- 1Department of Pediatric Surgery and Urology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo, ” Trieste, Italy
- 2Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health Research Unit, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo, ” Trieste, Italy
- 3University of Trieste, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Trieste, Italy
Introduction: The diagnosis of adnexal torsion in children remains nonspecific. In some studies, D-dimer was shown to be a promising biochemical marker, especially in animals. This analysis aimed to preliminarily evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of D-dimer levels in predicting the diagnosis of adnexal torsion at our institution.
Methods: All female patients who presented at the emergency department from January 2022 to December 2024 with symptoms suggestive of adnexal torsion were prospectively enrolled in the study. Preoperative D-dimer levels were obtained for all patients undergoing surgical exploration. Descriptive analysis was computed, and a receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed via univariate logistic regression.
Results: Of the 27 eligible patients, 15 (aged 7–17 years) participated in the study. Torsion was found on the left side in six patients (40%) and on the right side in nine patients (60%). Almost all patients (80%) were treated laparoscopically. No postoperative complications were encountered. None of the examined variables were significantly correlated with adnexal torsion. Notably, D-dimer levels were higher in patients with adnexal torsion (odds ratio = 1, p = 0.29), with a sensitivity of 0.86 and a specificity of 0.75.
Conclusion: No association was observed between D-dimer levels and ovarian torsion in our cohort. Nonetheless, the sensitivity and specificity results lead us to believe that preoperative D-dimer levels could help surgeons in more accurately predicting the possibility of an adnexal torsion in children and adolescents, but this should not replace imaging studies and diagnostic laparoscopy especially in doubtful cases.
Introduction
Adnexal torsion, also known as ovarian torsion, is the fifth most common gynecologic emergency, with approximately 30% of cases occurring in females aged under 20 years. Its incidence is estimated at 5 per 100,000 females aged 1–20 years, with girls aged over 10 years at increased risk due to hormonal influences and gonadal growth leading to a higher frequency of both physiological and pathological masses. The right ovary is most frequently involved, and a delayed identification of adnexal torsion may lead to hemorrhagic infarction and necrosis of adnexal structures, which may impair future fertility (1–3).
The clinical presentation of adnexal torsion is often nonspecific, with the most common symptom being acute, intermittent, non-radiating lower abdominal pain, associated with nausea and vomiting in 60%−70% of patients. Clinical signs such as rebound tenderness and peritoneal irritation are less commonly observed. Laboratory markers, including leukocytosis, pyuria, C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, are by no means reliable for diagnosing adnexal torsion.
Diagnostic imaging primarily involves abdominal ultrasonography (US), which demonstrates high sensitivity (92%) and specificity (96%) in detecting adnexal torsion. In cases where US is inconclusive, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or computed tomography (CT) may be utilized, although they are less commonly employed. However, no clinical or imaging criteria are sufficiently definitive to confirm the preoperative diagnosis of adnexal torsion. Therefore, patients with a high clinical suspicion still undergo emergent diagnostic laparoscopy (1, 3).
In adults, the inflammatory marker interleukin 6 (IL6) has shown promise in predicting adnexal torsion. A few studies have also investigated the role of other biochemical markers, such as D-dimer, in diagnosing adnexal torsion. D-dimer, a fibrin degradation product, has been proposed as a potential indicator of ischemia in various tissues, including the ovaries. Preliminary data suggest that elevated D-dimer levels may correlate with adnexal torsion, although further studies are needed to establish its diagnostic utility in children and adolescents (4, 5).
This study aimed to prospectively investigate the specificity and sensitivity of preoperative D-dimer levels in predicting the diagnosis of adnexal torsion in children and adolescents, potentially reducing unnecessary surgical procedures and preserving ovarian function in affected patients.
Methods
A multicenter prospective observational study of diagnostic appropriateness was approved by the institutional review board of our hospital (approval number: CEUR-2021-Os-219), and informed consent was obtained from all study participants. In this preliminary monocentric analysis, we enrolled female patients aged under 18 years who presented to the emergency department with symptoms and imaging findings suggestive of adnexal torsion between January 2022 and December 2024. The exclusion criteria were age 18 years and older, a history of prior surgery for adnexal pathologies, and exhibiting clinical symptoms and imaging findings suggestive of alternative surgical conditions, such as appendicitis or gastroenteritis.
The primary aim was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of serum D-dimer levels in the preoperative diagnosis of adnexal torsion. The secondary aim was to investigate the possible reduction of unnecessary surgery and any related complications in these patients.
A Word-based data sheet and an Excel spreadsheet were used to collect the patients' data, including age; clinical history; preoperative examination values, symptoms, and imaging features; laparoscopic findings (e.g., the aspect of each tube and the ovaries), presence of cyst or malformations; surgical outcomes; and complications. Plasma D-dimer was measured at admission using a latex-based automated immunologic kit HemosIL D-dimer HS 500 (Cat. 0020500100, Werfen Instrumentation Laboratory Company, United States) on the system ACLTOP350CTS with a sensitivity of 100% (95.2% - 100%, 95% CI) and a specificity of 42.3% (35.7% - 49.1%, 95% CI). The clinical cut-off value was settled at 500 ng/mL of D-dimer.
The patients' demographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed descriptively, with categorical variables reported as the number (percentage) of the subjects, and quantitative variables reported as the median (interquartile range). The association between categorical variables was evaluated by the Chi-square test or the exact Fisher test, as appropriate. The non-parametric Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test was applied to assess a difference in the distribution of a continuous variable between the categories of a dichotomic variable. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to assess the accuracy of D-dimer levels in the preoperative diagnosis of adnexal torsion, which was used to calculate their sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. The optimal threshold of D-dimer levels capable of discriminating the presence of adnexal torsion was evaluated using the Youden Index. The number of operations that could have been avoided if D-dimer levels were used as a predictor of adnexal torsion was evaluated by calculating and verifying the number of patients who had a D-dimer level below the optimal threshold found using the Youden index. All analyses were conducted using the SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
Results
Of the 27 eligible patients with suspected adnexal torsion, 12 were excluded from this study due to refusal to participate (n = 4, 33.3%), incorrect diagnosis (n = 4, 33.3%; three had appendicitis, and one had an isolated paratubal cyst), not undergoing surgical exploration (n = 3, 25.0%), and a prior surgery on the contralateral side (n = 1, 8.3%). Therefore, 15 patients were ultimately included in this preliminary monocentric analysis, and their clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Their median age was 13 years (IQR: 11-15; range: 7–17). All patients reported abdominal pain, as well as other symptoms, including vomiting (n = 7, 46.7%), nausea (n = 4, 26.7%), fever (n = 3, 20.0%), and abdominal mass (n = 3, 20.0%). Interestingly, at presentation, 12 patients (80.0%) reported menstruation.
According to the preoperative examinations, all patients underwent an abdominal US, and only two (13.3%) required a CT for a more accurate diagnosis. The suspected side was more frequently the right side (n = 9, 60%). Every patient with suspected adnexal torsion underwent surgical exploration: 12 (80.0%) underwent a laparoscopic surgery, 1 (6.7%) began laparoscopically but was then converted to open surgery, and 2 (13.3%) underwent open surgery. Intraoperatively, it was determined that the involved side was the left side in seven patients (46.7%) and the right side in eight patients (53.3%). Ultimately, only seven patients (46.7%) presented with an actual adnexal torsion, of whom two (28.57%) were in prepubertal age at presentation, while five (71.43%) were pubescent. Notably, in both prepubescent patients presenting with an adnexal torsion a specific reason for torsion was not found at intervention.
All patients underwent different surgical procedures according to the primary problem: one (6.7%) underwent a simple derotation of the adnexa, two (13.3%) underwent derotation of the adnexa and oophoropexy, one (6.7%) underwent derotation of the adnexa and punction of the cyst, two (13.3%) underwent oophorectomy, one (6.7%) only underwent punction of the cyst, two (13.3%) underwent ablation of the cyst, two (13.3%) underwent punction and ablation of the cyst, one (6.7%) underwent punction and ablation of the cyst and derotation of the adnexa, and one (6.7%) underwent punction of the cyst and oophorectomy; two (13.3%) presented only with a haemorrhagic corpus luteum cyst requiring no procedures. Given the importance of ovarian presenvation, no histological examinations were performed to define the damage caused by torsion in intraoperatively confirmed cases. Remarkably, none of these patients experienced postoperative complications. All patients underwent a US scan at 2 and 6 months after surgery.
Statistically, patients with and without adnexal torsion exhibited no important differences in the preoperative examinations (Table 2). Specifically, they had similar white blood cell counts [median: 8.9 × 103/μL (IQR: 8.2-14.1 × 103/μL) vs. 9.6 × 103/μL (IQR: 8-10.6 × 103/μL), p = 0.61], neutrophil percentages [median: 77.3% (IQR: 53.2-83.1%) vs. 72.3% (IQR: 63.7-79.2), p = 0.73], and CRP levels [median: 1.6 mg/L (IQR: 0.5-66 mg/L) vs. 1.7 mg/L (0.3-32.6 mg/L), p = 0.78]. However, preoperative D-dimer levels were higher among the patients with than without adnexal torsion [median: 753 ng/mL (IQR: 520-1887 ng/mL) vs. 385 ng/mL (IQR: 321.5-660 ng/mL), p = 0.14]. Notably, the association between preoperative D-dimer levels and adnexal torsion had an odds ratio (OR) of 1 (p = 0.29). The ROC curve had an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.75 (95% CI: 0.47-1.00), showing a sensitivity of 0.86 and specificity of 0.75. The optimal threshold of D-dimer levels was 520 ng/mL (Table 3 and Figure 1).
Table 2. Statistical analysis of demographic and preoperative blood values and their correlation with adnexal torsion.
Table 3. Statistical analysis to assess the accuracy of D-dimer levels in the preoperative diagnosis of adnexal torsion.
Figure 1. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve constructed to evaluate the accuracy of D-dimer levels in the preoperative diagnosis of adnexal torsion.
Discussion
Adnexal torsion is defined as the partial or complete rotation of the adnexa on its vascular pedicle. It can involve the ovary, the fallopian tube, or both. The venous blood flow is the first to be impaired, followed by the arterial blood flow, leading to congestion, adnexal edema, ischemia, and, ultimately, necrosis (2).
According to the literature, diagnosing adnexal torsion is challenging due to the lack of distinctive symptoms, specific tests, or suggestive radiological findings. The clinical signs typically reported by patients experiencing an adnexal torsion include lower abdominal pain (~60%−70%), abdominal tenderness (~80%−90%), and fever (~10%, usually as a late finding resulting from the presence of necrotic tissue). A palpable mass is reported in 20%−36% of children presenting with adnexal torsion, and the cause of torsion of the ovarian masses is likely related to the increased size and weight of the involved ovary (2, 3, 6). Regarding laboratory tests, leukocytosis, pyuria, CRP level, and erythrocyte sedimentation are not helpful in diagnosing adnexal torsion (1). In contrast, according to the literature, D-dimer and IL6 levels could be informative in diagnosing adnexal torsion (4, 5).
Additionally, US findings can be indicative of adnexal torsion, including unilateral ovarian enlargement, ovarian edema characterized by the presence of a hyperechogenic stroma, free fluid, and coiled vascular pedicle (called the “whirlpool sign”) (1). Some pediatric patients may present with a normal blood flow in the Doppler scan if the ovary has transiently and spontaneously detorsed, is only partially torsed, or if the US study is performed early in the torsion process when arterial perfusion is still preserved and only the venous and lymphatic drainage are obstructed. Similarly, MRI may show a decreased contrast enhancement of the ovary, asymmetric ovarian enlargement, uterine deviation toward the pathologic side, and the presence of multiple small peripherally located follicles; however, MRI may require sedation, and it is not customarily available in an emergency care setting. Lastly, intra-adnexal CT features of torsion included uterine tube thickening (74%), eccentric or concentric wall thickening (54%), and eccentric septal thickening (50%) (1, 2); however, CT involves the use of X-rays and, thus, should only be used in selected pediatric cases.
Currently, in cases of suspected adnexal torsion, the patient must undergo an urgent laparoscopic exploration. Indeed, in our cohort, all enrolled patients underwent surgery, but only seven (46.7%) presented with an actual adnexal torsion requiring surgical correction. Considering that the goals of surgery are to detorse the adnexa and preserve the ovary regardless of its appearance and the timing of presentation (1), no histological examinations were performed in case of adnexal torsion. All patients were followed up with a US scan at 2 and 6 months, and a gynecological evaluation was suggested to all patients close to adolescence. Stimulatingly, indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging has recently revolutionized surgical practice across various specialties. Although ICG fluorescence is used more commonly in the adult population, its adoption in pediatric surgery continues to expand. In particular, in cases of adnexal torsion ICG started to be used to assess ovarian perfusion after detorsion, thus reducing the rate of oophorectomy (7). At our institution, ICG is currently being used to study the perfusion after detorsion in males experiencing testicular torsion, and it could be used to evaluate ovarian perfusion in torsed adnexa in the future as well.
Even if the inflammatory marker IL6 has shown promise in predicting adnexal torsion in adults (4), we decided to investigate exclusively the potential of D-dimer as a diagnostic biomarker due to the fact that unlike IL6, the D-dimer could be easily added to routine blood exams without any additional costs for the institution. Based on our current experience, patients presenting with an adnexal torsion were prone to having a higher D-dimer level than those without an adnexal torsion. Actually, our statistical analyses do not support the hypothesis that high D-dimer levels are suggestive of adnexal torsion, but the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity results lead us to believe that studies with a larger sample size could help achieve the intended objective. Consequently, D-dimer levels could help surgeons in more accurately predicting the possibility of an adnexal torsion in children and adolescents, but this should not replace imaging studies and diagnostic laparoscopy especially in doubtful cases.
However, our study had several limitations. Firstly, the number of patients enrolled during the study period (n = 15) is small and limits statistical power. Therefore, the present study represents a pilot analysis waiting for results from the multicenter data and encouraging prospective randomized studies with larger sample sizes to verify our hypothesis. Moreover, time from onset of symptoms, hormonal fluctuations, nutritional and dietary factors, or eventual infections were not evaluated as possible confounding factors in this prospective pilot analysis.
Adnexal torsion currently remains a surgical emergency. We believe that it is crucial to identify pertinent clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings that enable surgeons to confidently establish an adnexal torsion diagnosis and select appropriate patients for surgical intervention, thereby avoiding unnecessary procedures, especially in pediatric patients. Our study highlights the potential diagnostic utility of preoperative serum D-dimer levels in diagnosing adnexal torsion, supporting their potential use in the early identification of this condition even if it cannot still replace imaging and laparoscopy to date.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo” of Trieste, Italy. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants' legal guardians/next of kin.
Author contributions
AB: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing. MG: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft. EV: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. DC: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. VM: Data curation, Writing – original draft. MI: Investigation, Writing – original draft. M-GS: Investigation, Writing – original draft. DO: Investigation, Writing – original draft. SM: Investigation, Writing – original draft. CC: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. EG: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. JS: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Adnexal torsion in adolescents: ACOG Committee Opinion No, 783. Obstet Gynecol. (2019) 134:e56–e63. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003373
2. Kives S, Gascon S, Dubuc É, Van Eyk N. No. 341-Diagnosis and management of adnexal torsion in children, adolescents, and adults. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. (2017) 39:82–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.10.001
3. Rougier E, Mar W, Della Valle V, Morel B, Irtan S, Audureau E, et al. Added value of MRI for the diagnosis of adnexal torsion in children and adolescents after inconclusive ultrasound examination. Diagn Interv Imaging. (2020) 101:747–56. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.04.015
4. Reed JL, Strait RT, Kachelmeyer AM, Byczkowski TL, Ho ML, Huppert JS. Biomarkers to distinguish surgical etiologies in females with lower quadrant abdominal pain. Acad Emerg Med. (2011) 18:686–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01108.x
5. Kart C, Aran T, Guven S, Karahan SC, Yulug E. Acute increase in plasma D-dimer level in ovarian torsion: an experimental study. Hum Reprod. (2011) 26:564–8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq378
6. Adeyemi-Fowode O, Lin EG, Syed F, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Zhu H, Dietrich JE. Adnexal torsion in children and adolescents: a retrospective review of 245 cases at a single institution. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. (2019) 32:64–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2018.07.003
Keywords: adnexal torsion, adolescents, children, D-dimer levels, diagnosis
Citation: Boscarelli A, Giangreco M, Valvo E, Codrich D, Masiello V, Iaquinto M, Scarpa M-G, Olenik D, Maita S, Campilongo C, Guida E and Schleef J (2025) The role of preoperative D-dimer levels in diagnosing adnexal torsion in children and adolescents: a prospective monocentric pilot analysis. Front. Med. 12:1706633. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1706633
Received: 16 September 2025; Accepted: 03 November 2025;
Published: 20 November 2025.
Edited by:
Giovanna Riccipetitoni, San Matteo Hospital Foundation (IRCCS), ItalyReviewed by:
Gloria Pelizzo, University of Milan, ItalyHarsali Fransiscus Lampus, Sam Ratulangi University, Indonesia
Copyright © 2025 Boscarelli, Giangreco, Valvo, Codrich, Masiello, Iaquinto, Scarpa, Olenik, Maita, Campilongo, Guida and Schleef. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Alessandro Boscarelli, dGJvc2NhckBob3RtYWlsLml0
†ORCID: Alessandro Boscarelli orcid.org/0000-0003-1934-1764
Manuela Giangreco orcid.org/0000-0002-4479-3087
Daniela Codrich orcid.org/0000-0003-2925-8876
Edoardo Guida orcid.org/0000-0003-4901-2515
Jürgen Schleef orcid.org/0000-0001-9754-2479
Elena Valvo1