Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CASE REPORT article

Front. Med., 17 November 2025

Sec. Pulmonary Medicine

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1709713

This article is part of the Research TopicCase Reports in Pulmonary Medicine 2025View all 24 articles

A cautious approach for detecting and managing intercostal artery injury during CT-guided lung biopsy: a case report and literature review

Hao Zhang
Hao Zhang1*Lin LiLin Li2Dong LanDong Lan1Jing XuJing Xu1Huan LengHuan Leng1Xiang LiaoXiang Liao1Chi Zhang
Chi Zhang3*
  • 1Department of Radiology, Dianjiang People’s Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, China
  • 2Department of Pharmacy, Dianjiang People’s Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, China
  • 3Department of Medical Imaging, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China

Intercostal artery (ICA) injury during CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) is a rare but potentially severe complication. This case report describes a cautious approach for detecting and managing suspected ICA injury using a coaxial needle system. During PTNB in a 71-year-old male with lung cancer, ICA injury was detected through blood aspiration during needle withdrawal. Management involved immediate cessation of withdrawal, slight needle advancement for mechanical hemostasis, and serial monitoring, achieving hemostasis without requiring additional invasive interventions. Literature review of cases from 2018 to 2024 revealed that current management approaches vary based on severity, with a 30% mortality rate among reported cases. Most ICA injuries are detected post-procedurally rather than intraoperatively. Traditional interventions range from conservative treatment to transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) or thoracotomy. This approach suggests a potential stepwise method for managing suspected ICA injury that might reduce complications and minimize the need for invasive interventions. As a single case report representing hypothesis-generating evidence, this observation requires further validation through collaborative experience from other operators when similar circumstances arise. The case demonstrates an exploratory approach for managing ICA injury during PTNB, particularly relevant in resource-limited settings where interventional radiology services may not be immediately available.

1 Introduction

Increased lung cancer screening recommendations using low-dose CT have amplified demand for percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB). While PTNB is generally safe, intercostal artery (ICA) injury remains a rare but potentially severe complication (1, 2). Given the substantial volume of PTNB procedures performed annually, even rare complications may affect a substantial number of patients. This case describes an exploratory approach for detecting and managing ICA injury during PTNB using a coaxial needle system. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) waived ethical approval requirements for this retrospective case report.

2 Case report

2.1 Patient information

A 71-year-old male presented with worsening cough, sputum production, and chest pain for 3 days. His medical history included chronic cough and sputum production for over 10 years. He had no history of allergies or bleeding disorders. Laboratory tests showed an elevated squamous cell carcinoma antigen level of 17.3 (reference value <3), with other tumor markers within normal ranges. Due to the patient’s severe emphysema with multiple large bullae, pulmonary function tests were not performed to avoid potential pneumothorax risk. Clinical assessment suggested severe obstructive ventilatory dysfunction.

2.2 Clinical findings and pre-procedure planning

Initial contrast-enhanced chest CT revealed an oval soft tissue density mass in the right lower lobe adjacent to the spine. The scan also demonstrated severe emphysema with multiple bullae in both lungs. Notably, an ICA was observed coursing along the posterior margin of the mass (Figures 1A,B).

Figure 1
Six-panel CT image sequence documenting CT-guided lung biopsy and intercostal artery injury detection. Panel A: Axial CT showing a right lower lobe lung mass (3.0×6.0 cm) adjacent to the spine in a patient with severe emphysema. Panel B: Contrast-enhanced CT demonstrating an intercostal artery (white arrowhead) coursing along the posterior margin of the mass. Panel C (14:50): Coaxial needle positioned at the extrapleural space, with needle tip adjacent to the intercostal artery origin (white arrow). Panel D (14:52): Four tissue samples obtained. Panel E (14:55): Blood aspiration detected during needle withdrawal, with bright red blood in syringe (white arrow, approximately 0.5 mL). Panel F: Sagittal view showing needle trajectory and relationship to vertebral structures.

Figure 1. A 71-year-old male with a 10+ year history of recurrent cough and sputum production was admitted due to worsening symptoms and chest pain for 3 days. (A,B) Chest CT scan demonstrates emphysema with multiple bullae in both lungs, and an oval soft tissue density mass (approximately 3.0 × 6.0 cm) in the right lower lobe adjacent to the spine. An ICA (white arrowhead) courses along the posterior margin of the right lung mass. (C) To minimize the risk of pneumothorax, the puncture path was planned to avoid areas of emphysema and lung bullae. The coaxial puncture needle reaches the extrapleural pleura, with its medial edge adjacent to the origin segment of the ICA (white arrow). (D) Four tissue samples were obtained, each measuring 2.2 cm in length. (E,F) Bright red blood rapidly spurted into the 5 mL syringe (white arrow), with an approximate volume of 0.5 mL.

This case presented a challenging clinical decision due to competing risk factors: severe emphysema with multiple bullae increasing pneumothorax risk, and proximity of the target lesion to a large-caliber proximal ICA. Considering the patient’s poor pulmonary function and the relatively low reported incidence of ICA injury, the intervention team chose a posterior approach near the spine, bypassing the emphysematous areas while maintaining increased vigilance throughout the procedure.

2.3 Procedure description

CT-guided PTNB was performed using an 18G coaxial needle system (Monopty 1816B Bard, USA) with the patient in prone position under local anesthesia with 1% lidocaine. Initial CT scan showed the coaxial needle reaching the extrapleural space. At this point, 1 mL of 1% lidocaine was administered for local anesthesia to minimize pleural reaction during subsequent transpleural advancement. A large ICA origin segment was observed at the medial edge of the needle path (Figure 1C). The needle then reached the target mass, and four 2.2-cm-long pathological specimens were obtained (Figure 1D).

After specimen collection, needle withdrawal began. Given the proximity to the spine where the ICA is typically larger at its origin, and considering the CT image findings, the operator maintained increased vigilance for potential ICA injury. The stylet was removed, and a 5 mL syringe was attached. During slow withdrawal (approximately 1 mm/s) with slight negative pressure, 0.5 mL of bright red blood rapidly spurted into the syringe, consistent with ICA injury (Figures 1E,F).

2.4 Management steps

The following management steps were undertaken (Figures 2AD): (1) Immediate cessation of needle withdrawal and slight advancement of the coaxial needle by 1–2 mm. No additional blood was aspirated, and subsequent CT scan showed no visible hematoma or hemothorax; (2) Serial CT monitoring at regular intervals. The final scan showed no evidence of active bleeding after complete needle withdrawal and no pneumothorax.

Figure 2
Six-panel CT scan series showing management and follow-up of intercostal artery injury. Panel A (14:55): Initial mechanical hemostasis with needle repositioned, showing attached syringe causing slight needle tilt, no visible hematoma or hemothorax. Panel B (14:57): Continued monitoring showing no signs of active bleeding. Panels C-D (15:27 and later): Serial CT scans demonstrating stable appearance without progression of bleeding. Panel E (24 hours post-procedure): Follow-up CT showing no pneumothorax or hemorrhage. Panel F (72 hours post-procedure): Final follow-up CT confirming resolution with no complications.

Figure 2. Intervention and evaluation. (A) Mechanical hemostasis was initiated. No visible hematoma or hemothorax was observed. The 5 mL syringe attached to the needle hub caused a slight tilt in the puncture needle. (B) No apparent signs of active bleeding were visible. (C,D) Following complete needle withdrawal, no apparent signs of active bleeding or pneumothorax were observed. (E,F) Follow-up CT scan images obtained at 24 and 72 h post-procedure.

2.5 Follow-up and outcomes

Throughout the procedure, vital signs remained stable, and the patient reported no discomfort. CT scans performed during the hemostasis process revealed slight edema and thickening of the soft tissue surrounding the injured ICA compared to the contralateral side, with no progressive worsening or signs of active bleeding. Follow-up CT scans at 24 and 72 h post-procedure showed no evidence of pneumothorax or new hemorrhage, with gradual resolution of mild local soft tissue edema (Figures 2E,F). The procedural timeline and management sequence are summarized in Figure 3.

Figure 3
Flowchart illustrating a stepwise protocol for detecting and managing suspected intercostal artery injury during percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy. The protocol includes six main steps: Step 1-2 (Detection): Remove stylet, attach syringe, and withdraw needle slowly under slight negative pressure while monitoring for bright red blood spurting. Step 3 (Immediate Management): If injury detected, immediately stop needle withdrawal and advance needle 1-2 mm for mechanical compression. Step 4 (Serial Monitoring): Perform CT scans at regular intervals over 30 minutes while monitoring vital signs. Step 5 (Completion): Remove needle after confirming hemostasis and perform final CT scan. Step 6 (Follow-up): Conduct CT scans at 24 hours and 72 hours, plus clinical evaluation at one week. Abbreviations and key terminology are defined at bottom.

Figure 3. Management protocol for suspected ICA injury during PTNB.

Pathological examination confirmed well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (Figure 4). The patient subsequently initiated appropriate treatment. During the week-long follow-up period, the patient reported no biopsy-related pain, activity limitations, or complications.

Figure 4
Pathological examination confirming well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. Panel A: H&E stained section (low magnification) showing biopsy tissue with chronic inflammation and multiple squamous cell nests with keratinization, rare mitotic figures. Panel B: H&E stained section (high magnification) demonstrating well-differentiated squamous epithelial cells. Panel C: Immunohistochemistry panel showing characteristic markers: CK7 negative, TTF-1 negative, NapsinA negative, p63 positive, CK5/6 strongly positive (2+), P40 positive, and Ki-67 proliferation index of 20% (3+).

Figure 4. Pathological examination. (A,B) H&E stained pathological section: The biopsy tissue shows chronic inflammation with multiple squamous cell nests, accompanied by keratinization and incomplete keratinization. Mitotic figures are rare, and the cells appear well-differentiated. (C) Immunohistochemistry results: CK7 (−), TTF-1 (−), NapsinA (−), p63 (+), CK5/6 (2+), P40 (+), Ki-67 (3+, 20%).

3 Literature review

A systematic review of literature from 2018 to 2024 was conducted using PubMed database. Search terms included “intercostal artery injury,” “intercostal artery pseudoaneurysm,” and “hemothorax biopsy lung.” Studies reporting iatrogenic ICA injuries in thoracoabdominal procedures and hemothorax complications in PTNB were included.

3.1 Current management and outcomes

Literature review findings (Tables 1, 2) revealed varying management approaches for ICA injuries based on their severity. Detection timing typically ranges from intraoperative discovery to early postoperative periods, not exceeding 24 h post-procedure. Among the reviewed cases, the mortality rate was 30% (3/10), with deaths occurring between the day of injury and up to 10 days later. For surviving patients, recovery periods varied from 5 to 30 days. Currently, most ICA injuries are detected after rather than during the procedure. Management strategies depend on severity: mild cases presenting with hemothorax or local hematoma typically receive conservative treatment, while progressive or severe hemothorax may require more invasive interventions such as transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE), chest tube drainage, blood transfusion, or even thoracotomy. The consensus among reviewed studies emphasizes maintaining high suspicion for ICA injury and considering early intervention to reduce morbidity and mortality, though potential reporting bias may lead to overrepresentation of severe cases.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Summary of case reports on iatrogenic ICA injury (2018–2024) (1, 2, 714).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Incidence and management of hemothorax in CT-guided PTNB: a review of original research (2018–2024) (1521).

4 Discussion

This improvised intraoperative management decision was formulated based on two factors: (1) preoperative imaging demonstrating ICA proximity and intraoperative CT findings suggesting potential complications, and (2) adaptation of detection techniques from CT-guided percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage, extended to include therapeutic needle repositioning for hemostasis. In biliary procedures, when a coaxial needle inadvertently penetrates through the bile duct wall, the established protocol involves removing the stylet, attaching a 5 mL syringe to the needle hub, and slowly withdrawing the needle under slight negative pressure. Bile aspiration confirms when the needlepoint is within the duct, thus facilitating subsequent guidewire insertion. This diagnostic approach parallels established clinical practice protocols, where indirect procedural evidence guides decision-making. A comparable example is the routine use of pre-injection aspiration to prevent inadvertent intravascular lidocaine administration and its associated adverse effects—a standard safety measure based on aspiration results rather than direct vascular visualization. The coaxial needle appeared to provide dual hemostatic functions: (1) mechanical compression of the injured vessel, promoting vasoconstriction and thrombus formation, and (2) coagulation stimulation through foreign body-induced platelet aggregation and fibrin formation (3, 4).

Recent studies report hemothorax incidence rates ranging from 0.38 to 4.9%, higher than earlier reported rates (5). In 2019, Tamburini et al. reported that among 30 cases of ICA injuries managed with TAE at two institutions over 16 months, iatrogenic injuries accounted for 37% (11/30) (6). When faced with ICA injury during PTNB, outcomes can vary widely, ranging from patient recovery with conservative treatment to rapid deterioration and death (1, 7, 8). This case suggests a potential stepwise approach for managing suspected ICA injury that might reduce treatment time and minimize complications while decreasing the need for more invasive interventions. In resource-limited settings where interventional radiology services may not be immediately available, having alternative management options could be valuable.

Several important limitations must be acknowledged. The diagnosis of ICA injury was based primarily on clinical observation and imaging findings, without angiographic confirmation. Additionally, as a single case report representing the lowest level of clinical evidence, this observation should be considered hypothesis-generating and requires further validation. Given that the rarity of this complication limits opportunities for single-center validation, publication of this case report serves to enable other operators to evaluate this approach when similar circumstances arise, thereby facilitating the necessary collaborative validation. The applicability of this method may be influenced by various factors, including vessel size, injury severity, and operator experience in detecting and responding to injury signs.

4.1 Patient perspective

The patient expressed satisfaction with the procedure and appreciated the prompt management of the complication. He reported minimal discomfort during and after the procedure, and was particularly relieved to have avoided both pneumothorax and additional invasive interventions such as chest tube placement.

5 Conclusion

This case describes a cautious approach for managing suspected ICA injury during PTNB that may serve as one potential management option for consideration in similar high-risk scenarios.

Data availability statement

The data analyzed in this study is subject to the following licenses/restrictions: Patient clinical data is protected under medical privacy regulations and institutional policies. Raw clinical data cannot be shared publicly due to patient confidentiality requirements. The literature review data are publicly available through the cited references. Summary data and analysis results are presented within the manuscript tables and text. Requests to access these datasets should be directed to Hao Zhang, cGx1dG95ZV83QGhvdG1haWwuY29t.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by The Institutional Review Board of Dianjiang People’s Hospital of Chongqing. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article. Written informed consent was obtained from the participant for the publication of this case report.

Author contributions

HZ: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. LL: Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. DL: Investigation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. JX: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. HL: Visualization, Writing – review & editing. XL: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. CZ: Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Chongqing medical scientific research project (Joint project of Chongqing Health Commission and Science and Technology Bureau) (grant number 2025MSXM166) and Dianjiang Science and Technology Bureau (grant number: djkjxm2024shmskjcxyw016).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Huang, WM, Lin, HC, Chen, CH, Chen, CW, Wang, CH, Huang, CY, et al. Massive hemothorax after computed tomography-guided lung tumor biopsy: an unusual but disastrous complication. Thorac Cancer. (2018) 9:892–6. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12769

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Song, L, Zhou, Y, and Huang, D. Inadvertent posterior intercostal artery puncture and haemorrhage after ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block: a case report. BMC Anesthesiol. (2018) 18:196. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0667-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Kizhakkedathu, JN, and Conway, EM. Biomaterial and cellular implants: foreign surfaces where immunity and coagulation meet. Blood. (2022) 139:1987–98. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020007209

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Al-Amer, OM. The role of thrombin in haemostasis. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. (2022) 33:145–8. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000001130

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Tomiyama, N, Yasuhara, Y, Nakajima, Y, Adachi, S, Arai, Y, Kusumoto, M, et al. CT-guided needle biopsy of lung lesions: a survey of severe complication based on 9783 biopsies in Japan. Eur J Radiol. (2006) 59:60–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.02.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Tamburini, N, Carriel, N, Cavallesco, G, Molins, L, Galeotti, R, Guzmán, R, et al. Technical results, clinical efficacy and predictors of outcome of intercostal arteries embolization for hemothorax: a two-institutions' experience. J Thorac Dis. (2019) 11:4693–9. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.10.27

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Casper, KP, Sanchirico, PJ, and Pfeiffer, DC. Intercostal artery pseudoaneurysm following thoracentesis: multi-modal imaging and treatment. BMC Med Imaging. (2019) 19:31. doi: 10.1186/s12880-019-0333-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Berry, AC. Hemorrhagic complications of paracentesis: aberrant anatomy versus aberrant technique. Cureus. (2020) 12:e8827. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8827

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Bozhchenko, AP, Tolmachev, IA, and Belykh, AN. Nastuplenie letal'nogo iskhoda vsledstvie iatrogennogo povrezhdeniia vetvi mezhrebernoĭ arterii pri provedenii plevral'noĭ punktsii [occurrence of a lethal outcome due to iatrogenic damage of an intercostal vessel during a pleural puncture procedure]. Sud-Med Ekspert. (2019) 62:58–62. doi: 10.17116/sudmed20196206158

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Laugsand, EA, and Xanthoulis, A. Management of a life-threatening intercostal artery bleeding, difficult to visualize in open surgery: a case report. J Surg Case Rep. (2020) 2020:rjaa444. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjaa444

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Park, C, and Lee, J. Massive hemothorax due to intercostal arterial bleeding after percutaneous catheter removal in a multiple-trauma patient: a case report. World J Clin Cases. (2021) 9:9942–7. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i32.9942

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Chou, CH, and Hsieh, HJ. Haemothorax due to intercostal artery injury after thoracentesis. Respirol Case Rep. (2022) 10:e0950. Published 2022 Apr 15. doi: 10.1002/rcr2.950

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Warhadpande, S, Liles, A, and Kirkpatrick, D. Intercostal artery laceration after adrenal mass cryoablation. Semin Intervent Radiol. (2023) 40:286–9. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769766

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Kakinoki, H, Yamaguchi, Y, Yukimoto, M, Kakinoki, Y, Udo, K, Tobu, S, et al. A case of bleeding shock induced by injury of the intercostal artery following percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. IJU Case Rep. (2023) 7:18–21. doi: 10.1002/iju5.12657

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Jeon, MC, Kim, JO, Jung, SS, Park, HS, Lee, JE, Moon, JY, et al. CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy using the additional laser guidance system by a pulmonologist with 2 years of experience in CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). (2018) 81:330–8. doi: 10.4046/trd.2017.0123

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Huang, WM, Chen, CH, Liang, SH, Huang, CY, Cheng, SM, Sheu, CY, et al. Multiplanar reconstruction technique for difficult computed tomography-guided lung biopsy: improved accuracy and safety. Thorac Cancer. (2018) 9:1333–7. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12835

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Watane, GV, Hammer, MM, and Barile, MF. CT-guided Core-needle biopsy of the lung is safe and more effective than fine-needle aspiration biopsy in patients with hematologic malignancies. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. (2019) 1:e180030. doi: 10.1148/ryct.2019180030

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Ahn, JH, and Jang, JG. Initial experience in CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy of lung lesions performed by a pulmonologist. J Clin Med. (2019) 8:8. doi: 10.3390/jcm8060821

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Gershman, E, Vaynshteyn, I, Freidkin, L, Pertzov, B, Rosengarten, D, and Kramer, MR. Marked safety and high diagnostic yield of freehand ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsies performed by pulmonologists. Thorac Cancer. (2022) 13:1577–82. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14413

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Chen, LC, Yang, SM, Malwade, S, Chang, HC, Chang, LK, Chung, WY, et al. Cone-beam computed-tomography-derived augmented fluoroscopy-guided biopsy for peripheral pulmonary nodules in a hybrid operating room: a case series. Diagnostics (Basel). (2023) 13:1055. Published 2023 Mar 10. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061055

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Ezenagu, OC, Gabriel, GE, and Saha, SP. Computed tomography (CT)-guided needle biopsy of lung lesions: a single center experience. Healthcare (Basel). (2024) 12:1260. Published 2024 Jun 25. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12131260

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: intercostal artery injury, percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy, coaxial needle, hemostasis, case report

Citation: Zhang H, Li L, Lan D, Xu J, Leng H, Liao X and Zhang C (2025) A cautious approach for detecting and managing intercostal artery injury during CT-guided lung biopsy: a case report and literature review. Front. Med. 12:1709713. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1709713

Received: 20 September 2025; Accepted: 04 November 2025;
Published: 17 November 2025.

Edited by:

Giuseppe Fiorentino, Colli Hospital, Italy

Reviewed by:

Yang Jiao, Second Military Medical University, China
Tin Nadarević, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Croatia

Copyright © 2025 Zhang, Li, Lan, Xu, Leng, Liao and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Hao Zhang, cGx1dG95ZV83QGhvdG1haWwuY29t; Chi Zhang, Y2hpemhhbmcyMDA3QGhvdG1haWwuY29t

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.