ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Netw. Physiol.
Sec. Networks in Sleep and Circadian Systems
Volume 5 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnetp.2025.1519407
This article is part of the Research TopicWearable Technology: The New Ornament of Network PhysiologyView all 5 articles
What goes on when the lights go off? Using machine learning techniques to characterize a child's settling down period
Provisionally accepted- 1Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
- 2University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
- 3Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objectives: Current approaches to objective measurement of sleep disturbances in children overlook the period prior to sleep, or the settling down time. Using machine learning techniques, we identified key features that characterize differences in activity during the settling down period that differentiate children with sensory sensitivities to tactile input (SS) and children without sensitivities (NSS).Methods: Actigraphy data were collected from children with SS (n=17) and children with NSS (n=18) over 2 weeks (a total of 430 evenings). The settling down period, indicated using caregiver report and actigraphy indices, was isolated each evening and 7 features (mean magnitude, maximum magnitude, kurtosis, skewness, Shannon entropy, standard deviation, and interquartile range) were extracted. 10-fold cross-validation with random forests were used to determine accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of differentiating groups.Results: We could accurately differentiate groups (accuracy= 83%, specificity= 83%, sensitivity= 84%). Feature importance maps identify that children with SS have higher maximum bouts of activity (U=-2.23, p=.026) during the settling down time and a higher variance in activity for the children with SS (e.g., interquartile range, Shannon entropy) that sets them apart from their peers.We present a novel use of machine learning techniques that successfully uncovered differentiating features within the settling down period for our groups. These differences have been difficult to capture using
Keywords: Actigraphy, Sleep, sleep onset delay, Children, machine learning, sensory sensitivity
Received: 29 Oct 2024; Accepted: 13 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Kocanaogullari, Akcakaya, Bendixen, Soehner and Hartman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Amy Gore Hartman, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 15260, Pennsylvania, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.