Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.

Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1670994

Increased propofol consumption with later anesthesia start times in sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy: Insights from regression and machine learning models

Provisionally accepted
Qiong  LanQiong Lan1Zhuonan  SunZhuonan Sun1Tian  WangTian Wang1Zhuya  HuangZhuya Huang2Dengyang  HanDengyang Han1Taotao  LiuTaotao Liu1Hua  ZhangHua Zhang1Ye  WangYe Wang1Rui  ZhangRui Zhang1Binlong  LiBinlong Li1Ning  YangNing Yang1Yinyin  QuYinyin Qu1Huili  LiuHuili Liu1*Mao  XuMao Xu1
  • 1Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 2Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications School of Electronic Engineering, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Chronopharmacology is an important but underexplored aspect of propofol administration. Despite the implementation of propofol administration models, none have yet incorporated temporal variables. This study aims to investigate the impact of temporal variations on propofol administration during sedated gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. Moreover, we aim to develop regression models to predict manually-controlled propofol administration that integrate temporal variables. Methods: This prospective single-center cohort study enrolled patients undergoing sedated GI endoscopy. For analysis, patients were categorized into 4 groups based on the anesthesia start time: Group 1 (8:00-10:00), Group 2 (10:00-12:00), Group 3 (13:00-15:00), and Group 4 (15:00-17:00). Perioperative characteristics and propofol doses were compared across groups. Correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between propofol dose and the anesthesia start time. Subsequently, linear regression models were developed for manually-controlled propofol administration. Results: A total of 146 cases were included in the statistical analysis. Significant differences were found for all parameters related to propofol dose across the 4 different groups, including induction dose, maintenance dose, total dose and these doses per kilogram per hour. Furthermore, there were positive correlations between the anesthesia start time and all parameters. In the linear regression models, the induction dose equation incorporated the anesthesia start time, age and weight as variables. The model of the maintenance dose per kilogram per hour included the anesthesia start time, duration and weight as variables. Conclusions: The results suggest that propofol dose increases with later anesthesia start times. Therefore, further clinical administration of propofol should incorporate a heightened consideration of temporal factors. Trial registration: This prospective study has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration date: December 3, registry number ChiCTR2400093328).

Keywords: Propofol, Temporal variations, sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy, manually-controlled administration, Machine learning model

Received: 22 Jul 2025; Accepted: 06 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Lan, Sun, Wang, Huang, Han, Liu, Zhang, Wang, Zhang, Li, Yang, Qu, Liu and Xu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Huili Liu, liuhuili@bjmu.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.