ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nucl. Med.

Sec. Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence

Volume 5 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnume.2025.1611823

This article is part of the Research TopicRadiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Oncology ImagingView all 6 articles

Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Biomarker and artificial intelligence for the Characterization of Solitary Pulmonary Nodule (SPN)

Provisionally accepted
Ashish  Kumar JhaAshish Kumar Jha1,2*Umeshkumar  Baburao SherkhaneUmeshkumar Baburao Sherkhane1,3Nilendu  C. PurandareNilendu C. Purandare1,2Leonard  WeeLeonard Wee3Andre  DekkerAndre Dekker3VENKATESH  RANGARAJANVENKATESH RANGARAJAN1,2
  • 1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • 2Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • 3Department of Radiotherapy, GROW School for Oncology & Reproduction, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The characterization of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) as malignant or benign remains a diagnostic challenge using conventional imaging parameters. The literature suggests using combined Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Computed Tomography (CT) to characterise a SPN. Radiomics and machine learning are other promising technologies which can be utilised to characterise the SPN. Purpose: This study explores the potential of PET radiomics signatures and machine learning algorithms to characterise the SPN. Methods: This retrospective study aimed to characterize solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) using PET radiomics. A total of 163 patients who underwent PET/CT imaging were included in this study. A total of 1098 features were extracted from PET images using PyRadiomics. To optimize model performance two strategies i.e. a) feature selection and b) feature reduction techniques were employed, including hierarchical clustering, RFE in feature selection, and PCA in feature reduction. To address outcome class imbalance, the dataset was statistically resampled (SMOTE). A random forest models was developed using original training set (RF-Model-O & RF-PCA-Model-O) and balanced training dataset (RF-Model-B & RF-PCA-Model-B) and validated on the test datasets. Additionally, 5-fold cross-validation and bootstrap validation was also performed. The model's performance was assessed using various metrics, such as accuracy, AUC, precision, recall, and F1-score.Results: Of the 163 patients (aged 36-76 years, mean age 58 ± 7), 117 had malignantmetastatic disease and 46 had granulomatous or benign conditions. In Strategy (a), five radiomic features were identified as optimal using hierarchical clustering and RFE. In Strategy (b), five principal components were deemed optimal using PCA. The model accuracy of RF-Model-O and RF-Model-B in the train-test validation, 5-fold cross-validation and bootstrap validation were found to be 0.8, 0.80 ± 0.07, 0.84 ± 1.11 and 0.8, 0.83 ± 0.10, 0.80 ± 0.07 in Strategy (a).Similarly, the model accuracy of RF-PCA-Model-O and RF-PCA-Model-B in the train-test validation, 5-fold cross-validation and bootstrap validation were found to be 0.84, 0.80 ± 0.07, 0.84 ± 07 and 0.74, 0.80 ± 0.08, 0.75 ± 0.08 in Strategy (b).The PET radiomics demonstrated excellent performance in characterizing SPNs as benign or malignant.

Keywords: lung cancer, SPN, pet scan, Radiomics, Random Forest algorithm, SMOTE, Cross-validation, Bootstrap

Received: 14 Apr 2025; Accepted: 23 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Jha, Sherkhane, Purandare, Wee, Dekker and RANGARAJAN. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ashish Kumar Jha, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, 400 012, Maharashtra, India

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.