Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CASE REPORT article

Front. Med., 02 October 2025

Sec. Dermatology

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1676980

Secukinumab treatment in a pediatric patient with corticosteroid-intolerant pyoderma gangrenosum: a case report

Wang LiweiWang Liwei1Qian YihongQian Yihong1Tan Fei
Tan Fei2*Yuan Chao
Yuan Chao1*
  • 1Skin & Cosmetic Research Department, Skin Disease Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai, China
  • 2Skin Disease Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai, China

Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare, rapidly progressive, non-infectious neutrophilic dermatosis characterized by severely painful ulcers. Its pathogenesis may be attributed to genetic factors, autoimmune dysfunction, and neutrophil disorders. Interleukin-17 (IL-17) inhibitors can suppress neutrophil activity by blocking the IL-17/IL-23 axis, which has been documented to be effective in PG treatment. However, there is limited response rate of treatments with the use of IL-17 inhibitors for PG. Accordingly, the present study reports on a pediatric case of corticosteroid-intolerant pyoderma gangrenosum treated with the IL-17A inhibitor secukinumab, where the patient achieved significant improvement. This case underscores that secukinumab may be a promising therapeutic option for pediatric PG, offering valuable insights for clinical practice in managing such refractory cases.

Introduction

Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare, rapidly progressive, non-infectious neutrophilic dermatosis characterized by severely painful ulcers. The pathogenesis of this disease may involve genetic factors, autoimmune dysfunction, and neutrophil dysregulation. IL-17 inhibitors have been demonstrated to suppress the activity of neutrophils by blocking the IL-17/IL-23 axis. However, there is still suboptimal response rate in many case reports, and there is insufficient clinical experience with IL-17 inhibitors for PG. Herein, we reported a pediatric case of corticosteroid-intolerant PG treated with secukinumab. This report is anticipated to provide a novel therapeutic option for the management of pediatric PG.

Clinical data

A male patient presented with recurrent erythema, papules, ulcers, and pruritus on both lower limbs since the age of 12, lasting for over 3 years, with worsening in the past 2 months. In January 2021, the patient developed dark red patches on both calves, with multiple ulcerated areas and exudate for no apparent reason. The patient was diagnosed with soft tissue infection in a local hospital initially, and treated with topical Mupirocin Ointment, which proved ineffective, with continuous expansion of these ulcers. In September 2021, the patient received a skin tissue biopsy of the lower extremity (Figure 1). Subsequently, the patient experienced recurrent condition intermittently. Throughout the course of the disease, the patient reported no history of abdominal pain, diarrhea, or joint pain. Furthermore, the patient had no preexisting systemic diseases, no specific details in his personal history, and no history of extensive or long-term oral medication use. His father had a history of photosensitivity.

Figure 1
Histological images showing three levels of magnification: 2x, 10x, and 40x. At 2x, a wide view illustrates tissue structures. At 10x, finer details of cell organization become visible. At 40x, cells and nuclei are distinctly detailed, highlighting cellular texture and density variations.

Figure 1. Histopathological findings (Specimen No.: D21-13321): epidermal ulceration with infiltration of neutrophils and formation of serocrust; edema of the upper dermal stroma; dense infiltration of lymphocytes, histiocytes, and neutrophils in the dermis and subcutaneous fat layer; indistinct vascular wall structure with erythrocyte extravasation; and stromal collagen hyperplasia with prominent red staining.

The patient showed no abnormalities in systemic examination. Dermatological examination: Diffuse congestive erythema was observed on both lower extremities, with swelling over the dorsum of the feet, desquamation at the foot margins, and densely distributed millet-sized papules and papulovesicles. Several ulcers with irregular borders and partially covered by purulent exudate were noted on the extensor aspect of the left lower leg and heel, surrounded by a violaceous-red halo, with positive tenderness and slightly elevated skin temperature. The right lower extremity was covered with old scars and pigmentation. Meanwhile, there was no abnormality in the mucosa of the external genitalia or oral cavity; or deformity and tenderness in the joints of the limbs.

To further rule out infectious ulcers, vascular ulcers, and autoimmune ulcers, we completed the following examinations and tests during the patient’s consultation. Initial tests for fungal culture, bacterial culture, total IgE, and ANCA were all negative. Based on the integration of the patient’s medical history, clinical symptoms, physical signs, and pathological findings, the diagnosis was confirmed as pyoderma gangrenosum (PG).

During the disease course, the patient initiated oral methylprednisolone in November 2021, with initial symptom improvement. However, the skin lesions recurred repeatedly with each glucocorticoid taper. Due to being in a phase of active growth and development, the patient failed to achieve complete remission of the skin lesions after glucocorticoid maintenance therapy and concurrently experienced a rapid increase in body weight. Moreover, the patient experienced recurrent fungal and bacterial skin infections during the treatment course (Figure 2).

Figure 2
Timeline of a medical case from January 2021 to April 2025 highlighting key events: onset, diagnosis, condition fluctuations, treatments, and follow-up. Initial metrics were 160 cm, 60 kg, BMI 23.44. Later metrics were 170 cm, 96 kg, BMI 33.22, and then 90 kg, BMI 31.14. Treatments included methylprednisolone, prednisolone, and secukinumab, with notes on their dosage and tapering. Recurrent conditions like relapses, ulcer healing, and multiple recurrences are detailed along with medications used for treatment. Follow-ups became biweekly by 2025.

Figure 2. Timeline of treatment milestones during 2021–2025. The timeline illustrates the pediatric patient’s weight fluctuations and key treatment milestones from January 2021 to April 2025. The patient’s height, weight, and BMI (kg/m2) are indicated above the timeline, while key events such as disease progression and treatment adjustments are represented by color-coded dots and arrows below. Yellow dots denote confirmation of diagnosis; red dots denote disease exacerbation or recurrence; green dots denote disease remission.

On February 15, 2025, after obtaining informed consent from both the patient and guardians and the exclusion of contraindications, the patient was given treatment with secukinumab, an IL-17A inhibitor, given the relapse and worsening of skin lesions. The initial dose was 150 mg × 2 (300 mg) through subcutaneous injection, followed by 300 mg once weekly for maintenance, and was concomitantly treated with topical antibiotics. After 2 weeks of secukinumab treatment, the patient showed significantly subsided erythema and edema in both lower extremities, decreased ulcer exudation, and relieved pruritus. By week 4, the patient was observed with smoother ulcer margins, and re-epithelialization in the central areas, forming scar tissues. By week 8, the patient experienced ulcer healing, with residual erythema present at the sites of prior lesions (Figure 3). During treatment, routine CBC as well as hepatic and renal function monitoring revealed no abnormalities in the patient, without any adverse events such as infections or allergic reactions. At follow-up in May 2025, the patient was in stable condition, and was prescribed secukinumab injections every 4 weeks for maintenance treatment, with regular follow-up advised.

Figure 3
Series of images showing skin changes on a leg over time. Each photo is labeled with a date and side: 2021.01 (left and right), 2025.02.19 (right and left), 2025.03.04 (right and left), and 2025.04.21 (right and left). Differences in redness and texture are visible in each image.

Figure 3. Initial skin lesions and changes following secukinumab treatment at five treatment timepoints of 2025.

Discussion

PG is a rare neutrophilic dermatosis, which is estimated to affect 5.8 cases per 100,000 adults (1, 2). PG significantly impairs patients’ quality of life and is associated with a threefold increased risk of mortality compared to the general population (3). PG consists of four subtypes (e.g., ulcerative, vegetative, bullous, and pustular), with the ulcerative form being the most common. Skin lesions typically begin as papules, pustules, or nodules, which rapidly ulcerate and evolve into progressively enlarging, non-infectious deep ulcers, with red to violaceous undermined borders and severe pain (4). The lower extremities are the major sites of occurrence, involving approximately 80% of cases (5). The diagnosis is primarily made by excluding other causes of skin ulcers, coupled with clinical presentation and histopathological features for further confirmation. Despite an unclear understanding of the precise pathogenesis, PG is thought to be multifactorial, involving immune dysregulation, genetic predisposition, infections, and associated systemic diseases. About 50% of PG patients have comorbidities such as inflammatory bowel disease or rheumatoid arthritis (6). In this case, the patient presented with erythema and painful ulcers on both lower limbs. Further findings of ulcerative lesions with predominant neutrophilic infiltration, indicated by histopathological examination, were well consistent with the diagnostic criteria for ulcerative-type PG. Besides, the patient was identified without other systemic comorbidities.

According to recent research, skin lesions in PG exhibited remarkably upregulated levels of inflammatory cytokines, including IL-8, IL-17A, IL-23A, TNF-α, IFN-γ, and CXCL-1/2/3/9/10/11/16 (7), accompanied by an increased Th17/Treg cell ratio. Elevated serum levels of IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, and IL-23 were frequently reported in PG patients as well (810). Mechanistically, activation of the Th17 cell axis, particularly the IL-17/IL-23 pathway, is pivotal in triggering the inflammatory cascade. IL-23 secreted by dendritic cells can promote Th17 cell expansion and IL-17A production via the JAK 2–STAT3 signaling pathway, leading to massive neutrophil recruitment and activation, thereby driving tissue damage (11).

Currently, no standardized therapeutic protocol is available for the management of PG. Traditional therapies primarily involve the use of systemic glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive agents. In recent decades, small-molecule drugs and biologic agents have emerged as promising alternatives, showing encouraging therapeutic outcomes in case reports and small studies (4). JAK inhibitors, such as tofacitinib and ruxolitinib, have demonstrated efficacy in PG treatment. The phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor apremilast also shows potential as a monotherapy for refractory PG and may be used in combination with other agents (12, 13). Meanwhile, as for specific biologic agents, TNF-α inhibitors (e.g., infliximab and adalimumab), are effective options and may serve as alternatives to long-term use of corticosteroids or cyclosporine to mitigate relevant adverse effects (14, 15). Simultaneously, IL-1 inhibitors also exhibit therapeutic potential for PG in case reports and open-label studies (16). Secukinumab, brodalumab and other IL-17 inhibitors might also exert potential efficacy in some patients with PG (17); however, there were also reports of PG being paradoxically induced by this drug class, particularly in switch-therapy settings or certain predisposing conditions (18). Additionally, IL-23 inhibitors, such as ustekinumab and guselkumab, have demonstrated a therapeutic effect in the majority of patients across several studies (19, 20).

In our case, an adolescent patient with PG showed poor response to conventional therapy, with persistent, non-healing skin lesions that repeatedly worsened over time. During his growth and development period, the physical development of this patient was compromised by long-term maintenance with oral glucocorticoids, leading to rapid weight gain, coupled with recurrent bacterial and fungal infections. Noticeably, the safety profile of the therapeutic agent was a critical concern given the patient’s age and history of recurrent infections. Accordingly, this patient was provided with secukinumab, an agent approved for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in pediatric ≥6-year-old patients, with supportive safety data in children. For instance, in a phase I–II pilot study, seven patients received secukinumab 300 mg weekly from week 0 to 4, followed by 300 mg every 4 weeks in two patients through week 16, and every 2 weeks in five patients through week 32. Notably, two patients continued treatment through week 32 and experienced significant improvement in ulcer size, inflammatory markers, and Dermatology Life Quality Index scores; all participants reported pain relief (17). Following this dosing regimen, our patient exhibited marked improvement in skin lesions, weight reduction, and pain alleviation. Furthermore, our literature review identified six case reports on the use of secukinumab for PG treatment (2126), all of which reported clinical improvement, though all involved adult patients.

This case report demonstrates that secukinumab, an IL-17A inhibitor, achieved ulcer healing and symptom relief without adverse reactions in an adolescent with corticosteroid-intolerant PG over an 8-week short-term treatment course, providing practical single-case reference for managing refractory pediatric PG. However, as a single case report, it has inherent limitations: it cannot extrapolate secukinumab’s universal efficacy in pediatric PG from one patient’s short-term data, nor fully address the potential paradoxical reactions or long-term adverse events associated with IL-17 inhibitors. With follow-up limited to 3 months (through May 2025), short-term safety findings cannot rule out delayed risks such as increased infection susceptibility. Furthermore, the long-term impact of IL-17 pathway blockade on pediatric growth and immune maturation remains unclear, and secukinumab’s established safety data in children with psoriasis cannot be directly generalized to PG. Consequently, this case offers preliminary clinical clues but no definitive evidence for secukinumab’s efficacy or long-term safety in pediatric PG; multi-center, long-term studies are therefore necessary to validate the role of IL-17 inhibitors in this patient population.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s), and minor(s)’ legal guardian/next of kin, for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article. Written informed consent was obtained from the participant/patient(s) for the publication of this case report.

Author contributions

WL: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft. QY: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. TF: Visualization, Writing – review & editing. YC: Data curation, Investigation, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

ANCA, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies; BMI, body mass index; CBC, complete blood counts; CRP, C-reactive protein; CXCL, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand; DLQI, dermatology life quality index; IFN-γ, interferon-γ; IL-17, interleukin-17; IL-23, interleukin-23; JAK, janus kinase; PG, pyoderma gangrenosum; SC, subcutaneous injection; STAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; Th17, T helper 17 cells; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; Treg, regulatory T cells.

References

1. Xu, A, Balgobind, A, Strunk, A, Garg, A, and Alloo, A. Prevalence estimates for pyoderma gangrenosum in the United States: an age- and sex-adjusted population analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. (2020) 83:425–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Orfaly, VE, Reese, AM, Friedman, M, Latour, E, and Ortega-Loayza, AG. Pyoderma gangrenosum study pilot registry: the first step to a better understanding. Wound Repair Regen. (2022) 30:334–7. doi: 10.1111/wrr.13005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Langan, SM, Groves, RW, Card, TR, and Gulliford, MC. Incidence, mortality, and disease associations of pyoderma gangrenosum in the United Kingdom: a retrospective cohort study. J Invest Dermatol. (2012) 132:2166–70. doi: 10.1038/jid.2012.130

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Zaino, ML, Schadt, CR, Callen, JP, and Owen, LG. Pyoderma gangrenosum: diagnostic criteria, subtypes, systemic associations, and workup. Dermatol Clin. (2024) 42:157–70. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2023.08.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Binus, AM, Qureshi, AA, Li, VW, and Winterfield, LS. Pyoderma gangrenosum: a retrospective review of patient characteristics, comorbidities and therapy in 103 patients. Br J Dermatol. (2011) 165:1244–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10565.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Yamamoto, T. Epidemiology of pyoderma gangrenosum in Japanese patients by questionnaire survey. J Dermatol. (2019) 46:e145–6. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.14658

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Marzano, AV, Damiani, G, Ceccherini, I, Berti, E, Gattorno, M, and Cugno, M. Autoinflammation in pyoderma gangrenosum and its syndromic form (pyoderma gangrenosum, acne and suppurative hidradenitis). Br J Dermatol. (2017) 176:1588–98. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15226

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Ortega-Loayza, AG, Friedman, MA, Reese, AM, Liu, Y, Greiling, TM, Cassidy, PB, et al. Molecular and cellular characterization of pyoderma gangrenosum: implications for the use of gene expression. J Invest Dermatol. (2022) 142:1217–1220.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2021.08.431

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Guenova, E, Teske, A, Fehrenbacher, B, Hoerber, S, Adamczyk, A, Schaller, M, et al. Interleukin 23 expression in pyoderma gangrenosum and targeted therapy with ustekinumab. Arch Dermatol. (2011) 147:1203–5. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2011.168

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Rubas, K, Reich, A, Nowicka-Suszko, D, and Maj, J. The role of interleukins 6, 8, 17 and 23 in the pathogenesis of pyoderma gangrenosum. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. (2023) 37:e660–2. doi: 10.1111/jdv.18683

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Maverakis, E, Marzano, AV, Le, ST, Callen, JP, Brüggen, MC, Guenova, E, et al. Pyoderma gangrenosum. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2020) 6:81. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-0213-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Bordeaux, ZA, Kwatra, SG, and West, CE. Treatment of pyoderma gangrenosum with apremilast monotherapy. JAAD Case Rep. (2022) 30:8–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2022.10.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Laird, ME, Tong, LX, Sicco, KIL, Kim, RH, Meehan, SA, and Franks, AG. Novel use of apremilast for adjunctive treatment of recalcitrant pyoderma gangrenosum. JAAD Case Rep. (2017) 3:228–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2017.02.019

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Ben, AH, Fogh, K, and Bech, R. Pyoderma gangrenosum and tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors: a semi-systematic review. Int Wound J. (2019) 16:511–21. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13067

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Yamamoto, T. An update on adalimumab for pyoderma gangrenosum. Drugs Today (Barc). (2021) 57:535–42. doi: 10.1358/dot.2021.57.9.3293619

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. McKenzie, F, Cash, D, Gupta, A, Cummings, LW, and Ortega-Loayza, AG. Biologic and small-molecule medications in the management of pyoderma gangrenosum. J Dermatolog Treat. (2019) 30:264–76. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2018.1506083

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Lauffer, FSPBD. 044 safety and efficacy of anti-IL-17 (secukinumab) for the treatment of pyoderma gangrenosum. J Invest Dermatol. (2021) 141:S156. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2021.08.046

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Sadik, CD, Thieme, M, Zillikens, D, and Terheyden, P. First emergence of pyoderma gangraenosum, palmoplantar pustulosis and sacroiliitis in a psoriasis patient associated with switching from secukinumab to brodalumab. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. (2019) 33:e406–7. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15714

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Westerdahl, JS, Nusbaum, KB, Chung, CG, Kaffenberger, BH, and Ortega-Loayza, AG. Ustekinumab as adjuvant treatment for all pyoderma gangrenosum subtypes. J Dermatolog Treat. (2022) 33:2386–90. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2021.1937475

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Ben Abdallah, H, Fogh, K, Vestergaard, C, and Bech, R. Pyoderma gangrenosum and interleukin inhibitors: a semi-systematic review. Dermatology. (2022) 238:785–92. doi: 10.1159/000519320

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Orita, A, Hoshina, D, and Hirosaki, K. Pyoderma gangrenosum caused by secukinumab successfully treated with risankizumab: a case report and literature review. Clin Exp Dermatol. (2022) 47:1372–4. doi: 10.1111/ced.15183

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Coe, J, Kudva, S, and Shams, K. Matching the dose to the disease: successful treatment of recalcitrant pyoderma gangrenosum using high-dose secukinumab. Dermatol Ther. (2022) 35:e15669. doi: 10.1111/dth.15669

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Li, M, Xiang, H, Liang, Y, Xue, L, Zhou, X, Yang, L, et al. Secukinumab for PASS syndrome: a new choice for therapeutic challenge? Dermatol Ther. (2022) 35:e15507. doi: 10.1111/dth.15507

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Maronese, CA, Pimentel, MA, Li, MM, Genovese, G, Ortega-Loayza, AG, and Marzano, AV. Pyoderma gangrenosum: an updated literature review on established and emerging pharmacological treatments. Am J Clin Dermatol. (2022) 23:615–34. doi: 10.1007/s40257-022-00699-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. McPhie, ML, and Kirchhof, MG. Pyoderma gangrenosum treated with secukinumab: a case report. SAGE Open Med Case Rep. (2020) 8:2050313X-20940430X. doi: 10.1177/2050313X20940430

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Nikolakis, G, Kreibich, K, Vaiopoulos, A, Kaleta, K, Talas, J, Becker, M, et al. Case report: PsAPSASH syndrome: an alternative phenotype of syndromic hidradenitis suppurativa treated with the IL-17A inhibitor secukinumab. F1000Res. (2021) 10:381. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.52100.2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: pyoderma gangrenosum, secukinumab, IL-17 inhibitor, pediatric, corticosteroid

Citation: Liwei W, Yihong Q, Fei T and Chao Y (2025) Secukinumab treatment in a pediatric patient with corticosteroid-intolerant pyoderma gangrenosum: a case report. Front. Med. 12:1676980. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1676980

Received: 31 July 2025; Accepted: 17 September 2025;
Published: 02 October 2025.

Edited by:

Dongqing Li, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China

Reviewed by:

Yumin Xia, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, China
Bingrong Zhou, Nanjing Medical University, China

Copyright © 2025 Liwei, Yihong, Fei and Chao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Tan Fei, dGFuZmVpdHJ1ZUAxMjYuY29t; Yuan Chao, ZGVybWF5dWFuQDE2My5jb20=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.