Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CASE REPORT article

Front. Med., 16 January 2026

Sec. Translational Medicine

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1711809

This article is part of the Research TopicMolecular Drivers of Cancer Therapy Resistance: Mechanisms and Translational OpportunitiesView all articles

Cold agglutinin syndrome in a patient with metastatic breast cancer: a Case Report


Daniel Bandarra*Daniel Bandarra1*Dina RochateDina Rochate2Beatriz GosalbezBeatriz Gosalbez1Jos FerreiraJosé Ferreira1Nidia Maltez CunhaNidia Maltez Cunha1Sara Carvalhal*Sara Carvalhal3*
  • 1Department of Medical Oncology, ULS do Algarve, Faro, Portugal
  • 2Department of Medical Hematology, ULS do Algarve, Faro, Portugal
  • 3Algarve Biomedical Center, Research institute (ABC-Ri), Universidade do Algarve, Faro, Portugal

Background: Cold agglutinin syndrome (CAS) is a form of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), most often associated with lymphoproliferative disorders or infections. Its occurrence in breast cancer is rare and may be triggered by systemic treatment.

Case presentation: We report the case of a woman in their fifties diagnosed with breast cancer in 2019. She underwent surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy and subsequently received 3 years of endocrine therapy before developing bone and hepatic metastases. First-line treatment with ribociclib plus letrozole achieved partial response, and fulvestrant was administered at progression. Following further progression, paclitaxel was introduced as third-line metastatic therapy. After four weekly administrations, the patient was admitted to our hospital with severe anemia and diagnosed with CAS. Prompt management and a multidisciplinary approach resulted in partial hematological recovery. Nevertheless, paclitaxel was permanently discontinued, and subsequent therapies provided only transient benefit. The disease continued to progress, her performance status declined, and she ultimately transitioned to exclusive palliative care until death.

Conclusion: This case illustrates a rare and severe immune complication of paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer. The emergence of CAS not only limited systemic options but also reshaped the therapeutic trajectory, highlighting the need for close monitoring during cancer treatments. Early recognition, multidisciplinary approach, and prompt management can provide some improvement, although overall prognosis remains determined by the underlying malignancy.

Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide (1). In the metastatic setting, anemia is a frequent complication, most often resulting from treatment-induced myelosuppression, nutritional deficiencies, or bone marrow infiltration (2). Less commonly, anemia may result from an autoimmune mechanism such as autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). AIHA is a rare form of hemolytic anemia caused by autoantibodies that target red blood cells, often in a temperature-dependent manner. It encompasses cold AIHA, which is further classified into primary cold agglutinin disease (CAD), paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria (PCH), and secondary cold agglutinin syndrome (CAS) (35). Cold AIHA is rarely reported in association with solid tumors (68).

While cold AIHA can occasionally arise as a paraneoplastic manifestation, the association with systemic therapy raises the possibility of a drug-induced mechanism (9). In such cases, the drug may trigger the formation of antibodies that recognize red blood cell surface antigens and, at low temperatures, activate the classical complement pathway. These antibodies can bind to erythrocytes, promote complement deposition, and ultimately cause intravascular or extravascular hemolysis (10).

Among anticancer treatments, taxane-based regimens have occasionally been linked to immune-mediated hemolysis (9, 11). Awareness of this potential complication is crucial, as timely recognition can directly shape therapeutic decision-making, often requiring discontinuation of the causative agent, adjustment of systemic treatment, and the need to prioritize multidisciplinary care. Beyond altering the oncological trajectory, it also carries major implications for prognosis.

Here, we report the development of CAS in a patient with metastatic breast cancer following taxane-based chemotherapy.

Case presentation

A woman in the 50–59 age range with a medical history of obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and anxiety was diagnosed in 2019 with left breast carcinoma. Histopathology revealed invasive carcinoma of no special type, grade 2, estrogen receptor (ER) positive, progesterone receptor (PR) positive, and HER2-negative. She underwent tumorectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide, followed by paclitaxel (Figure 1). Treatment was complicated by mild toxicities, including nausea, vomiting, asthenia, and peripheral neuropathy. Radiotherapy was completed in August 2020, and tamoxifen was initiated.

FIGURE 1
Timeline illustrating a breast cancer patient’s treatment journey. Starting with diagnosis in June 2019, followed by chemotherapy and radiotherapy completion. Metastatic disease identified in February 2022, leading to targeted treatments and drug changes. The timeline highlights severe anemia and further disease progression until transition to palliative care and death in April 2025.

Figure 1. Clinical timeline of the patient with metastatic breast carcinoma and CAS. The diagram summarizes key milestones from initial breast cancer diagnosis through adjuvant therapy, detection of metastatic disease, sequential systemic treatments, onset and management of CAS, and final transition to palliative care and death. Dates (month/year) indicate the start of each major event or intervention.

In February 2022, PET-CT demonstrated diffuse bone metastases, a single hepatic lesion, and peripancreatic lymphadenopathy. Liver biopsy confirmed metastatic breast carcinoma (ER/PR positive, HER2-negative). After the diagnosis of metastatic disease, ribociclib plus letrozole was initiated as first-line metastatic treatment, achieving partial response. Following further progression, the patient received fulvestrant and subsequently paclitaxel as second- and third-line therapies, respectively, with the latter initiated in May 2024 (Figure 1). After four weekly paclitaxel treatments (80 mg/m2/week), the patient was admitted to our hospital with severe anemia (Hb 5.5 g/dL, in-hospital nadir 2.8 g/dL). Laboratory evaluation revealed evidence of hemolysis, including elevated total bilirubin (3.1 mg/dL, nadir of 5.5 mg/dL), elevated lactacte dehydrogenase (1107 UI/L), low haptoglobin (<7 mg/dL), and a reticulocyte count of 7.3% (32 × 109/L; reference range 50–100 × 109/L). It was also observed a direct antiglobulin test (DAT) strongly positive (3+), with C3d 4+ and IgM 2+ (Table 1). The peripheral smear showed marked red blood cell agglutination, polychromasia, scarce spherocytes and no schistocytes were identified. The slide was rewarmed to 37 °C before preparation and red blood cell agglutination was dispersed. A comprehensive infectious and autoimmune workup was conducted, yielding negative results.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Evolution of hematologic and serologic findings during the patient’s admission, nadir and discharge.

The patient required multiple life-saving transfusions administered through a blood warmer, and corticosteroids for 6 days (prednisolone, 1 mg/Kg/day, tapering 7.5 mg/week) with a limited response. Due to the patient’s clinical instability at the time of hemoglobin aggravation and apparent disease progression, bone marrow infiltration could not be assessed. Hepatitis serology was negative. Rituximab 375 mg/m2 weekly for four consecutive doses was subsequently initiated, resulting in clinical and hematological improvement, with hemoglobin rising to 7–8 g/dL, and hemolysis parameters decreased.

Following discharge, paclitaxel was not resumed. A few weeks later, the patient started metronomic capecitabine (500 mg twice daily), initially well tolerated but discontinued in January 2025 due to hepatotoxicity (AST/ALT > 5 × ULN, bilirubin 1.7 mg/dL), and worsening clinical condition. In February 2025, she initiated metronomic liposomal doxorubicin (20 mg/m2 every 2 weeks), which produced transient biochemical improvement, including reduced AST, normalized bilirubin, and decreased CA15-3. However, by March 2025, PET-CT revealed diffuse hepatic and skeletal progression. Systemic therapy was permanently discontinued, and she transitioned to exclusive best supportive and palliative care until her death (Figure 1).

Discussion

Cold agglutinin disease is a subtype of AIHA mediated by cold agglutinins-IgM autoantibodies capable of agglutinating red blood cells by binding to the surface antigen. Primary CAD is characterized by chronic hemolysis, a significant cold agglutinin titer, typical DAT findings, and the absence of an underlying clinical disorder (35, 12). The characteristic DAT pattern is a positive monospecific test for C3d only. However, DAT results may be weakly positive for IgG in addition to C3d in up to 20% of patients. Determination of the thermal amplitude is a time-consuming procedure and, in most cases, unnecessary for establishing a reliable diagnosis. Nevertheless, it can be helpful in selected cases to distinguish pathologic cold agglutinins from physiological low-titer cold agglutinins that may cause false-positive findings (35, 12).

Secondary CAS is even less common than CAD. In most patients, the onset of hemolysis is abrupt, presenting with pallor, jaundice, and occasionally prostration. In addition to biochemical evidence of hemolysis, high-titer cold agglutinins are typically detectable, and the direct antiglobulin test is positive for C3d (4, 5, 12).

In most patients with metastatic malignancy, anemia is often attributable to marrow suppression, nutritional deficiencies, or disease infiltration (13). The abrupt onset of severe hemolysis, shortly after paclitaxel initiation, supports the hypothesis of drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia, rather than a paraneoplastic mechanism. This interpretation is consistent with published cases in which taxane-based regimens and other anti-cancer drugs have been associated with immune-mediated hemolysis (9, 11, 14).

Several mechanisms may explain this complication: (i) paraneoplastic immune activation in the context of progressive disease; (ii) hepatic dysfunction from metastases further compromising immune tolerance and red blood cell clearance, and (iii) drug-induced immune dysregulation, whereby paclitaxel could have triggered cold-reactive IgM antibodies and complement activation, generating a drug resistance complication.

Management of CAD and CAS varies according to whether an underlying trigger is present. In secondary CAS, therapy is primarily directed at treating the underlying condition, when identifiable. Supportive measures such as red blood cell transfusion may be required, following the same precautions applied in primary CAD (4, 15, 16). Although measures such as corticosteroids have been described in case reports, their benefit remains poorly documented, especially since hemolysis often resolves when the underlying infection or disorder is treated (4). Emerging evidence supports the use of rituximab in selected cases of CAS when an underlying B-cell clone is identified; although data are limited, rituximab’s B-cell–depleting effect provides a mechanistic rationale for its use (17).

In primary CAD, corticosteroids are not recommended as first-line therapy due to limited and transient responses (<15%) (4, 18). Rituximab is the preferred treatment for patients requiring therapy, achieving response rates of approximately 50%–60% in clinical studies, with more durable remissions. It may be used alone or combined with agents such as bendamustine in refractory cases (13).

Despite partial hematological recovery, the onset of CAS in this patient had a profound impact on the oncological management. Paclitaxel was discontinued, and subsequent chemotherapy regimens had to be adapted to less myelosuppressive metronomic settings. Ultimately, recurrent hepatic dysfunction, cumulative toxicity, and functional decline restricted systemic options and accelerated transition to exclusive palliative care.

This case highlights how an uncommon, treatment-related immune complication can redefine the therapeutic trajectory of a patient with advanced breast cancer. By shifting the focus from disease progression to treatment toxicity, it illustrates the importance of recognizing unusual patterns of anemia, integrating hematology expertise, and adapting systemic strategies accordingly. Ultimately, it reminds us that oncology care is complex, and unexpected events can alter not only prognosis but also the very framework of decision-making.

Conclusion

Cold agglutinin syndrome represents a rare and debilitating complication in the metastatic breast cancer setting. In this patient, its abrupt emergence shortly after paclitaxel highlights the need to consider treatment-related immune mechanisms alongside paraneoplastic causes. Beyond its rarity, the condition reshaped therapeutic priorities: systemic therapy was suspended, rituximab was introduced as salvage, and oncological decisions became driven as much by toxicity as by tumor progression. This case underlies how unexpected chemotherapy-induced complications can decisively alter management pathways, limiting therapeutic intensity, and hastening transition to supportive care. Close clinical monitoring and multidisciplinary involvement are key to recognizing and addressing such events, even in regions where cold agglutinin disease would not typically be anticipated.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The patient is deceased, and identifiable information has been removed. According to institutional policy, publication of anonymized single case reports does not require ethics approval or consent.

Author contributions

DB: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DR: Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing. BG: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. JF: Writing – review & editing. NC: Writing – review & editing. SC: Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT): CEECIND/03721/2018/CP1540/CT0003, (DOI: 10.54499/CEECIND/03721/2018/CP1540/CT0003), MRTI donation, and ABC-Ri/AD-ABC internal funding, all to SC. MRTI was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.

Acknowledgments

We thank the oncology department for insightful discussions.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. The authors verify and take full responsibility for the content of this manuscript. Generative artificial intelligence (ChatGPT, OpenAI, GPT-5 and Grammarly) was used only as a writing-assistance tool to improve the clarity, grammar, and flow of the English text and to help format references. All scientific content, data analysis, and interpretations were conceived, verified, and approved by the authors, who remain fully accountable for the accuracy and integrity of the work.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Cai Y, Dai F, Ye Y, Qian J. The global burden of breast cancer among women of reproductive age: a comprehensive analysis | Scientific Reports. Sci Rep. (2025) 15:9347. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93883-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Yuan T, Jia Q, Zhu B, Chen D, Long H. Synergistic immunotherapy targeting cancer-associated anemia: prospects of a combination strategy. Cell Commun Signal. (2023) 21:117. doi: 10.1186/s12964-023-01145-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Berentsen S, Malecka A, Randen U, Tjønnfjord G. Cold agglutinin disease: where do we stand, and where are we going? Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. (2020) 18:35–44.

Google Scholar

4. Berentsen S. How I treat cold agglutinin disease. Blood. (2021) 137:1295–303. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019003809

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Jäger U, Barcellini W, Broome C, Gertz M, Hill A, Hill Q, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune hemolytic anemia in adults: recommendations from the first international consensus meeting. Blood Rev. (2020) 41:100648. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2019.100648

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Honore C, Agrawal U, Shoaib F, Sharma S. Breast adenocarcinoma and cold agglutinin disease: a paraneoplastic syndrome. Cureus. (2024) 16:e74437. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74437

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Chellappan A, Bammigatti C, Palamalai S. An unusual presentation of metastatic breast carcinoma as cold autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Turk J Haematol. (2015) 32:85–6. doi: 10.4274/tjh.2014.0373

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Tauseef A, Asghar M, Zafar M, Ahmed I, Dawood M, Shaikh T. Cold autoimmune hemolytic anemia: a rare association with triple-positive breast cancer. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. (2019) 9:499–502. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2019.1698262

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Leger R, Jain S, Nester T, Kaplan H. Drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia associated with anti-carboplatin and the first example of anti-paclitaxel. Transfusion. (2015) 55:2949–54. doi: 10.1111/trf.13255

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Barcellini W, Fattizzo B. The evolving management algorithm for the patient with newly diagnosed cold agglutinin disease. Expert Rev Hematol. (2024) 17:287–94. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2024.2366540

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Yingchoncharoen P, Thongpiya J, Maharjan S, Abdelnabi M, Kim S, Saowapa S, et al. rare cause of recurrent haemolytic anaemia: carboplatin and paclitaxel-induced autoimmune haemolytic anaemia. Eur J Case Rep Intern Med. (2023) 10:003740. doi: 10.12890/2023_003740

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Berentsen S, Tjønnfjord G. Diagnosis and treatment of cold agglutinin mediated autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Blood Rev. (2012) 26:107–15. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2012.01.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Berentsen S, Randen U, Oksman M, Birgens H, Tvedt T, Dalgaard J, et al. Bendamustine plus rituximab for chronic cold agglutinin disease: results of a Nordic prospective multicenter trial. Blood. (2017) 130:537–41. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-04-778175

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Atiq O, Atiq S, Atiq Z, Patel V, Atiq M, Atiq O. Pembrolizumab-induced cold agglutinin disease. Am J Case Rep. (2020) 21:e924283. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.924283

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Berentsen S. New insights in the pathogenesis and therapy of cold agglutinin-mediated autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Front Immunol. (2020) 11:590. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00590

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Berentsen S. Cold agglutinin disease. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. (2016) 2016:226–31. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2016.1.226

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Murakhovskaya I. Rituximab use in warm and cold autoimmune hemolytic anemia. J Clin Med. (2020) 9:4034. doi: 10.3390/jcm9124034

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Berentsen S, Ulvestad E, Gjertsen B, Hjorth-Hansen H, Langholm R, Knutsen H, et al. Rituximab for primary chronic cold agglutinin disease: a prospective study of 37 courses of therapy in 27 patients. Blood. (2004) 103:2925–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-10-3597

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: breast cancer, chemotherapy, cold agglutinin syndrome (CAS), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), drug-induced hemolysis

Citation: Bandarra D, Rochate D, Gosalbez B, Ferreira J, Cunha NM and Carvalhal S (2025) Cold agglutinin syndrome in a patient with metastatic breast cancer: a Case Report. Front. Med. 12:1711809. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1711809

Received: 23 September 2025; Revised: 28 October 2025; Accepted: 05 November 2025;
Published: 16 January 2026.

Edited by:

Changmin Peng, The George Washington University, United States

Reviewed by:

Alexandre Gomes Vizzoni, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Brazil
Boglárka Brugós, University of Debrecen, Hungary
Larissa Venancio, Federal University of Western Bahia, Brazil

Copyright © 2025 Bandarra, Rochate, Gosalbez, Ferreira, Cunha and Carvalhal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Daniel Bandarra, ZGJhbmRhcnJhQHVsc2FsZy5taW4tc2F1ZGUucHQ=; Sara Carvalhal, c2liYW5kYXJyYUB1YWxnLnB0

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.