (lipolysis modulation), and liver (inhibition of hepatic glucose output) (13). These wide-ranging actions reflect the evolutionary importance of incretin signaling in nutrient metabolism and energy homeostasis. GLP-1, in particular, is secreted by enteroendocrine L-cells of the distal ileum and colon following food intake. It exists mainly as GLP-1 (7–36) amide and GLP-1 (7–37), both of which are rapidly degraded by the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) into the inactive metabolite GLP-1 (9–36), giving the active form a plasma half-life of only 1–2 min (14, 15). GLP-1 exerts its biological effects via the GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R), a class B heptahelical G protein-coupled receptor coupled to Gs proteins that stimulate adenylyl cyclase and increase intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) (16). While the receptor is abundantly expressed in pancreatic β-cells, it is also present in cardiovascular tissues (heart, vasculature), kidneys, lungs, and central nervous system (17––19). However, the exact localization and functional significance of GLP-1R in the cardiovascular system are still being unraveled (16). The pharmacologic exploitation of GLP-1 signaling has led to two major therapeutic strategies: DPP-4 inhibitors, which prolong endogenous GLP-1 activity, and GLP-1 RAs, which mimic or enhance GLP-1 action while resisting enzymatic degradation (13). GLP-1 RAs are administered via injection and can be categorized by duration of action into short-acting (e.g., exenatide BID, lixisenatide) and long-acting forms (e.g., liraglutide, semaglutide, dulaglutide). These agents are derived either from human GLP-1 analogs or non-mammalian sequences such as exendin-4 (13). In addition to glycemic control, GLP-1 RAs induce significant weight loss, establishing them as foundational therapies in the management of T2DM and obesity (17).
3 Cardiovascular effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists: clinical evidence beyond glycemic control
Since the FDA mandate in 2008 to demonstrate cardiovascular safety for new glucose-lowering agents, a series of large randomized cardiovascular outcome trials have evaluated GLP-1 RAs in patients with T2DM, many of whom had established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or multiple risk factors. These trials, while originally designed to establish non-inferiority, have consistently revealed a broader cardioprotective signal in several agents, suggesting that the benefits extend beyond glucose control. The LEADER trial enrolled patients with T2DM and high cardiovascular risk, defined as established CVD (81%) or age ≥60 years with at least one risk factor, and showed that liraglutide significantly reduced the incidence of 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (i.e., CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke) by 13% compared to placebo (HR 0.87; p = 0.01), along with a reduction in all-cause mortality (HR 0.85; p = 0.02) over a median follow-up of 3.8 years (18). Similarly, the SUSTAIN-6 trial, which enrolled patients with T2DM and either established CVD, stage ≥3 chronic kidney disease, or age ≥60 with risk factors, showed that semaglutide reduced MACE by 26% (HR 0.74), primarily driven by a 39% reduction in non-fatal stroke (19). Albiglutide in the Harmony Outcomes trial showed a 22% reduction in MACE in patients with established ASCVD (20), while exenatide (EXSCEL trial) (21) and lixisenatide (ELIXA trial) (22) did not meet superiority, though both demonstrated CV safety. Notably, the EXSCEL trial had a high treatment discontinuation rate (~43%), potentially diluting its results. In the PIONEER 6 trial, involving patients with T2D and high CV risk (including established CVD, chronic kidney disease, or age ≥50 years with risk factors), oral semaglutide demonstrated non-inferiority for MACE (HR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.57–1.11), with significant reductions in CV death (HR 0.49) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.51), though the trial was not powered to demonstrate superiority (23). The REWIND trial, which notably included a broader population-only 31% of participants had established CVD-showed that dulaglutide still reduced MACE by 12% (HR 0.88; p = 0.026), suggesting potential benefit even in primary prevention contexts (24). Finally, the AMPLITUDE-O trial, which included patients with T2D and either a history of CVD (90%) or CKD, demonstrated that efpeglenatide significantly reduced MACE by 27% (HR 0.73; p < 0.001), confirming the class effect even with agents structurally distinct from native GLP-1 (25). Overall, meta-analyses suggest a class effect in reducing MACE, particularly with long-acting agents (26). Importantly, the magnitude and consistency of MACE reduction in several trials exceed what would be expected from glycemic or weight improvements alone. Blood pressure, lipid profile, and body weight all improved modestly, but not sufficiently to explain the full cardiovascular benefit. This suggests a possible direct action of GLP-1 RAs on the cardiovascular system (27). Recent trials in heart failure (HF) have further clarified the therapeutic potential of GLP-1 RAs beyond glycemic control. While earlier trials in HFrEF (28, 29) were neutral or inconclusive, the STEP-HFpEF and SELECT trials highlighted robust improvements in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), particularly in obese phenotypes. In STEP-HFpEF, semaglutide led to improvements in symptoms, physical function, and quality of life metrics, with associated reductions in body weight and inflammation (30). Similarly, in the SUMMIT trial, tirzepatide significantly reduced a composite of death and HF worsening in obese HFpEF patients (HR 0.41–0.67), along with measurable improvements in functional status and exercise tolerance (31). Most strikingly, the SELECT trial demonstrated that semaglutide significantly reduced MACE in individuals without T2DM but with overweight or obesity and established CV risk (HR 0.80), making it the first GLP-1 RA approved for CV risk reduction in a non-diabetic population (32). This is a critical proof-of-concept that GLP-1 RAs effects are not mediated solely through glycemic control but may involve direct modulation of vascular inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and myocardial energetics. Taken together, these findings establish GLP-1 RAs as agents with multidimensional benefits.
4 Endothelial dysfunction as a central mechanism in cardiovascular disease: molecular insights
ED plays a central role in the pathogenesis and progression of CVD, including atherosclerosis, hypertension, HF, stroke, and peripheral artery disease. The endothelium is not merely a passive barrier lining blood vessels but a highly dynamic and heterogenous organ with autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine functions. It regulates vascular tone, blood flow, hemostasis, inflammation, and angiogenesis (33, 34). One of the hallmark features of ED is reduced nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability. NO is a vasodilator synthesized by endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) in response to shear stress and stimuli such as acetylcholine. It inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) proliferation, platelet aggregation, and leukocyte adhesion (35). Impaired NO synthesis or increased NO degradation due to oxidative stress reduces vasodilatory capacity, promotes vasoconstriction, and enhances vascular tone, contributing to hypertension and ischemia (36, 37). Reduced NO levels also induce the expression of adhesion molecules, such as intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), and E-selectin, which mediate leukocyte recruitment to sites of endothelial injury (38). These leukocytes internalize oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL), promoting foam cell formation and early atherogenesis. Endothelial activation, marked by increased permeability and leukocyte adhesion, further fuels vascular inflammation and plaque progression (39). Oxidative stress is a key driver of ED. Reactive oxygen species (ROS), generated by nicotinamide-adenine-dinucleotide-phosphate (NADPH) oxidases, mitochondrial dysfunction, and uncoupled eNOS, deplete NO and oxidize cellular lipids and proteins (40). Exogenous factors such as hyperglycemia, smoking, and dyslipidemia exacerbate ROS production (41). ROS compromise tight junction integrity, increase endothelial permeability, and permit inflammatory cell infiltration, amplifying vascular damage. In a translational context, targeting ROS, through NADPH oxidase inhibitors or mitochondrial antioxidants, have shown promise in restoring endothelial function, with emerging biomarkers of oxidative stress offering potential for clinical monitoring and therapeutic stratification (42). Persistent oxidative stress creates a self-perpetuating cycle of endothelial injury, inflammation, and vascular remodeling (33). Inflammation is both a cause and consequence of ED. Pro-inflammatory cytokines like tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and interleukin-6 (IL-6), along with chemokines such as monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), are upregulated in ED and drive immune cell recruitment and cytokine release (39–43). Chronic low-grade inflammation, as seen in diabetes, hypertension, and metabolic syndrome, initiates and perpetuates ED, ultimately leading to plaque destabilization and thrombosis. A more recently recognized contributor to ED is the endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition, a process by which endothelial cells acquire mesenchymal characteristics, losing markers such as VE-cadherin and gaining fibrotic and migratory phenotypes (47–37). Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition is induced by high glucose, TGF-β signaling, and inflammatory cytokines, and is implicated in fibrosis and plaque instability (33, 34). In conclusion, ED is not merely a marker but a mechanistic driver of CVD. It integrates hemodynamic, metabolic, and inflammatory insults through molecular pathways centered around NO deficiency, oxidative stress, and immune activation. Several therapeutic strategies aim to restore endothelial function, with growing evidence supporting GLP-1RAs.
5 Endothelial-protective effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists: mechanistic insights from preclinical and clinical evidence
GLP-1RAs exert profound protective effects on the vascular endothelium, impacting key pathways involved in endothelial homeostasis, inflammation, oxidative stress, and vascular regeneration. These pleiotropic effects are increasingly recognized as central to the cardiovascular benefits observed in major clinical trials of GLP-1RAs. Below, we synthesize current evidence from both experimental and clinical studies elucidating how GLP-1R activation promotes endothelial health and counteracts atherogenesis (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Effects of GLP1-RA on endothelium.
5.1 Promotion of angiogenesis and endothelial progenitor cell function
Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) play a pivotal role in endothelial repair and post-ischemic angiogenesis. These cells, derived from bone marrow, can differentiate into mature endothelial cells, contributing to vascular regeneration, particularly in response to injury or ischemia. Their number and function are highly sensitive to oxidative stress, glycation end products, and inflammation (44). GLP-1RAs enhance EPC number and function through multiple mechanisms. Clinical studies in patients with T2DM have shown that treatment with dulaglutide increases circulating EPCs and boosts their proliferative, adhesive, migratory, and tubulogenic capacity (45, 46). This improvement correlates with reductions in pro-inflammatory markers such as IL-6, TNF-α, C-reactive protein, and advanced glycation end-products, supporting a role for GLP-1RAs in modulating EPC function through anti-inflammatory and antioxidative pathways (45, 46). Furthermore, high glucose reduces GLP-1R expression in EPCs, impairing their function and promoting apoptosis. Restoration of GLP-1 signaling using exendin-4 reverses these effects, highlighting the direct role of GLP-1R in EPC biology (44, 47). Moreover, GLP-1RAs stimulate endothelial VEGF expression, a fundamental trigger for angiogenesis, leading to activation of downstream VEGF receptors (VEGFR-2), which initiate angiogenic cascades involving phospholipase C gamma/extracellular signal-regulated kinase/phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B pathways. This molecular signaling enhances EC proliferation, migration, and tubulogenesis. In primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) treated with GLP-1RAs, increased VEGF production is accompanied by improved proliferation and tube formation, reflecting restored angiogenic capacity (44).
5.2 Reduction of oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum stress
Chronic hyperglycemia and endothelial activation drive excessive generation of ROS, promoting mitochondrial dysfunction, endothelial apoptosis, and reduced NO bioavailability. GLP-1RAs mitigate these effects through a combination of antioxidant, anti-apoptotic, and mitochondrial-stabilizing actions. Several studies report that GLP-1RAs reduce ROS production, recover mitochondrial membrane potential, and improve oxygen consumption in endothelial cells. These effects are accompanied by increased leukocyte rolling velocity and reduced leukocyte adhesion-indicators of improved endothelial barrier function (45). At the molecular level, exendin-4 activates adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and upregulates endoplasmic reticulum oxidoreductin 1 alpha, which enhances the protein-folding machinery in endothelial cells, suppressing ER stress and ROS overproduction (48). In hyperhomocysteinemia models, this mechanism restores endothelial function and suppresses oxidative damage. Moreover, GLP-1RAs inhibit NADPH oxidase (NOX4)-dependent ROS production and downregulate NLRP3 inflammasome activation, both critical mediators of endothelial injury in diabetes (49). Liraglutide has also been shown to reduce TRIB3/nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB)/inhibitor of κB alpha signaling, thereby attenuating oxidative stress and pyroptosis in HUVECs (50). Translational studies demonstrate that GLP-1RAs, such as liraglutide, restore endothelial redox balance by reducing NOX4-derived ROS and enhancing mitochondrial function, effects corroborated in both HUVECs and diabetic animal models of vascular dysfunction. These findings support their emerging role in preserving endothelial integrity and preventing atherosclerotic progression beyond glycemic control (45).
5.3 Improvement of vasodilation and NO bioavailability
A defining feature of GLP-1RA-mediated endothelial protection is the restoration of endothelial-dependent vasodilation. Clinical and preclinical data consistently demonstrate enhanced NO production and eNOS phosphorylation following GLP-1RA treatment (44–51). In ApoE−/− mice, liraglutide increased endothelium-derived NO as evidenced by enhanced contractile response to Nitro-L-Arginine Methyl Ester, confirming improved NO availability (43). Parallel in vitro studies showed increased eNOS and expression mediated by AMPK and Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase / Protein Kinase B signaling pathways, implicating a GLP-1R/cAMP/protein kinase A (PKA) axis in the upregulation of endothelial NO production (51). These effects are functionally significant: GLP-1RAs improve coronary and brachial artery flow, as shown in both healthy individuals and patients with diabetes, independent of glucose control (51). Notably, exenatide also enhances ATP-sensitive potassium channel activity, contributing to improved vasomotor responsiveness following ischemia-reperfusion injury (52).
5.4 Anti-inflammatory effects and endothelial adhesion molecule regulation
GLP-1RAs exert potent anti-inflammatory effects on the endothelium and immune cell interfaces, inhibiting key processes in leukocyte recruitment and adhesion. A hallmark of atherosclerosis is endothelial expression of adhesion molecules such as ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and E-selectin, which mediate monocyte recruitment. GLP-1RAs reduce the expression of these molecules in vitro and in vivo. For instance, liraglutide suppresses TNF-α-induced ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 expression in endothelial cells, an effect mediated via NF-κB inhibition (14–43, 53–55). Similarly, exenatide reduces soluble ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 in patients with type 2 diabetes, indicating systemic anti-inflammatory action (51). Additionally, semaglutide alters the secretory profile of epicardial adipose tissue, increasing its anti-thrombotic and anti-inflammatory properties by downregulating FABP4 expression (56). In vascular macrophages, exendin-4 suppresses lipopolysaccharide-induced pro-inflammatory gene expression by activating the cAMP/PKA pathway and inhibiting NF-κB nuclear translocation, further supporting a systemic immunomodulatory role (57).
5.5 Inhibition of atherosclerotic plaque formation and stabilization
Collectively, the endothelial and immunological actions of GLP-1RAs culminate in reduced atherogenesis and enhanced plaque stability. Preclinical models have demonstrated that GLP-1RAs reduce plaque area, monocyte/macrophage accumulation, and plaque vulnerability (37–48–49). For example, treatment with semaglutide reverses Western diet-induced aortic gene expression patterns related to leukocyte trafficking, lipid metabolism, and extracellular matrix turnover-key contributors to atherogenesis (58). Moreover, GLP-1RA therapy leads to plaques characterized by reduced inflammation and increased stability due to suppression of matrix metalloproteinases and promotion of fibrous cap formation (44, 45). Human data further support these findings: GLP-1RA treatment is associated with reduced carotid intima-media thickness and lower circulating inflammatory biomarkers, suggesting tangible antiatherogenic effects in patients (45, 46, 48–52, 56–59). Finally, beyond their effect on the vascular wall, GLP-1RAs may reduce thrombosis risk by inhibiting platelet aggregation, although the precise mechanisms-whether endothelial-dependent or independent-remain under investigation (35).
5.6 Effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists on endothelial function in vivo
Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is a well-established, noninvasive, endothelium-dependent method for assessing vascular function. It measures the change in brachial artery diameter in response to ischemia via ultrasound and reflects vascular elasticity and endothelial integrity (60). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have explored the impact of antidiabetic agents on vascular function, showing that GLP-1RAs significantly improve FMD compared to placebo (61, 62). Notably, GLP-1RAs demonstrated superior improvements in FMD compared to sulfonylureas and lifestyle interventions in multiple randomized controlled trials, including in patients with T2DM without overt CVD. Network meta-analyses have confirmed these effects with robust consistency (I2 = 0%) and no significant heterogeneity (61). However, some individual studies reported variable results (63). Conversely, treatment with exenatide LAR was associated with improved FMD and carotid intima-media thickness, alongside metabolic benefits, in patients with type 2 diabetes (64).
6 Discussion
The global rise in obesity and T2DM has led to a parallel pandemic of CVD, forming a cardio-metabolic triad that now represents a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide (65). At the intersection of these conditions lies the endothelium, a dynamic regulator of vascular homeostasis, whose dysfunction initiates and accelerates atherosclerosis and associated complications. GLP-1RAs first emerged as glucose-lowering drugs, but recent findings highlight their multifactorial role in endothelial protection, particularly in the context of metabolic and atherosclerotic disease (44). Rather than acting through a single pathway, these agents exert coordinated effects across several levels of vascular regulation. This pleiotropic profile suggests that GLP-1RAs may go beyond glycemic control to provide direct vascular benefits, a hypothesis increasingly supported by both preclinical and clinical data. Among the most relevant effects, the ability of GLP-1RAs to restore EPC number and function deserves particular attention, especially considering the impairment of EPCs in diabetes and their central role in endothelial repair (14–37–50). By promoting VEGF and NO signaling, these agents enhance angiogenic potential that may translate into improved microvascular integrity. Similarly, the reduction of ROS and restoration of mitochondrial function (14) position GLP-1RAs as valuable tools against oxidative stress-driven endothelial injury. Lastly GLP1-RA proved to reduce inflammation (14–49–54–57). These effects might represent the potential mechanisms underlying the reduction in cardiovascular events observed in some clinical trials. Collectively, these trials reinforce that the cardiovascular benefits of GLP-1RAs are not restricted to one molecule or only injectable formulations, and may extend to lower-risk populations. Despite the consistency of MACE reduction across several agents, different trial designs, population, and exposure, argues for a true class effect, yet several critical issues remain unresolved. First, the heterogeneity among GLP-1RAs, particularly regarding their molecular structure and pharmacokinetics, may account for divergent cardiovascular outcomes. Human GLP-1 analogs such as liraglutide and semaglutide demonstrate more consistent cardioprotection compared to exendin-4-based agents like exenatide, which may suffer from lower receptor affinity, greater immunogenicity, and less favorable pharmacokinetic profiles (49). These differences might partly explain the neutral results of the EXSCEL trial with exenatide (22). Second, the translational relevance of in vitro studies remains uncertain. Many experiments utilize supraphysiological concentrations of GLP-1RAs, potentially engaging non-canonical receptors or producing artifacts not reflective of clinical scenarios (34). This calls for a more cautious interpretation of molecular findings and underlines the need for dose–response studies in vivo. Lastly, while current CVOTs have provided encouraging data, they have largely focused on patients with T2DM. The ongoing SURPASS-CVOT and SYNCHRONIZE-CVOT trials will expand this landscape, testing the cardiovascular efficacy of dual agonists like tirzepatide and survodutide in broader populations, including those with obesity and established cardiovascular risk (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT04255433, NCT05556512). These studies may help clarify whether the endothelial benefits observed preclinically translate into meaningful clinical outcomes across diverse patient groups. In summary, GLP-1RAs exhibit substantial potential in reversing ED via multiple integrated mechanisms. However, further investigation is warranted to clarify drug-specific actions, confirm the translational relevance of preclinical findings, and evaluate long-term vascular outcomes in broader patient populations, including those without T2DM. Comparative studies and real-world data will be crucial to better define their cardiovascular impact. Future research should also explore potential synergies with other antidiabetic agents and assess effects on validated clinical vascular biomarkers such FMD. Notably, despite the central role of ED in the pathogenesis of CVD, its clinical application as a prognostic or diagnostic tool remains limited. Various biomarkers and functional assessments of endothelial health, have demonstrated predictive value in research settings; however, their integration into routine clinical practice for cardiovascular risk stratification is still lacking. Bridging this gap between mechanistic insight and clinical utility represents a critical challenge for future translational research.
Author contributions
AB: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. LP: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. NT: Writing – review & editing. FC: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. CV: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. EB: Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Mekala, KC, and Bertoni, AG. Epidemiology of diabetes mellitus In: Transplantation, bioengineering, and regeneration of the endocrine pancreas. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press (2020). 49–58.
2. Einarson, TR, Acs, A, Ludwig, C, and Panton, UH. Prevalence of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review of scientific evidence from across the world in 2007–2017. Cardiovasc Diabetol. (2018) 17:83–19. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0728-6
4. Widlansky, ME, Gokce, N, Keaney, JF Jr, and Vita, JA. The clinical implications of endothelial dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2003) 42:1149–60. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00994-X
5. Hadi, HAR, and Al Suwaidi, J. Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes mellitus. Vasc Health Risk Manag. (2007) 3:853–76.
6. Haffner, SM, Lehto, S, Rönnemaa, T, Pyörälä, K, and Laakso, M. Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. (1998) 339:229–34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199807233390404
7. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC) . Worldwide trends in underweight and obesity from 1990 to 2022: a pooled analysis of 3663 population-representative studies with 222 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. (2024) 403:1027–50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02750-2
8. Afshin, A, Forouzanfar, MH, Reitsma, MB, Sur, P, Estep, K, Lee, A, et al. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. N Engl J Med. (2017) 377:13–27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614362
9. Gupta, S, and Bansal, S. Does a rise in BMI cause an increased risk of diabetes?: Evidence from India. PLoS One. (2020) 15:e0229716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229716
10. Shi, Q, Wang, Y, Hao, Q, Vandvik, PO, Guyatt, G, Li, J, et al. Pharmacotherapy for adults with overweight and obesity: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet. (2024) 403:e21–31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00351-9
11. Lim, S, Kim, KM, and Nauck, MA. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and cardiovascular events: class effects versus individual patterns. Trends Endocrinol Metab. (2018) 29:238e248. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2018.01.010
12. Nystrom, T, Gutniak, MK, Zhang, Q, Zhang, F, Holst, JJ, Ahrén, B, et al. Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 on endothelial function in type 2 diabetes patients with stable coronary artery disease. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. (2004) 287:E1209–15. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00237.2004
13. Hullon, D, Subeh, GK, Volkova, Y, Janiec, K, Trach, A, Mnevets, R, et al. The role of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in enhancing endothelial function: a potential avenue for improving heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Cardiovasc Diabetol. (2025) 24:70. doi: 10.1186/s12933-025-02607-w
14. Mojsov, S, Kopczynski, MG, and Habener, JF. Both amidated and nonamidated forms of glucagon-like peptide I are synthesized in the rat intestine and the pancreas. J Biol Chem. (1990) 265:8001–8.
15. Wei, Y, and Mojsov, S. Tissue-specific expression of the human receptor for glucagon-like peptide, I: brain, heart and pancreatic forms have the same deduced amino acid sequences. FEBS Lett. (1995) 358:219–24. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)01430-9
16. Ban, K, Noyan-Ashraf, MH, Hoefer, J, Bolz, SS, Drucker, DJ, and Husain, M. Cardioprotective and vasodilatory actions of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor are mediated through both glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor-dependent and -independent pathways. Circulation. (2008) 117:2340–50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.739938
17. Berndt, J, Ooi, SL, and Pak, SC. What is the mechanism driving the reduction of cardiovascular events from glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists?—A mini review. Molecules. (2021) 26:4822. doi: 10.3390/molecules26164822
18. Marso, SP, Daniels, GH, Brown-Frandsen, K, Kristensen, P, Mann, JFE, Nauck, MA, et al. Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. (2016) 375:311–22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603827
19. Marso, SP, Bain, SC, Consoli, A, Eliaschewitz, FG, Jódar, E, Leiter, LA, et al. Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. (2016) 375:1834–44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607141
20. Hernandez, AF, Green, JB, Janmohamed, S, D'Agostino, RB Sr, Granger, CB, Jones, NP, et al. Albiglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (Harmony Outcomes): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. (2018) 392:1519–29. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32261-X
21. Holman, RR, Bethel, MA, Mentz, RJ, Thompson, VP, Lokhnygina, Y, Buse, JB, et al. Effects of once-weekly exenatide on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. (2017) 377:1228–39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1612917
22. Pfeffer, MA, Claggett, B, Diaz, R, Dickstein, K, Gerstein, HC, Køber, LV, et al. Lixisenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes and acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. (2015) 373:2247–57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509225
23. Husain, M, Birkenfeld, AL, Donsmark, M, Dungan, K, Eliaschewitz, FG, Franco, DR, et al. Oral semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. (2019) 381:841–51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1901118
24. Gerstein, HC, Colhoun, HM, Dagenais, GR, Diaz, R, Lakshmanan, M, Pais, P, et al. Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. (2019) 394:121–30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31149-3
25. Gerstein, HC, Sattar, N, Rosenstock, J, Ramasundarahettige, C, Pratley, R, Lopes, RD, et al. Cardiovascular and renal outcomes with efpeglenatide in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. (2021) 385:896–907. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2108269
26. Kristensen, SL, Rørth, R, Jhund, PS, Docherty, KF, Sattar, N, Preiss, D, et al. Cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2019) 7:776–85. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30249-9
27. Krasner, NM, Ido, Y, Ruderman, NB, and Cacicedo, JM. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analog liraglutide inhibits endothelial cell inflammation through a calcium and AMPK dependent mechanism. PLoS One. (2014) 9:e97554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097554
28. Marso, SP, Bain, SC, Consoli, A, Eliaschewitz, FG, Jódar, E, Leiter, LA, et al. Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. Eur J Heart Fail. (2017) 19:69–77. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.657
29. Margulies, KB, Hernandez, AF, Redfield, MM, Givertz, MM, Oliveira, GH, Cole, R, et al. Effects of liraglutide on clinical stability among patients with advanced heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. (2016) 316:500–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.10260
30. Frías, JP, Aroda, VR, Frias, JP, Assaad-Khalil, SH, Blonde, L, Mohan, V, et al. Tirzepatide versus semaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. (2024) 390:1394–407. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2313917
31. Verma, S, Bhatt, DL, Gerstein, HC, Husain, M, Mathieu, C, Leiter, LA, et al. Inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in diabetes: mechanistic links and therapeutic opportunities. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2025) 85:1721–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.03.009
32. Mann, JFE, Verma, S, Leiter, LA, Rosenstock, J, de Zeeuw, D, George, J, et al. Effects of tirzepatide on cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. (2023) 389:2221–32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307563
33. Huynh, DTN, and Heo, KS. Therapeutic targets for endothelial dysfunction in vascular diseases. Arch Pharm Res. (2019) 42:848–61. doi: 10.1007/s12272-019-01180-7
34. Petrie, JR, Cosentino, F, Verma, S, Bhatt, DL, Buse, JB, Ceriello, A, et al. Addressing the root causes of vascular complications in diabetes: new insights from SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists. Acta Diabetol. (2023) 60:1441–8. doi: 10.1007/s00592-023-02124-w
35. Liu, Z, Lu, J, Sha, W, and Lei, T. Comprehensive treatment of diabetic endothelial dysfunction based on pathophysiological mechanism. Front Med. (2025) 12:1509884. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1509884
36. Förstermann, U, and Sessa, WC. Nitric oxide synthases: regulation and function. Eur Heart J. (2012) 33:829–37. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr304
37. Guzik, TJ, and Harrison, DG. Vascular NADPH oxidases as drug targets for novel antioxidant strategies. Drug Discov Today. (2012) 11:524–33. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2006.04.008
38. Heo, KS, Fujiwara, K, and Abe, J. Disturbed-flow-mediated vascular reactive oxygen species induce endothelial dysfunction. Circ J. (2011) 75:2722–30. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-11-1015
39. Wolf, D, and Ley, K. Immune–cell interactions and endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis and hypertension. Curr Opin Lipidol. (2019) 30:431–8. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000623
40. Le, NT, Sandhu, UG, Quintana-Quezada, RA, Hoang, NM, Fujiwara, K, and Abe, JL. Flow signaling and atherosclerosis. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2017) 74:1835–1858. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2442-4
41. Brownlee, M . Biochemistry and molecular cell biology of diabetic complications. Nature. (2001) 414:813–20. doi: 10.1038/414813a
42. Kirkman, DL, Robinson, AT, Rossman, MJ, Seals, DR, and Edwards, DG. Mitochondrial contributions to vascular endothelial dysfunction, arterial stiffness, and cardiovascular diseases. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. (2021) 320:H2080–100. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00917.2020
43. Gaspari, T, Liu, H, Welungoda, I, Hu, Y, Widdop, RE, Knudsen, LB, et al. A GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide inhibits endothelial cell dysfunction and vascular adhesion molecule expression in an ApoE−/− mouse model. Diab Vasc Dis Res. (2011) 8:117–24. doi: 10.1177/1479164111404257
44. Park, B, Bakbak, E, Teoh, H, Krishnaraj, A, Dennis, F, Quan, A, et al. GLP-1 receptor agonists and atherosclerosis protection: the vascular endothelium takes center stage. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. (2024) 326:H1159–76. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00574.2023
45. Luna-Marco, C, de Marañon, AM, Hermo-Argibay, A, Rodriguez-Hernandez, Y, Hermenejildo, J, Fernandez-Reyes, M, et al. Effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists on mitochondrial function, inflammatory markers and leukocyte-endothelium interactions in type 2 diabetes. Redox Biol. (2023) 66:102849. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2023.102849
46. Xie, Y, Li, Y, Xu, M, Zhao, X, and Chen, M. Protective effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on endothelial dysfunction in diabetes mellitus: a review of preclinical and clinical studies. Cardiovasc Diabetol. (2022) 21:200. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01634-1
47. Heo, KS, Phan, LP, Le, NTT, and Jin, Y. Mechanistic insights and emerging therapeutic strategies targeting endothelial dysfunction in cardiovascular diseases. Arch Pharm Res. (2025) 48:305–32. doi: 10.1007/s12272-025-01542-4
48. Cheng, CK, Luo, JY, Lau, CW, Cho, WC, Ng, CF, Ma, RCW, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and cardiovascular protection: from molecular mechanisms to clinical effects. Acta Pharmacol Sin. (2021) 42:1598–609. doi: 10.1038/s41401-020-00589-x
49. Dimitriadis, K, Mitrou, P, Lambadiari, V, Maratou, E, and Raptis, SA. Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes mellitus: role in cardiovascular disease pathogenesis. Hell J Cardiol. (2019) 60:347–51. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2018.11.008
50. Shi, L, Xu, Y, Zhao, C, Qu, G, and Hao, M. Liraglutide ameliorates high glucose-induced vascular endothelial injury through TRIB3/NF-κB signaling pathway. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. (2024) 60:1046–57. doi: 10.1007/s11626-024-00947-7
51. Wei, R, Ma, S, Wang, C, Ke, J, Yang, J, Li, W, et al. Exenatide exerts direct protective effects on endothelial cells through the AMPK/Akt/eNOS pathway in a GLP-1 receptor-dependent manner. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. (2016) 310:E947–57. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00400.2015
52. Ha, SJ, Kim, W, Woo, JS, Kim, JB, Kim, SJ, Kim, WS, et al. Preventive effects of exenatide on endothelial dysfunction induced by ischemia-reperfusion injury via KATP channels. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2012) 32:474–80. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.222653
53. Bullock, BP, Heller, RS, and Habener, JF. Tissue distribution of messenger ribonucleic acid encoding the rat glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor. Endocrinology. (1996) 137:2968–78. doi: 10.1210/endo.137.7.8770937
54. Wei, Y, and Mojsov, S. Distribution of GLP-1 and PACAP receptors in human tissues. Acta Physiol Scand. (1996) 157:355–7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-201x.1996.446304000.x
55. Kigoshi, T, Nakayama, K, and Uchida, K. Receptor gene expression of glucagon-like peptide-1, but not glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, in rat nodose ganglion cells. Auton Neurosci. (2004) 110:36–43. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2003.11.001
56. García-Vega, A, Martínez-Cuesta, MA, González-Domínguez, Á, López-García, A, Ruiz-Rodríguez, J, and Medina-Vera, I. Endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Cardiovasc Diabetol. (2024) 23:1. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-02096-9
57. Arakawa, M, Mita, T, Azuma, K, Ebato, C, Goto, H, Nomiyama, T, et al. Inhibition of monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells and attenuation of atherosclerotic lesion by a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, exendin-4. Diabetes. (2010) 59:1030–7. doi: 10.2337/db09-1694
58. Salheen, SM, Panchapakesan, U, Pollock, CA, and Woodman, OL. The DPP-4 inhibitor linagliptin and the GLP-1 receptor agonist exendin-4 improve endothelium-dependent relaxation of rat mesenteric arteries in the presence of high glucose. Pharmacol Res. (2015) 94:26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2015.02.003
59. Hachuła, M, Basiak, M, Kosowski, M, and Okopie’n, B. Effect of GLP-1RA treatment on adhesion molecules and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in diabetic patients with atherosclerosis. Life. (2024) 14:690. doi: 10.3390/life14060690
60. Corretti, MC, Anderson, TJ, Benjamin, EJ, Celermajer, D, Charbonneau, F, Creager, MA, et al. Guidelines for the ultrasound assessment of endothelial-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery: a report of the international Brachial Artery Reactivity Task Force. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2002) 39:257–65. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01746-6
61. Kim, H, Choi, CU, Rhew, K, Park, J, Lim, Y, Kim, MG, et al. Comparative effects of glucose-lowering agents on endothelial function and arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes: a network meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis. (2024) 391:117490. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2024.117490
62. Wang, Y, Yao, M, Wang, J, Liu, H, Zhang, X, Zhao, L, et al. Effects of antidiabetic drugs on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol. (2022) 13:818537. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.818537
63. Nomoto, H, Miyoshi, H, Furumoto, T, Oba, K, Tsutsui, H, Miyoshi, A, et al. A comparison of the effects of the GLP-1 analogue liraglutide and insulin glargine on endothelial function and metabolic parameters: a randomized, controlled trial Sapporo Athero-Incretin Study 2 (SAIS2). PLoS One. (2015) 10:e0135854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135854
64. Di Paolo, MC, Gruden, G, Barutta, F, Annaratone, L, Gallo, M, Arzarello, G, et al. Exenatide long acting release improves endothelial function and carotid intima-media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2019) 149:163–9. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.05.009
Keywords: obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, endothelial dysfunction, incretins, GLP1, GLP1-RA
Citation: Battistoni A, Piras L, Tartaglia N, Carrano FM, De Vitis C and Barbato E (2025) Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and the endothelium: molecular and clinical insights into cardiovascular protection. Front. Med. 12:1669685. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1669685
Edited by:
Christina Antza, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GreeceReviewed by:
Eleni Gavriilaki, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GreecePanagiotis Dolgyras, G. Papanikolaou General Hospital, Greece
Copyright © 2025 Battistoni, Piras, Tartaglia, Carrano, De Vitis and Barbato. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Allegra Battistoni, YWxsZWdyYS5iYXR0aXN0b25pQHVuaXJvbWExLml0