ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Obstetrics and Gynecology
Association of Antenatal Dexamethasone Administration Timing with Outcomes in Preterm Infants in a Low-and Middle-income Country
Provisionally accepted- Bharati Vidyapeeth's Medical College, Pune, India
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Timely administration of antenatal corticosteroids improves preterm outcomes; however, in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), multiple barriers often delay treatment. Whether exposure within 24 h before delivery confers benefits remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the association between antenatal dexamethasone-to-delivery intervals and preterm outcomes in an LMIC setting. Methods: This single-center prospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit in India from June 2023 to December 2024. The participants were preterm infants born at 24 0/7 to 33 6/7 wk gestation. Exclusion criteria were major congenital anomalies, multiple courses of dexamethasone, administration-to-birth interval >7 d, and interfacility transfer. The exposure variable was maternal first dexamethasone dose-to-delivery interval, categorized as ≤24 h (n=167), >24 h–7 d (n=64), or no exposure (n=101). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included severe necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), intraventricular hemorrhage, respiratory distress syndrome, and a composite of death or severe morbidity. Propensity scores from 10 covariates generated inverse-probability-of-treatment-weights (IPTW). Adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a doubly-robust, trimmed IPTW-modified Poisson model. Sensitivity analyses used doubly-robust overlap weighting and an entropy-balanced treatment-only model. Results: Of the 371 infants born during the study period, 332 met eligibility criteria (mean gestational age, 30.6 ± 2.2 wk; 60.5% male). Overall mortality was 7.8% (26/332): 11.9% (12/101) without dexamethasone, 6.6% (11/167) with ≤24 h exposure, and 4.7% (3/64) with >24 h–7 d exposure. Mortality did not differ by dexamethasone timing interval group: ≤24 h (aRR, 0.58; 95%CI 0.26–1.27) and >24 h–7 d (aRR, 0.33; 95%CI, 0.10–1.12) vs. no dexamethasone. Wide CIs were observed, reflecting imprecision due to lower-than-expected mortality in the unexposed group. Severe NEC was lower with ≤24 h exposure (1.8% [3/167] vs. 8.9% [9/101]; aRR, 0.15; 95%CI 0.04–0.54), persisting in sensitivity analyses (aRR, 0.11; 95%CI 0.03–0.38) and after multiple-comparison adjustment. No other secondary outcomes differed significantly. Conclusions: Dexamethasone administration within 24 h before delivery did not reduce mortality but significantly decreased the risk of severe NEC. Imprecise estimates due to lower-than-expected mortality, reduced statistical power, and potential residual confounding limit definitive conclusions.
Keywords: Preterm Birth, Neonatal outcomes, neonatal mortality, necrotizing enterocolitis, Antenatal corticosteroid timing, Dexamethasone dose-to-delivery-interval, low- and middle-income countries, Propensity Score
Received: 24 Sep 2025; Accepted: 13 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Kalrao and Benda. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Vijay Kalrao, vijay.kalrao@bharatividyapeeth.edu
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
