Abstract
Background:
Escherichia coli (E. coli) could cause asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB), urinary tract infections (UTIs), and bloodstream infections (BSIs). However, the characteristics of antibiotic resistance patterns and molecular features of E. coli strains among these three patient groups have not been clarified.
Methods:
Three patient groups were prospectively and consecutively enrolled, including: the BSI-B group (UTI with concurrent bacteremia), the UTI-U group (UTI without bacteremia), and the ASB-U group (asymptomatic bacteriuria). All isolated strains were confirmed as E. coli by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed against 18 agents using VITEK 2 Compact system with AST-GN13 cards. Additionally, next-generation sequencing was employed to characterize multi-locus sequence typing, phylogenetic groups, serotypes, and virulence factors.
Results:
There were 50 cases for each group enrolled in this study. The UTI-U isolates demonstrated significantly higher resistance rates to aztreonam (28.00% vs. 8.00%), ceftazidime (20.00% vs. 4.00%), cefepime (16.00% vs. 2.00%), and gentamicin (30.00% vs. 12.00%) compared to the BSI-B group (P < 0.05). Phylogenetic group B2 and sequence type ST131 predominated in the BSI-B and UTI-U groups, whereas ST1193 was predominant in the ASB-U group. Virulence gene analysis revealed a higher prevalence of exotoxin (hlyABCD and cnf1) and adherence (papBCDEFGHJK) genes in both the BSI-B and UTI-U groups compared to ASB-U (P < 0.05). Additionally, the BSI-B group uniquely displayed a higher carriage of the nutritional/metabolic genes iroBCDEN.
Conclusion:
E. coli isolates from different clinical sources showed variations in antimicrobial resistance and molecular characteristics, which would be helpful for UTI patients’ management.
1 Introduction
Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most prevalent bacterial infections worldwide, with a global incidence of 1.6% (1), and its incidence is higher in women (estimated at approximately 10%) (2). From 1990 to 2021, both the incidence and mortality rates associated with UTI have shown an increasing trend (3). Severe UTI can progress to bloodstream infection (BSI), with community-acquired UTI being the predominant contributor, reported to account for 30–35% of adult bacteremia cases (4).
Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) is the most common pathogen of UTI (5), but the clinical outcomes varied as some cases were companied by BSI and some present with asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB). Studies have shown that 30% of ASB patients present with UTI symptoms (6). The different clinical outcomes could be potentially explained by varied bacterial determinants, including virulence determinants and resistance phenotypes.
In recent years, ESBL-producing E. coli are increasingly being detected in urine and blood (7), which enhances the risk of UTI relapse (8) and BSI (9). It has been reported that bacteria isolated from different specimen show distinct drug resistance patterns (10), making it difficult to select appropriate antibiotics, especially for patients with multiple sites of infections. Therefore, it is imperative to separately investigate the characteristics of strains obtained from urine and blood.
Current research on E. coli in UTI patients has primarily focused on strains originating from either intestinal or urinary sources (11). Although some studies have compared the antimicrobial resistance profiles of BSI isolates with those from urinary sources (10), such comparisons are limited by the heterogeneity of BSI strains, which encompass primary infections from non-urinary origins. To date, there were limited data on strains obtained from three infection status associated with UTIs: ASB, symptomatic UTI, and urinary tract-derived BSI. In this study, we collected E. coli from UTI patients with different status and analyzed their drug sensitivity phenotypes and molecular characteristics to provide data that will improve the treatment of UTI and BSI.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Patient enrollment and classification
Three groups of patients who were admitted to Dongyang People’s Hospital from January 2023 to June 2024 were consecutively enrolled, with 50 participants enrolled into each group based on the following criteria: patients diagnosed with UTI combined with BSI (blood culture was positive), were designated as the BSI-B group; patients diagnosed with UTI without BSI were assigned to the UTI-U group; those tested positive in the urine culture but not diagnosed with UTI were assigned to the ASB-U group. For the BSI-B group, patients with infections unrelated to the urinary system were excluded. Moreover, patients’ age and gender were collected. The UTI diagnostic criteria can be found in Supplementary File 1.
The sample size was estimated based on the prevalence rates of virulence genes from our previous study (12) using G*Power software with a one-sided alpha of 0.05 and 80% statistical power. Considering practical constraints including the availability of qualified clinical isolates meeting our strict inclusion criteria during the study period, we ultimately included 50 isolates per group in the final analysis.
2.2 Specimen collection, bacterial culture, and species identification
The strains for group BSI-B were extracted from blood, and UTI-U and ASB-U strains were isolated from urine. The specimen collection and transfer were performed in line with the established guidelines by the health industry in the People’s Republic of China, namely the WS/T640-2018 standard for specimen collection and transit in clinical microbiology (13). Briefly, 20–50 mL urine samples were collected using sterile containers, and 5–10 mL blood samples were obtained into a blood culture vial (bioMérieux, France). The specimens were cultured under ambient conditions and promptly transported to the laboratory within 2 h. The specimens were then cultured on Columbia blood agar and chocolate agar plates (Kangtai, Wenzhou) and then incubated at 3°C under a 5% CO2 atmosphere for 24–48 h. The species were identified using the matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) when visible colonies were formed on the medium plates. The Escherichia coli ATCC8739 was used as the quality control strain. All the strains were derived from different patients.
2.3 Drug sensitivity testing
The resistance phenotype against 18 antibiotics (amikacin, ampicillin, aztreonam, amoxicillin, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefotetan, ertapenem, cefepime, gentamicin, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, sulbactam-ampicillin, sulfamethoxazole- trimethoprim, tobramycin, piperacillin-tazobactam) and extended spectrum beta- lactamase (ESBL) were evaluated using the AST- GN13 card in vitek2 compact. The ATCC25922 strain was utilized to perform quality control.
2.4 Next-generation sequencing and gene annotation
Genomic DNA was extracted using the Cetyltrimethyl Ammonium Bromide (CTAB) method with minor modifications, and the DNA concentration, quality and integrity were measured using a Qubit Fluorometer (Invitrogen, United States) and a NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, United States). Sequencing libraries were generated using the TruSeq DNA Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina, United States) and the Template Prep Kit (Pacific Biosciences, United States). Next, genome sequencing was conducted at the Personal Biotechnology Company (Shanghai, China) on the Illumina Novaseq platform. Data assembly was carried out following the removal of adapter contamination and data filtration using the Adapter Removal (14) and SOAPec (15). The filtered reads were assembled by SPAdes (16) and A5-miseq (17) for the subsequent design of scaffolds and contigs. Finally, the genome sequence was obtained following rectification using the pilon software (18). Phylogenetic and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analyses were performed using the ClermonTyping program (19) and the MLST program (20), respectively. The Virulence Factors of Pathogenic Bacteria (VFDB) database (21) and The Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance (CARD) database (22) were employed to obtain the pathogenicity genes and antibiotic resistance genes, respectively.
2.5 Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 26.0. Count data were presented as numbers and percentages and were compared using the Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, with Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparisons. Continuous data were expressed as medians accompanied by quartiles and were analyzed by an independent sample Kruskal-Wallis test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
2.6 Ethics approval
This study, which involved human participants, was approved by the Ethics Committee of Dongyang People’s Hospital (No. 2022-YX-290) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent, and data were collected anonymously.
3 Results
3.1 The differences in age and gender among the three groups
There was no significant difference in ages between group BSI-B and group ASB-U (Table 1). Notably, group BSI-B [74 (60, 82)] and group ASB-U [69 (62, 78)] were older compared with group UTI-U [57 (35, 65)] (P < 0.001). Notably, these three groups showed similar gender distribution.
TABLE 1
| Index | BSI-B (50) | UTI-U (50) | ASB-U (50) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 74 (60, 82) | 57 (35, 65) | 69 (62, 78) | |
| 0.442 (BSI vs. ASB) | ||||
| < 0.001(UTI vs. ASB) | ||||
| < 0.001(BSI vs. UTI) | ||||
| Gender (male) | 11 (22.00) | 8 (16.00) | 6 (12.00) | 0.402 |
Comparative analysis of age and sex distribution across the three groups.
BSI-B, urinary tract-associated BSI; UTI-U, urinary tract infection only; ASB-U, asymptomatic bacteriuria.
3.2 The antimicrobial drug resistance of E. coli among the three groups
The resistance rates of aztreonam (28.00%) and ceftazidime (20.00%) in the UTI-U group were significantly higher than those in the BSI-B group (8.00 and 4.00%, respectively (Table 2) (P < 0.05). The resistance rate of cefepime in UTI-U (16.00%) was higher than that in BSI-B (2.00%) and ASB-U (2.00%) (P < 0.05). The resistance rate of tobramycin in ASB-U (34.69%) was higher than that in BSI-B (14.00%) (P < 0.05) (Table 2).
TABLE 2
| Antimicrobial type | Antimicrobial drug | BSI-B (50) | UTI-U (50) | ASB-U (50) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESBL | 11 (22.00) | 19 (39.58) | 15 (31.25) | 0.169 | |
| Penicillins | Amoxicillin | 39 (78.00) | 34 (72.34) | 39 (82.98) | 0.463 |
| Ampicillin | 40 (80.00) | 36 (73.47) | 40 (80.00) | 0.666 | |
| Aztreonam | Aztreonam | 4 (8.00)a | 14 (28.00)b | 6 (12.24)ab | 0.017 |
| Cephems | Cefotetan | 0 | 0 | 0 | / |
| Ceftazidime | 2 (4.00)a | 10 (20.00)b | 5 (10.20)ab | 0.040 | |
| Ceftriaxone | 12 (24.00) | 21 (42.86) | 14 (30.43) | 0.126 | |
| Cefepime | 1 (2.00)a | 8 (16.00)b | 1 (2.00)a | 0.007* | |
| Carbapenems | Ertapenem | 0 | 0 | 0 | / |
| Imipenem | 0 | 0 | 2 (4.081) | 0.107* | |
| β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations | Sulbactam/ampicillin | 19 (38.00) | 23 (46.94) | 23 (46.00) | 0.614 |
| Piperacillin/tazobactam | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.00) | 1 (2.04) | 0.599 | |
| Aminoglycosides | Amikacin | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.04) | 1 (2.04) | 0.550* |
| To bramycin | 7 (14.00)a | 14 (29.17)ab | 17 (34.69)b | 0.051^ | |
| Gentamicin | 6 (12.00)a | 15 (30.00)b | 16 (32.65)b | 0.035 | |
| Quinolones | Ciprofloxacin | 19 (38.00) | 21 (43.75) | 26 (53.06) | 0.316 |
| Levofloxacin | 16 (32.00) | 19 (38.00) | 21 (45.65) | 0.388 | |
| Nitrofurantoin | Nitrofurantoin | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.04) | 0 (0.00) | 0.662* |
| Folate pathway inhibitors | Sulfamethoxazole/ trimethoprim |
18 (36.00) | 18 (36.00) | 16 (32.65) | 0.922 |
Distribution of antimicrobial resistance in E. coli across the three groups.
χ2 test was used to compare between groups.
*Fisher’s exact test. ^ BSI-B vs. ASB-U, P = 0.016. ab The groups with the same subscript letter indicate no significant difference between compared groups. BSI-B, urinary tract-associated BSI; UTI-U, urinary tract infection only; ASB-U, asymptomatic bacteriuria; ESBL, extended spectrum beta- lactamase.
However, no differences were observed in the distributed genes responsible for resistance against aminoglycoside, quinolones, sulfonamide and β-lactam antibiotics between the any two groups (Table 3 and Supplementary File 2).
TABLE 3
| Antibiotic agent | Gene | Positive strains no. (%) | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSI-B | UTI-U | ASB-U | |||
| Aminoglycoside | aadA2 | 2 (4) | 3 (6) | 1 (2) | 0.59 |
| aadA5 | 16 (32) | 14 (28) | 14 (28) | 0.879 | |
| apha1-1AB | 1 (2) | 3 (6) | 4 (8) | 0.352 | |
| strA | 19 (38) | 20 (40) | 17 (34) | 0.819 | |
| strB | 19 (38) | 20 (40) | 18 (36) | 0.919 | |
| addA1 | 4 (8) | 1 (2) | 5 (10) | 0.193 | |
| Fluoroquinolone | parC | 50 (100) | 50 (100) | 50 (100) | |
| parE | 50 (100) | 50 (100) | 50 (100) | ||
| gyrA | 50 (100) | 50 (100) | 50 (100) | ||
| qnr | 3 (6) | 1 (2) | 4 (8) | 0.352 | |
| Sulfonamide | folP | 48 (96) | 50 (100) | 49 (98) | 0.245 |
| sul1 | 19 (38) | 18 (36) | 16 (32) | 0.815 | |
| sul2 | 20 (40) | 20 (40) | 19 (38) | 0.972 | |
| sul3 | 1 (2) | 2 (4) | 4 (8) | 0.35 | |
| β-lactams | blaCMY-118 | 6 (12) | 5 (10) | 5 (10) | 0.932 |
| blaCMY-47 | 42 (84) | 44 (88) | 45 (90) | 0.656 | |
| blaCTX-M-27 | 6 (12) | 8 (16) | 3 (6) | 0.284 | |
| blaCTX-M-55 | 4 (8) | 6 (12) | 5 (10) | 0.801 | |
| blaTEM-1β | 30 (60) | 26 (50) | 25 (50) | 0.488 | |
Distribution of antimicrobial resistance genes in E. coli across the three groups.
BSI-B, urinary tract-associated BSI; UTI-U, urinary tract infection only; ASB-U, asymptomatic bacteriuria.
3.3 Phylogenetic group and MLST results
Phylogenetic group analysis demonstrated that the E. coli strains isolated from the three groups were predominantly group B2. Specifically, Group B2 strains accounted for 66.00% in the BSI-B group, 60.00% in the UTI-U group, 50.00% in the ASB-U group, followed by group B1, accounting for 12.00, 8.00, and 16.00%, respectively (Table 4).
TABLE 4
| Phylogenetic group | BSI-B (%) | UTI-U (%) | ASB-U (%) | Total (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 2 (4.00) | 5 (10.00) | 8 (16.00) | 15 (10.00) |
| B1 | 6 (12.00) | 4 (8.00) | 8 (16.00) | 18 (12.00) |
| B2 | 33 (66.00) | 30 (60.00) | 25 (50.00) | 88 (58.67) |
| D | 7 (14.00) | 9 (18.00) | 7 (14.00) | 23 (15.33) |
| E | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.00) | 1 (0.67) |
| F | 2 (4.00) | 2 (4.00) | 1 (2.00) | 5 (3.33) |
Distribution of phylogenetic groups in E. coli across the three groups.
BSI-B, urinary tract-associated BSI; UTI-U, urinary tract infection only; ASB-U, asymptomatic bacteriuria.
A total of 35 sequence types (ST) and two unassigned types were detected (Supplementary File 3). The top five composition of E. coli ST in BSI-B group was as follows (Table 5): ST131 (10), ST1193 (8), ST69 (6), ST95 (6), ST73 (5); in UTI-U group was as follows: ST131 (11), ST1193 (10), ST69 (5), ST73 (4), ST10 (3); in ASB-U group was as follows: ST1193 (16), ST131 (6), ST69 (5), ST58 (4), ST10 (3).
TABLE 5
| Ranking order | BSI-B (n) | UTI-U (n) | ASB-U (n) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top1 | 131 (10) | 131 (11) | 1193 (16) |
| Top2 | 1193 (8) | 1193 (10) | 131 (6) |
| Top3 | 69 (6) | 69 (5) | 69 (5) |
| Top4 | 95 (6) | 73 (4) | 58 (4) |
| Top5 | 73 (5) | 10 (3) | 10 (3) |
Distribution of MLST sequence types in E. coli across the three groups.
BSI-B, urinary tract-associated BSI; UTI-U, urinary tract infection only; ASB-U, asymptomatic bacteriuria.
3.4 The distribution of virulence genes of E. coli among the three groups
A total of 91 UPEC-related VF genes were identified (Supplementary File 4). The detection rates of five VF genes of Exotoxin (hlyA, hlyB, hlyC, hlyD, and ncf1) and eight VF genes of Adherence (papB, papC, papD, papF, papG, papH, papJ, papK) in BSI-B and UTI-U were higher than that in the ASB-U group (P < 0.05) (Table 6). Moreover, the BSI-B group exhibited higher detection rates of the nutritional/metabolic virulence genes iroBCDEN than the UTI-U and ASB-U groups, with a statistically significant difference observed specifically for iroB (P = 0.044). However, the carriage rate of fepE in the BSI-B was lower compared with that in the UTI-U and ASB-U groups (P = 0.011) (Table 6).
TABLE 6
| VF function | VF name | BSI-B (%) | UTI-U (%) | ASB-U (%) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exotoxin | hlyA | 11 (22.0)a | 16 (32.0)a | 3 (6.0)b | 0.005 |
| hlyB/C/D | 11 (22.0)a | 17 (34.0)a | 3 (6.0)b | 0.002 | |
| cnf1 | 9 (18.0) | 15 (30.0) | 3 (6.0) | 0.008 | |
| Adherence | papB | 19 (38.0)a | 16 (32.0)a | 2 (4.0)b | < 0.001 |
| papC/D | 23 (46.0)a | 20 (40.0)a | 4 (8.0)b | < 0.001 | |
| papF | 24 (48.0)a | 23 (46.0)a | 9 (18.0)b | 0.002 | |
| papG | 21 (42.0)a | 16 (32.0)a | 3 (6.0)b | < 0.001* | |
| papH/J | 23 (46.0)a | 19 (38.0)a | 4 (8.0)b | < 0.001 | |
| papK | 23 (46.0)a | 20 (40.0)a | 4 (8.0)b | < 0.001 | |
| Nutritional/metabolic factor | iroB | 21 (42.0)a | 13 (26.0)ab | 10 (20.0)b | 0.044 |
| iroC | 21 (42.0) | 14 (28.0) | 10 (20.0) | 0.052 | |
| iroD/E/N | 21 (42.0) | 14 (28.0) | 11 (22.0) | 0.084 | |
| fepE | 45 (90.0)a | 50 (100.0)b | 50 (100.0)b | 0.011* |
Distribution of virulence genes in E. coli across the three groups.
χ2 test was used to compare between groups.
*Fisher’s exact test. ab The groups with the same subscript letter indicate no significant difference between compared groups. BSI-B, urinary tract-associated BSI; UTI-U, urinary tract infection only; ASB-U, asymptomatic bacteriuria. Human Organ Color Code: Red indicates infection; Black indicates asymptomatic. ATM, aztreonam; CAZ, ceftazidime; FEP, cefepime; TOB, tobramycin; GEN, gentamicin. Blue Color Scale Blocks: The numerical value represents the drug resistance rate. Darker blue shades indicate higher resistance rates. Red Color Scale Blocks: The numerical value represents the virulence gene carriage rate. Darker blue shades indicate higher carriage rates.
4 Discussion
As summarized in the graphical abstract (Figure 1), three clinical statuses for UTI patients were included in this study, and our findings reveals distinct antimicrobial resistance and virulence gene profiles for E. coli strains from patients UTI, ASB, and BSI.
FIGURE 1

The summary findings in this study. Human Organ Color Code: Red indicates infection, black indicates asymptomatic. Antibiotic Abbreviations: ATM, aztreonam; CAZ, ceftazidime; FEP, cefepime; TOB, tobramycin; GEN, gentamicin. Blue Color Scale Blocks: The numerical value represents the drug resistance rate and darker blue shades indicate higher resistance rates. Orange Color Scale Blocks: The numerical value represents the virulence gene carriage rate and darker orange shades indicate higher carriage rates.
Both ASB and UTI were common in older adults, whereas ASB was uncommon in younger populations. Among healthy women, the prevalence of ASB increases with age, from under 1% in newborns to 10–20% in those aged 80 years (23). The finding that the median age of the BSI group was notably higher than that of the UTI group is consistent with the observations reported by Cheung et al. (24). This observation aligns with existing evidence that age is a significant risk factor for UTIs that are complicated by sepsis (25).
In this study, higher antimicrobial resistance rates were observed in UTI-derived strains compared to BSI isolates, which is contrary to a Finnish surveillance from 2008 to 2019 reported higher ESBL production rates in E. coli from blood cultures (1.6–8.6%) than from urine (1.0–7.2%) (7). Another study also found that levofloxacin resistance was higher in bloodstream isolates (10). This inconsistency could be explained by the different infection sites causing bloodstream infection. In detail, bloodstream isolates in those studies were not exclusively of urinary origin but included strains from biliary, intestinal, and other infections while all isolates in our study were obtained from patients with UTI.
The higher resistance observed in the UTI group may be attributable to its predominance of outpatients, who commonly receive empirical broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy such as fluoroquinolones and third-generation cephalosporins, thereby driving increased resistance (26). The widespread use of these antibiotics can contribute to the evolution of bacterial populations, leading to the development of subpopulations with diverse resistance phenotypes (23). Furthermore, poor adherence among outpatients often results in suboptimal infection management, which can further facilitate the rise of drug-resistant bacterial strains. Moreover, strains associated with bloodstream infections generally exhibit high virulence, as hypervirulent variants of bacteria often demonstrate lower levels of antimicrobial resistance. A previous study investigating the virulence-resistance relationship reported that pan-susceptibility to antibiotics was detected in 44.7% of high-virulence isolates compared to 57.7% of low-virulence isolates (25). In the present study, we found that more virulence genes were isolated from the BSI-B group compared with the UTI-U group. The observed lower resistance in the BSI group could be attributed to the relationship between bacterial virulence and drug resistance.
Based on the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles observed in the three groups and in alignment with the Chinese guidelines for UTI management (27), we recommend that antibiotic therapy be customized according to the infection site. In cases of upper UTIs, where there is a significant risk of concurrent BSI and confirmed urosepsis, it is crucial to initiate empirical antibiotic therapy without delay. Preferred initial regimens may include β-lactam antibiotics or a combination of β-lactams with β-lactamase inhibitors. For lower UTIs, which are characterized by higher resistance rates among bacterial isolates, we recommend obtaining urine cultures as soon as possible. This early step is essential for identifying the causative pathogen and enabling targeted antibiotic selection based on the susceptibility results. In the context of ASB, treatment is typically not advised according to existing literature, with the exception of pregnant women and patients scheduled for invasive urological procedures (28). In these specific situations, antibiotic therapy should also be informed by the susceptibility profile of the identified pathogen. E. coli strains from different phylogroups typically harbor distinct accessory gene pools (e.g., virulence factors, antibiotic resistance genes, metabolic genes), which contribute to the divergent antimicrobial resistance profiles and pathogenic potential.
Here, we found that the Phylogenetic group B2 was the dominant group in all three groups, which should be closely monitored as this group-caused infections have higher morbidity and mortality (29). Unfortunately, more than 70% of the isolates of complex UTI are the group B2 (30), which was similar to that causing BSI (53%) (27).
As the predominant ST in the BSI group in this study, ST131 is also prevalent among patients with E. coli caused bacteremia across multiple regions, including Shanghai (14/80) (31), Shanxi (15/76) (32), and Paris (exceeding 70%) (28). Moreover, some surveillance data indicate an increasing trend in the proportion of ST131 among bloodstream isolates over time (27). In addition to its high frequency in BSI, ST131 also exhibits a high prevalence in UTI, supported by our findings and data from other regions (33, 34). Nevertheless, the prevalent STs might vary from subgroups as ST1193 is the most common sequence type (25.83%) among UPEC isolates from female patients (35). Notably, all ST1193 strains demonstrated ciprofloxacin resistance in our study, consistent with its characterization as an emerging global fluoroquinolone-resistant clone. Therefore, quinolone antibiotics should be avoided in treating infections caused by ST1193 strains. Previous investigations indicated that ST1193 was the cause of community-acquired upper UTI in the elderly (36). But current guidelines do not endorse routine screening or prophylactic treatment for ASB (28). However, our findings reveal that the median age of the ASB cohort was over 60 years. Given the multidrug-resistant characteristics and increased pathogenicity of ST1193 strains in elderly populations, it is essential to closely monitor these individuals for the potential development of symptomatic UTIs.
UPEC strains harbor multiple virulence factors that contribute to pathogenesis. Our study found hly, cnf1, and pap genes to be more abundant in BSI-B and UTI-U groups than in the ASB-U group, consistent with previous reports (11, 37–39). This phenomenon reinforces their potential as key virulence determinants in symptomatic and invasive urinary tract infections. Furthermore, the iroBCDEN gene cluster, responsible for producing the high-affinity siderophore salmochelin, facilitates bacterial invasion of urothelial cells (40) and promotes systemic infection (41). Proteomics research suggests that iron uptake systems may contribute to the risk of UTI-related sepsis (42). In line with this, we observed an enrichment of the iroBCDEN genes in BSI-B isolates compared to UTI-U strains.
The distinct bacterial profiles observed across different UTI statuses carry distinct implications for clinical management. The higher abundance of adhesin-related virulence factors in UTI-U strains suggests a potential mechanism for enhanced urinary epithelial colonization, which may support the importance of ensuring adequate antibiotic courses to reduce recurrence risk in symptomatic UTI. In contrast, the generally low virulence of ASB-U strains aligns with current recommendations that many patients with ASB may not require treatment. Interestingly, some studies have proposed the potential use of such low-virulence strains as live biotherapeutic agents for recurrent UTI (43). For BSI-associated strains, the enrichment of siderophore genes such as those in the iro cluster suggests a potential role in systemic infection, which may warrant consideration of prompt antibiotic intervention in such cases. Future research integrating approaches with molecular docking and dynamics simulations, as demonstrated in related studies (44, 45), could further elucidate the mechanism underlying these observations and support the development of targeted agents.
However, this study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, the absence of clinical outcomes and longitudinal follow-up data prevented the assessment of associations between bacterial characteristics and patient prognosis. Second, the relatively small sample size, combined with the inability to perform one-to-one matching between blood and urine samples, further constrains the generalizability of our findings and underscores the need for validation in larger, well-structured cohorts. Finally, the single-center design carries an inherent risk of selection bias, which should be considered when interpreting the results.
5 Conclusion
In this single-center study, E. coli isolates from different clinical sources showed variations in antimicrobial resistance and molecular characteristics, which could be considered in the personalized management of UTI patients with different status.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in this article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the Dongyang People’s Hospital Ethics Committee. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
SW: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. SZ: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. TY: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. XL: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. XP: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the Science and Technology Bureau of Jinhua (2023-3-031).
Acknowledgments
Funding from the Science and Technology Bureau of Jinhua, Zhejiang, China Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1678401/full#supplementary-material
References
1.
Mengistu DA Alemu A Abdukadir AA Mohammed Husen A Ahmed F Mohammed B . Incidence of urinary tract infection among patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.Inquiry. (2023) 60:469580231168746. 10.1177/00469580231168746
2.
Lihong L Xie H . Expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of female urinary tract infection in China.Chin Med J. (2017) 97:2827–32. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.36.010
3.
Zi H Liu MY Luo LS Huang Q Luo PC Luan HH et al Global burden of benign prostatic hyperplasia, urinary tract infections, urolithiasis, bladder cancer, kidney cancer, and prostate cancer from 1990 to 2021. Mil Med Res. (2024) 11:64. 10.1186/s40779-024-00569-w
4.
Hounsom L Grayson K Melzer M . Mortality and associated risk factors in consecutive patients admitted to a UK NHS trust with community acquired bacteraemia.Postgrad Med J. (2011) 87:757–62. 10.1136/pgmj.2010.116616
5.
Wang S Zhao S Jin S Ye T Xinling P . Sepsis risk in diabetic patients with urinary tract infection.PLoS One. (2024) 19:e0303557. 10.1371/journal.pone.0303557
6.
Lindberg U Claesson I Hanson LA Jodal U . Asymptomatic bacteriuria in schoolgirls. VIII. Clinical course during a 3-year follow-up.J Pediatr. (1978) 92:194–9. 10.1016/s0022-3476(78)80003-1
7.
Ilmavirta H Ollgren J Räisänen K Kinnunen T Hakanen AJ Jalava J et al Increasing proportions of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing isolates among Escherichia coli from urine and bloodstream infections: results from a nationwide surveillance network, Finland, 2008 to 2019. Euro Surveill. (2023) 28:2200934. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.43.2200934
8.
Anesi JA Lautenbach E Nachamkin I Garrigan C Bilker WB Omorogbe J et al The role of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistance in recurrent community-onset Enterobacteriaceae urinary tract infections: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. (2019) 19:163. 10.1186/s12879-019-3804-y
9.
Gatti M Bonazzetti C Tazza B Pascale R Miani B Malosso M et al Impact on clinical outcome of follow-up blood cultures and risk factors for persistent bacteraemia in patients with gram-negative bloodstream infections: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. (2023) 29:1150–8. 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.02.024
10.
Wang S Zhao S Zhou Y Jin S Ye T Pan X . Antibiotic resistance spectrum of E. coli strains from different samples and age-grouped patients: a 10-year retrospective study.BMJ Open. (2023) 13:e067490. 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067490
11.
Rezatofighi SE Mirzarazi M Salehi M . Virulence genes and phylogenetic groups of uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates from patients with urinary tract infection and uninfected control subjects: a case-control study.BMC Infect Dis. (2021) 21:361. 10.1186/s12879-021-06036-4
12.
Li G Wang S Zhao S Zhou Y Jin S Pan X . Prevalence of USP and hlyA genes and association with drug resistance in uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from patients in a tertiary hospital from Southeast China.Bull Exp Biol Med. (2022) 174:57–61. 10.1007/s10517-022-05648-3
13.
World Health Organization [WHO]. Specimen Collection and Transport in Clinical Microbiology. Beijing: Health industry standards of the People’s Republic of China (2018).
14.
Schubert M Lindgreen S Orlando L . AdapterRemoval v2: rapid adapter trimming, identification, and read merging.BMC Res Notes. (2016) 9:88. 10.1186/s13104-016-1900-2
15.
Luo R Liu B Xie Y Li Z Huang W Yuan J et al SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience. (2012) 1:18. 10.1186/2047-217X-1-18
16.
Bankevich A Nurk S Antipov D Gurevich AA Dvorkin M Kulikov AS et al SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. (2012) 19:455–77. 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021
17.
Coil D Jospin G Darling AE . A5-miseq: an updated pipeline to assemble microbial genomes from Illumina MiSeq data.Bioinformatics. (2015) 31:587–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu661
18.
Wick RR Judd LM Gorrie CL Holt KE . Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads.PLoS Comput Biol. (2017) 13:e1005595. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595
19.
Github. The Github. (2024). Available online at: https://github.com/tseemann/Clermontyping (accessed February 2, 2024).
20.
Github. Tseemann. (2025). Available online at: https://github.com/tseemann/mlst (accessed October 28, 2022).
21.
Chen L Zheng D Liu B Yang J Jin Q . VFDB 2016: hierarchical and refined dataset for big data analysis–10 years on.Nucleic Acids Res. (2016) 44:D694–7. 10.1093/nar/gkv1239
22.
McArthur AG Waglechner N Nizam F Yan A Azad MA Baylay AJ et al The comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. (2013) 57:3348–57. 10.1128/AAC.00419-13
23.
Thänert R Choi J Reske KA Hink T Thänert A Wallace MA et al Persisting uropathogenic Escherichia coli lineages show signatures of niche-specific within-host adaptation mediated by mobile genetic elements. Cell Host Microbe. (2022) 30:1034–47.e6. 10.1016/j.chom.2022.04.008.
24.
Cheung DA Nicholson A Butterfield TR DaCosta M . Prevalence, co-infection and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia Coli from blood and urine samples at a hospital in Jamaica.J Infect Dev Ctries. (2020) 14:146–52. 10.3855/jidc.11361
25.
ÄŒurová K SlebodnÃková R Kmetová M Hrabovský V Maruniak M Liptáková E et al Virulence, phylogenetic background and antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli associated with extraintestinal infections. J Infect Public Health. (2020) 13:1537–43. 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.06.032
26.
Bo Zhen W Ming Tian T Wu W . Chinese expert consensus on diagnosis cle distributed under the terms of and treatment of urinary tract infections.Chin J Urol. (2015) 36. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2015.04.001
27.
RodrÃguez I Figueiredo AS Sousa M Aracil-Gisbert S Fernández-de-Bobadilla MD Lanza VF et al A 21-Year Survey of Escherichia coli from Bloodstream Infections (BSI) in a tertiary hospital reveals how community-hospital dynamics of B2 phylogroup clones influence local BSI Rates. mSphere. (2021) 6:e0086821. 10.1128/msphere.00868-21
28.
Royer G Darty MM Clermont O Condamine B Laouenan C Decousser JW et al Phylogroup stability contrasts with high within sequence type complex dynamics of Escherichia coli bloodstream infection isolates over a 12-year period. Genome Med. (2021) 13:77. 10.1186/s13073-021-00892-0
29.
Pitout JDD . Population Dynamics of Escherichia coli causing bloodstream infections over extended time periods.mSphere. (2021) 6:e0095621. 10.1128/msphere.00956-21
30.
GarcÃa-Meniño I GarcÃa V Lumbreras-Iglesias P Fernández J Mora A . Fluoroquinolone resistance in complicated urinary tract infections: association with the increased occurrence and diversity of Escherichia coli of clonal complex 131, together with ST1193.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2024) 14:1351618. 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1351618
31.
Xiao S Tang C Zeng Q Xue Y Chen Q Chen E et al Antimicrobial resistance and molecular epidemiology of Escherichia coli from bloodstream infection in Shanghai, China, 2016-2019. Front Med. (2021) 8:803837. 10.3389/fmed.2021.803837
32.
Zhang Y Wang H Li Y Hou Y Hao C . Drug susceptibility and molecular epidemiology of Escherichia coli in bloodstream infections in Shanxi, China.PeerJ. (2021) 9:e12371. 10.7717/peerj.12371
33.
Jafari A Falahatkar S Delpasand K Sabati H Sedigh Ebrahim-Saraie H . Emergence of Escherichia coli ST131 causing urinary tract infection in western asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Microb Drug Resist. (2020) 26:1357–64. 10.1089/mdr.2019.0312
34.
Choi HJ Jeong SH Shin KS Kim YA Kim YR Kim HS et al Characteristics of Escherichia coli urine isolates and risk factors for secondary bloodstream infections in patients with urinary tract infections. Microbiol Spectr. (2022) 10:e0166022. 10.1128/spectrum.01660-22
35.
Zeng Q Xiao S Gu F He W Xie Q Yu F et al Antimicrobial resistance and molecular epidemiology of uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from female patients in Shanghai, China. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2021) 11:653983. 10.3389/fcimb.2021.653983
36.
Peirano G Matsumara Y Nobrega D DeVinney R Pitout J . Population-based epidemiology of Escherichia coli ST1193 causing blood stream infections in a centralized Canadian region.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. (2021) [Online ahead of print]. 10.1007/s10096-021-04373-5.
37.
Blanco M Blanco JE Alonso MP Blanco J . Virulence factors and O groups of Escherichia coli strains isolated from cultures of blood specimens from urosepsis and non-urosepsis patients.Microbiologia. (1994) 10:249–56.
38.
Ikeda M Kobayashi T Okugawa S Fujimoto F Okada Y Tatsuno K et al Comparison of phylogenetic and virulence factors between Escherichia coli isolated from biliary tract infections and uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Heliyon. (2023) 9:e21748. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21748
39.
Yun KW Kim HY Park HK Kim W Lim IS . Virulence factors of uropathogenic Escherichia coli of urinary tract infections and asymptomatic bacteriuria in children.J Microbiol Immunol Infect. (2014) 47:455–61. 10.1016/j.jmii.2013.07.010
40.
Feldmann F Sorsa LJ Hildinger K Schubert S . The salmochelin siderophore receptor IroN contributes to invasion of urothelial cells by extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli in vitro.Infect Immun. (2007) 75:3183–7. 10.1128/IAI.00656-06
41.
Lim C Zhang CY Cheam G Chu WHW Chen Y Yong M et al Essentiality of the virulence plasmid-encoded factors in disease pathogenesis of the major lineage of hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae varies in different infection niches. EBioMedicine. (2025) 115:105683. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105683
42.
Fogarty SA Singh DR Nelson SE Calandranis ME Zhang Y Pawelski AS et al IRF6 controls Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) lytic reactivation and differentiation in EBV-infected epithelial cells. PLoS Pathog. (2025) 21:e1013236. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1013236
43.
Segev G Sykes JE Klumpp DJ Schaeffer AJ Antaki EM Byrne BA et al Evaluation of the live biotherapeutic product, asymptomatic bacteriuria Escherichia coli 2-12, in healthy dogs and dogs with clinical recurrent UTI. J Vet Intern Med. (2018) 32:267–73. 10.1111/jvim.14851
44.
Wisal A Saeed N Aurongzeb M Shafique M Sohail S Anwar W et al Bridging drug discovery through hierarchical subtractive genomics against asd, trpG, and secY of pneumonia causing MDR Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Genet Genomics. (2024) 299:34. 10.1007/s00438-024-02115-8
45.
Basharat Z Akhtar U Khan K Alotaibi G Jalal K Abbas MN et al Differential analysis of Orientia tsutsugamushi genomes for therapeutic target identification and possible intervention through natural product inhibitor screening. Comput Biol Med. (2022) 141:105165. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105165
Summary
Keywords
E. coli , bloodstream infection, urinary tract infection, asymptomatic bacteriuria, virulence factor, antibiotic resistance
Citation
Wang S, Zhao S, Ye T, Lou X and Pan X (2025) Comparison of antibiotic resistance and molecular characteristics of Escherichia coli isolated from patients with UTI, ASB, and uropathic bloodstream infection. Front. Med. 12:1678401. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1678401
Received
02 August 2025
Revised
14 November 2025
Accepted
14 November 2025
Published
09 December 2025
Volume
12 - 2025
Edited by
Miklos Fuzi, Independent Researcher, Seattle, United States
Reviewed by
Valentina Scheggi, Careggi University Hospital, Italy
Hassan S. S, University of Karachi, Pakistan
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Wang, Zhao, Ye, Lou and Pan.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xinling Pan, panfengyuwuzu@163.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.