ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology
This article is part of the Research TopicAntimicrobial Resistance and Therapy in Critically Ill Patients, Volume IIView all 8 articles
The Underestimated Burden of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Emergency Laparotomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
Provisionally accepted
Anca-Laura Amati1,2*
Nicoleta Negruta1,2Romina Ebert1,2Niklas Kümmel1,2Moritz Fritzenwanker3
Matthias Wolff2,4Sebastian Petzoldt2,4
Martin Reichert1,2
Andreas Hecker1,2- 1Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Transplant Surgery, Universitatsklinikum Giessen, Giessen, Germany
- 2Justus-Liebig-Universitat Giessen, Giessen, Germany
- 3Institute of Medical Microbiology, Justus-Liebig-Universitat Giessen, Giessen, Germany
- 4Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Universitatsklinikum Giessen, Giessen, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Emergency laparotomy (EL) remains one of the highest-risk procedures in general surgery, characterized by substantial postoperative morbidity and mortality. Despite major advances in perioperative medicine, current enhanced-recovery and infection-prevention protocols are largely derived from elective surgical cohorts and are seldom validated in emergency settings. This lack of EL-specific data represents a critical gap in establishing evidence-based perioperative guidelines for this uniquely vulnerable patient population. Among postoperative complications, pulmonary complications (PPCs) are the most frequent and consequential, affecting 20–40% of patients and significantly impairing recovery and survival. This study aimed to identify preoperative predictors of PPCs and their impact on postoperative mortality, highlighting potentially actionable targets within the constraints of emergency surgical care. Methods: A total of 928 EL patients were analyzed. To control for non-modifiable demographics and comorbidities, propensity score matching generated two cohorts of 328 patients each—those with and without PPCs. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified independent preoperative predictors of PPCs, and survival analyses assessed their association with postoperative mortality. Results: Mortality was significantly higher in patients with PPCs (42.1%) than in those without (11.9%). Independent preoperative predictors of PPCs included ASA score (p = 0.0004), hemoglobin level (p = 0.0340), C-reactive protein–to–albumin ratio (CAR) (p = 0.0001), and colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) on preoperative screening (p = 0.0420). Each of these factors also predicted reduced postoperative survival. Notably, 67.3% of MDROs were not covered by initial empiric antibiotic regimens, and 28.6% of gram-negative MDROs detected preoperatively were later isolated from the airways of patients who developed PPCs. PPC patients colonized with MDROs had a 47% higher 90-day mortality risk compared with non-colonized counterparts (HR 1.46, 95% CI 0.99–2.15). Conclusion: PPCs are the most frequent and deadly complications following EL, and their occurrence substantially worsens survival. Among identified predictors, gram-negative MDRO colonization represents the most clinically actionable target. Tailoring empiric antibiotic therapy for high-risk, colonized EL patients could represent a pivotal step toward evidence-based, condition-specific perioperative guidelines aimed at reducing pulmonary complication–related mortality
Keywords: Emergency laparotomy, Postoperative pulmonary complications, risk prediction, Multidrug-resistant organisms, survival analysis
Received: 27 Oct 2025; Accepted: 26 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Amati, Negruta, Ebert, Kümmel, Fritzenwanker, Wolff, Petzoldt, Reichert and Hecker. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Anca-Laura Amati
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.