ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Pulmonary Medicine
Safety and Efficacy of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Biopsy of Intrathoracic Lymphadenopathy
Provisionally accepted- 1People’s Hospital of Henan University, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, People’s Hospital of Henan Province, zhengzhou, China
- 2Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction In clinical practice, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) often yields small-volume specimens that may be inadequate for full pathological assessment. To overcome this limitation, EBUS-guided transbronchial cryobiopsy (EBUS-TBCB) and transbronchial forceps biopsy (EBUS-TBFB) have been increasingly adopted. This study systematically evaluates their diagnostic performance and safety in intrathoracic lymph node lesions to inform clinical decision-making. Methods This retrospective study included patients who presented to Henan Provincial People's Hospital between July 2018 and August 2025 with mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes of a short-axis diameter ≥ 1 cm on chest computed tomography (CT) or with abnormally increased metabolic activity of lymph nodes on positron emission tomography (PET)-CT. All patients underwent EBUS-TBNA followed by either EBUS-TBCB or EBUS-TBFB. The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and safety of the combined use of EBUS-TBNA with EBUS-TBCB or EBUS-TBFB for assessing intrathoracic lymph node lesions. Results A total of 211 patients were included in this study, of whom 204 received a definitive diagnosis through EBUS-TBNA combined with EBUS-TBCB or EBUS-TBFB. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall diagnostic accuracy in differentiating benign from malignant thoracic lymph node lesions were 96.92% (126/130), 100% (81/81), 100% (126/126), 95.29% (81/85), and 98.10% (207/211), respectively. Further analysis revealed no significant difference in diagnostic yield between the combination of EBUS-TBNA with EBUS-TBCB and that with EBUS-TBFB. However, for pulmonary sarcoidosis, the diagnostic rate of EBUS-TBNA combined with EBUS-TBCB was 96.67% (29/30), higher than that of EBUS-TBNA combined with EBUS-TBFB at 87.50% (14/16). Post-procedural hemoptysis was the most common complication, occurring in 4.74% (10/211) of patients. No severe complications such as major bleeding, mediastinal infection, respiratory distress, or hypoxemia were observed. Conclusions EBUS-TBNA combined with EBUS-TBCB or EBUS-TBFB is a safe, minimally invasive technique that achieves a high diagnostic yield for intrathoracic lymph node lesions. By obtaining sufficient and structurally intact tissue specimens, this approach facilitates molecular pathology testing, supports the diagnosis of benign conditions, and enables accurate pathological classification of malignant diseases.
Keywords: lymphadenopathy, EBUS-TBNA, EBUS-TBCB, EBUS-TBFB, Biopsy, laser-assisted biopsy
Received: 31 Oct 2025; Accepted: 25 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Kong, Yang, zhang, Li, Zhang and ZHOU. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Huizhen Yang
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.