SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Med.
Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1707596
This article is part of the Research TopicLung Cross-talk in Acute Respiratory FailureView all 3 articles
Effects of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal in facilitating ultra-protective ventilation strategies for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Provisionally accepted- PLA 983rd Hospital, Tianjin, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Although low tidal volume ventilation has been shown to reduce mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), overall mortality remains high (30–40%). Ultra-protective ventilation (≤4 mL/kg predicted body weight) has the potential to further decrease ventilator-induced lung injury but may result in severe hypercapnia. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂R) could facilitate ultra-protective ventilation by alleviating carbon dioxide retention; however, supporting evidence remains limited. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of ECCO₂R in enabling ultra-protective ventilation strategies in patients with ARDS. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to June 2025 that met predefined inclusion criteria. Primary outcomes included changes in gas exchange and ventilator settings 24 hours after initiating ECCO₂R. All analyses were performed using a random-effects model. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted to further explore the findings. Results: Fourteen studies involving 593 ARDS patients were included. ECCO₂R significantly reduced driving pressure (weighted mean difference [WMD]: –3.70 cmH₂O; 95% CI: –4.05 to –3.34; P < 0.001), plateau pressure (WMD: –3.26 cmH₂O; 95% CI: –3.70 to –2.82; P < 0.001), and tidal volume (WMD: –1.68 mL/kg; 95% CI: –1.81 to –1.55; P < 0.001) at 24 hours, while it increased positive end-expiratory pressure (WMD: 0.64 cmH₂O; 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.85; P < 0.001). No significant changes were observed in PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio, pCO₂, or pH (P > 0.05). The pooled 28-day mortality rate was 29% (95% CI: 19–38%). Notable complications included bleeding (15%; 95% CI: 8–21%), circuit clotting (19%; 95% CI: 13–26%), and hemolysis (15%; 95% CI: 5–25%). Conclusion: ECCO₂R facilitates the implementation of ultra-protective ventilation by significantly improving respiratory mechanics and mitigating the hypercapnia that would otherwise result from ultra-low tidal volumes. However, its use is associated with a notable risk of device-related complications, necessitating careful patient selection and expert management.
Keywords: Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal, Ultra-protective ventilation, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Systematic review, Meta-analysis
Received: 17 Sep 2025; Accepted: 17 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhen, Zhang, Shi and Zhu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Yu Zhu, zhuyulio999@163.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.