Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Med.

Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1685044

This article is part of the Research TopicExploring Immunometabolism: Metabolic Pathway and Immune Response in SepsisView all 10 articles

Gut-Lung Immunometabolic Crosstalk in Sepsis: From Microbiota to Respiratory Failure

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Binzhou Medical University - Yantai Campus, Yantai, China
  • 2Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai, China
  • 3Macao Polytechnic University, Macau, Macao, SAR China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Sepsis is a systemic immune-metabolic disorder syndrome caused by infection, in which gut microbiota dysbiosis plays a central role in the occurrence and development of multi-organ dysfunction. This paper systematically elaborates on the bidirectional regulatory mechanism of the "gut-lung axis" in sepsis: Gut microbiota dysregulation damages the gut barrier function, reduces the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), and increases endotoxin translocation. Subsequently, it activates alveolar macrophage polarization, promotes the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), and leads to an imbalance in the Treg/Th17 cell ratio, ultimately exacerbating the pathological process of acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Conversely, the pulmonary inflammatory response can also aggravate gut barrier damage through circulating inflammatory mediators, forming a vicious cycle. Mechanistically, HIF-1α, mTOR, and Sirtuins do not act in isolation. Instead, they jointly regulate the metabolic fate of immune cells through spatiotemporally dynamic interactions. During the evolution of sepsis, these signals exhibit opposite regulatory polarities during the hyper - inflammatory phase and the immunosuppressive phase, and mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress further amplify the inflammatory cascade reaction. Preclinical research evidence shows that microbiota-based intervention measures (including probiotic preparations, fecal microbiota transplantation, and SCFA supplementation) and vagus nerve electrical stimulation can effectively alleviate sepsis-related lung injury and improve prognosis, but there is significant individual heterogeneity in their therapeutic effects. Future research should not be restricted to descriptive associations. Instead, it is essential to conduct in - depth analyses of the specific logic of the aforementioned signaling networks in terms of cell types, subcellular compartments, and disease course timings, and clarify their context - dependent controversies to promote the transformation of mechanistic understanding into precision treatment. Meanwhile, research efforts should focus on constructing a multi - omics dynamic biomarker system integrating metagenomics, metabolomics, and immunophenotyping analysis, and designing clinical trials through precise patient stratification to facilitate the clinical translation of individualized treatment strategies based on gut - lung axis regulation.

Keywords: Sepsis, Gut-Lung Axis, Microbiota dysbiosis, Intensive Care Unit, Immunemetabolism

Received: 13 Aug 2025; Accepted: 16 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Li, Song, Li and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Xicheng Song, drxchsong@163.com
Kefeng Li, kefengl@mpu.edu.mo
Jing Wang, 17836215528@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.