Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

STUDY PROTOCOL article

Front. Med.

Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Biophysiological Modeling and Organ-Specific Therapeutic StrategiesView all 3 articles

Clinical Efficacy and Mechanisms of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Targeting the Gut-Brain Axis for Postoperative Complications of Aortic Dissection: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Provisionally accepted
Bo  NingBo Ning1Liangbin  YangLiangbin Yang1YI  WeiYI Wei1Cheng  LuoCheng Luo2Feisheng  ZhengFeisheng Zheng3Teng  GeTeng Ge1Zhuang  LiZhuang Li1Chaojie  WangChaojie Wang3Jinlin  HuJinlin Hu1Qingzuo  ZhaoQingzuo Zhao1Jingyu  BoJingyu Bo1Kai  WangKai Wang4Zhan  ZhangZhan Zhang4Hongyu  ChenHongyu Chen4Rongjun  ZouRongjun Zou3*Jihai  PengJihai Peng3*Xiaoping  FanXiaoping Fan3*
  • 1Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
  • 2Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
  • 3The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
  • 4Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract: Background: Aortic dissection (AD) is a life-threatening cardiovascular emergency characterized by rapid onset and high mortality. While surgery intervention, the primary treatment, improves short-term survival, it frequently leads to postoperative complications including systemic inflammatory response syndrome, gastrointestinal dysfunction, and anxiety/depression. These complications may be exacerbated by dysregulation of the gut-brain axis (GBA). Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique known to exert anti-inflammatory, prokinetic, and neuroregulatory effects in various conditions; however, its application for managing postoperative complications in AD remains unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of taVNS in regulating the GBA among postoperative AD patients through a randomized controlled trial. Methods: This is a single-center, randomized, investigator-blinded, sham-controlled randomized controlled trial. A total of 50 patients aged 18–75 years with postoperative Stanford Type A or B AD will be enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the active taVNS group or the sham control group. Both groups will receive standard postoperative care. The experimental group will additionally receive active taVNS targeting the vagus nerve-innervated auricular area (15 Hz, 200 μs pulse width), while the control group will receive sham stimulation at a non-vagus innervated site without electrical current. The intervention will be administered for 30 minutes, twice daily, over 7 consecutive days, with follow-up assessments continuing until 24 weeks post-surgery. Primary outcomes include changes in gut microbiota diversity/abundance and brain function (assessed via functional near-infrared spectroscopy). Secondary outcomes encompass inflammatory markers, plasma neurotransmitter levels, intestinal function recovery, and relevant psychometric scale scores. Safety will be monitored through vital signs, laboratory tests, and recording of any adverse events. Discussion: This study is the first to innovatively integrate taVNS with the GBA theory, investigating its multi-target mechanisms through a comprehensive set of biomarkers and clinical endpoints. If proven effective, taVNS could offer a safe and cost-effective non-pharmacological adjunctive therapy for managing postoperative complications in AD. Furthermore, the findings have the potential to elucidate the role of the GBA in the recovery trajectory of patients following major cardiovascular surgery. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR, http://www.chictr.org.cn), No. ChiCTR2500102345

Keywords: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation, gut-brain axis, aortic dissection, Postoperative Complications, randomized controlled trial

Received: 25 Aug 2025; Accepted: 17 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ning, Yang, Wei, Luo, Zheng, Ge, Li, Wang, Hu, Zhao, Bo, Wang, Zhang, Chen, Zou, Peng and Fan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Rongjun Zou, zourj3@mail2.sysu.edu.cn
Jihai Peng, jiurupengjihai@163.com
Xiaoping Fan, fanxiaoping@gzucm.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.