ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Gastroenterology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1687499
Association between Life's Crucial 9 and bowel health among US adults: a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES 2005–2010 with external validation
Provisionally accepted- Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Abnormal bowel health, including constipation and diarrhea, is common in the general population. The American Heart Association recently introduced Life’s Essential 8 (LE8) as a framework for assessing cardiovascular health (CVH). Building on this, Life’s Crucial 9 (LC9) was developed by adding psychological health as a ninth component, providing a more holistic measure of overall health. Our objective was to investigate whether LC9 is linked to bowel health. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the association between LC9 and bowel health outcomes using nationally representative data, with validation in an independent hospital-based cohort. Methods: This cross-sectional analysis included 12,817 adults from Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2010, and validation was conducted in an external hospital-based cohort of 991 patients. The primary exposure was the LC9 score, and the primary outcomes were constipation and diarrhea. The primary analysis used weighted multivariable logistic regression to assess the associations of LC9 scores with bowel outcomes. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) were applied to evaluate potential non-linear relationships. Sensitivity and stratified analyses were performed to test the stability of the results. Internal validation was conducted within the U.S. NHANES cohort, and external validation was performed using a hospital-based cohort from our center to confirm robustness and generalizability. Results: After adjusting for potential confounders, higher LC9 scores were significantly associated with a lower risk of both constipation (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=0.90, p =0.001) and diarrhea (AOR=0.82, p<0.001). Compared to participants in the lowest tertile, those in the highest LC9 tertile showed a reduced risk of constipation (AOR=0.70, p<0.001) and diarrhea (AOR=0.54, p<0.001). RCS analysis demonstrated a linear dose-response relationship between LC9 and bowel health outcomes. Stratified analyses confirmed consistent associations across most subgroups, with no significant interactions except for race in the LC9-diarrhea relationship. Sensitivity analyses using unweighted logistic models yielded similar results. Validation analyses confirmed consistent performance, with good discrimination, calibration, and net clinical benefit across cohorts. Conclusions: A negative linear association was found between LC9 and both constipation and diarrhea in US adults. Future longitudinal cohort studies are needed to assess the association between LC9 and bowel health.
Keywords: Life's Crucial 9, Diarrhea, Constipation, NHANES, Cardiovascular health
Received: 17 Aug 2025; Accepted: 08 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Dong, Lian and Jiang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Xintong Jiang, jxt115019@163.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.