ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Nephrol.
Sec. Blood Purification
This article is part of the Research TopicManagement of Patients with Dialysis Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease (DD-CKD)View all 11 articles
Patient Satisfaction with Dialysis Services Provided Across Different Providers in Saudi Arabia
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Health Administration and Hospitals, College of Public Health and Health Informatics, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
- 2General Directorate of Research and Studies, Saudi Arabia Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- 3General Administration of School Health, Saudi Arabia Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- 4Global Center for Mass Gathering Medicine, Saudi Arabia Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- 5Minister’s office, International Health Indicators Unit, Saudi Arabia Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- 6Evaluation and Impact Measurement Unit, Public Health Operations Center (PHOC), Saudi Arabia Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- 7General Directorate of Environmental Health, Saudi Arabia Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- 8General Directorate of Research and Studies, Ministry of Health (Saudi Arabia), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction with dialysis services provided across different healthcare sectors in Saudi Arabia, including governmental and private facilities, and to identify key determinants influencing satisfaction levels. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted using secondary data from dialysis patients attending Ministry of Health, Diaverum, and DaVita facilities between January and December 2023. Patient satisfaction data were collected through the Press Ganey survey, a validated instrument assessing six domains: registration, care, dialysis, pharmacy, personal issues, and personal experience. Descriptive statistics summarized patient demographics and satisfaction scores, while regression analysis identified factors associated with satisfaction. Results: A total of 5,472 patients were included, with an overall satisfaction score of 89.84±14.25. The mean satisfaction score was highest in the personal experience domain (91.39±17.02) and lowest in the dialysis domain (88.45±18.65). Private facilities had statistically significant higher satisfaction scores (90.41±13.31) compared to governmental hospitals (88.57±16.08). Females reported significantly higher satisfaction than males (91.96±12.15 vs. 88.91±14.60), respectively. Pediatric patients demonstrated significantly higher satisfaction (age ≤18 years: 93.80±11.42) compared to young adults (age = 19-29 years: 89.18±14.62). Regional differences were observed, with the Southern region reporting the highest satisfaction (91.37±14.18) and the Eastern region the lowest (88.60±15.59). Regression analysis identified gender (B = 2.943, 95% CI [2.165, 3.722], p < 0.001) and facility type (B = 1.108, 95% CI [0.243, 1.973], p = 0.012) as significant predictors of satisfaction. Conclusion: Patient satisfaction with dialysis services in Saudi Arabia is generally high, with statistically significant but modest differences across regions, facility types, age groups, and genders. Improving dialysis-related education, addressing regional disparities, and enhancing patient-centered care, particularly in governmental facilities, could further optimize satisfaction outcomes.
Keywords: Dialysis satisfaction, Healthcare facilities, Healthcare quality, hemodialysis, patient experience, Saudi Arabia
Received: 11 Sep 2025; Accepted: 04 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Monshi, Alamri, Almuaddi, Almutairi, Aljishi, Alfaki, Alturki, Saqah and Aldossary. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Mohammed S. Aldossary
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
