Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.

Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Neurocritical CareView all articles

Balanced Multi-electrolyte Solution versus Normal Saline for Fluid Therapy in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid hemorrhage: An influence on fluid and electrolytes balance and outcome

Provisionally accepted
Yu-qing  DuanYu-qing Duan1Ying  TianYing Tian1Shuya  WangShuya Wang1Shan-shan  XuShan-shan Xu2Ming-yue  MiaoMing-yue Miao2Ran  GaoRan Gao2Rui  SuRui Su3Mengxue  HouMengxue Hou2Yuqing  ChenYuqing Chen3Zimeng  XuZimeng Xu3Linlin  ZhangLinlin Zhang3*Jian-Xin  ZhouJian-Xin Zhou2*
  • 1Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • 2Emergency and Critical Care Medical Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • 3Department of Neurocritical Care, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Isotonic crystalloids are commonly used for maintaining fluid balance and cerebral perfusion pressure in critical care patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, the relatively high concentration of chloride in normal saline (NS) might lead to hyperchloremia or acute kidney injury, comparing with multi-electrolyte solutions (BMES). The aim of the study is to compare the incidence of hyperchloremia in aSAH patients and provide feasibility and safety research for further study. Methods: This is a pilot study of a single center, randomized, controlled trail. Patients were enrolled randomly to receive BMES or NS for 3 days of ICU stay. Results: Overall, 87 patients were randomized to receive BMES or NS, 60 patients (30 in each group) were enrolled for final analysis. Within 3 days of randomization, hyperchloremia occurred in 18/30 (60%) patients in the BMES group and 23/30 (76.7%) in the NS group (p=0.165, relative risk 0.58, 95% CI 0.27-1.28). Incidence of hyperchloremia (BMES 36.7% vs. NS 63.3%, p=0.039) and hyperchloremic acidosis (BMES 36.7% vs. NS 63.3%, p=0.039) were decreased on trial day 1. There were no differences on bicarbonate, anion gap, serum creatinine, incidence of acute kidney injury, or length of hospital stay between groups. Discussion: For patients with aSAH, the use of BMES did not result in a lower risk of hyperchloremia, and also did not increase the incidence of hyponatremia or intracranial hypertension over NS, which warrants further research.

Keywords: aneurysmal subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Normal saline, balanced multi-electrolyte solution, Isotonic Solutions, Hyperchloremia

Received: 19 Sep 2025; Accepted: 31 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Duan, Tian, Wang, Xu, Miao, Gao, Su, Hou, Chen, Xu, Zhang and Zhou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Linlin Zhang, abluelemon@163.com
Jian-Xin Zhou, zhoujx.cn@icloud.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.