Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neuroimaging

Sec. Clinical Neuroimaging

This article is part of the Research TopicHydrocephalus Volume IIView all 6 articles

CSF-flow prior and after spinal tap test in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus – an exploratory study using real-time phase-contrast MRI

Provisionally accepted
Fiona  DierksenFiona Dierksen1Marielle  HeideMarielle Heide1Sabine  HoferSabine Hofer1Felix  BernsdorffFelix Bernsdorff1Peter  DechentPeter Dechent2Christian  Von Der BrelieChristian Von Der Brelie3,4Veit  RohdeVeit Rohde3Jan  LimanJan Liman5Mathias  BahrMathias Bahr1Ilko  MaierIlko Maier1*
  • 1Universitatsmedizin Gottingen Klinik fur Neurologie, Göttingen, Germany
  • 2University Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Cognitive Neurology, Göttingen, Germany
  • 3Johanniter-Kliniken Bonn, Department of Neurosurgery, Bonn, Germany
  • 4University Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Neurosurgery, Göttingen, Germany
  • 5Paracelsus Medical School, Department of Neurology, Nürnberg, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Neuroimaging plays a key role in the diagnostic workup of patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). A flow void in the aqueduct - indicating increased cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) velocity - is a common, but unspecific finding. Aim of this study was to investigate CSF-flow characteristics in iNPH patients before and after spinal tap test (STT) using novel, real-time phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (RT-PC MRI). Methods: We included consecutive patients with clinical signs of iNPH being electively admitted for diagnostic workup, including neurological examination, conventional MRI and STT. RT-PC MRI and clinical examination were performed before and within 24 hours after STT. CSF-flow volumes were determined at five regions in the inner and outer CSF spaces. Results: Fifteen patients with suspected iNPH and five age-matched healthy controls (HC) were included. Baseline RT-PC MRI revealed elevated CSF-flow volumes in the inner ventricular system of iNPH patients compared to healthy controls, being detectable predominantly in the third ventricle (iNPH vs. HC: 15.93 ± 7.01 ml vs. 6.58 ± 2.99 ml, p=0.020). There was a positive correlation between the Evans Index and CSF-flow in the third ventricle (r=0.586, p=0.017), cerebral aqueduct (r=0.639, p=0.006) and the fourth ventricle (r=0.649, p=0.007). There was no statistically significant change of CSF-flow volumes before and after STT in the iNPH-group. Conclusion: RT-PC MRI provides a promising, non-invasive approach for evaluating CSF-flow in iNPH. Baseline CSF-flow volumes were elevated in the inner ventricular system, particularly in the third ventricle, and correlated with ventricular enlargement, suggesting that increased CSF-flow may reflect disease progression rather than therapeutic response. However, in contrast to clinical tests, the lack of change of CSF-flow after STT limits its utility for patient selection for ventriculo-peritoneal-shunt implantation.

Keywords: CSF-Flow, real-time phase-contrast MRI, normal pressure hydrocephalus, Spinal tap test, iNPH

Received: 14 Jul 2025; Accepted: 31 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Dierksen, Heide, Hofer, Bernsdorff, Dechent, Von Der Brelie, Rohde, Liman, Bahr and Maier. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ilko Maier, ilko.maier@med.uni-goettingen.de

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.